logo
What's in the government's £500m plan to tackle child poverty?

What's in the government's £500m plan to tackle child poverty?

ITV News4 hours ago
The government has announced a new £500 million fund aimed at improving the life chances of vulnerable children facing poverty.
The money will be used to tackle issues faced by children and their families, such as school absence, mental health and criminal behaviour.
The government has described it as the "world's largest fund of its kind", but how will it be paid for, and how will it work?
What is the Better Futures Fund?
The fund announced by the Chancellor Rachel Reeves aims to help up to 200,000 children facing poverty by funding local projects that tackle things like addiction and school absence.
ITV News understands the money will be invested in "social impact bonds", a system where private investors are encouraged to put money into certain schemes and recoup their costs from the government when a particular target is met.
The announcement has also received cross-party support, with Conservative ministers saying this builds on the "Life Chances Fund" they implemented while in government - a scheme that received £70 million of funding at the time.
The scheme also bears some resemblance to the previous Labour government's "Sure Start" support, aimed similarly at early years assistance.
Former Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown had recently called for further investment of this sort, to the tune of £1 billion. While the government is putting in half of this amount, it hopes councils, investors and philanthropists will match this.
The fund will run for ten years and be overseen by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, with more operational details due to be set out in time.
What sort of projects are being invested in?
The money will be used to fund a wide variety of projects targeting specific issues facing vulnerable children.
These fall into categories like: school absence, addiction, mental health, education, and criminal activity.
The Skill Mill is one project which received funding under the Conservatives' "Life Chances Fund" - the precursor to Labour's Better Futures Fund.
The Skill Mill provides support to more than 243 young ex-offenders across eight local authorities by offering them paid real work experience, recognised qualifications, and advice.
The reconviction rate of people they have supported is just 8% compared to 63% for young offenders outside of the scheme with 11+ convictions.
The founder of The Skill Mill, David Parks, offered his backing to The Better Futures Fund, saying it represented a "real shift" in the support for to vulnerable children and their families.
"By moving the focus from inputs and activities to meaningful person-centred outcomes, we create more impact for individuals and better value for society," he said.
"At The Skill Mill, we've seen the transformation in the young people who have offended and how much they value the second chances they have been given.
"Partnering for outcomes holds the key to creating support and programmes that really work, solving some of society's biggest challenges. Everyone wins.'
How will Rachel Reeves pay for it?
The announcement comes against a backdrop of tight finances, a weak global economic picture, and a blackhole in the chancellor's budget after the government's welfare reform climbdown.
Furthermore, many MPs, as well as voters, are urging the government to lift the two-child cap on support currently in place.
Supporters of lifting this cap claim it would be the single biggest thing the government could do to lift children out of poverty, but it would come with a roughly £3.5 billion price tag.
The £500 million being invested in the Better Futures Fund is significantly cheaper, but still only half of that recommended by former Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
Speaking on Monday, Reeves claimed previous projects of this nature have drawn in at least as much money in private investment, and they hope to achieve the same in this instance.
The chancellor hopes that, as well as this additional investment, the positive effects of this scheme will be felt for "many years to come", ultimately saving the public money in the long term.
What has the chancellor said?
Trailing the announcement, Reeves said: 'I got into politics to help children facing the toughest challenges. This fund will give hundreds of thousands of children, young people and their families a better chance. For too long, these children have been overlooked.'
Speaking on Monday from a school in Wigan, the chancellor said she could already see the impact of programmes operating but that the benefits would be felt "for many years to come" in better jobs, wages and educational attainment.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, whose department will oversee this scheme and accompanied the chancellor to make this announcement, said: 'This groundbreaking Better Futures Fund represents a major step in partnering with the impact economy, which has long played an important role in strengthening communities and driving inclusive growth.
'As part of the plan for change, we're bringing together Government, local authorities, charities, social enterprises and philanthropists to create a powerful alliance that will transform the lives of vulnerable children and young people.
'We owe them the best start in life.
'Together we will break down barriers to opportunity, ensuring those who need support most aren't left behind and have the chance to reach their potential.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Monmouthshire parking review finds further review needed
Monmouthshire parking review finds further review needed

South Wales Argus

time32 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Monmouthshire parking review finds further review needed

