Mama Hooch rapists appeal convictions, victims attend hearing
At the one-day hearing yesterday, their defence team called for a retrial, claiming the way their six-week judge-alone trial was conducted led to a miscarriage of justice.
The Jaz brothers were convicted on 68 of the combined 113 charges they faced, for stupefying and subjecting 17 young women to sex attacks. Danny Jaz was sentenced to 16 and a half years in prison while his brother, Roberto, was jailed for 17 years.
The brothers are both appealing their convictions and sentences for heinous sex crimes the trial judge described as predatory and prolific. They didn't appear in court as their appeal was heard.
However, in court for the appeal were several survivors of the pair's crimes. Sophie Brown spoke outside court, saying: "These are dangerous men. They have little remorse for what they've done."
ADVERTISEMENT
During the hearing, defence counsel Ron Mansfield KC told Justice Cameron Mander: 'The appellants did not get a fair hearing in the lower court, and there was a significant miscarriage of justice. In effect, the judge simplistically ran roughshod over the defence cases in relation to each grouping of charges.'
He argued, at the conclusion of their six-week judge-alone trial, that Judge Mabey didn't permit Crown or defence closing arguments to save time, ahead of a second trial of a fourth defendant.
Summary: The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including death of a The Cosby Show actor, vape product recalled, and how working less makes us feel better. (Source: Breakfast)
'This was literally weeks into a very long fixture and in and of itself establishes both a predetermination and bias in favour of the crown's case against the defendants before he's even had an opportunity to hear all of the crowns evidence let alone that defendants have the opportunity of making an election and calling evidence for him to consider," Mansfield said.
He added: 'The only answer to it, given its magnitude, is setting aside the verdicts and returning the matter to the District Court for a further trial," Mansfield said.
The Crown, which gave a two-day opening at the start of the trial, agreed it would have been preferable to have closing arguments, but pointed out the defence accepted it at the time.
Crown prosecutor Charlotte Brook stated in her submission: 'Despite the absence of closing addresses, with the combination of his questioning, his discussions with counsel and the 147 arguments that took place, he was indeed well aware of the defence to be run on all of the charges.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Defence lawyer Ron Mansfield. (Source: Pool )
Several victims sat in the back of the court with support people to listen to the appeal, while others watched online.
Survivor Sophie Brown was among them and said outside court they had a lot of anxious energy leading up to the hearing, but felt it was important to be there to show they care deeply about keeping the men behind bars.
"These are dangerous men. They have little remorse for what they've done. They're appealing, which shows they think they shouldn't have had the sentences they got, and they should be out,' Brown said.
Sophie Brown (GEORGE HEARD/POOL) (Source: 1News)
Brown said of the possibility of a retrial: 'While it's a small chance, it is still quite anxiety-inducing, and the reason for that is it took six years for this to go to court.
"I don't know if all the survivors would go through that again'.
Justice Mander has reserved his decision.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Supervision of released high risk sex offender should be allowed to lapse High Court hears
The case was heard in the High Court in Wellington. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver The High Court in Wellington has heard Correction's supervision of a high risk sexual offender released earlier this year should be allowed to lapse. Local Democracy Reporting previously reported Nathaniel James Mahoney was sentenced to 10 years' jail in 2015 after he was found guilty on 10 charges of sexual and physical violence against four women. In one instance, Mahoney raped an 18-year-old autistic woman. He met her at a North Island comic book convention while dressed as Batman villain the Joker. The victim was dressed as the Joker's girlfriend Harley Quinn. In the High Court on Wednesday counsel for Mahoney, Charlotte Brook, argued that Corrections had erred in making a second Extended Supervision Order (ESO) application towards Mahoney that could nullify an existing one made ahead of his release. People under a supervision order are monitored by authorities, and might have conditions around where they can live and work, and who they interacted with. Brook said an implication of lodging a second order was it could allow for Mahoney to be in the community without supervision in the period between his release conditions expiring in August and an expected decision on the application due in November. She said interim supervision intended to monitor Mahoney in the lead-up to the decision could not be included in the second ESO as it had not been applied for while Mahoney was still incarcerated. "Corrections filed the second application intending to change the terms of the first one. They want a longer term. It's not Mr Mahoney's fault that the second one has been filed," Brook said. Brook cited previous decisions which characterised ESO's as "a second penalty and... an unjustified intrusion of a person's rights". She described the conditions of Mahoney's supervision orders as "intrusive" and argued the court should take a rights based approach in making its decision. "Mr Mahoney has been assessed as being very high risk but you can only take these preventative measures so far," Brook said. Justice Karen Grau observed that Mahoney's high risk of re-offending had increased following an incident relating to interactions with women during a prior employment placement initiative. Counsel for the Department of Corrections, Anselm Williams, argued there was nothing in legislation to stipulate the filing of a second ESO application would discontinue a prior application. "I don't accept ... that a court would decline the department's application when you have a person who is clearly a high risk and that risk has increased over the time that application is being considered," Williams said. Williams argued that interim supervision was not only necessary to protect the community but to enable Corrections to "provide rehabilitative options" for Mahoney. Justice Grau reserved her decision to be delivered ahead of Mahoney's release conditions expiring in early August. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Concrete tradie Jason Mark Lambert accused of duping 28 clients and not paying bills
