At least 21 killed by Israeli gunfire near Gaza aid site, health ministry says
In a statement posted to X, the Israel Defense Forces said, "At this stage, there are no known casualties from IDF gunfire" within the site. "The matter is still under investigation," it added.
Local witnesses cited by The Associated Press suggested that the shooting occurred around 1,000 yards from the aid site, which is run by the U.S.- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.
In a Sunday morning statement issued before the latest report of shooting emerged, the GHF said aid "was again distributed today without incident."
MORE: Humanitarian groups, UN heavily criticize new aid distribution plan in Gaza
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
At least 21 killed by Israeli gunfire near Gaza aid site, health ministry says originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘The war needs to end': is the US right turning on Israel?
As the Israel-Gaza war nears its two-year mark, and as images of starving people and utter devastation flood social media, cracks seem to be emerging in the American right's typically iron-clad support for Israel. The US continues to support Israel diplomatically and militarily, and last Thursday pulled out of peace negotiations that it accused Hamas of sabotaging. And in the US Congress, only two Republicans voted for a recent amendment that would have pulled funding for missile defense systems for Israel. One of them, Marjorie Taylor Greene, on Monday became the first Republican to call Israel's war a 'genocide'. Yet the war's duration and human cost, as well as recent Israeli strikes on Christian targets, have spurred modest signs of discontent on the US right. Some conservative commentators have walked back their support for Israel's war; the US's famously Zionist ambassador to Israel rebuked the actions of Jewish settlers in the West Bank; and an unresolved rift over foreign intervention continues to plague the Maga world. To some extent this mirrors trends in US sentiment overall. A recent CNN poll found a steep decline in US support for Israel since the war started. That drop was most dramatic among respondents who identified as Democrats or independents, but the poll also found that since 2023 the percentage of surveyed Republicans who believe that Israel's actions are justified fell from 68% to 52%. It's highly likely that depictions of starvation in the territory – where 147 people have reportedly starved to death, including 88 children, and nearly one in three people are going multiple days without eating, according to the United Nations – have played a role. On Monday, Donald Trump partly contradicted the claim of the Israeli leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, that there is no starvation in Gaza, telling reporters: 'That's real starvation … I see it, and you can't fake that. So, we're going to be even more involved.' Trump made the statement while visiting Britain, where the Daily Express, considered the country's most rightwing mainstream tabloid, recently ran a headline decrying hunger in Gaza: 'FOR PITY'S SAKE STOP THIS NOW.' A recent spate of Israeli attacks on Christian targets in Gaza and the West Bank have also angered some American conservatives. Last Thursday, after an Israeli tank fired on the sole Catholic church in Gaza – killing three people and wounding nine, including a priest – a reportedly upset Trump called Netanyahu to complain. A few days after the church shelling, the US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, visited Taybeh, a Palestinian Christian town in the West Bank that has been repeatedly attacked by Israeli settlers, who earlier this month set a fire near a fifth-century church. In a statement, Huckabee described the attack as 'an absolute travesty' and 'an act of terror' and called for the perpetrators to be prosecuted. (He did not directly implicate the Israeli government or settlers.) Although there have long been isolationist and populist elements on the right skeptical of the close US alliance with Israel, their point of view has been eclipsed in recent history by the pro-Israel camp, which enjoys strong support among American evangelical Christians. Huckabee is an evangelical Christian who has described himself as an 'unapologetic, unreformed Zionist'. Like many evangelicals, he believes that Israel has a divine claim to the West Bank, and has memorably declared that 'there is no such thing as a Palestinian'. That Huckabee issued such a strong statement on Taybeh 'was surprising', Todd Deatherage said. Deatherage is the co-founder of Telos, a non-profit that works to give US policymakers and religious groups a more nuanced understanding of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Huckabee's gesture, he said, seems to indicate 'some complexity in a movement that didn't have complexity around this before'. Sohrab Ahmari, a conservative journalist and commentator, described Huckabee's statement as remarkable, 'given how much of a kind of boomer evangelical Huckabee is'. Huckabee also recently called for Israel to 'aggressively investigate' the murder of Sayfollah 'Saif' Musallet, a Palestinian American man who was recently beaten to death by settlers in the West Bank, according to his family. The events abroad also seem to have made ripples in the US conservative media sphere. The Israeli government said the church strike was a battlefield mistake, but in a recent episode of his talkshow, Michael Knowles, a rightwing American pundit, expressed skepticism. 