
N.B. Power report based on 'facts and evidence,' auditors tell MLAs
Auditors who examined an apparent winter spike in N.B. Power bills have persuaded one opposition party that meters are working properly — but another party still has doubts.
The two senior auditors from KPMG Canada spent almost three hours Thursday fielding questions from MLAs about their conclusions that the utility's residential meters accurately measured the electricity customers were consuming.
"Our work was focused on facts and evidence and data and analytics-based work. It was robust and it was thorough," said Andrea Coish, an auditor and managing partner of KPMG's Halifax office.
Jack Martin, a KPMG expert in forensic data analytics, told the public accounts committee that "there's no evidence that either conventional meters or smart meters were overstating the power consumption of New Brunswick Power residential customers."
They said it was up to N.B. Power to look at why some ratepayers were consuming more electricity than they believed.
The anecdotal evidence of unexplained spikes in January power bills put the Holt Liberal government on the defensive last winter, prompting it to call in KPMG.
WATCH | 'Our work was focused on facts': auditors grilled by MLAs
N.B. Power auditors field questions from MLAs about bill spikes
2 hours ago
Duration 2:54
The auditors examined 400 cases of bill spikes — enough to provide a statistically accurate picture of all customers, Martin said.
The report backed N.B. Power's initial explanation that a cold winter, a longer December billing period and a major rate increase — which may have passed unnoticed until winter — combined to jolt customers with high bills.
At least one Liberal MLA said he was convinced.
"We need to stick to the facts and the fact was, on the 400-plus meters, there was nothing wrong about that," Hautes-Terres-Nepisiguit Liberal MLA Luc Robichaud told reporters.
Green Party Leader David Coon, who had raised questions about the accuracy of some N.B. Power bills, said he was persuaded by the presentation.
"My view is that the report, after all the questioning, finds that the system is functioning properly for New Brunswickers in terms of making sure that the bills they're being given reflect their actual consumption," he said.
"I'm confident that's the case now."
But Progressive Conservative energy critic Kris Austin said he believes some New Brunswickers will remain unpersuaded because KPMG relied on meter data collected by N.B. Power's own meter testers.
"What we had called for was a review and a testing of the meters outside of N.B. Power's purview. That's what we wanted to see. That's what did not happen," he said.
N.B. Power CEO Lori Clark told the committee that the utility's testers, who are certified by a federal agency, Measurement Canada, would be risking their careers if they deliberately faked any numbers.
"There's no incentive for a tester to producer fraudulent results. These are highly trained individuals who would lose their certification and their jobs if they didn't measure properly," she said.
Austin told reporters it was his job as an MLA to reflect public skepticism at the committee, even after three hours of expert testimony.
"It's not my place to tell ratepayers the meters are working properly. My personal opinion — I have no reason to believe they're not," he told reporters.
"It's not whether I'm satisfied. It's whether ratepayers are satisfied, and what I'm hearing from many ratepayers is they're not satisfied."
Clark told the committee that Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador all experienced a public backlash to similar bill spikes during the winter — and authorities in all three provinces came to the same conclusions as N.B. Power.
Clark acknowledged to the MLAs that it has been a struggle for N.B. Power to convince some customers that they're consuming more electricity than they believe.
The utility plans to provide more information to ratepayers, including about how their habits and the weather may affect their bills.
"We have recognized through this process that a lot of our customers do not understand how they are using electricity and they know very little about how consumption is measured and how much they're using in their homes. So there is an education requirement, for sure."