'He didn't complete any work' Police prosecutor Steve Hickey said Lambert offered concreting and landscaping services on Facebook and also answered requests for services wanted. Contact was made, and quotes were given for complainants from around the Bay of Plenty and Waikato, including Hamilton, Huntly, Te Awamutu, Kihikihi, Ngaruawāhia, and Tauranga. Lambert often sought a 40% deposit before work started, which was paid into a bank account nominated by him. On two occasions, cash was paid. 'Evidence will be given that the defendant, on most occasions, did not complete any work.' Complainants will refer to messages or conversations they had with Lambert, and some would also produce photos. Other times, a small amount of work was done before Lambert was accused of offering 'multiple excuses for not returning to the properties'. As the relationships broke down, refunds were sought, but none were given. Lambert used four different bank accounts for the complainants to put deposits into, but he was not named as an owner of any of the accounts. 'Viewed separately, it could be argued that each of these failed transactions are a civil breach of contract,' Hickey said. 'The prosecution case is that due to the number and regularity of the failed transactions, the behaviours displayed by the defendant and the lack of compensation, the defendant never intended to fulfil the work as agreed, therefore deceiving the complainants into paying the deposit sought.' Hickey said once police got involved, it was clear to officers that Lambert 'intended to cause a loss to these people'. 'There wasn't any bad faith' Co-defence counsel Johnathan Myers said all but one complaint related to 2020 and 2021, when the country was struck by Covid-19, lockdowns, and supply chain issues. He denied there was any bad faith by his client in entering into contracts. 'Mr Lambert entered in good faith and Mr Lambert had every intention to complete the work. 'However, while Mr Lambert was not new to concreting work, he was new to running his own business and all the pitfalls that come with that. Concrete contractor and fraud accused Jason Mark Lambert pictured in the Hamilton District Court this week. Photo / Belinda Feek Myers said 2020 and 2021 'were some of the most challenging years'. The defence counsel said the police had tried to elevate the allegations beyond what they were, 'a civil dispute about contract work'. He reminded the judge that she would need to be sure that Lambert made false representations or that he was reckless as to whether they were false, and that there was an intention to deceive the victims, and that he was aware that some loss was likely to occur. 'I saw him featured on Fair Go' Gerald Fieten dealt with Lambert in October 2018 when he was suggested as a contractor to do a small concreting job at his rental property at Murphy Lane, Taupiri. He was given Lambert's details by a Versatile garage representative after asking for a recommendation to do a small concreting job. 'We asked him if he could do it, and he said he could do it. He had a look at the job and texted us a quote.' That quote was $2800, of which he asked for a 60% deposit. Fieten paid $1500 and was told it would be done a couple of days later. 'Did he?' Hickey asked. 'No, he didn't,' Fieten replied. Lambert asked him to pay the remainder of the money in December, but Fieten refused, because the job still hadn't been completed. 'I didn't think it was wise to do that.' By February 2019, Fieten began asking for his deposit back, and Lambert agreed, but nothing was ever paid. Lambert's co-counsel, Kerry Hadaway, put to Fieten that Lambert had visited the property and prepared the area for work. 'He didn't get it ready. I had to get it ready myself,' Fieten said. 'Didn't Mr Lambert put the timber edging in?' Hadaway asked. 'No,' he replied. 'Didn't he box the area and get it ready for concreting?' she asked. 'No,' he said again. He also rejected her suggestion that Lambert had spent four hours at the property. 'But you can't be sure of that because you didn't live there,' she put to him. 'I can be sure of that because I put the boxing down myself to get the job done,' he replied. He eventually made a complaint to the police after seeing Lambert featured on Fair Go in 2021. 'He never, ever paid' But it's not just clients who were unhappy. The court heard Lambert also failed to pay his bills. Karl Sinclair, of Kowhai Hire, testified that initially, when Lambert hired goods from him in early 2020, he paid each time. 'He seemed like a real nice guy, trustworthy guy at the time.' However, by March of that year, the payment of invoices stopped. 'He just continued to hire quite a bit in a short period of time, probably like two months or whatever. 'They were not paid for. 'It was never disputed that he didn't owe the money, but they were never paid.' The total money owed from three unpaid invoices was about $4000, Sinclair said. He said Lambert was always good at responding to requests for payment, but he 'never, ever paid'. 'He told me again and again over different times that he would pay. Sinclair eventually sent the claim off to the debt collectors, but then finally realised 'it's a waste of our time'. The trial is set down for three weeks. Belinda Feek is an Open Justice reporter based in Waikato. She has worked at NZME for 10 years and has been a journalist for 21.
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
One Before The Courts Following Search Warrant In Lower Hutt
A Lower Hutt man is before the courts following an investigation into a breach of the Gangs Act 2024. Police established an investigation into the breach after a tangi in May, where the man was observed wearing gang insignia in a public place. After a number of enquiries, today the Wellington Gang Disruption Unit conducted a search warrant at a Taita address. A 19-year-old man was located at the address and taken into custody without incident. During the search warrant, Police located two firearms, along with about 90 rounds of ammunition. A gang patch was also located and seized during the search. The 19-year-old man is due to appear in Hutt Valley District Court on 31 July, facing two counts of prohibited display of gang insignia, two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm, two counts of unlawful possession of ammunition.
