Court ruling secures baggage screening units for passengers at OR Tambo and King Shaka
Image: Supplied
Airline passengers can thank the courts for the replacement of four critical Hold Baggage Screening (HBS) units at OR Tambo and King Shaka International Airports.
This is as a protracted legal dispute continues involving - the Aviation Co-ordination Services (ACS), Airports Company South Africa (Acsa) and the South African Civil Aviation Authority (Sacaa) - over who holds the mandate to provide check-in hold baggage screening (HBS) services at South African airports.
The ACS said it had launched the legal action given the risk of service breakdown due to ageing screening infrastructure and manufacturer support withdrawal, which compelled it to seek urgent court relief in 2024 to allow it to replace four back-up Level 3 HBS units at OR Tambo and King Shaka.
ACS in November obtained an order barring Acsa from implementing its insourcing decision or awarding any contracts under its tender that directed Acsa to allow ACS to replace the equipment; and ordered Sacaa to approve the replacement within five days.
ACS CEO Duke Phahla said, 'We commend Sacaa's recognition of the urgency in replacing aged HBS equipment to ensure uninterrupted security operations at airports. We have always maintained that passenger safety and continuity must come first, and this step reflects that shared concern.'
The matter stems from May 2023 when Acsa announced its intention to terminate ACS's long-standing role as the provider of HBS services and to insource the function and subsequently issued a R3.15 billion tender for the procurement of new baggage screening equipment opening the floodgate of legal suits amongst the parties.
Following the Gauteng High Court granting for the replacement, Acsa said it contested the ACS's handling of baggage as it was in contravention of the Constitution (which states that all organs of state must engage in procurement that is fair and transparent), the ACSA Act, the Public Finance Management Act, which requires that all airport charges levied to passengers must be approved by a Regulating Committee.
Acsa's manager for Communications, Sisa Majola, said in response to enquiries, "The charges currently being levied by ACS are not regulated. The next development in the proceedings will be the hearing of the appeal against the court's order to interdict Acsa from implementing its insourcing of Hold Baggage Screening and the procurement of the screening."
Majola said it was crucial that the ACS has challenged Acsa's decision to insource/perform Hold Baggage Screening Services, and a court of law has not heard this matter, nor has ACS been confirmed as the entity entitled to render Hold Baggage Screening Services.
Acsa confirmed it would comply with the back-up replacement court order and continue with the appeal, as it was granted leave to appeal by the High Court and would continue to defend the review proceedings.
ACS's Phala said, 'While the legal process runs its course, our focus remains on ensuring uninterrupted, world-class baggage screening services for passengers and airlines. We remain committed to working co-operatively with Acsa, Sacaa and all stakeholders to safeguard operational integrity and uphold aviation security standards."
In its response, Sacaa said there are no ongoing discussions between the Sacaa and ACS and that further determinations would have to be from court pronouncements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
4 hours ago
- The South African
Family business? Gayton McKenzie's son buys PSL club
Calvin Le John, the first-born son of Minister of Sport, Art and Culture Gayton McKenzie, is the new owner of PSL club SuperSport United – and South Africans are unsurprised at the 'convenience.' The news was announced by sports broadcaster Robert Marawa on the X platform. The club, which was reportedly sold for R50 million, will change its name to Siwelele FC. Its goal is to revive the glory days of the now-defunct Bloemfontein Celtics, which later became Royal AM. In an X post, Robert Marawa broke the news that SuperSport United had been sold to a new owner, Calvin Le John. The deal – which cost R50 million – took place through a closed bidding process. Interestingly, Calvin is the son of Minister of Sport Gayton McKenzie and reportedly changed his last name to avoid public scrutiny. Calvin now takes up the post of chairman of the PSL club. He wants to officially rebrand as Siwelele FC and fill a void that the now-defunct Bloemfontein Celtics left behind. Calvin Le John said in a statement: 'As Siwelele FC, we are privileged to have been given the responsibility of continuing with a rich winning tradition in the PSL. SuperSport and the MultiChoice Group laid an incredible 30-year platform that we wish to build upon, should we get the final vote of approval from the PSL Executive Committee'. SuperSport United's new owner is the son of Minister of Sport, Gayton McKenzie. The R50 million closed bidding deal has sparked controversy. Image via Facebook. Marawa said of the deal – and Calvin's relation to the minister: 'Football holds a special place in his heart. Siwelele FC is not just a club – it's a promise to the people of Bloemfontein. Calvin is not doing this for attention. He's doing it for legacy.' News that SuperSport United's new owner, Calvin Le John, is the son of Gayton McKenzie did not come as much of a surprise to South African football fans. Some have even accused the minister of having a hand in the closed bidding deal. Gayton Mackenzie is the real Mafia!🤣 — YourServant (@ArnoModd) July 3, 2025 According to a profile of the new PSL club owner, Calvin Le John changed his name several years ago in the hopes of also becoming a hotshot businessman like his dad. The eldest son of Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture, Gayton McKenzie, was entrusted with running the family's extensive business empire in the sectors of mining, transport, hospitality, entertainment, properties, and publishing. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
The South African
5 hours ago
- The South African
Principal of Hilton College - SA's most expensive school - 'scolds' rich parents
