Tinder is testing facial recognition for users as a new security feature
New users in California will now be mandated to take a video selfie during the app's onboarding process which Tinder will compare against the user's other photos to verify their profile is genuine.
The app will also check the scan against faces used on other accounts and provide verified profiles with a special badge.
Tinder will store a non-reversible, encrypted face map to detect duplications, according to Axios, which reported on the new feature.
"We see this as one part of a set of identity assurance options that are available to users," Yoel Roth, head of trust and safety at Tinder's parent company Match Group, told the outlet. "Face Check ... is really meant to be about confirming that this person is a real, live person and not a bot or a spoofed account."
The feature is already in use in Colombia and Canada, and California will be its first U.S. pilot market.
The stored facial data is deleted once a user deletes their profile, Tinder claims.
Computer and app users have long attempted to use fraudulent identities on public profiles, for purposes ranging from financial 'romance scams' to full-blown, in-depth attempts at pretending to be someone else, a practice known as 'catfishing.'
U.S. Justice Department and FBI officials told CBS News in 2024 that there were more than 64,000 romance scams in the U.S. the previous year.
The practice is common enough that it inspired a hit Netflix documentary about the 'Tinder Swindler,' who is accused of using dating apps to swindle matches out of millions.
Tinder and its competitors have previously added features such as identification verification, real-time photo verification, and location-sharing to prevent safety issues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
AI is making everyone on dating apps sound charming. What could go wrong?
Richard Wilson felt like he had struck gold: The 31-year-old met someone on a dating app who wanted to exchange more than the cursory 'what's up.' He would send long, multi-paragraph messages, and she would acknowledge each of his points, weaving in details he had mentioned before. Their winding discussions fanned the romantic spark, he said, but when they recently met in person, his date had none of the conversational pizzazz she had shown over text. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. Wilson's confusion turned to suspicion when his date mentioned she used ChatGPT 'all the time' at work. Rather than stumbling through those awkward early conversations, had she called in an AI ringer? Dating app companies such as Match Group - which owns Hinge, Tinder and a slew of other dating apps - say AI can help people who are too busy, shy or abrasive to win dates. But a growing number of singles like Wilson are finding that the influx of AI makes dating more complicated, raising questions about etiquette and ethics in a dating landscape that can already feel alienating. With AI helping everyone sound more charming - and editing out red-flag comments before they are uttered - it's harder to suss out whether a potential partner is appealing and safe, said Erika Ettin, a dating coach who has worked with thousands of clients. 'Normally, you can see in the chat what kind of language they're using. You can see if they jump to sexual stuff quickly and how they navigate conversations with strangers in the world,' Ettin said. 'When some bot is chatting for them, you can't collect those data points on that person anymore.' With nearly a third of U.S. adults saying they have used dating apps and the majority of relationships now beginning online, dating companies are keen to find how cutting-edge AI can bolster their business model. Hinge has added AI tools that read users' profiles and skim through their photos, suggesting changes and additions that theoretically boost their chances at a match. Tinder uses AI to read your messages, nudging you if it thinks you have sent or received something distasteful. And apps such as Rizz and Wing AI help users decide what to say to a potential date. Amanda Gesselman, a psychologist at the Kinsey Institute, said her research with Match Group suggests that a significant chunk of singles use AI to 'enhance their dating lives.' Gesselman said the tech could help people who struggle to navigate the tricky process of swiping, matching, chatting and setting up dates. But she acknowledged the features come with ethical complications, and she struggled to articulate when using AI is acceptable and when it's deceitful. 