
Do I Have To Pay For My Partner's Care?
Send your questions to susan.edmunds@rnz.co.nz
If one person in a de facto relationship needs permanent medical care, does the Government require the other partner to pay for the care once the unwell patient's funds run out?
The basic answer to your question is that when your partner is being assessed for their ability to pay for their care, your income and assets will usually be taken into account.
If you're referring to medical care in a rest home setting, your assets and personal income affect whether your partner will qualify for a residential care subsidy.
"People who need residential care are required to pay for it themselves, if they can afford to do so. If they cannot afford it, they may be eligible for a residential care subsidy, which Health New Zealand pays directly to the care provider," said Ministry of Social Development group general manager for client service delivery Graham Allpress.
"MSD's role is to check whether people qualify for this subsidy by performing a 'financial means assessment'.
"To get the subsidy, a person's income and assets must be under a certain amount. If they are in a relationship, the combined income and assets of both parties must be under a certain amount."
People can qualify for the subsidy if they are 50 to 64, single and without dependent children, or over 65 and meet the income and means test. That means, even if your partner's funds have run out, your assets could still be taken into account.
If only one partner needs care, the couple combined need to have assets of no more than $155,873 not including the family home and car, or $284,636 if you do want the home and car in the assessment.
If it's other types of care that you're thinking of, it could be a good idea to contact Health NZ for a needs assessment.
There are options such as the supported living payment but eligibility for this is assessed on a household income basis, too.
I'm currently a NZ tax resident living in NZ, but previously lived in Australia (over a decade ago) and purchased shares on the ASX that I continue to own and receive dividends for (which I declare as part of my income). If I sold these shares now, worth about $150,000, what taxes would they be subject to? Specifically, would I have to pay a capital gains tax on the increased share value (as I would if I were an Australian tax resident).
This is probably a question for an accountant with expertise in Australian tax.
Based on information available online, it seems that you potentially should have paid tax on the shares in Australia when you stopped being an Australian resident.
Assuming that didn't happen, the Australian Tax Office is likely to be expecting capital gains tax to be paid on them when they are sold.
You aren't likely to have any New Zealand tax obligations.
Tax experts tell me that the authorities have access to a lot of data these days so it's possible that the Australian Tax Office will find out about any share sale and might get in touch with you.
I am 78 years of age and still work part time and also still contribute to my KiwiSaver. Am I eligible for the government contribution?
Sorry, no. While the government said it was going to start making contributions to 16 and 17-year-olds' accounts, it hasn't budged on the upper limit of 65.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Life X DNA™ Expands Access To Genetic Methylation Testing In Canberra
Life X DNA™, an Australia-based provider of advanced DNA analysis, has announced the availability of its genetic methylation testing in Canberra services in Canberra, ACT. The company's at-home test kits are designed to offer individuals insights into their genetic methylation pathways, including analysis of the MTHFR gene and related health markers. Methylation is a fundamental biochemical process that influences DNA repair, detoxification, cardiovascular health, and neurological function. Variations in genes such as MTHFR can impact the efficiency of these processes, potentially affecting an individual's risk for certain health conditions. Through methylation tests, users can assess their genetic predispositions and receive information that may assist in making informed decisions about diet, supplementation, and lifestyle. The Life X DNA™ service utilises a simple cheek swab to collect DNA samples, which are then analysed using next-generation sequencing and AI-powered software. According to the company, the analysis covers over 200 million SNPs and more than 80 million variants. The resulting reports provide detailed information on methylation efficiency, MTHFR gene variants, homocysteine levels, and associated health risks. Recommendations are tailored to the individual's genetic profile. In Canberra, genetic methylation testing is available via mail-order kits, making the process accessible without the need for clinic visits. The reports generated from these tests are intended for informational and educational purposes only and are not intended to diagnose or treat medical conditions. Life X DNA™ is fully Australian owned and operated, with data privacy and security protocols in place. The company states that personal genetic data is not shared with third parties and is stored securely offline. The expansion of genetic methylation testing in Canberra reflects growing interest in personalised health insights based on DNA analysis. Life X DNA™'s services are also available in other major Australian cities and New Zealand.


Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Signing of build contract edges closer
After years of delay, the government is finally edging closer to a contract with an Australian construction giant to build the new Dunedin hospital, the ODT understands. Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand (HNZ) is expected to send CPB Contractors a letter saying it plans to hire the firm to construct the inpatient building. Crown manager Evan Davies' role for the government requires him to negotiate a draft contract and present it to ministers for signing by mid-September. However, there are hurdles that mean the process could take longer, including getting an implementation business case through legally required Treasury approval. The re-employment of former programme director Tony Lloyd in Mr Davies' team raises the likelihood that the proposed contract will have fine print that shares at least some of any overspend risk between government and CPB, rather than HNZ paying a fixed price set in advance. Mr Davies, Mr Lloyd and senior CPB executives are known to have all favoured a shared-risk deal when discussing possible contracts three years ago. Responding on social media to a post by a CPB legal adviser about the problems of fixed-price contracts, Mr Lloyd said he "fully agreed". Fixed-price contracts are usually priced higher to protect the contractor against any rising costs but, depending on construction prices and other variables, are no guarantee that a project's costs will be contained. One independent construction expert — who did not wish to be named — said the type of contract would make little difference to the job's price compared with the cost of the lengthy delays to date. "It will be six of one and half a dozen of the other," they said. However, a shared-risk arrangement could prevent pricey legal pain down the track. CPB and the government have had various scuffles, including time in the High Court over escalating costs of a sports centre build in Christchurch. Meanwhile, the foundations of the inpatient building are likely to get under way. Health Minister Simeon Brown told the ODT that capping of the 324 piles already on the site would start soon, followed by work on the perimeter of the basement to form the base for the substructure. "The third part of the process will be installing the base isolators and then the frame of the main construction," he said. HNZ did not answer a question about the letter of intent to CPB but said that "commercial and delivery arrangements for the inpatient building are continuing to progress.'


NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Tonga's health system hacked, US$1m ransom demanded
Tonga has refused to pay a US$1 million ($1.6m) ransom after hackers seized control of the country's health IT system. Hackers broke into Tonga's national health database earlier this month, the Government said, locking out medical staff who have since reverted to paper record keeping. The IT system stores confidential