logo
NDP-Tories spar as interprovincial trade bill up in the air

NDP-Tories spar as interprovincial trade bill up in the air

A game of political chicken playing out at the Manitoba legislature could see the premier go to a first ministers' meeting Monday in Saskatoon without an interprovincial trade bill and MLAs' summer recess delayed three weeks.
'If (the Progressive Conservatives) want to sit here throughout the month of June, we are very happy to do so,' Premier Wab Kinew said during question period Thursday.
The NDP want the Tories' co-operation in fast-tracking the Fair Trade in Canada (Internal Trade Mutual Recognition) Act and the Buy Manitoba, Buy Canadian Day Act. It was introduced May 22, long past the deadline for bills to be guaranteed passage before the house rises on Monday. The opposition has said it won't pass the bill unless the NDP agree to fast track four of their bills.
On Thursday, Kinew tabled a letter from Nova Scotia's PC Premier Tim Houston saying that Manitoba's fair trade bill meets his province's criteria for reciprocal free trade.
Kinew wanted Bill 47 passed before he meets with Prime Minister Mark Carney and his fellow premiers in Saskatoon. Internal trade is expected to be a key part of the discussions.
Carney has said he wants a Canada-wide interprovincial free trade deal signed by July 1. The federal government's speech from the throne delivered Tuesday by King Charles called for free trade across Canada.
'It is crucial that Manitoba's interprovincial trade legislation is passed without further delay,' the premier said in a news release Thursday.
It pointed to support for the elimination of interprovincial trade barriers from business and labour leaders — including Keystone Agricultural Producers president Jill Verwey, Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce president Loren Remillard and the United Steelworkers Manitoba co-ordinator Mike Pulak.
The news release said the legislative sitting will be extended into the summer if the passage of the bill is delayed.
'We will pass Bill 47 within a few days and then we can spend the rest of the month talking about Sio (Silica),' the premier told the chamber Thursday. He was referring to Ethics Commissioner Jeffrey Schnoor's report last week that found former premier Heather Stefanson, then-deputy premier Cliff Cullen and former economic development minister Jeff Wharton — the MLA for Red River North — acted improperly by trying to get a controversial sand mine licensed after the PCs lost the election and before the NDP government was sworn in.
Schnoor recommended fines of $18,000, $12,000 and $10,000 respectively that the Manitoba Legislative Assembly must vote on within 10 sitting days of the tabling of his report.
The PCs refused to fast-track the bill Thursday and said it's the NDP government's own fault for missing the deadline to get the bill passed before the summer recess and for refusing to work with the opposition.
'We have clearly laid out a pathway for passing this bill,' PC leader Obby Khan told reporters Thursday. 'It is unfortunate that the government house leader refuses to negotiate, refuses to be reasonable, refuses to put Manitobans first.'
Government house leader Nahanni Fontaine said the bill is in the best interests of the province and the country as it faces U.S. president Donald Trump's threats of tariffs and making Canada the 51st state.
'It's incredibly disappointing to see the Manitoba PCs choose to play games rather than do the job that they're elected to do, which I remind folks is to do what's in the best interest of Manitobans,' Fontaine said.
Management of the legislative agenda is the responsibility of the government house leader, said veteran political observer Paul Thomas.
'Even in a majority government situation, making progress on moving bills forward depends somewhat on the co-operation of the opposition,' the University of Manitoba political studies professor emeritus said. 'Achieving that co-operation involves negotiation within meetings between the two house leaders. In addition to the clash of their respective political goals, the interpersonal styles and the level of respect between the house leaders affect how constructive such meeting are.'
Sometimes bills just aren't ready on time, he added.
'Unforeseen events can occur which prevent the government from completing its legislative agenda based on a possible plan starting the session. There have been more than a few unforeseen, disruptive events this spring.'
Members return to the chamber Monday and will sit for an additional three weeks if the government requests an extension from the speaker.
carol.sanders@freepress.mb.ca
Carol SandersLegislature reporter
Carol Sanders is a reporter at the Free Press legislature bureau. The former general assignment reporter and copy editor joined the paper in 1997. Read more about Carol.
Every piece of reporting Carol produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Manitoba, Saskatchewan invest in Churchill port as trade war drags on
Manitoba, Saskatchewan invest in Churchill port as trade war drags on

