"Rights Of Voters Being Snatched": Jairam Ramesh On Voter List Revision
Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday criticised the decision of the Election Commission to determine citizenship of Indian nationals, accusing them of doing "NRC through back door" over the poll-body's decision to Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls ahead of the Bihar Assembly election and stated that the constitutional rights of voters were being snatched.
He further questioned why the exercise was being conducted four to five months before the Bihar assembly polls, further stating that there was an atmosphere of fear in Bihar.
"The constitutional rights of the voters are being snatched...The matter is pending before the Supreme Court...It is not the responsibility of the Election Commission to prove citizenship. Why is this exercise being conducted four to five months before the assembly polls?... There is an atmosphere of fear in Bihar..." Mr Ramesh told ANI.
Earlier on July 15, All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) president Asaduddin Owaisi has questioned the authority of the Election Commission of India to determine citizenship of Indian nationals, accusing them of doing "NRC through back door" over the poll-body's decision to Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls ahead of the Bihar Assembly election.
Speaking with ANI, Mr Owaisi said. "Who gave the ECI the power to determine whether someone is a citizen or not? Our party was the first to say that SIR is NRC through the back door."
Mr Owaisi also questioned the result of the last SIR conducted in Bihar in 2003"We demand the number of those BLOs. We will ask our party members to meet those BLOs and ask them where the people from Nepal, Myanmar and Bangladesh are that they are talking about... The SIR was conducted in 2003. How many foreign nationals were revealed at that time?"
Mr Owaisi continued his verbal tirade not just on the ruling alliance and ECI but also on the INDIA bloc by ruling out the possibility of joining the alliance and accusing it of suppressing the new leaders.
"One-sided love is not going to happen. The people of Bihar should understand that the accusations that were made against us were based on lies and were made because they do not want a leader of the poor and oppressed people to become their political leadership," Mr Owaisi said while speaking to ANI.
"They just want you to remain their slaves, to walk behind them with your head bowed," Mr Owaisi added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
ETtech Explainer: X, Centre at loggerheads over social media misuse
In a legal battle on accountability versus liberty, the government of India and Elon Musk's microblogging platform X are slugging it out in the Karnataka High Court. At the eye of the storm are the government's content-blocking orders and issues arising out of them. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Indian government and Elon Musk's X are engaged in a legal battle before the Karnataka High Court over the question of accountability versus liberty. The microblogging platform has argued that the government's content-blocking orders hinder its business. In response, the government has advocated for justified action against misleading content on social matter has raised questions over the Information Technology Act, 2000 provisions that mandate taking down problematic content and grant 'safe harbour' to intermediaries that host take a look at arguments set forth so far by both parties and their prospective implications:In its plea before the Karnataka High Court, X has asked for the scrapping of Rule 3(1)(d) of the Information Technology Rules as unconstitutional. It also wants the court to declare that the government cannot take down content under Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act, 2000, and only the procedure under Section 69A of the Act, read with the IT Rules, allows 3(1)(d) of the IT Rules, 2021, mandates that intermediaries should take down unlawful content following a court order or appropriate government notification under Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act, 2000, which rescinds 'safe harbour' against criminal liability granted to such entities if they fail to take down information after being notified.X has been vocal about takedown orders from the government, calling them unjustified and detrimental to its business in a hearing earlier this month, KG Raghavan, representing X in the matter, had told the court that every "Tom, Dick, and Harry" government official had been authorised to issue content takedown orders, which evoked sharp rebuke from the government's the legal spat is unfolding as Musk is looking to launch and expand his companies—Tesla and Starlink—in Indian government has been proposing regulations for content on social media platforms to curb the proliferation of harmful the central government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stated that X has been trying to shirk its responsibility by hiding behind 'safe harbour' provisions. The platform allowing unlawful content in the name of free speech is endangering democracy, Mehta the hearing on Friday, the law officer presented before the court a verified account of the 'Supreme Court of Karnataka' on X to make the point that creating fake accounts and getting them verified are easy on the platform."We have created an AI-generated video where Your Lordship appears to speak against the nation. It's unlawful, but it doesn't fit any category under Section 69A," Mehta told the single-judge bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna, pressing his point that many instances of online harm fall into a regulatory grey explained that the legal framework includes both severe and minimal interventions and advocated for cautious, proportionate responses in certain court will now hear the matter next on July the wake of the Pahalgam terrorist attack in April, several social media accounts across platforms were blocked by the Indian government to check the spread of misinformation amid heightened bilateral tensions. While the accounts were primarily from Pakistan, some Indian accounts were affected in the action as May 9, X blocked its own Global Government Affairs account, a day after revealing that it was asked by the government to restrict 8,000 accounts of prominent news organisations and individuals. The social media platform said the government threatened significant fines and imprisonment of its employees upon failure to comply. The account was later July 6, official accounts of the global news portal Reuters and Reuters Global were withheld in India. While the IT Ministry denied issuing any order to this effect, X said that it was asked to block 2,355 accounts, along with the two from Reuters, under Section 69A of the IT response, the government blamed X for delaying the restoration of the two accounts and denied its claims that it wanted to block any international news ongoing spat has also brought into focus the 'safe harbour' accorded to internet intermediaries against third-party content they host. In his arguments, Mehta has noted that safe harbour is not an absolute right but a privilege granted to intermediaries who adhere to a written submission to a parliamentary committee, the government had said that it is reconsidering the concept of safe harbour to curb the spread of fake news. Changes in provisions would affect all social media platforms operating in India, not just X.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is Global South ready to lead—Or just done being ignored?