'I've been broadly supportive of the state of Israel,' Knowles, who is Catholic, said in the segment. 'And you're losing me.' The Israeli government 'is really screwing up, is really not playing its cards right', he argued. 'The war needs to come to an end. How long is the war gonna go on?' He added: 'America is the only friend that Israel has on planet Earth. I do not get what the Israeli government is doing here, but I suspect there will be political consequences – as there should be.' Some critics in the comments section of Knowles's video accused him of only noticing deaths in Gaza once the victims were conspicuously Christian. The Free Press, the online publication founded by Bari Weiss to challenge what she describes as an establishment liberal media, recently published an article arguing that although past claims about hunger in Gaza were 'lies', the territory was now rapidly entering a 'real hunger crisis'. The Free Press has generally taken a fervently pro-Israel stance. Similarly, Joe Rogan, the everyman podcaster who threw his support to Trump in the last election, has refused to host Netanyahu on his podcast, the premier's son, Yair Netanyahu, claimed on Friday. And Ross Douthat, the conservative New York Times columnist, published an op-ed on Saturday arguing that Israel's military operation has crossed into being 'unjust'. Although the US right is perceived today as staunchly pro-Israel, recent history is more complicated, Deatherage noted; George HW Bush's Republican administration undertook a political fight with Israel about Jewish settlements in the West Bank. The right's pro-Israel stance really hardened after 9/11, he said, when Christian conservatives and defense hawks embraced the view that the US and Israel were allies against Islamic terror. The modern iteration of Christians United for Israel (CUFI) was founded in 2006 to facilitate US evangelical support for Israel. The organization's membership is significantly larger than Aipac, the pro-Israel organization founded by Jewish Americans. Trump's alliance with the religious right during his first term intensified the political power of Christian Zionism. 'That part of the evangelical movement really gained unprecedented access to being heard,' Deatherage said. Some Christian Zionists, particularly evangelicals, believe there are biblical justifications for the US supporting Israel. A small subset believe that a showdown between Israel and enemy states could presage the End of Days, Daniel Hummel, a historian of Christian Zionism, said. The recent strike on Iran sparked apocalyptic speculation in some Christian circles, he noted. Related: Netanyahu flies home without a Gaza peace deal but still keeps Trump onside Yet polling data suggests a generational divide. Younger evangelicals, like younger Americans broadly, are more skeptical of Zionism, and the gap seems to be growing. A 2021 survey by researchers at the University of North Carolina at Pembroke found that only 33.6% of American evangelicals between the ages of 18 and 29 supported Israel, down from 69% surveyed in a similar poll in 2018. Research by the University of Maryland Critical Issues Poll has found similar shifts among younger evangelicals. 'Younger evangelicals in particular are kind of renegotiating what it means to be a Christian in the public square,' Deatherage said. 'And they're not thrilled by the bargain that the older generation maybe made with politics.' The topic of Christian Zionism came up during a heated episode of Tucker Carlson's talkshow, this June, featuring Senator Ted Cruz. Carlson is one of the major faces of an America First camp in the Maga movement that views the American alliance with Israel with increasing suspicion. During the conversation, Cruz cited a Bible verse as one of the reasons that he supports Israel. Carlson responded by testily mocking the notion that foreign policy objectives should be determined by biblical exegesis. On the fringes, criticisms of Israel have sometimes been intertwined with outright antisemitism. The far-right pundit Candace Owens, for example, has often disparaged Israel in conspiratorial terms. Yet skepticism of Israel has also gained some credible intellectual traction on the more mainstream Maga right, particularly among a group of mostly younger conservative activists, political staffers and policy wonks sometimes known in Washington DC as the 'restrainers'. These are generally pro-Trump conservatives who, while not necessarily outright isolationists, believe that the US should protect its own national interests even if this means scaling back – or 'restraining' – allies such as Israel. The term is subjective and contentious, but the Pentagon's policy chief, Elbridge Colby; the deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East, Mike DiMino; and JD Vance himself are sometimes considered examples. Pro-Israel Republicans and hawks still mostly hold the whip hand, but Deatherage believes a political window for rethinking the US's relationship for Israel may be opening on the right. 'There's a lot of pressure on [Trump] to support whatever the Israeli government is doing. But there's now some really dissenting voices on the other side of that.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