Clark told MLAs that N.B. Power needs their help to push back at what she called misinformation and misperceptions circulating online, particularly on social media.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
8 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
International Petroleum Corporation to release Second Quarter 2025 Financial and Operational Results on August 5, 2025
TORONTO, July 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- International Petroleum Corporation (IPC) (TSX, Nasdaq Stockholm: IPCO) will publish its financial and operating results and related management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, on Tuesday, August 5, 2025 at 07:30 CEST, followed by an audiocast at 09:00 CEST. Listen to William Lundin, President and CEO, and Christophe Nerguararian, CFO, commenting on the second quarter 2025 financial and operating results and the latest developments from IPC. Follow the presentation live starting at 09:00 CEST on Tuesday, August 5, 2025 on or using the link or dial-in details below: Presentation Link: International Petroleum Corp. (IPC) is an international oil and gas exploration and production company with a high quality portfolio of assets located in Canada, Malaysia and France, providing a solid foundation for organic and inorganic growth. IPC is a member of the Lundin Group of Companies. IPC is incorporated in Canada and IPC's shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and the Nasdaq Stockholm under the symbol 'IPCO'. For further information, please contact: Rebecca Gordon SVP Corporate Planning and Investor Relations Tel: +41 22 595 10 50 Or Robert Eriksson Media Manager reriksson@ Tel: +46 701 11 26 15 Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains statements and information which constitute 'forward-looking statements' or 'forward-looking information' (within the meaning of applicable securities legislation). Such statements and information (together, 'forward-looking statements') relate to future events, including the Corporation's future performance, business prospects or opportunities. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release, unless otherwise indicated. IPC does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable laws. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, forecasts, guidance, budgets, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as 'seek', 'anticipate', 'plan', 'continue', 'estimate', 'expect', 'may', 'will', 'project', 'forecast', 'predict', 'potential', 'targeting', 'intend', 'could', 'might', 'should', 'believe', 'budget' and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be 'forward-looking statements'.


CBC
9 minutes ago
- CBC
Gaza's hunger crisis + Duty-free fears
The National takes a closer look at the rapidly deteriorating hunger crisis in Gaza and the significance of Canada's plan to recognize a Palestinian state. And family-run duty-free shops fear Trump's trade war will put them out of business.


CBC
9 minutes ago
- CBC
As Detroit 3 automakers report tariff blows, experts say a trade deal is the only solution
The Detroit Three automakers are taking a big hit from the Trump administration's tariffs, and industry experts say only one thing can stop the bleeding for the North American auto industry — a trade deal with low tariff rates for the industry. General Motors, Ford and Stellantis have all reported tariff impacts in the billions on recent earnings calls. Ford said on Wednesday that it took an $800-million US (about $1.1 billion Cdn) hit for the second quarter as a result of tariffs. Ford CEO Jim Farley said the company is in daily contact with the White House, with an ultimate goal of reducing its tariff costs, especially on parts tariffs. "We see there's a lot of upside depending on how the negotiation goes with the administration," Farley said. This comes after General Motors said last week that tariffs cost the company $1.1 billion US (about $1.52 billion Cdn) in its second quarter. Chief financial officer Paul Jacobson said the tariff impact for the full year could reach $4 or $5 billion US, though GM is working to offset that with "manufacturing adjustments, targeted cost initiatives and consistent pricing." "Over time, we remain confident that our total tariff expense will come down as bilateral trade deals emerge and our sourcing and production adjustments are implemented," Jacobson said on the company's quarterly earnings call. On its own earnings call on Tuesday, Stellantis also said tariffs were having a major impact, and could add up to the tune of 1.5 billion euros (about $2.4 billion Cdn) this year. Since April, a 25 per cent tariff rate on all finished cars going into the U.S. has applied, regardless of what country they're made in. But under the Canada-United States-Mexico trade agreement (CUSMA), that rate only applies to the non-U.S. content of a car. So far, that cost hasn't made its way into car prices — GM said pricing "remains stable" for the second quarter, and added pricing assumptions for North America for the rest of the year are unchanged. Ford also said it expected net pricing to remain "flat." Industry analyst Sam Fiorani said it isn't entirely surprising that companies are choosing to eat the cost of tariffs thus far. "The car companies can't really push the tariffs through directly