logo
Mama Hooch rapists appeal convictions, victims attend hearing

Mama Hooch rapists appeal convictions, victims attend hearing

1News3 days ago
The Mama Hooch rapists' High Court appeal has been heard in Christchurch, almost two years after they were jailed.
At the one-day hearing yesterday, their defence team called for a retrial, claiming the way their six-week judge-alone trial was conducted led to a miscarriage of justice.
The Jaz brothers were convicted on 68 of the combined 113 charges they faced, for stupefying and subjecting 17 young women to sex attacks. Danny Jaz was sentenced to 16 and a half years in prison while his brother, Roberto, was jailed for 17 years.
The brothers are both appealing their convictions and sentences for heinous sex crimes the trial judge described as predatory and prolific. They didn't appear in court as their appeal was heard.
However, in court for the appeal were several survivors of the pair's crimes. Sophie Brown spoke outside court, saying: "These are dangerous men. They have little remorse for what they've done."
ADVERTISEMENT
During the hearing, defence counsel Ron Mansfield KC told Justice Cameron Mander: 'The appellants did not get a fair hearing in the lower court, and there was a significant miscarriage of justice. In effect, the judge simplistically ran roughshod over the defence cases in relation to each grouping of charges.'
He argued, at the conclusion of their six-week judge-alone trial, that Judge Mabey didn't permit Crown or defence closing arguments to save time, ahead of a second trial of a fourth defendant.
Summary: The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including death of a The Cosby Show actor, vape product recalled, and how working less makes us feel better. (Source: Breakfast)
'This was literally weeks into a very long fixture and in and of itself establishes both a predetermination and bias in favour of the crown's case against the defendants before he's even had an opportunity to hear all of the crowns evidence let alone that defendants have the opportunity of making an election and calling evidence for him to consider," Mansfield said.
He added: 'The only answer to it, given its magnitude, is setting aside the verdicts and returning the matter to the District Court for a further trial," Mansfield said.
The Crown, which gave a two-day opening at the start of the trial, agreed it would have been preferable to have closing arguments, but pointed out the defence accepted it at the time.
Crown prosecutor Charlotte Brook stated in her submission: 'Despite the absence of closing addresses, with the combination of his questioning, his discussions with counsel and the 147 arguments that took place, he was indeed well aware of the defence to be run on all of the charges.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Defence lawyer Ron Mansfield. (Source: Pool )
Several victims sat in the back of the court with support people to listen to the appeal, while others watched online.
Survivor Sophie Brown was among them and said outside court they had a lot of anxious energy leading up to the hearing, but felt it was important to be there to show they care deeply about keeping the men behind bars.
"These are dangerous men. They have little remorse for what they've done. They're appealing, which shows they think they shouldn't have had the sentences they got, and they should be out,' Brown said.
Sophie Brown (GEORGE HEARD/POOL) (Source: 1News)
Brown said of the possibility of a retrial: 'While it's a small chance, it is still quite anxiety-inducing, and the reason for that is it took six years for this to go to court.
"I don't know if all the survivors would go through that again'.
Justice Mander has reserved his decision.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Teacher faces four charges of indecent assault in Wellington District Court
Teacher faces four charges of indecent assault in Wellington District Court

RNZ News

time13 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Teacher faces four charges of indecent assault in Wellington District Court

The person is due to appear in court again next month. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King Secrecy surrounds the details of a teacher charged with multiple counts of indecent assault. The person appeared in Wellington District Court on Thursday, but all identifying information is suppressed until at least 19 August. They face four charges of indecent assault and one of intentionally impeding normal breathing by applying pressure to the throat. The charges relate to the period between mid December 2024 and late February of this year. The person is due to appear in court again next month. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Serial sex offender Luca Fairgray's prison sentence cut on appeal
Serial sex offender Luca Fairgray's prison sentence cut on appeal

NZ Herald

time16 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Serial sex offender Luca Fairgray's prison sentence cut on appeal