'We were never voiceless. You just refused to listen.' This silent refrain echoes from Accra to Jakarta, from the favelas of Rio to the corridors of Delhi. The world's power architecture, once held firmly by the hands of the Global North, now quivers as tectonic shifts emerge. But as the Global South finds its voice amplified on the world stage—through economic leverage, demographic might, and climate urgency—the question is no longer if it can lead, but whether it wants to. Has the Global South arrived at the helm—or is it simply done being dismissed? The great recalibration: Why 2025 feels like a pivot year In 2025, the term Global South is no longer code for 'underdeveloped.' It's shorthand for undervalued—and now ascendant. According to the World Bank's Global Economic Prospects Report (June 2025): Emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) are projected to grow at 4.5% this year—nearly twice the rate of advanced economies (2.3%). India alone will contribute 16.2% to global growth in 2025, surpassing the EU bloc (14.9%) for the first time. ASEAN economies together are now the fourth-largest economic bloc, overtaking Japan. South-South trade now accounts for approximately 33% of total global trade, though trade in goods has recently contracted by 7% to $5.7 trillion, reflecting volatility in global supply networks (UNCTAD, 2025). Yet, this moment isn't defined solely by statistics. It's powered by assertion—and a mounting refusal to be seen as a footnote in someone else's economic story. Redrawing the world map—One rebuff at a time This isn't noise—it's navigation. The Global South is no longer asking to be seen; it's redesigning the frame. With India at the helm, the 2024 expansion of BRICS to include Egypt, Iran, Ethiopia, and the UAE was less about membership and more about momentum. BRICS+ now speaks for 46% of the global population and commands 32% of global GDP, fundamentally tilting the scales of influence. At COP30 in Brasília (March 2025), assertive Indian diplomacy, backed by African and Latin American allies, blocked diluted climate pledges from the Global North and clinched a $50 billion binding Loss and Damage Fund—not positioned as aid, but as owed accountability. Meanwhile, Africa's ambitions are no longer theoretical. With its digital economy expanding at 11% annually, the continent is rewriting its future. Kibera Tech City in Nairobi, once overlooked, has emerged as a ground-up AI innovation zone rooted in local resilience. Across the Indian Ocean, Bengaluru and Hyderabad are quietly architecting the Global South's digital DNA—from semiconductors to sovereign AI stacks—indigenously developed and locally governed systems—turning India into a strategic innovation corridor between East and West. These aren't just responses—they are strategic assertions of autonomy, reshaping global power through precision, not protest. Leading, but differently: The southern style of stewardship Leadership, as defined by the West, has long revolved around dominance. But the Global South isn't interested in mimicking. It's innovating. India's Vaccine Diplomacy 2.0 now includes mRNA tech transfer agreements with 22 low-income countries—driven by strategic solidarity. Indonesia and Brazil, once labelled resource exporters, are spearheading a tropical green alliance, commanding 78% of global rubber and 52% of soy production, asserting commodity sovereignty. The UN Global Digital Compact, slated for signing in late 2025, saw Chile and Ghana co-authoring the data sovereignty clause—insisting on algorithmic fairness for AI tools deployed in the Global South. This is not the South asking for a seat at the table. It is crafting its own table, one that trades power for purpose. Growth with fragility But beneath this renaissance lie unresolved realities that must be reckoned with: Debt stress at historic levels Global public debt has now crossed $100 trillion, with developing countries owing over $31 trillion. External public debt service for Global South nations reached $487 billion in 2023, while net interest payments globally rose to $921 billion in 2024. More than 3.4 billion people now live in countries spending more on interest than on health or education. The world's poorest 75 nations owe $22 billion to China in 2025 alone, under the weight of Belt and Road-related repayments. In Africa, 57% of the population lives in countries where debt servicing exceeds public investment in core social services. This is not just economic distress—it is structural inequity. The very systems through which the South is expected to lead are shackling it. Trade and finance imbalances While global trade expanded by $300 billion in the first half of 2025, developing economies saw a 2% decline in imports, indicating uneven recovery. Africa's