UN admits internet conference panel was edited after Saudi complaint
The UN's Internet Governance Forum (IGF) was accused by Human Rights Watch on Thursday of censoring critical comments made by Saudi Arabian activist Lina al-Hathloul during the event at IGF's conference in the Saudi capital in December.
Asked whether the IGF had been prompted to act by Saudi Arabia, an IGF spokesperson told Middle East Eye it had 'received a request from the host nation' regarding an alleged violation of its code of conduct.
The spokesperson said it was standard procedure that the host 'may raise concerns about adherence to rules agreed upon by all participants'.
'The Secretariat's role in such cases is to review the concerns in an impartial manner, engage with the concerned party, and seek a solution that adheres to the IGF's commitment to multistakeholder dialogue.'
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The involvement of Human Rights Watch and Alqst - a UK-based organisation that campaigns for human rights in Saudi Arabia - in the IGF's conference in Riyadh was considered significant because of the kingdom's repressive track record.
Hathloul, Alqst's head of advocacy, spoke remotely at the panel event co-hosted by HRW and Alqst because of concerns for her safety.
But last month, the IGF published an edited version of the panel on YouTube in which significant portions of Hathloul's comments as well as a moment of silence for human rights defenders punished for expressing themselves online, including several held in Saudi Arabia's prisons, were removed.
In their place was a note saying they had been removed for violating the IGF's code of conduct, particularly a section in which participants are asked to focus remarks on issues rather than on 'individuals, groups, organisations or governments, and to refrain from personal or ad hominem attacks'.
The comments that now appear where many of Lina al-Hathloul's remarks were made during the 16 December panel at the UN IGF in Riyadh (YouTube)
HRW also said that UN officials told Joey Shea, the organisation's Saudi Arabia researcher who moderated the panel, that the Saudi government had complained and asked the UN to revoke her accreditation for the conference.
The officials referred to an HRW video that cited the case of imprisoned retired Saudi Arabian teacher Mohammed al-Ghamdi "as the basis of the host country's complaint", and also said that Shea's naming of specific human rights defenders during the panel might have constituted a code of conduct violation.
Saudi Arabia plans to execute Shia youths on charges UN deems 'arbitrary' Read More »
The UN officials told Shea they would discuss whether to revoke her accreditation badge with UN headquarters in New York, HRW said. Her badge was ultimately not revoked.
HRW has said that Shea's mention of specific detained human rights activists did not comprise a 'personal or ad hominem attack' and that she did not mention which governments had imprisoned the activists.
The UN IGF noted on Friday that it had 'responded to an infringement' of its code of conduct by speaking with the civil society organisation representative concerned 'and arriving at a mutually agreed solution'.
'No retaliation in any form occurred. The secretariat's actions were taken to uphold the spirit of the rules, which is to foster democratic, multistakeholder discussions,' a spokesperson said.
The spokesperson also said that the IGF remained 'dedicated to creating a forum where diverse perspectives, including those of civil society organisations, are respected and heard'.
'The presence and active participation of human rights organisations such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, who were likely present in a major meeting setting in Saudi Arabia for the first time, reflect the IGF's broad commitment to these values.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tahawul Tech
an hour ago
- Tahawul Tech
X criticises the UK's Online Safety Act
X, the social media platform owned by Elon Musk, has criticised the UK's Online Safety Act, citing unnecessary bureaucracy and a threat to free speech. In a statement, X criticised the breadth of the law's enforcement, stating that its 'laudable intentions' are at risk of being overridden by regulatory overreach. 'When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety',' the company posted on X. 'It is fair to ask if UK citizens were equally aware of the trade-off being made.' X said the rollout has come with 'unnecessarily tight' timelines and significant compliance costs. Despite meeting the obligations under the law, the company said it continues to face threats of fines and enforcement, pushing platforms toward 'over-censorship.' The Online Safety Act introduced wide-ranging rules for platforms including X, Meta, YouTube and TikTok as well as pornography sites to enforce age verification and remove harmful and illegal content. While the government maintains the measures are essential to protecting children and users, it has attracted criticism from free-speech activists. More than 470,000 people have signed a petition calling for the law's withdrawal, citing privacy concerns as users are required to upload personal data for age verification. However, the government confirmed earlier this week that it has 'no plans to repeal' the legislation. Technology secretary Peter Kyle defended the law in a post on X earlier this week, stating that those opposing the Online Safety Act are 'on the side of predators'. Heavy-handed approach In its statement, Musk's platform also flagged concerns about a new National Internet Intelligence Investigations unit established within the British Police to monitor online content for signs of unrest and hate speech, warning it could further curb free speech. 'Instead of specifically and collaboratively addressing a problem everyone agrees needs to be solved', X stated that regulators have adopted a 'heavy-handed approach by rapidly increasing enforcement resources, adding layers of bureaucratic oversight'. 'It's safe to say that significant changes must take place to achieve these objectives in the UK,' the platform concluded, calling for a balanced approach to ensuring online safety alongside personal liberties and innovation. Source: Mobile World Live Image Credit: X