The principal of Hilton College – the most expensive private school in South Africa – has issued a directive to parents of the private school not to overtly display their wealth, particularly at rugby school games. The school is located in the KwaZulu-Natal Midlands. Alumni include prominent figures such as sports broadcaster Robert Marawa, former Springbok Gary Teichmann, and uMngeni Local Municipality mayor Chris Pappas. On social media, snippets of an open letter written by Hilton College principal George Harris went viral. In it, the headmaster of the prominent private school shared his feedback to parents of learners following a rugby derby day last month between the school and its rivals, Michael House. While Harris thanked parents for their unwavering support, he also chastised them for overtly displaying their wealth on the day. He wrote: 'I've been reflecting on this and have been noticing growing tendencies toward one-upmanship in the scale of hosting and catering around the field. When hospitality and generosity became self-serving displays of opulence, and began to pull away from what we aspire to be as a community The Hilton College principal added: 'Next year, can we ditch the opulence in favour of a wholesome hospitality devoid of showmanship and loud extravagance. 'When the extravagance stretches into overconsumption, the message we send to our children is wrong'. Hilton College bags the number one spot as South Africa's most expensive private school. Its annual fees for 2025 stand at R420 729, which includes boarding and tuition fees. Here are others from around the country that make the Top 10. Michaelhouse – R392 000 St Andrews College – R387 531 Roedean School for Girls – R387 093 St John's College – R376 589 Kearsney College – R374 330 Bishops College – R364 680 St Mary's – R358 665 St Alban's College – R353 580 Diocesan School for Girls – R345 630 Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
US participation in G20 Summit in Johannesburg ‘remains very important and critical', says Lamola
Most observers and analysts seem less optimistic than Lamola that the Trump administration can be kept fully on board the G20. They fear that if Trump does attend the summit, he won't sign the declaration. The South African government is still pinning its hopes on full US participation at the G20 Summit, despite intermittent attendance of US officials in the meetings preparing for the summit in Johannesburg in November. International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola said on Thursday that the US participation 'remains very critical and important' as the G20 is a consensus-based organisation and all of its members had to agree on the outcome document from the summit. The US does 'participate … fully in the finance track. And in the sherpa track, not fully; and recently, not at all,' Lamola replied to questions at a press conference in Cape Town. He added that the US had sent an apology for its sherpa not attending last week's third sherpa meeting at Sun City. Lamola's spokesperson, Chrispin Phiri, told Daily Maverick that the reason the US gave was that its sherpa was attending the Nato summit that was taking place in The Hague at the same time. Lamola said that as the G20 had to adopt its summit declaration by consensus, it needed the US vote. 'We continue to call … on the US as a member country of the G20 … to participate and make a contribution,' he said. 'Their participation remains very critical and important.' Lamola has just returned from attending the International Conference on Financing for Development in Spain, which adopted a declaration on increased financing for development, even though there was no consensus because the US didn't support it. Lamola said the difference between this and the G20 Summit was that the Financing for Development conference was not a consensus-based forum. Earlier on Thursday, Alvin Botes, the deputy minister of international relations and cooperation, said: 'It's imperative for the success of the G20 that the US, as the incoming presidency, are part of the November summit.' He appeared to be suggesting it would be critical for the US to attend the November summit to provide some continuity in the G20 agenda. He noted that SA was the last of a group of developing countries — after Indonesia, India and Brazil — that had been chairing the G20 in succession and which together had driven a developmental agenda. He suggested the US's attendance or non-attendance at the Johannesburg summit would define the US outlook for the next few years — through its presidency next year and beyond, when it is part of the troika of present, past and future presidents that helps manage the G20. He echoed Lamola in saying that the US had participated in the finance track, which was encouraging. 'But we require them to engage more deeply in the shepa track, and that is a critical issue.' The sherpa track deals with all G20 issues other than financial ones. Botes was the keynote speaker at a seminar on financial inclusion organised by the South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA) and the Department of International Relations and Cooperation. Less than wholehearted Some analysts have pointed out that the US attendance even at finance track meetings has been less than wholehearted. Though the Federal Reserve has attended most meetings, the US Treasury's participation has been patchy. The analysts said it would be interesting to see if the US Treasury attends the meeting of the deputy finance ministers and central bank governors in the week after next. Most observers and analysts seem less optimistic than Lamola and Botes that the Trump administration can be kept fully on board the G20. They fear that if Trump does attend the summit, he won't sign the declaration. This seems a logical prediction, given that SA's G20 themes of equality, inclusiveness and sustainability seem diametrically opposed to Trump's philosophy, as his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, pointed out earlier this year when he refused to attend a G20 foreign ministers meeting. If the US doesn't sign the declaration, that would force SA to either drastically dilute it to get the US in or issue a 'chairperson's statement' on the summit rather than a consensus declaration, diluting the impact of any decisions made. A foreign diplomatic source told Daily Maverick, 'We cannot stop working, or adopt the agenda to the US needs. Thus, we — SA and almost everyone else — want to continue the work, and that is happening. I think the ultimate loser of this strategy is the US. 'They also withdrew from the Financing for Development process in the 11th hour. If you are not around the table, you do not have a voice … the rest of the world moves on.' Elizabeth Sidiropoulos, the national director of the SAIIA, said at the financial inclusion seminar that even if SA could not get all that it wanted at the summit, 'What is critical is to make sure that these things are on the agenda, because they can be picked up at another time. 'We have a responsibility to drive some of these issues forward, to put some interesting ideas and perspectives on to the table and then work towards seeing them actualised, even if they do not actualise by the 30th of November [the summit date].' SA's agenda includes debt relief, reducing the cost of capital for developing countries and providing more financing for climate adaptation and disaster relief. DM