In June, Fairgray's lawyer Susan Gray told the Court of Appeal that his sentence and its starting point was 'manifestly excessive'. A starting point (for example: four years' prison) is the sentence which a judge decides on before taking into account aggravating or mitigating factors that may increase or reduce a sentence. A judge uses any comparable cases to determine what that starting point is. Gray submitted 'a lack of consistency is a lack of justice' and she pointed to another case where a man who had ongoing sex with one minor and one-off sex with another was given a starting point of 2.5 years in prison. She acknowledged the pregnancy and abortion that occurred because of Fairgray's offending, and its distressing impact, but said it was wrong for the judge to attribute the second surgical intervention needed to her client. Gray also took issue with the Crown's submission that the victim was vulnerable due to her age, as she said it was inherent in the charge. The seven-year age gap between Fairgray and the complainant was at the lower end of the spectrum, she said. 'There was no breach of trust.' Prosecutor Pip McNabb said the real issue before the court was whether the four-year starting point was available to Judge Thomas. She told the Justices the victim's vulnerability was about much more than just her age and included her autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) diagnosis. 'At the lowest end of that seven-year age gap we have a 13-year-old girl, so she had just become a teenager.' At the other end of the spectrum, she said, was an educated 20-year-old male. She did not agree that Fairgray's own diagnoses of autism and ADHD tempered the difference between the pair. His offending was 'calculated and careful', she said, and he actively pursued the girl despite knowing her age. McNabb submitted that while the second surgery could not be directly attributed to the appellant, it was his actions of having unprotected sex with her that led to it. The Crown maintained that there were some efforts by him to manipulate the victim. Luca Fairgray pictured when he testified in the Auckland District Court earlier this year. The three appeal judges hearing the case agreed with Fairgray's lawyer that the starting point taken by the sentencing judge was too high. In its decision, released by Justice Rachel Dunningham this afternoon, the appeal court said there were clearly adverse effects on the victim through having to endure a termination of her pregnancy. 'However, there was no abuse of trust, nor was there a significant age gap (comparatively speaking) between the offender and the victim. There were also no other aggravating features present such as grooming, or abusive or demeaning behaviour. This assessment points to a lower starting point than was adopted in R v H [the case the sentencing judge used as a comparison] and we would adopt three and a half years,' she said. After taking that starting point, the Court of Appeal then added on six months to Fairgray's jail term due to the fact his offending followed crimes of a similar nature (the same uplift imposed by Judge Evangelos Thomas at his sentencing). As a result, the Court of Appeal cut Fairgray's final sentence to four years' jail. Katie Harris is an Auckland-based journalist who covers issues including sexual assault, workplace misconduct, media, crime and justice. She joined the Herald in 2020. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Effluent Mismanagement Attracts Large Fine
Effluent Mismanagement Attracts Large Fine

Scoop

time19 hours ago

  • Scoop

Effluent Mismanagement Attracts Large Fine

Press Release – Waikato Regional Council Arrick Limited was convicted and sentenced by District Court Judge Melinda Dickey on 4 February 2025 on a charge filed under the Resource Management Act, with the sentencing decision received this week. A prosecution taken by Waikato Regional Council has resulted in a Taupiri farming company being convicted and fined $52,500 in the Hamilton District Court for the unlawful discharge of dairy effluent into the environment. Arrick Limited was convicted and sentenced by District Court Judge Melinda Dickey on 4 February 2025 on a charge filed under the Resource Management Act, with the sentencing decision received this week. In November 2023, council officers conducted a compliance inspection at a farm owned by the defendant at Taupiri, north of Hamilton. They found the dairy effluent storage pond was overflowing, with effluent ponding in the surrounding paddock at such a depth and volume that it posed a risk of contaminating groundwater. In her sentencing decision, Judge Dickey found that the system was poorly managed in the time leading up to the offending and concluded that the defendant had been highly careless in its management of proper effluent disposal on the farm. 'Unfortunately, this is a case where the defendant has failed to address effluent management on the property despite repeated requests by the council since 2012 for the farm owner to upgrade the farm effluent system and previous discharges from the same pond,' said acting Regional Compliance Manager Evan Billington. 'The rules are very clear, and do not permit the discharge and ponding of effluent from effluent holding facilities. That's because large volumes of ponded effluent can pose a real risk of contaminating groundwater.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store