Should another report be ordered, to consider variations in parking charges and inconsistencies including why there are no charges in some towns, it will be the third in five years, commissioned by Monmouthshire County Council. Usk councillor Tony Kear said he couldn't understand why a further review is necessary following the most recent, a 309 page tome produced by consultants AtkinsRealis. The Conservative said: 'I don't know how much this report cost but I find it astonishing the result is to say you've not got enough data and we've got to revisit it. I struggle to understand why a report is being presented, and why it was initiated, without the correct analysis required to produce a result. 'It seems to me this is now going to have to cost the council more money to get more analysis on car park usage and I struggle to understand that.' Labour member for Caldicot West End Jill Bond told the council's place scrutiny committee which considred the review: 'I'm quite surprised we didn't have this level of information before.' Council regeneration manager Daniel Fordham said had the authority requested that level of data when the report was commissioned there would have been an additional cost at that point and he said it didn't know it would need the additional information. He said the council needed to understand what data it requires 'to make an informed decision about a charging strategy.' AtkinsRealis were commissioned in 2024 to review Monmouthshire's parking services including car park usage patterns and pay and display sales trends. It was also asked to make recommendations for improved or amended charges, assessment of enforcement functions and capacity, how additional responsibility for enforcing pavement parking expected later this year will impact it, use of technology and benchmarking against neighbouring local authorities. The council said the work would build on a strategy commissioned from Capita in 2020 which set out the council's policy framework for managing parking. The latest review found a lack of consistency in existing parking charges, and changes to the local context since the existing structure was introduced in 2014 but said the data needed for a specific recommendation isn't yet available and a further review of existing car park use is required. The report has also said as well as supporting the local economy, encouraging sustainable travel and reducing reliance on private vehicles, facilitating parking and reducing competition between towns the parking stragegy should recognise the importance of revenue from parking to meet the costs of providing facilities, enforcement and contribute towards highways and transport services. As a result the council's Labour-led cabinet will be recommended that it keep the existing charging structure in place until it has the results of the further review.

Veterans protest against possible repeal of Legacy Act
Veterans protest against possible repeal of Legacy Act

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

Veterans protest against possible repeal of Legacy Act

MPs including Sir Iain Duncan Smith, Mark Francois and Stuart Anderson joined former soldiers as the Act was debated inside the House of Commons on Monday. They marched to Parliament Square in Westminster, brandishing regiment flags and Union flags, and were flanked by a motorbike procession. The debate comes after more than 165,000 people signed a petition calling for the Government to keep the Legacy Act, which was put in place in 2023 by the former Conservative government to halt all but the most serious allegations involving Troubles-related cases from being investigated any further. The Labour Government announced it would repeal and replace the Northern Ireland (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 following criticism over immunity for soldiers by human rights groups. Veterans and MPs alike said they feared this would open up soldiers to being prosecuted for acts and create a 'two-tier' justice system, in which IRA soldiers are given immunity but British troops are open to prosecution. James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, said he feared it would dissuade people from joining the Armed Forces because they could be 'persecuted' further down the line. He said: 'We all know we need more people in our Army, our Navy, our Air Force. 'Fundamentally, this is about us as a country, recognising that we live in a time of heightened threat…When that is happening, we will be strengthening our Armed Forces. The last thing we want to do is be going after them again for what they did decades ago. What message is that going to send to all the young people whom we want to join the Army in future?' Detail from the 2nd Battalion, Parachute Regiment cap badge (Niall Carson/PA) Sir Iain, the former leader of the Conservative Party who served in Northern Ireland, told the PA news agency that veterans were angry about the potential changes to the legislation. He said: 'They feel they served their country. They did what they could do. They did their best. It was difficult, I can promise you now, I patrolled the streets. 'We see the pursuit of Northern Ireland veterans whose cases were heard previously and settled. 'They are the ones being pursued yet again in the courts under the arrangements and this is wrong. 'You don't see any of the IRA being pursued. 'Right now this is a very one-sided arrangement with the British soldiers who didn't ask to go there.' Mr Francois, a shadow junior defence minister who backed the petition, added: 'What the Government is doing is wrong. 'They're not treating veterans who were there to uphold the law in Northern Ireland the same as they are treating alleged terrorists. 'There should be no moral equivalence between the veterans and the terrorists.' Aldwin Wight, 72, a former special forces commanding officer who lives in Cornwall, said: 'These are people we've served with. 'They're very close to us, and seeing them caught up in this sort of endless doom loop of legislation is not good. 'We're in a fairly dark situation at the moment in security terms and therefore there are going to be incidents and you've got to have people who are willing to step forward and take on the hard tasks. 'And you don't want to do that as it were, with your solicitor in your pocket. 'You want to do it with a clear operational view of what you're doing.' Denise Walker, 58, a veteran in the catering corps, came down from Glasgow to protest. She said: 'This has led to our servicemen fearing that we're going to be up for prosecution again. 'At the end of the day, this Government sent us over there to do a job on their behalf. 'We followed their orders to the letter.' David Holmes, a 64-year old veteran who runs the Rolling Thunder veteran motorbike group which protested, said: 'I spent years campaigning with this. 'We worked with the previous government. We found a good solution. 'People want closure, but actually to put 70 and 80-year-old soldiers in the dock for doing their job they were asked to do by the government on what is basically trumped up charges (is wrong). 'The only evidence is they were there at the time.' Northern Ireland Secretary, Hilary Benn, said: 'The Legacy Act has been rejected in Northern Ireland and found by our domestic courts to be unlawful, not least because it would have offered immunity to terrorists. Any incoming government would have had to repeal unlawful legislation and it is simply wrong for anyone to suggest otherwise. 'This Government's commitment to our Operation Banner veterans is unshakeable. Their professionalism and sacrifice saved countless lives in Northern Ireland and across the United Kingdom, and ultimately helped bring about peace. The Legacy Act did nothing to help our veterans – it offered only false and undeliverable promises. 'I and the Defence Secretary are engaging with our veterans community and with all interested parties over future legislation, and we will ensure that there are far better protections in place.'

