You won't believe what the Atari 2600 from 1977 did to ChatGPT, and Copilot while scaring Gemini
Caruso wrote that "ChatGPT got absolutely wrecked on the beginner level." He also explained how this apparent upset could take place. "Despite being given a baseline board layout to identify pieces, ChatGPT confused rooks for bishops, missed pawn forks, and repeatedly lost track of where pieces were," he stated. ChatGPT recognized that its loss was an upset and blamed it on the abstract icons used by Atari to represent chess pieces. However, even after changing to standard chess notation, the chatbot "made enough blunders to get laughed out of a 3rd grade chess club."
The underpowered Atari 2600 is a chess master when playing AI opponents. | Image credit-Amazon
Caruso said that during an hour and a half, he had to stop ChatGPT from making bad moves and help it understand where the pieces belonging to both sides were located. Several times per turn ChatGPT had to have its awareness of the board reset. The AI chatbot promised multiple times that its playing would improve if the game started over from the beginning. Finally, ChatGPT conceded the match.
Interestingly, it was ChatGPT that suggested the contest. During a conversation about chess, ChatGPT said that it was a strong player and could easily beat Atari Video Chess, which thinks only 1-2 moves ahead. ChatGPT was curious about how fast it could win. Instead, we know it lost.
At the start of this month, the Atari 2600 game console took on another modern AI powerhouse in a game of chess. Microsoft's Copilot thought that the Atari 2600 was no match for it. Even though it said that it could think 10-15 moves ahead of the Atari, Copilot said that it would stick to thinking 3-5 moves ahead because the Atari console makes "suboptimal moves. Copilot also said that, unlike ChatGPT, "I make a strong effort to remember previous moves and maintain continuity in gameplay, so our match should be much smoother."
As it turned out, Caruso had to send Copilot a screenshot of the board after every move the Atari 2600 made. The Microsoft AI chatbot admitted that it had the same spatial memory gaps as ChatGPT. Despite this shortcoming, Copilot said that it could still analyze the board and make good moves. Well, apparently it couldn't as the Atari 2600 made it two straight victories against an AI opponent.
Caruso then spoke with Gemini to set up a match. The Google-developed AI, like ChatGPT and Copilot, thought it had an easy victory in the bag. However, Gemini then admitted that it had hallucinated its chess-playing abilities. That left Gemini to make the only correct decision it could in light of its admission. "Canceling the match is likely the most time-efficient and sensible decision," said Gemini.
While Gemini never did get a chance to take on the Atari 2600, Caruso was impressed with how the chatbot had the insight to know its own limitations.
It seems incredible that a game console 48 years old using woefully underpowered technology, could beat two AI chatbots with cutting-edge tech and scare a third one into cancelling a match. But this is not really the upset that you might think it is. Senior Software Engineer Kyle Witeck wrote, "So...you're comparing language models to a chess bot that was designed to play chess...classic...AI is not intelligent and not AI. It patterns and guesses from a system designed on language. Token-driven guesses." Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase This offer is not available in your area.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
22 minutes ago
- Phone Arena
NFL Sunday Ticket is suddenly cheaper on YouTube TV, but only for some
Receive the latest Google news Subscribe By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy The fact that some users are getting exclusive discounts only after canceling has raised questions. There's no formal opt-in or visible banner on YouTube TV's platform promoting these deals. Instead, they seem to be part of an unannounced retention effort, sent quietly via email. That could leave many loyal subscribers feeling left out or frustrated that they aren't eligible for the same savings. As someone who subscribed to YouTube TV back when it launched, I can relate to those deciding to cancel. The service once stood out as an affordable and flexible cable alternative. Over the years, though, prices have climbed steadily. Today, it's often more expensive than some traditional TV bundles, especially when adding premium sports content like NFL Sunday Ticket. The decision to offer steep discounts only to lapsed users also doesn't sit well with everyone. It may encourage users to cancel just to receive a better deal later. And for subscribers who stick around year after year, the lack of similar offers can feel like a penalty for staying loyal. Ideally, streaming platforms like YouTube TV would focus on upfront transparency and equal treatment across their user base. Until then, the NFL Sunday Ticket deal might be a nice bonus—if you're lucky enough to receive it. The fact that some users are getting exclusive discounts only after canceling has raised questions. There's no formal opt-in or visible banner on YouTube TV's platform promoting these deals. Instead, they seem to be part of an unannounced retention effort, sent quietly via email. That could leave many loyal subscribers feeling left out or frustrated that they aren't eligible for the same someone who subscribed to YouTube TV back when it launched, I can relate to those deciding to cancel. The service once stood out as an affordable and flexible cable alternative. Over the years, though, prices have climbed steadily. Today, it's often more expensive than some traditional TV bundles, especially when adding premium sports content like NFL Sunday decision to offer steep discounts only to lapsed users also doesn't sit well with everyone. It may encourage users to cancel just to receive a better deal later. And for subscribers who stick around year after year, the lack of similar offers can feel like a penalty for staying loyal. Ideally, streaming platforms like YouTube TV would focus on upfront transparency and equal treatment across their user then, the NFL Sunday Ticket deal might be a nice bonus—if you're lucky enough to receive it. Grab Surfshark VPN now at more than 50% off and with 3 extra months for free! Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer Some YouTube TV users who canceled their subscriptions are now seeing offers in their inboxes for discounted NFL Sunday Ticket plans. According to a Reddit post, a former subscriber reported getting an email from YouTube TV offering $96 off the NFL Sunday Ticket package. This lowers the price to $282 for existing YouTube TV subscribers. The user said they had canceled their service earlier this year after March Madness ended. Based on their post, it seems YouTube TV may be targeting users who left after major sports events wrapped Reddit commenters mentioned they received smaller discounts, such as $48 off. However, there is no consistent pattern across the reports. That suggests the discount amounts might vary based on account history, subscription length, or cancellation timing. So far, YouTube has not confirmed that it's running an official promotion, and it's unclear how many former users are getting these NFL Sunday Ticket costs $378 per season for current YouTube TV subscribers. For those without an active subscription, the standalone version runs $480 annually. Prices go up if users add RedZone access or choose monthly billing. While this year's pricing remains the same as last season, some viewers still see the package as too expensive for what's offered.
GSM Arena
an hour ago
- GSM Arena
Google officially reveals when it's unveiling the Pixel 10 family
Ever since early June, Google has been rumored to hold its grand unveiling event for the Pixel 10 family on August 20, and today the company itself has officially confirmed the date. Of course, Google hasn't mentioned whether it had initially chosen August 13 and then changed its mind and postponed the event by exactly one week, as we have heard from rumors, so we'll never know if that was true. But the 'new' date itself was accurate, as is so often the case with rumors related to Google (and especially the Pixel line, which just can't seem to stop leaking). We are expecting the Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL, Pixel 10 Pro Fold, and Pixel Watch 4 to all be introduced during the August 20 event, perhaps joined by the Pixel Buds 2a. The phones should all have macro capabilities built into their telephoto cameras alongside their ultrawides, and support for "Pixelsnap" magnetic accessories, but unfortunately only through cases - the magnets apparently won't be built into the handsets themselves, iPhone-style. Otherwise, the entire range will be powered by the Tensor G5 SoC, Google's first that will be built by TSMC and not Samsung. Source
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
Pixel Watch 4 might handle AI much better thanks to a key spec upgrade
Google Pixel Watch 4might stick to the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 chipset, but it is set to get an updated co-processor. The new chip, called M55, is said to introduce major improvements to the AI abilities of the smartwatch. A new report from Android Headlines claims that the M55 co-processor might be capable of handling 'five times the AI workload at a fraction of the power' used by previous versions. All previous Pixel Watch models have used the M33 co-processor, which was released by Arm in 2016. The goal of that chip is to handle specific tasks, such as per-second heart rate measurements. The Cortex-M55, which might be featured in the Pixel Watch 4 , was released in 2020, and Arm describes it as its most AI-capable Cortex-M chip. Arm, July 2025 The list of specs is completed by 2GB of RAM and 32GB of storage. Those numbers are similar to those on previous models, so there's nothing surprising about them. Google might also upgrade the brightness of the Pixel Watch 4 's display. The upgrade might be to 3,000 nits, which is a significant upgrade from the Pixel Watch 3's 2,000 nits peak brightness. If that turns out to be true, Google's watch will match the brightness of the Apple Watch Ultra 2 and the brand new Samsung Galaxy Watch 8. The battery might also improve significantly, leading to an increase in estimated battery life. The 41mm model might last up to 30 hours with always-on display turned on and up to 48 hours in battery saver mode. On the 45mm model, the numbers are up to 40 hours with AOD and up to 72 hours with Battery Saver. I think the upgrades to the Pixel Watch 4 sound great, especially for owners of older watches. While the chipset will stay the same, that's still Qualcomm's latest smartwatch chip, so Google doesn't have much of a choice about it. However, the battery life and display improvements sound significant enough to get excited about. Pairing that with the rumored introduction of Gemini to the Pixel Watch 4 , and we get a decent refresh. The Pixel Watch 4 is likely to be introduced along the Pixel 10 series. The next Made by Google event is on August 20 and it's where the company might introduce the Pixel 10 , Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL, Pixel 10 Pro Fold, and the new smartwatch. All devices might be released on August 28. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