yet, because we're in this period of flux, we don't know what the end point will be," Fiorani said. Raising prices by 10 or 15 per cent for now and then lowering them if tariffs come back down isn't an option, he explained, because any customers who just bought the car when it was at the higher rate would be upset with the change. If they do raise any prices, that would have to be longer term. Autoworkers feeling the impact While folks buying cars have been spared the cost of tariffs for the time being, workers in the auto industry haven't been so lucky. Lana Payne, national president of Unifor, which represents some 40,000 autoparts and assembly workers in Canada, says tariffs have resulted in lost work and investment within Canada. In May, GM laid off 750 autoworkers at its Oshawa, Ont., plant when it cut a shift. Windsor's Stellantis assembly plant is also alternating between full production levels, a reduced schedule and full shutdowns throughout the summer. And Stellantis's Brampton, Ont., plant also paused retooling in recent months, with workers there recently telling media they were growing increasingly concerned about when work would resume. "The carnage is building up," Payne said. "Pretty much across the entire auto sector, there has been an impact of some kind or another, depending on the facility and the community." WATCH | Auto expert discusses Windsor Assembly Plant's future given Stellantis earnings: The Windsor Assembly Plant could be in trouble if tariffs don't disappear, as company posts losses: Auto expert 9 days ago The Windsor Assembly Plant could be in serious trouble if tariffs don't go away, a leading automotive expert says, as U.S. President Donald Trump renews threats of tariffs. It comes as the company says preliminary estimates show a nearly $4-billion loss in the first half of this year. The CBC's Katerina Georgieva reports. If tariffs on autos are here to stay, Payne says she expects more of these production cuts and pauses to pile up. That's why she says it's "crucial" that a trade deal between Canada and the U.S. sets tariffs on autos at zero — something she's been working to articulate to folks in government. "We've been very clear to the government what our red lines are," Payne said. "Even though we're facing a deadline right now of August 1st … we're much better off having no deal than a bad deal that will result in a continued bleed of investment and jobs out of this country." Only thing that will help is a trade deal While he doesn't have a prediction for Canada's trade deal, president and CEO of Global Automakers of Canada David Adams says he hopes the rate will be zero, at the very least for CUSMA-compliant cars and parts. "The reality is that any tariff is problematic," Adams said. "If you start doing the math … you're talking, you know, billions [of] dollars per year in terms of the extra cost associated with the tariff." At any rate higher than zero, he says automakers would slowly start to shift production to the U.S. Adams says it won't necessarily be easy to strike an agreement, and that Canada should be very careful about what it puts on the table, given the free trade deal between the U.S., Canada and Mexico is up for review in 2026. So far, goods that are subject to that deal have been sheltered from any tariffs, which has helped Canada weather the tariff storm. WATCH | Why the American auto industry needs the Canadian market: Why the American auto industry needs the Canadian market 28 days ago "We don't have a lot of cards to play, and we need to play the cards that we do have very carefully and strategically," Adams said. Given that the European Union and Japan recently reached deals with the U.S. that will allow those countries to sell products to Americans at a 15 per cent rate, Fiorani says he expects cars and parts not covered by CUSMA might face a similar rate. Fiorani said the deals with the EU and Japan are a sore spot for car companies and suppliers in North America, given that rates for cars coming from Europe or Japan are lower than the 25 per cent currently on cars from Canada. "These are companies that have built their business case on shipping parts across the border. And now they're competing with vehicles that are coming from either the EU, U.K. or Japan, with potentially a lower tariff than they're currently applying to Canadian parts and vehicles," Fiorani said. That said, Fiorani points out that the deals that U.S. President Donald Trump has struck so far are still "handshakes at best," as none of them have yet been signed on paper, which means that reality could still change. In the long term, Greig Mordue, an associate professor at McMaster University in Hamilton, says putting any kinds of tariffs on the auto sector would be a dismantling of the last 60 years of North America's joint auto industry. And while that won't happen overnight, Mordue says Canada will need to find ways to distance itself from the U.S. in the long run. He added that while the Detroit Three have been the focus of the auto sector in North America historically, they don't produce as many cars in Canada anymore. And of the 1.3 million cars made here in 2024, 533,000 were Toyotas and 420,550 were Honda models. Given that, and the global shift from gas-powered cars to electric vehicles, he says Canada should try to find partnerships abroad.