Veterans protest against possible repeal of Legacy Act
Veterans protest against possible repeal of Legacy Act

Leader Live

timean hour ago

  • Leader Live

Veterans protest against possible repeal of Legacy Act

MPs including Sir Iain Duncan Smith, Mark Francois and Stuart Anderson joined former soldiers as the Act was debated inside the House of Commons on Monday. They marched to Parliament Square in Westminster, brandishing regiment flags and Union flags, and were flanked by a motorbike procession. The debate comes after more than 165,000 people signed a petition calling for the Government to keep the Legacy Act, which was put in place in 2023 by the former Conservative government to halt all but the most serious allegations involving Troubles-related cases from being investigated any further. The Labour Government announced it would repeal and replace the Northern Ireland (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 following criticism over immunity for soldiers by human rights groups. Veterans and MPs alike said they feared this would open up soldiers to being prosecuted for acts and create a 'two-tier' justice system, in which IRA soldiers are given immunity but British troops are open to prosecution. James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, said he feared it would dissuade people from joining the Armed Forces because they could be 'persecuted' further down the line. He said: 'We all know we need more people in our Army, our Navy, our Air Force. 'Fundamentally, this is about us as a country, recognising that we live in a time of heightened threat…When that is happening, we will be strengthening our Armed Forces. The last thing we want to do is be going after them again for what they did decades ago. What message is that going to send to all the young people whom we want to join the Army in future?' Sir Iain, the former leader of the Conservative Party who served in Northern Ireland, told the PA news agency that veterans were angry about the potential changes to the legislation. He said: 'They feel they served their country. They did what they could do. They did their best. It was difficult, I can promise you now, I patrolled the streets. 'We see the pursuit of Northern Ireland veterans whose cases were heard previously and settled. 'They are the ones being pursued yet again in the courts under the arrangements and this is wrong. 'You don't see any of the IRA being pursued. 'Right now this is a very one-sided arrangement with the British soldiers who didn't ask to go there.' Mr Francois, a shadow junior defence minister who backed the petition, added: 'What the Government is doing is wrong. 'They're not treating veterans who were there to uphold the law in Northern Ireland the same as they are treating alleged terrorists. 'There should be no moral equivalence between the veterans and the terrorists.' Aldwin Wight, 72, a former special forces commanding officer who lives in Cornwall, said: 'These are people we've served with. 'They're very close to us, and seeing them caught up in this sort of endless doom loop of legislation is not good. 'We're in a fairly dark situation at the moment in security terms and therefore there are going to be incidents and you've got to have people who are willing to step forward and take on the hard tasks. 'And you don't want to do that as it were, with your solicitor in your pocket. 'You want to do it with a clear operational view of what you're doing.' Denise Walker, 58, a veteran in the catering corps, came down from Glasgow to protest. She said: 'This has led to our servicemen fearing that we're going to be up for prosecution again. 'At the end of the day, this Government sent us over there to do a job on their behalf. 'We followed their orders to the letter.' David Holmes, a 64-year old veteran who runs the Rolling Thunder veteran motorbike group which protested, said: 'I spent years campaigning with this. 'We worked with the previous government. We found a good solution. 'People want closure, but actually to put 70 and 80-year-old soldiers in the dock for doing their job they were asked to do by the government on what is basically trumped up charges (is wrong). 'The only evidence is they were there at the time.' Northern Ireland Secretary, Hilary Benn, said: 'The Legacy Act has been rejected in Northern Ireland and found by our domestic courts to be unlawful, not least because it would have offered immunity to terrorists. Any incoming government would have had to repeal unlawful legislation and it is simply wrong for anyone to suggest otherwise. 'This Government's commitment to our Operation Banner veterans is unshakeable. Their professionalism and sacrifice saved countless lives in Northern Ireland and across the United Kingdom, and ultimately helped bring about peace. The Legacy Act did nothing to help our veterans – it offered only false and undeliverable promises. 'I and the Defence Secretary are engaging with our veterans community and with all interested parties over future legislation, and we will ensure that there are far better protections in place.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store