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
‘We Are Inclusion' congress to convene in Sharjah
The 18th Inclusion International World Congress 2025, themed 'We are Inclusion,' to address international legal frameworks for people with intellectual disabilities will be held for the first time in the region from Sept.15 - 17, 2025 at Sharjah Expo Centre. The 3-day conference will bring together a host of experts and specialists in disability affairs, alongside representatives from civil society organisations, international human rights and development entities, legislators, and decision-makers from around the world. This collective effort aims to review existing legislation and assess its alignment with the rapidly evolving social and technological landscape. The congress held under the patronage of His Highness Dr Sheikh Sultan Bin Mohammed Al Qasimi, Supreme Council Member and Ruler of Sharjah, is organised in collaboration between Sharjah City for Humanitarian Services (SCHS) and 'Inclusion International,' with media and logistical partnership with the Sharjah Government Media Bureau (SGMB), as well as support from a broad network of strategic local partners. Registration is now available through the official website The congress aims to strengthen legal frameworks and modernise legislative concepts through a holistic approach aligned with sustainable development policies, while respecting diverse cultural and social contexts. It also seeks to equip policymakers with contemporary approaches that move beyond humanitarian concerns towards a comprehensive developmental vision, ensuring the full and active participation of persons with intellectual disabilities in all aspects of life. Most notably, the congress will address the UN's Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, as well as the UAE's federal law No. 29 of 2006, which protects the rights of people of determination. The event will also highlight a number of UN recommendations and human rights principles that serve as essential references for shaping inclusive development policies. This forms part of an expanded programme tackling critical topics affecting persons with disabilities, such as inclusive education, family support, labour market access, legal empowerment, healthcare, community planning, self-advocacy expansion, and capacity building for field organisations. This broad scope emphasises the congress's comprehensive approach and reinforces its powerful legal and humanitarian message. Held once every four years, 'We Are Inclusion' World Congress is organised by 'Inclusion International.' It is one of the most prominent global platforms for dialogue on the future of policies supporting persons with intellectual disabilities.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Trump administration says US states won't be denied disaster funds for boycotting Israel
US President Donald Trump 's administration on Monday denied a report that said states and cities will not receive funding to prepare for natural disasters if they choose to boycott Israeli companies. Reuters, quoting grant notices posted last week, reported that states and cities must certify that they will not cut commercial relations with Israeli companies to receive the money from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The condition reportedly applies to at least $1.9 billion on which states rely for search and rescue equipment, emergency manager salaries and back-up power systems, among other expenses. "There is no Fema requirement tied to Israel in any current NOFO [Notice of Funding Opportunity]. No states have lost funding, and no new conditions have been imposed. Fema grants remain governed by existing law and policy and not political litmus tests," a Department of Homeland Security representative said in a statement to The National. In an earlier statement, the representative said: 'DHS will enforce all anti-discrimination laws and policies, including as it relates to the BDS [Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions] movement, which is expressly grounded in anti-Semitism. Those who engage in racial discrimination should not receive a single dollar of federal funding." The BDS campaign is designed to put economic pressure on Israel to end the occupation of the Palestinian territories. More than 30 states already have anti-BDS laws or policies, according to Newsweek. Fema will require major cities to agree to the Israel policy to receive a cut of $553.5 million set aside to prevent terrorism in dense areas, according to the Reuters report. It is apparently the latest example of the Trump administration making use of routine federal funding to advance its political message at the state level. Fema said in July that states will be required to spend part of their federal terrorism prevention funds on helping the government to arrest migrants, which is an administration priority. Mr Trump has said that Fema should be eliminated, and that states should take on more responsibility for responding to and preparing for disasters, including extreme weather.