CTV News

time5 hours ago

  • CTV News

Manitoba, Saskatchewan invest in Churchill port as trade war drags on

The Port of Churchill, nestled along the shores of Hudson Bay in northern Manitoba, has become an important piece of the puzzle as the Canada-U.S. trade war rages on. Expanding operations in Churchill has taken on new urgency and has been part of the national discussion over the last few months. 'We're building trade-enabling infrastructure for the future,' said Chris Avery, president and CEO of Arctic Gateway Group, which owns and operates the Port of Churchill. The port is currently Canada's only Arctic seaport serviced by rail, offering access to Europe and destinations around the world. 'Building this trade-enabling infrastructure will further enable the vast resources we have in Western Canada (to reach) global markets,' said Avery. The Port of Churchill has a brief operating window each summer —about four and a half months — due to ice in Hudson Bay. However, Avery says a University of Manitoba study shows the port could remain open longer due to climate change. 'Given their study and given the data they've collected for the past 40 years, the sea lanes can probably be open right now, without icebreaker, up to six months of the year,' he said. 'Beyond that - icebreakers can help us lengthen the shipping season to almost year-round.' Last week, Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew and Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe signed an agreement with Arctic Gateway Group to upgrade infrastructure and modernize supply chains. Saskatchewan will connect producers and exporters to the Arctic trade corridor, and Arctic Gateway Group will be expanding investment in port and rail assets. Churchill Port Port of Churchill workers support arrival of Arctic Supply Ship. (Arctic Gateway Group) Kinew said the deal between the two Prairie provinces is a positive step. 'It's really exciting for Manitoba,' he said. 'It helps us to unlock mining in the North, and more agricultural exports in the South.' In recent years, the federal and provincial governments have invested millions of dollars in both the rail line and the Port in Churchill to build up a proper trade route through the Arctic. In March, Ottawa and the Manitoba government committed nearly $80 million to finish work on the Hudson Bay Railway and continue redevelopment of the Port of Churchill. Premier Kinew at the time said the project would help with long-term economic security. 'The memorandum of understanding is a good reinforcement of what we have been thinking for some time,' said Barry Prentice, a professor of supply chain management at the University of Manitoba. The Port of Churchill has mainly been used for grain shipments in the past but began shipping critical minerals in 2024. Prentice says there is a lot of economic opportunity, not just for Manitoba, but also for Saskatchewan and Alberta to move products through the Hudson Bay. 'You want to move bulk products, especially those that are somewhat storable, and potash fits in that category, minerals, petrochemicals, and lumber too, because they do produce forest products as well,' he said. 'There are lots of things we can move through the port, in addition to grain.' Avery echoed Prentice's statement. 'We expect to have more products that originate from Saskatchewan, come through the Port of Churchill and be exported to global markets as well,' he said. 'So, we'll see that volume grow as we work together and build that traffic, and we'll see the volumes grow, and we'll see different types of commodities go through the port.' All the talk about breathing new life into the Artic comes as welcome news for those living in the North. Port of Churchill Arctic Supply Ship is seen here at Port of Churchill on July 14, 2025. (Arctic Gateway Group) 'It goes to show how much potential our area on Hudson Bay has for shipping, for contributing to Canada's GDP as a whole,' said Joe Stover, a longtime Churchill resident. 'It's good for the country, because it's obviously another outlet for being able to ship — and helps with some of these bottlenecks that you see logistically across the country.' Stover worked at the port for 10 years. While he's happy to see investment and renewed interest in revitalizing the port, he hopes words turn into action. 'Let's just hope that the pressure stays on and things actually get done,' he said. 'We hear lots, in the past — 'Oh, Churchill, it would be great if we could do this. Churchill, Churchill, Churchill. Potential, potential, potential.' Let's just really hope that now this is a dollars-to-donuts, boots-on-the-ground, actual work going to get done.' As for Avery, he said results will start to show in the short term — but the real focus is on building the future. 'We are definitely focused on the medium and long term as well,' he said. 'And building this trade-enabling structure — which will then build more trade and opportunities to export our resources and commodities to global markets.'

Michael Taube: No, Globe and Mail, Mark Carney isn't the second coming of Brian Mulroney
Michael Taube: No, Globe and Mail, Mark Carney isn't the second coming of Brian Mulroney

National Post

time18 hours ago

  • National Post

Michael Taube: No, Globe and Mail, Mark Carney isn't the second coming of Brian Mulroney

