Sebi issues new ESG debt framework to regulate social, sustainability, and linked bonds
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
To encourage responsible finance and curb "purpose-washing," capital markets regulator Sebi has released a detailed framework for issuing and listing ESG (Environment, Social and Governance) debt securities, excluding green bonds.The new norms, which came into effect on June 5, aim to enhance transparency, credibility, and accountability in the ESG debt market.According to Sebi, ESG debt securities will now include three major categories apart from green bonds — social bonds, sustainability bonds , and sustainability-linked bonds . These instruments must follow recognized global standards such as the ICMA Principles, Climate Bonds Standard, ASEAN Standards, or any methodology notified by Indian financial regulators.Social bonds are meant to raise money for projects with a direct social impact, such as affordable housing, clean water, education, or food security. Sustainability bonds combine both environmental and social objectives, while sustainability-linked bonds are performance-based instruments, where the financial terms are tied to the issuer's achievement of pre-set sustainability targets.Issuers of such bonds will need to make detailed disclosures before and after the issue. They must outline the specific projects they intend to fund, explain how they will track fund usage, and appoint independent third-party reviewers to verify claims. Post-listing, companies must share impact reports, usage of proceeds, and KPIs in their annual reports. This is aimed at curbing the misuse of ESG labels — known as 'purpose-washing' — where companies falsely claim to be funding ESG projects.Sebi has also made it clear that companies listed on SME platforms and looking to issue ESG debt will need to follow bi-annual disclosure norms, as specified in the circular's annexures. The regulator has empowered ESG rating agencies and certified reviewers to ensure proper assessments of bond impact and target adherence.Importantly, if any ESG funds are found misused or the projects do not align with their stated purpose, companies may be forced to redeem the securities early.This regulatory push comes at a time when ESG investing is gaining traction in India. By aligning local frameworks with international norms, Sebi aims to build investor confidence and deepen India's ESG debt market responsibly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Yali Capital closes Rs 893 crore deeptech fund
Bengaluru: Bengaluru-based Yali Capital closed its debut deep tech-focused fund at Rs 893 crore, exceeding its original Rs 500 crore target and Rs 310 crore greenshoe option. The Sebi-registered Category II AIF plans to deploy the fund across early-stage and late-stage investments in sectors such as semiconductors, AI, robotics, aerospace, and smart manufacturing. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Founding managing partner Ganapathy Subramaniam told TOI that the fundraise was completed entirely through word-of-mouth, without any bankers or distributors. "Nearly 78% of our capital came from India – entrepreneurs, family offices, fund-of-funds like Sidbi's FFS and Self-Reliant India Fund, and corporate backers including Infosys and Qualcomm," he said. The fund's leadership team also committed Rs 15 crore each to the vehicle. Yali Capital operates through a dual structure comprising a Sebi-registered AIF and a GIFT City-based feeder vehicle to attract global capital. The firm has already backed five startups and plans to invest in three more by the end of the year. The average ticket size ranges from $2 million to $10 million, with ownership targets varying from 20% at seed stage to as low as 5% in late-stage deals. The fund will allocate 70% of capital to early-stage bets and the remaining 30% to growth-stage investments, primarily in companies at Series D and beyond. "Of the early-stage capital, about 45% will go into first institutional rounds and 25% into follow-ons," Subramaniam said, adding that the fund will not participate in secondary transactions. Subramaniam, who previously led and backed deep tech companies such as Cosmic Circuits, IdeaForge, and Tonbo Imaging, said the team brings strong operator experience and intends to work closely with founders. "Today alone, two of our portfolio startups spent three hours each with us. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now We're not just capital providers; we want to help execute the vision," he said. While Yali's early-stage focus will be on experienced or university-affiliated founders in deep tech, the late-stage strategy leans heavily on partner Mathew Cyriac's track record of taking companies like MTAR Technologies and Data Patterns public. "India has several deep tech firms doing hundreds of crores in revenue but struggling to scale. We want to come in, back them with capital and execution, and take them public," Subramaniam said. Asked about sectoral depth, he flagged manufacturing, robotics, and chip design as areas with strong founder readiness. "India is the world's second-largest chip design talent pool. The challenge is converting that into product companies that can compete globally," he said. The firm expects to announce a large investment in the chip design space in the coming weeks. While India's domestic deep tech market remains early, Subramaniam said the LP response and founder momentum point to a long-term inflection. "The ecosystem is maturing. There's plenty of pipeline. Now it's about patient capital and execution."