'People will use AI to alter their photos in ways that aren't necessarily achievable for them, whereas when you use it for messages, you're using it in a way that is amplifying yourself and your ability to have conversations,' Gesselman said. Dating app design already encourages behaviors that make courtship feel impersonal, some users say. Certain eager singles swipe right on every profile, maximizing their chances of getting a match. Others ghost, cutting off communication after a bad date rather than officially breaking things off. And many try to manipulate dating app algorithms, saying 'no' to partners they are attracted to in an attempt to signal to the algorithm that they are choosy and desirable. Eve Tilley-Coulson, a lawyer in Los Angeles, runs a side business in which she logs in to Hinge users' accounts and swipes on their behalf, playing the algorithm to their advantage. For users already frustrated by dating apps, conversational AI features are unlikely to sit well, Tilley said. When Hinge's AI prompts her customers to write more detailed answers in their profiles, for example, some worry that the app is collecting extra data for nefarious purposes, she said. Match didn't comment about data collection. In Tilley's view, AI features will, at worst, be weaponized against users to keep them swiping and paying. At best, they will nudge users toward more uniform answers and conversations, since generative AI tends to reference ideas and conversations it has seen before. Match Group spokeswoman Vidhya Murugesan said the company's algorithms are designed to funnel users toward in-person connections and get them off the apps. 'As we integrate AI into our products, we're prioritizing authenticity, transparency, and safety, ensuring these tools enhance the user experience and help foster more of these connections,' she said. If AI suggestions have a cooling effect on some dating app conversations, that's not always a bad thing, according to Yoel Roth, Match Group's head of trust and safety. Match uses AI to read users' messages and prompt them if they're about to send something potentially offensive, abusive or weird. Senders are asked, 'Are you sure?' and given an opportunity to rephrase their message. About 20 percent of people who get this prompt choose not to send the original chat, Roth said onstage at an AI conference in June. Recipients might also get a 'Does this bother you?' prompt if Match's AI perceives a message to be potentially harmful, Roth said. 'A lot of what we're thinking about as we're building apps that help people connect is: How can we use AI to improve that experience, both to make it safer and more authentic and but then also to maybe round out some of the rough edges that make it more challenging for people to meet each other and express themselves?' Roth said. Those 'rough edges' can hobble some daters who don't have a way with words, said Roman Khaves, co-founder of the app Rizz, which bills itself as an AI-powered dating coach. Users can upload screenshots of their dating app conversations into Rizz and ask for tips on what to say next. 'AI is helping people be a little more confident in themselves and giving them that charisma,' he said. 'There's a lot of great guys out there that are not great texters, and Rizz is helping all those great guys get seen.' Social norms around when and how it's appropriate to use AI are developing slower than the technology itself. In the workplace, where the goal is to efficiently get things done, outsourcing to AI is less ethically complex than on dating apps, where the goal is to reveal your true self, said Giada Pistilli, principal ethicist at AI company Hugging Face. The more we rely on AI to facilitate our emotional connections, the less we're able to express ourselves genuinely, she said. 'While we lack formal regulations, we do have strong moral intuitions about authenticity in intimate relationships,' Pistilli said. 'Consider how a love letter loses practically all its emotional impact once we learn it was entirely AI-generated rather than coming from the heart.' People also want to know that when they open up to someone new, the other person is also showing their true self, said Kathryn Coduto, a professor of media science at Boston University who studies dating apps. 'If you put yourself out there but the other person is so disconnected that they're layering AI in, it feels like a mismatch.' After meeting the woman he suspected of using ChatGPT to message him, Wilson set up a second date. Maybe with more time, he figured, he would get a glimpse of her true personality. But he didn't like what he saw. Though he never learned for sure whether she had relied on a chatbot, the bad date made Wilson feel resentful of AI and exhausted with dating apps, he said. If this woman had been forced to write messages herself - without help from ChatGPT or Hinge alerts stopping her from sending potentially weird messages - maybe he could have determined earlier that they weren't a good pair. They had exchanged messages for weeks, Wilson said. But who had he really been talking to? 'It's almost like we never even spoke.' Related Content The Met opens a dazzling wing of non-European art Appeals court seems likely to back Trump's deportations under wartime law Supreme Court ruling on care for trans minors reopens other cases
Axios
a day ago
- Axios
River North mass shooting: 4 killed, 14 injured outside Chicago club