GOP Split on Gaza Grows, as MTG Calls Crisis a 'Genocide'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accompanied by U.S. President Donald Trump (L), speaks during a dinner at the White House on July 07, 2025. Credit - Andrew Harnik—Getty Images Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a right-wing lawmaker closely identified with President Donald Trump's MAGA movement, this week became the first Republican in Congress to describe the situation in Gaza as a 'genocide.' 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct. 7 in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene, who represents Georgia, said in a social media post Monday evening. The post was in response to fellow Republican Rep. Randy Fine, who had posted last week on X: 'Release the hostages. Until then, starve away.' Greene's declaration represented a sharp turn for her on the fraught issue of Gaza. Since Hamas' terror attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, in which over 1,200 people were killed and around 250 taken hostage, virtually all prominent Republicans have been in lockstep in support of Israel's military campaign. Weeks after Hamas' attack, Greene filed a resolution to censure Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat, over her criticism of Israel. Read More: The Malnutrition Crisis in Gaza Will Outlive the War, Experts Warn The shift from Greene was the latest sign of a broader debate within the Republican Party over Gaza. Greene's words came the same day as Trump seemed to break with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over Netanyahu's claims that there is no starvation in Gaza. Trump made clear to reporters at an event in Scotland with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that he believed the starvation there was 'real.' 'We're going to set up food centers, and we're going to do it in conjunction with some very good people,' Trump said. 'We're going to supply funds… and we're going to spend a little money on some food. Other nations are joining us.' Starmer later said on Tuesday that the U.K. would recognize Palestine as a state if Israel did not make 'substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza' and make moves towards 'sustainable, long-term peace.' Though Trump did not explicitly condemn Netanyahu, he did acknowledge he 'told Bibi [Netanyahu] that you have to maybe do it a different way.' Republicans are more divided on the issue than they have been since the Oct. 7 attack. While a few fellow Republicans have joined Greene's condemnation—'More need to speak out,' she said in response to a post from Rep. Lance Gooden of Texas about Gaza's 'humanitarian crisis'—others are insisting the fault over the situation still lies with Hamas. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he 'shares the President's view,' but also accused Hamas of intercepting and diverting much of the food aid going to Gaza. 'The humanitarian thing obviously when you see people hurting in a need like that, is to want to help meet that need and alleviate that pain,' Thune said at his weekly press conference. 'I think all of us want to see, obviously, a peaceful solution there that gets the hostages freed and ends the reign and rule of Hamas in the region. But in the meantime, do everything we can to ease the pain and the hunger that's afflicting so many of the people in that region.' North Carolina's Republican Sen. Thom Thillis simultaneously told The Hill that Hamas deserves blame and that Trump was 'right to hold elected [officials] accountable,' saying he would 'encourage Mr. Netanyahu to just be sensitive to that.' Meanwhile, Democratic Sen. Chris Hollen of Maryland said Sunday on CBS's Face The Nation that claims that Hamas was stealing U.N.-delivered food were a "big lie." Many others in the Republican Party remain staunch in their support for Netanyahu's government. 'I want to be crystal clear on my thoughts regarding the catastrophe in Gaza: I blame Hamas 100%,' South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham said on X on Tuesday. 'If you want this suffering to end, call on Hamas to lay down their weapons and their leaders to take safe passage out of Gaza. The criticism of Israel is beyond the pale as they are fighting for their very existence.' The split within the GOP comes amid mounting pressure from Democrats and the international community for both Israel and the U.S. to better address starvation in Gaza. On Tuesday, 40 Senators sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, imploring them and Trump to address starvation in Gaza with the resumption of ceasefire talks. The Senators also expressed opposition to 'permanent forced displacement of the Palestinian people.' 'To prevent the situation from getting even worse, we urge you to advocate for a large-scale expansion of humanitarian assistance and services throughout the Gaza Strip, including through the use of experienced multilateral bodies and NGOs that can get life-saving aid directly to those in need and prevent diversion,' the letter reads. Contact us at letters@
