The photo that fooled thousands: How sports star faked having cancer by sticking iPhone wire up his NOSE to con wellwishers
DJ Carey, who is widely recognised as one of the greatest hurlers of all time, pleaded guilty to 10 counts at the Circuit Court in Dublin's Criminal Courts of Justice on Wednesday.
Billionaire Denis O'Brien is among the several people the ex-Kilkenny sportsman induced to pay him money by fraudulently claiming he needed to fund cancer treatment.
Carey, 54, is one of the most acclaimed figures in GAA history, having won five All-Ireland titles and nine All-Star awards.
When he retired from inter-county hurling in 2006, he was hailed as an 'idol' for young players and a legend of the game.
Since his guilty plea, a photograph of the former star has resurfaced on social media, appearing to show him lying in a hospital bed.
The image, thought to have been sent to his victims, shows Carey with 'tubes' up his nose - which, on closer inspection, seems to be an iPhone cable taped to his face.
Carey was said to have induced his victims to make a monetary payment to him between 2014 and 2022 after fraudulently claiming to have cancer and saying he needed finances to obtain treatment.
In relation to Mr O'Brien, he was charged with inducing him to make a payment to him between January 2014 and late 2022.
The court heard from Carey's defence team that while cancer was referred to in the indictment, Carey 'does have very genuine health conditions' and required surgery for a heart condition last year.
The court heard he needs to attend check-ups periodically and that evidence from his surgeons can be provided.
The plea is a remarkable fall from grace from Carey - who enjoyed a celebrity-esque status after retiring from hurling in 2006.
In a senior inter-county career that lasted for 15 years, he won five All-Ireland medals and his tally of 34 goals and 195 points from 57 championship games marks him out as one of the top scorers in the history of the game.
In a recent episode of the Crime World podcast, he was described as the 'Maradona [referring to footballer Diego Maradona] of hurling' - one of Ireland's native Gaelic games played outside with a stick (hurley) and ball (sliotar).
But his history of financial struggle has been well documented as Allied Irish Banks secured an initial debt repayment court order for about £7.3million in May 2011.
Carey settled his debt with AIB in 2018 in a settlement that reduced his debt of over €9.5 million to €60,000 - just 0.63 per cent of the amount originally owed.
In 2015, speaking on RTE's Ray D'Arcy radio show, Carey said: 'I am not one of those who would say 'I don't care' about repaying debt.'
'You borrow money, it should be paid back,' he said, adding that 'to whatever extent that can be, I would still be conscious it has to be done'.
Carey's family members are also well-known in the world of Irish sport.
His sister, Catriona, was a member of the Ireland women's field hockey team and the Kilkenny senior camogie team.
Meanwhile his brother Martin was also a member of the Kilkenny hurling panel as the substitute goalkeeper.
Carey had appeared in court in late 2023 charged with 21 counts under the Theft and Fraud Offences Act, at which point a four-week trial was expected to take place this year.
On Wednesday, he arrived at criminal courts of justice where he was due to stand trial on deception charges at the Dublin circuit criminal court.
Instead, prosecuting counsel Dominic McGinn told the court that a jury would not be required as Mr Carey would be entering guilty pleas.
A sentencing date has been set for Wednesday October 29 and Carey was remanded on bail until then.
Shockingly, Carey is not the only cancer faker, a fraudster who lies about having the illness to scam funds from concerned well-wishers, to have come from famous origin.
In cases that have caused shock and outrage around the world, the con artists with public platforms have later been exposed for lying about having the sickness.
One of the most renowned cases includes influencer Belle Gibson, who rose to prominence in 2012 as a self-proclaimed health guru who had 'cured' her own brain cancer through healthy eating, clean living and 'positive thinking'.
Within a year, her inspirational Instagram account @healing_belle had amassed thousands of followers, many of them hopeful cancer sufferers, who would go on to download her wellness app, The Whole Pantry, and buy her cookbook of the same name.
Throughout it all, Gibson claimed her earnings – reportedly more than $1 million - would be donated to various cancer charities.
But there was one big problem: Gibson never had cancer, and eventually her empire came crashing down after two Australian journalists discovered she had been lying about it all – not just her disease but her philanthropy, too. Despite the con, Gibson never faced any jail time.
After a drawn-out and dramatic case against the Federal Court of Australia, she was ordered by the court in 2017 to pay AU$410,000 (US$257,000) for her false claims of charitable donations.
Her story was dramatised in Netflix show Apple Cider Vinegar earlier this year.