Mark Carney has been prime minister of Canada since March. He's been called many things by many people in this short time period. It never came to mind that he would be described as a 'progressive conservative' along the lines of Brian Mulroney. Article content This, in a nutshell, is the nonsense that the Globe and Mail's editorial board is currently peddling. Article content Article content 'That Mr. Carney was going to drag the Liberal Party back to the centre after years of an NDP-lite government under Mr. Trudeau was to be expected,' a June 28 Globe editorial noted. 'But more than mannerisms have changed. Since April, the Prime Minister has cut personal income taxes, boosted defence spending dramatically, pledged to cut the cost of the federal bureaucracy, tightened immigration rules, eliminated federal barriers to internal trade, created a framework for breaking the stasis on big national projects and signaled that he will dismiss underperforming top bureaucrats,' they wrote. Article content Article content The Globe's editorial board suggested 'that's an agenda that Brian Mulroney could have endorsed.' Article content Article content This analysis likely raised a few eyebrows, and not just in the Mulroney household. Alas, the editorial writers then flipped their collective wig with this bizarre assessment. 'In fact, it overlaps a good deal with the actual governing record of his Progressive Conservatives. Mr. Carney is a Liberal but, in the early going, he looks to be governing much like a Red Tory — a progressive kind of conservative.' Article content We shouldn't be surprised by the Globe's over-the-top analysis of Carney's leadership. It's become the raison d'être of this once-venerable publication to carry water for this particular prime minister. Article content Nevertheless, let's be serious about our national leader. Carney is certainly a progressive, but he's no 'progressive conservative' in any way, shape or form. Article content Left-leaning progressive conservatives, or Red Tories, generally combine two ideological components: classical conservative sensibilities (espoused by High Tories like philosopher Edmund Burke and former U.K. prime minister Benjamin Disraeli) and socialist-type policies such as government intrusion and developing a social safety net. Article content Article content As Gad Horowitz, a professor emeritus at the University of Toronto, wrote in the May-June 1965 issue of the defunct left-wing magazine Canadian Dimension, 'socialism has more in common with Toryism than with liberalism, for liberalism is possessive individualism, while socialism and Toryism are variants of collectivism.' Article content Article content Modern conservatism has little in common with classical conservatism. The former has largely incorporated classical liberal and libertarian ideals into its main ideology, while maintaining a smattering of social conservative principles related to individuals and families. That's why modern conservatives typically champion small government, lower taxes, free markets, private enterprise, greater individual rights and freedoms and so forth. Article content Carney doesn't fit into these conservative-leaning parameters. His progressive values do fit within the context of the modern Liberal Party of Canada. While he's not exactly the same as Trudeau, I pointed out in a March 16 National Post column that they're 'remarkably similar.' How so? In my estimation, 'they're both left-wing, pro-government intervention, distrust privatization and free markets, favour wealth redistribution, champion radical environmentalist policies, support woke ideology and political correctness — and more.' That's what today's Liberals basically stand for, and Carney's personal and political record fits like a glove.

AC shouldn't be first line of defence in maximum temperature law, experts say
AC shouldn't be first line of defence in maximum temperature law, experts say

CBC

time20 hours ago

  • CBC

AC shouldn't be first line of defence in maximum temperature law, experts say

Air conditioners in every apartment shouldn't be the first line of defence against extreme heat, experts say, because there's not enough labour to install them in every building quickly, and there's an environmental cost to relying on them. Amid a heat wave in early July, Catherine McKenney, the NDP's housing critic and representative for Ottawa Centre, said they plan to bring a motion to Queen's Park this fall that would cap apartment temperatures at 26 C. "It's not only a question of should we do this — it's a question of can we do this?" said Jeffrey Siegel, a professor of civil engineering at University of Toronto whose work focuses on ventilation and sustainable buildings. As extreme heat events become more common due to climate change, some kind of maximum temperature regulation for rental properties is important to keep people safe, he agreed, but a requirement to install air conditioning in all regulated buildings would face practical hurdles. "One of the best things that we could do is avoid the need for air conditioning by retrofitting our buildings to make them so the maximum temperature is less of an issue," he said. Practical hurdles A shortage of skilled workers would slow the implementation of McKenney's proposed law, Siegel said. "I do this for a living, right? And I can't find a good HVAC contractor," he said. Even if there were enough workers, all those additional AC units could overload the grid, he added. But there are ways to cool an apartment by several degrees without AC, said Marianne Touchie, the Canada Research Chair in Sustainable Urban Housing and associate professor at the University of Toronto. Experts don't just measure the temperature of a space, they find its "thermal comfort" level, which is calculated by considering temperature, humidity, wind speed and solar radiation (whether or not you're in direct sun or shade). An apartment could technically be 28 degrees, but might feel like 26 degrees if it's in the shade, windows are closed and a fan is running, Touchie said, explaining that focusing exclusively on the temperature is "overly simplistic." Touchie's work focuses on retrofitting old buildings to find ways to "get a lot more out of them." Retrofit strategies to cool a space include: Adding overhangs, external shades or special coatings to windows to reduce solar radiation. Installing ceiling fans to promote air flow. Planting trees to provide shade. Replacing windows with styles that can open further for better cooling at night. Government stepping in Duncan Phillips, a retired air flow expert with the Guelph-based company RWDI, said even more strategies are available to developers working on new builds, which aren't restricted by existing infrastructure. "If we just spend a little bit more time in design and a little bit more effort during construction, we would save a fortune when it comes to actually occupying the building later on," Phillips said, as occupants wouldn't be paying to run the AC as often. "But if your job as a developer is just simply to get the thing built and flip it, you're unlikely to want to put a lot of effort into design and construction," he added, suggesting that the government provide incentives to developers to build with thermal efficiency in mind. Touchie also believes the government should introduce passive cooling regulations for buildings. "I think there needs to be some sort of legislation [that] you need to have these effective passive elements in your building as part of a retrofit before you're going the mechanical cooling route," Touchie said. It's essential, she said, because over-reliance on AC could worsen climate change. "We're using so much more energy to provide that mechanical cooling," she said. Siegel agreed, noting that when electricity demand reaches peak, "we have to turn on our dirtiest power plants or most expensive power plants." While passive cooling regulations would be more complex than requiring AC installation, they would be more effective in the long term, Touchie said. "If we really want to do this right, it requires a more nuanced approach."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store