intra-regional trade, however, surged by 16%, showing regional resilience amid global fragmentation. Global FDI dropped by 11% in 2024, yet Africa posted record highs, though largely driven by extractives and infrastructure—a volatile foundation. Official net financial flows to developing economies turned negative, as debt repayments outpaced aid and investment. This dual reality—of rising ambition and restricted access to capital—defines the paradox of the Global South's moment. From dependency to interdependence: A Southern remix of global power The future isn't North-led. It's network-led. A Southern-led multilateralism is emerging—messier, more localised, but grounded in dignity and innovation. Latin American feminist diplomacy is reshaping peace narratives and environmental treaties. Bangladesh's solar microgrid exports are decentralising power in Sub-Saharan Africa. India's digital public infrastructure, including Aadhaar and UPI-like models, is now being adapted in Southeast Asia and Africa, establishing a tech stack rooted in inclusion. This isn't the Global South catching up. It's changing the race entirely. From margins to mandate To ask if the Global South is ready to lead is to cling to a dated worldview—one where leadership is something bestowed from above. But in 2025, leadership is something built from below. Yes, the Global South still battles internal contradictions, fiscal pressures, and geopolitical risks. But it no longer waits for permission. It redefines participation, reimagines prosperity, and reclaims its narrative. It isn't just knocking at the door. It is reconstructing the house. And if the old world refuses to listen, the Global South will speak louder—through trade, through treaties, through technology—and in a language it never needed permission to use. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
"A Party That Preaches 'Maa, Mati, Manush..": PM's RG Kar Jab At Trinamool
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday accused Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and her Trinamool Congress of shielding the guilty in the RG Kar rape-murder case. In Bengal's Durgapur to launch Rs 5,000 crore in oil, gas, electricity, road, and rail projects, the Prime Minister used the occasion to attack his arch-rival in next year's election and said incidents of violent crime against women in Bengal - including the rape and murder of a junior doctor at Kolkata's RG Kar Hospital in August last year - is a source of "pain and anger". In a no-holds barred attack on the Trinamool, Mr Modi warned Bengal voters the state could only develop if his Bharatiya Janata Party wins next year's election, and pointed to Bengalis migrating to other states in search of jobs and the overall lack of investment to make his point. He then pivoted to the issue of women's safety, which has underpinned Ms Banerjee's recent electoral campaigns. Women voters are seen as a Trinamool stronghold. In fact, the party's slogan for the 2009 federal and 2011 state elections was 'maa, mati, manush', which translates as 'mother, motherland, people', and has carried over since. But the Prime Minister used recent horrific attacks on women to criticise Ms Banerjee's track record. 'The mistreatment of women by a party that preaches 'maa, mati, manush' deeply pains and angers me. It is disheartening to witness such actions in the land of Kadambini Ganguly," he droned, referring to the first Indian woman trained in contemporary medical practice. "Today even hospitals are not safe for young women... the Trinamool has spared no effort in protecting the perpetrators (of the RG Kar rape-murder case)," the Prime Minister declared. The RG Kar case broke in August last year. The body of a young woman, a junior doctor, was found inside a seminar room on the hospital campus. She had been raped and mutilated. The horrific discovery prompted a firestorm of protests, accusations, and counteraccusations, with Ms Banerjee and the Trinamool accused of shielding the accused, Sanjay Roy, and the police accused of mishandling the inquiry and evidence, allegedly under political pressure. The Trinamool was also attacked over an incident of vandalism of the crime scene during a protest march; the BJP claimed Trinamool 'goons' had been told to destroy evidence. The Trinamool firmly denied any such charge. The BJP and Congress - nominally an ally of the Trinamool - both attacked the ruling party, and doctors launched protests nationwide, demanding better protection from goons and criminals. Eventually the case was transferred to the CBI, and Roy was tried and convicted of the rape and murder, and sentenced to life imprisonment, not death as sought by the doctor's family and Mamata Banerjee. No other arrests were made in connection with that crime.