Combined with her legal fees, she must cough up about half a million dollars (US$313,000). It's been almost a decade since then and she hasn't paid the fine.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
9 hours ago
- Times
US values must not trump valid concerns about social media
In December 2020, Helen McEntee, then the justice minister, announced her intention to bring forward new legislation to combat incitement to hatred and hate crime the following year. She made this promise at the launch of the findings of a public consultation that attracted more than 3,600 submissions. She stated that, after in-depth meetings with various civil society and community groups, academics and experts, her aim was to identify how Ireland's law in this area could be improved, based on a clear understanding of the experiences of those affected by hate speech and hate crime. McEntee ultimately proposed that the new law would cover both incitement to hatred and hate crime with the latter offences being aggravated versions of existing crimes. The idea was that offences against the person, criminal damage or public order offences — when they were carried out because of prejudice against a protected characteristic — would be criminalised. Close to four years after first mooting the legislation, and with a general election looming, McEntee dropped her plan, claiming the incitement to hatred element of the criminal justice bill did not have a consensus. It would be dealt with, in that classic Irish tradition, at a later time. The hate speech element had caused unease within her Fine Gael party and coalition partner Fianna Fail, and was criticised by various backbenchers, opposition parties and independents, free speech groups and even the world's richest man, Elon Musk. • Ireland's 'vague' anti-hate law threatens flood of court challenges Six weeks later, Donald Trump won the United States presidential election — and on free speech, like much else, the world turned. As Patrick O'Donoghue reveals in today's paper, the US State Department has recently warned Irish regulators against pressuring American tech companies to limit, or what it more evocatively calls chill, free speech following a meeting with the Irish media commissioner, Coimisiun na Mean, and officials from the Department of Justice. Ireland is an important battleground in the global culture war that is free speech because of the American social media giants headquartered in Dublin. All have proven hostile to any attempts to hold them liable for what is posted on their platforms, no matter how heinous or potentially libellous the context. All have also been brought to heel by the Trump administration. Their chief executives were only too happy to line up like lapdogs to have their picture taken with Trump at his inauguration, having stumped up large amounts of coin to contribute to the costs of the festivities. • Who's who in Trump's tech bro club Jeff Bezos of Amazon, Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, Tim Cook of Apple, Sundar Pichai of Google and Elon Musk of X (and much else besides) were centre stage while TikTok's Shou Zi Chew also put in an appearance. Earlier that month, Zuckerberg announced that Meta was to get rid of fact checkers and dramatically reduce the amount of what he called 'censorship' on its platforms. Facebook kicked Trump off its platform in the aftermath of the Capitol riots on January 6, 2021, which led Trump to call Facebook 'an enemy of the people'. Once the American people re-elected Trump, however, Zuckerberg was only too keen to ingratiate himself back into the president's capricious good books. Musk donated some $300 million to Trump's election campaign and, notwithstanding the pair's rather hilarious X spat last week, must be delighted at how the administration so clearly aligns with his views on hate speech, ie there is literally nothing that cannot be said on his platform. The US secretary of state, the sycophantic Marco Rubio — a man with no principle he won't change — recently announced a view to impose visa bans on foreign nationals it deems to be censoring Americans. He has rather weirdly tied this into a touchstone for the security of the country, something he also did when supporting Trump's tariffs. The delegation that came to Ireland to dissuade regulators from doing anything that might cause American tech giants even the slightest discomfort was led by one of Rubio's chief advisers, Samuel Samson, who complained that Europe had devolved into a 'hotbed of digital censorship'. He accused Europe of democratic backsliding, whatever that is, claiming that it affected American security and the free speech rights of US citizens and companies. Whatever about security concerns — and it seems there is no policy, no matter how esoteric or insignificant, that the Trump administration won't link to the country's security — Americans have always been protective of their first amendment rights to freedom of expression. Flag-burning, money in politics, pornography, school prayer, mobile phone data, protests at funerals, document leaks and anti-war protests have all gone before the US Supreme Court. While that court has been somewhat haphazard in its judgments over the years, the overriding consistency about free speech cases is that the government can limit free speech if it poses a clear and present danger. Beyond that, almost everything else is fair game. In that context, the Trump administration now wants to flex its free speech muscles globally — and Ireland is as good a place as any to start. Trump started a metaphorical war on tariffs that has caused division in the European Union as individual states try to protect their patches, including Ireland, as Simon Harris, the tanaiste, showed last week in seeking exemptions from the EU in terms of tariff retaliation. Another war over any European plans to enforce new laws on social media platforms is also brewing, with ominous threats of sanctions. When McEntee first mooted the idea of combating incitement to hatred through legislation, she framed it in the context of the fundamental right to freedom of expression. There are completely differing interpretations of how far this fundamental right goes in Europe and America. Under Trump, the US has constantly asserted that it will pursue policies that are in America's interests. Those who come to lobby on its behalf should be told that Ireland and the EU follow their own path.