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Shake off that boardom
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Sebi has mandated annual board performance reviews for listed companies with the intent of improving governance standards and ensuring agile and effective boards. But much like routine health checks, board evaluations are usually pushed back to another day, rushed through like a Monday morning breakfast, or treated as yet another compliance hassle. Very few boards treat it as meaningful methods of evaluation involving paper-based surveys, interviews and internal reviews have mostly fallen short. They are time-consuming, heavily reliant on subjective judgement, and reports tend to gather dust after board meetings. Thankfully, digital transformation is slowly but steadily bringing rigour, relevance and repeatability to board is not just simplifying the process but enhancing its quality as well. From board portals to AI-enhanced analytics, tech is shaking up the performance evaluations process of boards. Here are four shifts India Inc should know while preparing for the future:Periodic rituals to continuous insight Traditional board evaluations follow a rigid cycle of once in every three years for in-depth reviews, with lighter (symbolic?) annual quickies. With digital tools, evaluations can become more frequent, flexible and embedded into the rhythm of board Europe, a clear trend is emerging where more boards are moving to annual evaluations, sometimes with focused interim reviews in between. These 'in-betweeners' can be tailored to specific committees or themes such as audit oversight, strategy alignment or digital Indian enterprises, especially those facing major market shifts, or family-to-professional transitions, such agility can be a game-changer. Digital platforms reduce the cost and administrative burden of evaluations, and allow directors to evaluate performance in a way that feels relevant, not regulatory judgement to data-driven oversight One of the biggest criticisms of today's board evaluations is their subjectivity. When directors assess each other, implicit biases, interpersonal politics and unwritten hierarchies can creep in. Results can feel vague, cautious or sanitised, which defeats the very purpose of the exercise. Technology helps move the needle from opinion to platforms capture structured data aligned with clearly defined board KPIs, including strategic execution, financial oversight, risk management, succession planning and stakeholder engagement. More importantly, they enable year-on-year tracking, which is consistent digital tools, companies can build longitudinal data, making it possible to spot performance trends over time. In the past, each evaluation might have involved a new consultant with a different lens, making comparisons difficult. In India, where regulators, proxy advisory firms and institutional investors are increasingly scrutinising board behaviour, data-driven evaluations offer both credibility and clarity. They also align well with Sebi's push for transparency and long-term value templates to tailored evaluations All boards are not created equal. A large, listed conglomerate, a promoter-led tech unicorn, and a PSU each has vastly different governance challenges. And, yet, until recently, many digital evaluation platforms used 'one-size-fits-all' questionnaires that failed to capture the finer details. This is tools allow deep customisation. Evaluations can now be structured around company lifecycle stage, industry dynamics, board composition, strategic priorities and even anticipated disruptions. A logistics company undergoing digital transformation may want questions on tech-savviness and cybersecurity oversight. A manufacturing board preparing for succession may focus on talent pipeline and leadership India, where board diversity, independent director effectiveness and ESG oversight will all be in sharp focus soon, tailored evaluations are especially useful. They allow boards to gather input beyond the boardroom. Confidential feedback from CFOs, compliance officers and external auditors can highlight blind spots in committee functioning. A board chair may believe the audit committee is effective, but what does the internal audit team think? Tech tools enable this 360° feedback in a secure, anonymised emerging AI Theoretically, AI holds immense promise in enhancing board evaluations. Algorithms can analyse meeting minutes to flag overlooked agenda items, assess time spent on key issues, detect redundancy across committees, and even predict future director skill needs based on corporate strategy. If a company is entering new markets or industries, AI could help assess whether the board has the requisite global experience or regulatory could also objectively benchmark director contributions by analysing attendance, speaking time, committee involvement and follow-through on action adoption remains limited. Company secretaries cite internal policies that restrict the use of external AI tools. Concerns around data security, confidentiality and compliance with DPDP Act make boards wary. As AI tools mature and governance around data-sharing strengthens, selective use of AI in internal evaluations may become more acceptable. Striking a balance between AI analytics and human judgements will be Inc boards are under increasing pressure to perform, not just from Sebi but from shareholders, rating agencies and civil society as well. As businesses grow more complex and stakeholder expectations rise, the traditional approach to board evaluation simply won't suffice. Board evaluations done right are corporate a world where opacity is liability, data is destiny. As a veteran puts it, 'Great boards aren't born. They're beta-tested.'
Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
Sebi proposes to ease disclosure norms for debenture issuers
India's capital markets regulator proposed easier disclosure obligations for issuers of listed non-convertible securities, including debentures and hybrid instruments, as it seeks to reduce compliance costs and align domestic norms with global standards. The amendments proposed on Friday would eliminate the requirement for listed entities to dispatch hard copies of annual report summaries to debenture holders who have not registered their email addresses—a legacy obligation that has persisted even as equity market rules have moved decisively online. In its place, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) suggests that issuers send only a letter containing a web link and a quick-response (QR) code, allowing bondholders to access the full annual report digitally. The regulator said this would 'minimize the usage of paper and facilitate 'Go green' and sustainability initiatives of a listed entity." Also Read: Sebi seeks brokers' input on deepening markets after Jane Street crackdown The draft also clarifies timelines: for firms under the Companies Act, 2013, existing statutory deadlines will continue to apply, while for all other issuers—including statutory bodies and trusts—a minimum 21-day notice period is proposed, 'in line with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, for the sake of parity". The consultation paper invites public comments until 15 August. Experts back modernization efforts Sebi's latest move is part of a broader push to bring Indian markets into the 21st century, said Akshaya Bhansali, managing partner at Mindspright Legal. 'Sebi's July 2025 consultation paper is an important regulatory milestone aimed at modernizing India's disclosure system and easing corporate compliance." 'The proposal to require dematerialization of securities for corporate actions like splits, consolidations, and schemes of arrangement is a progressive step that aligns with global best practices and improves investor protection. By eliminating outdated provisions such as physical share transfers and proof-of-delivery requirements, Sebi is signalling a shift toward digital-first governance," Bhansali said. Bhansali added that these changes not only improve operational efficiency for listed entities but also reduce the risk of fraud and error. "The emphasis on electronic payments and streamlined disclosures reflects Sebi's commitment to ease of doing business while maintaining robust market integrity." She suggested that by requiring digital delivery and standardizing disclosure timelines, Sebi is making it easier for both domestic and international investors to assess and compare Indian debt securities. Boost to India's bond markets Ketan Mukhija, senior partner at Burgeon Law, noted the acute compliance burden faced by leveraged entities and large debt issuers. 'If this paper is adopted, governance norms for debt and hybrid securities will be reduced, which is positive as it could stimulate more activity in India's debt market," he said. 'Because debt market activity is not that active in India. There is a lot of equity. So, I think it will definitely induce that business-friendly environment in terms of greater activity in the debt market." Also Read: Sebi's gold, silver ETF local pricing plan draws calls for benchmark clarity Mukhija pointed to the significance of harmonizing disclosure and materiality event rules across asset classes. 'The disclosure requirements, materiality event—they have come at par with the equity kind of listed companies," he said. 'For equity, you have to give disclosures in XBRL, you have this timeline, this format, this way. It has become the same for debt. That's a very good point of uniformity. The more clarity and simplicity there is, the more investor confidence there is." "The activity of the debt market will definitely increase," Mukhija said, adding the proposals would resonate with both domestic and foreign institutional investors, who have long sought clarity and simplicity in Indian debt market regulations. Sebi's paper highlights that issuer financials are already available in the public domain—on company and stock exchange websites—and that further digitalization will only enhance transparency. 'It is also pertinent to note that the financials of the issuer are already in public domain viz. website of the issuer and the stock exchanges where the securities are listed." The regulator also points to previous public feedback, which cited 'relaxation from sending a physical copy of financials will lead to saving of cost and prevent wastage of paper," and that this 'would lead to regulatory consistency and ease of doing business." The current proposals build on temporary relaxations introduced during the Covid-19 pandemic, when Sebi and the ministry of corporate affairs allowed virtual meetings and digital dispatch of financial documents. Those measures were extended repeatedly, most recently through September 2025. Also Read: Viceroy vs Vedanta: Short-seller rebuts former Chief Justice's legal opinion Sebi's expert committee has now recommended making them permanent, arguing that digital communication should be the default for all listed entities.