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Brown University reaches agreement with Trump administration to restore federal research funding
Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up As part of the settlement, Brown agreed not to engage in racial discrimination in admissions or university programming, and will provide access to admissions data to the federal government so it can assess compliance with merit-based admissions. In contrast to the Columbia deal, Brown's agreement with the Trump administration does not appear to include any restrictions on how or what the school teaches. Advertisement The agreement also bars Brown from performing any gender-affirming surgeries on minors or prescribing puberty blockers, a treatment for gender dysphoria that stop the body from making certain hormones. While the university does have a medical school, it has never performed Advertisement Brown also agreed to adopt Trump's definitions of a male and female, which were In a statement, 'I stated that Brown should uphold its ethical and legal obligations while also steadfastly defending academic freedom and freedom of expression, for both the university as an institution and for individual members of our community,' said Paxson. 'By voluntarily entering this agreement, we meet those dual obligations.' Brown president Christina H. Paxson said there are aspects of the agreement that 'are priorities of the federal administration in resolving the funding freeze.' Matthew Healey for The Boston Globe The deal will also require Brown to conduct a climate survey of the campus and report the results to the Trump administration. Other parts of the deal simply codify what was previously pledged by Brown in 'The Trump Administration is successfully reversing the decades-long woke-capture of our nation's higher education institutions. Because of the Trump Administration's resolution agreement with Brown University, aspiring students will be judged solely on their merits, not their race or sex,' said US Education Secretary Linda McMahon in a statement. 'Brown has committed to proactive measures to protect Jewish students and combat Antisemitism on campus. Women's sports and intimate facilities will be protected for women and Title IX will be enforced as it was intended.' Advertisement Brown receives about $250 million in federal funding annually. Located in Providence, the school is Many faculty, alumni, and students at Brown have stood by statements made by The White House Advertisement Yet, Brown officials said, the White House never formally actually notified Brown of its intention to freeze funding. of the broad funding freeze. For the first time since 2002, 2022, Brown hired firms to lobby Congress and the Trump administration on its behalf. Demonstrators unfurl a banner on a lawn after an encampment protesting the Israel-Hamas war was taken down at Brown University, Tuesday, April 30, 2024, in Providence, R.I. David Goldman/Associated Press Even as While several other agencies continued to pay grants previously promised to Brown, the National Institutes of Health, the government's medical research funder, froze all payments flowing to the school. The agreement reached Wednesday will require NIH to pay the more than $50 million it owes in reimbursements to Brown. That amount grows by about $3.5 million each week as work from the active grants continue. Universities, including Brown, also struggle with the Trump administration's changing priorities in research and grant giving, which now focus less on climate research, for instance, and more on artificial intelligence and technology. Critics of the administration have argued that Trump is trying to extort universities and inhibit academic freedom. 'The only way to deal with a bully is to stand up strong,' said Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee and a former constitutional law professor, earlier this month. 'No college or university should be negotiating away any of its institutional freedom and academic prerogatives.' The settlement comes as higher education institutions face the broad financial impacts of Trump ' Advertisement While Brown's agreement may bring some relief to its campus, other elite universities are still battling against the Trump administration's demands. Harvard Trump has indicated that Harvard will likely have a high price tag to settle, as well. Asked Wednesday if the 'Well it's a lot of money,' Trump said. 'We're negotiating with Harvard now, they would like to settle, so we'll see what happens.' On Wednesday, the Trump administration also announced it was The University of Pennsylvania also recently Tal Kopan of the Globe Staff contributed to this report. Advertisement Alexa Gagosz can be reached at