Times
12 hours ago
- Times
The ‘Untalented Mr Ripley' accused of double murder
A Hollywood fraudster who fooled the Italian government into funding a non-existent film is at the centre of a real-life murder investigation after he was accused of killing his partner and daughter. Francis Charles Kaufmann, 46, fled from Italy to the Greek island of Skiathos after the discovery of the bodies in a park in Rome last month. He has been arrested and awaits extradition. He is, according to the Italian magistrate Flavia Costantini, 'a highly skilled criminal'. The hunt for Kaufmann started on June 7 when the body of Anastasia Trofimova, a 28-year-old Russian, was found hidden in the bushes in Villa Pamphili park. Trofimova is likely to have died of suffocation. Nearby, the body of her 11-month-old daughter was found, possibly strangled. Witnesses had seen the mother and daughter sleeping rough in the park with a man who had also been spotted drunkenly wandering with them around the centre of Rome, and who was identified during a police check as Rexal Ford. This was later found to be a fake name used by the American. The man's final encounter with police was on June 5, when he was seen walking without the woman but carrying the baby in one arm and a bottle of wine in the other. Officers let him go, although investigators suspect Trofimova may have already been dead by then, and the infant had hours left to live. Kaufmann, a Californian, had posed as a film producer in Rome to obtain €863,595 in tax credits from the Italian culture ministry for a film that was never made. The head of the ministry's film department resigned over the incident this week. Using another alias — Matteo Capozzi — Kaufmann claimed to have worked with the American director Clint Eastwood and on the 2017 Ridley Scott film All the Money in the World, which has been denied by the production. Investigators realised they were searching for a fraudster whose life increasingly resembled the film and novel The Talented Mr Ripley, in which an American con artist invents his past and goes on a killing spree in Italy. Kaufmann is said to have met Trofimova while she was on holiday in Malta in 2023. Their daughter was born last summer. Since Trofimova's tourist visa had expired, Kaufmann chartered a yacht to take them to Sicily to avoid customs upon entering Italy. Once in Rome, Kaufmann tried to broker new film deals but appears to have run out of money. When his real name emerged, the Italian daily newspaper La Repubblica tracked down his sister in Los Angeles, who claimed Kaufmann was a dangerous con man. 'Charlie was brilliant, he had a way with people,' she told the newspaper. 'He knew how to empathise immediately. When he lived in Los Angeles he would go to dinner with Hollywood directors, with famous musicians. He knew hundreds of stars of the entertainment world.' Even though he studied film he had only been involved in a few productions, she added. 'He would be capable of selling you your own clothes. He has always been brilliant, handsome, with thousands of women flocking after him,' she said. 'At home we called him the Untalented Mr Ripley.' He also had a dark side, she claimed. 'He is violent, especially when he drinks or takes drugs. His brain goes blank, he cannot manage his anger. He becomes a monster.' She added that after attacking one of his brothers, he changed his name to Rexal Ford and left the US. Italian magistrates have reported that Kaufmann was arrested for assault five times in the US and had spent 120 days in jail. On June 5, the day he was spotted by police with Andromeda, Kaufmann left a voice mail for an Italian contact, claiming Trofimova had left him for a richer man, leaving him with the baby. 'Unfortunately, she is not seeing the big future,' he said, adding: 'Whatever it is, it's all good.' On June 11 Kaufmann took a Ryanair flight to Skiathos and was arrested two days later. He will be brought back to Rome for interrogation next week. In a video conference with an Italian magistrate, he said: 'I am innocent, I didn't kill them.' He also accused the Italian police of being 'mafiosi'. Writing in the arrest warrant, Costantini accused Kaufmann of strangling his daughter, describing it as an act of 'instinctive cruelty' that revealed 'the extreme dangerousness of the man'.