A mass shooting in Chicago's River North neighborhood Wednesday night has left four people dead and at least 14 wounded, according to police. The latest: The shootings happened just outside Artis Restaurant on West Chicago Avenue, during a record-release party for rapper Mello Buckzz. Police say a large group of people were gathered outside when an SUV drove by and opened fire around 11pm. The four killed were two men and two women. Four others are listed in critical to serious conditions at local hospitals. The victims injured in the shooting range in age from 21 to 32 years old. The mass shooting comes as the city gears up for a traditionally violent weekend. Last year, 109 people were shot and 19 killed over the Fourth of July weekend. No arrests have been made as of Thursday morning. Flashback: This block in River North was also the site of a shooting in 2022, when the nightclub was called Hush Lounge. Zoom out: So far, 2025 has seen steep declines in homicides and shootings in the city, with some of the lowest levels in decades. Chicago had remarkably low numbers for Memorial Day weekend, and officials were hoping to see the same this weekend. There were 192 homicides in Chicago through June 30 this year, compared to 289 over the same period last year. What they're saying: "The goal is, obviously, to not have any homicides this weekend," deputy mayor of community safety Garien Gatewood told Axios this week. "But historically, the Fourth of July has been one of the hardest holidays in the history of the city of Chicago."
Axios
a day ago
- Axios
NWA nonprofits grapple with federal victim aid reductions
Northwest Arkansas nonprofits are facing budget concerns because of a depleted federal Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) fund, and the region stands to receive a disproportionately low amount of grant money compared to other parts of the state. Why it matters: The organizations at risk provide services to domestic violence and child sex abuse victims, some of NWA's most vulnerable populations. State of play: Just under $7 million is available in total for Arkansas for October 2025 through September 2026, compared to $13 million four years ago, according to documents on the state Department of Finance and Administration's website. Case in point: Springdale-based Peace at Home Family Shelter, which offers emergency shelter, counseling and legal services for domestic violence victims, received $1 million a year prior to 2021, executive director Teresa Mills told Axios. But the most any organization can apply for this year is $250,000, according to the state. Peace at Home has launched an endowment campaign to try to make up for the shortfall, and other organizations are also ramping up fundraising and applying for the Arkansas Economic Development Commission's new Community Assistance Grant Program. VOCA funding accounts for about 17% of Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) of Northwest Arkansas' $1.7 million budget, and the organization anticipates losing the funding will hurt its ability to serve children in foster care, according to CASA's website. The state supplemented some of the VOCA money using federal American Rescue Plan Act funding during the last application cycle in 2023, but Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration spokesperson Scott Hardin confirmed the state will not supplement grants this year. By the numbers: The Children's Safety Center of Washington County's 18 staff members provide free services like counseling and forensic interviewing for children suspected of experiencing sexual abuse that cannot be done by volunteers, executive director Elizabeth Shackelford told Axios. About 740 children received services last year. The Children and Family Advocacy Center in Benton County has applied for $80,000 this year, despite receiving about $280,000 in the past, executive director Natalie Tibbs told Axios. The organization primarily sees children suspected of experiencing abuse and also has a shelter for families, most of whom have experienced domestic violence, Tibbs said. Friction point: While the northwest region includes 14 counties home to a third of the state's population, it will receive a sixth of the remaining VOCA funding because the state is now divided into six geographic regions, compounding the challenge. "We have to turn, in a sense, competitive against each other," Shackelford said, speaking of the other child advocacy centers that typically collaborate with one another as they have a common cause. What they're saying: "VOCA's federal guidelines prohibit direct awards to victims, which is why population levels do not determine award amounts," Hardin told Axios in an email. Flashback: VOCA started in 1984 and is funded by fines paid by people or entities convicted of federal crimes, which have decreased in recent years and resulted in a depleted fund. Former President Biden signed a bill with a plan to give the fund a new source of revenue.