Times
12 hours ago
- Times
Fraud suspects will ‘lose their right to a jury trial'
Defendants charged with fraud and some sexual offences are expected to be among those who will lose their automatic right to a jury trial under the biggest shake-up of the criminal courts in a generation. Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, is said to be considering proposals for fraud cases to be heard by a specialist judge rather than a jury. This is because fraud cases often relate to complex financial information. It is designed to significantly speed up fraud trials, which clog up crown courts given the extra time needed for the prosecution and defence teams to prepare and present their evidence in a way that ordinary members of the public can understand. Fraud cases make up only 1,183 of the 76,957 cases in the crown court backlog or 1.6 per cent but take considerably longer than average trials given their complexity. Under the plans, fraud cases would be heard in a new intermediate court structure in between the magistrates court, which can only hand down sentences of up to 12 months, and the crown court with a jury. The creation of an intermediate court is expected to be recommended in a review of the crisis in crown courts to be published by Sir Brian Leveson, a former appeal judge and head of criminal justice, next week. Cases would be tried by a judge and two magistrates rather than a jury. These would be cases that are too serious for magistrates courts but are no longer deemed serious enough for the crown court in front of a jury. They would no longer be 'either way cases' in which the defendant is able to opt for their case to be heard by a jury in the crown court. The proposals are likely to cause concerns over the threat to Britain's centuries-old principle of jury trials. The establishment of an intermediate court was a key recommendation by The Times Crime and Justice Commission earlier this year. Mahmood is expected to accept this key recommendation in order to significantly reduce the time and cost of a trial, deliver swifter justice to victims and cut the crown courts' record backlog. However, she will not announce which offences will no longer be tried at a crown court until the autumn. Government sources said fraud cases and some sexual offences are likely to be moved to the intermediate court. There are 12,532 sexual offences in the crown courts' backlog. • Criminals will be released early under 'digital prison' plan A government source said: 'It will be for Sir Brian to recommend on the issue, but there is a strong case for fraud trials without juries. They are often related to complex financial information, and so may be better heard by a specialist judge alone. They would be dealt with more quickly that way, which would help reduce the courts backlog that soared under the last government.' There are a large number of cases that can be tried either way and ministers are understood to be planning for most of these offences to be heard in the intermediate court. The Times previously revealed that defendants accused of violent crimes and drug dealing will also be among those to lose their automatic right to a jury. However, the plans to remove fraud and other cases away from jury trials have already faced a backlash from senior legal figures and there are concerns of a fresh battle with barristers, who staged a series of strikes in 2022, which significantly harmed efforts to reduce the courts backlog. Jonathan Fisher KC, who conducted a Home Office-commissioned independent review of the conduct of serious fraud prosecutions, said: 'I do not think the case for abolishing juries in serious fraud trials has been made out.' Fisher pointed out that concerns around complex fraud cases related to disclosure 'where the prosecution has been overwhelmed by the handling of colossal volumes of digitally held unused material resulting in unnecessary and protracted court hearings'. Fisher noted that the recommendations made in his review would 'streamline the process and save considerable court time and resources' without having to move those cases to an intermediate Mills KC, the head of the Bar Council, said that 'changing the fundamental structure of delivering criminal justice' was not 'a principled response' to the backlog in the crown courts. • Courts without juries 'could bring swifter justice' Mills, who leads the professional body for more than 18,000 practising barristers in England and Wales, noted that backlogs were not limited to the crown court and that 300,000 cases were queuing in magistrates' courts. 'Anything that is put forward as a solution needs to take a whole system approach especially in terms of the available resources, so it doesn't simply reshuffle the problem,' Mills said. Mary Prior KC, chair of the Criminal Bar Association, criticised the government for failing to consult it. She said: 'As at the beginning of July we have no real understanding of precisely what is going to be suggested.' There are also concerns that crown courts are not making full use of their sitting days, which is holding back efforts to clear the backlog. Earlier this year Mahmood announced funding for a record 110,000 collective sitting days over this financial year. • Violent crime suspects may lose right to jury to clear court backlog Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: 'Before the government decides to rip up our constitutional settlement, they should start by getting the basics right, including getting courts sitting round the clock.' The changes will be introduced alongside the overhaul of sentencing laws, which will effectively scrap prison sentences of less than 12 months except in certain circumstances. Mahmood will formally introduce these changes in a Sentencing Bill next week. The Ministry of Justice said: 'We know that justice delayed is justice denied … That's why we're backing our courts with record funding and have asked Sir Brian Leveson to recommend once-in-a-generation reform to tackle delays and speed up justice for victims.' You can read the commission's full report below or here
