Welfare reforms U-turn means we're in 'better position'
Major concessions have put the government in a "better position" to pass welfare reforms, the health secretary said, as he admitted Labour's leadership mishandled the rollout of its flagship bill.Wes Streeting said Labour MPs had raised "substantial" concerns about planned welfare cuts, and the government strengthen its plans as a result.Last week, the prime minister was forced into a dramatic U-turn to avoid a House of Commons defeat after more than 120 Labour backbenchers threatened to vote down his plans."We are in a much better position this week than last week," Streeting told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, and promised that the government would "learn" from the narrowly avoided rebellion.
Streeting said the government had shifted "not just the package but also the approach" following criticism that the original proposals risked undermining support for disabled people.Last week, the government faced a growing rebellion from Labour MPs who warned the planned welfare cuts, aimed at saving £5bn annually, were rushed and would hurt vulnerable people.The government's initial plans, aimed at bringing down the welfare bill, would have made it harder for people to claim personal independence payment (Pip), a benefit paid to 3.7 million people with long-term physical or mental health conditions.The backlash culminated in a late-night announcement of major concessions to the rebel MPs - including limiting Pip cuts to only new claimants.It reversed its plans to freeze the health-related component of universal credit, and the payment will now rise in line with inflation for existing recipients.The government also announced plans for a review of the Pip assessment to be led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms and "co-produced" with disabled people.Louise Haigh, one of the leading rebel MPs, told the BBC she now planned to support the bill following the government's changes. Speaking on the same programme, Haigh, the Labour MP for Sheffield Heeley, said her fellow rebel MPs are "really pleased that the government has now listened to those concerns and they've made a significant number of concessions".Subject to seeing the final detail of the changes, she said: "I will be supporting the government on Tuesday in recognition that they have made significant progress and that they have protected the incomes of nearly 400,000 disabled people across the country."Rebels have told the BBC their colleagues are happy with the concessions - meaning the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill will not be blocked in a vote on Tuesday, although some Labour MPs have said they will still vote against the proposals.The episode has raised questions about the prime minister's political strategy and ability to manage internal dissent.Over the weekend, Sir Keir Starmer gave an interview with the Sunday Times to defend his handling of the row, pointing out he was abroad attending a Nato conference during the height of the rebellion.On Sunday, Streeting defended the government's intentions, saying the reforms were necessary to ensure the long-term sustainability of the welfare system. "No one will thank us if we carry on with the status quo," he said. "Unless you reform this system, I genuinely fear it will not be there for anyone in the future."Streeting did not rule out future changes to welfare following the Timms review. Asked if there could be further concessions on personal independence payments, he said "we have got to listen".His comments came after Sir Keir claimed "fixing" the welfare system is a "moral imperative".The prime minister told the Welsh Labour Party conference in Llandudno on Saturday that the government would not take away the welfare "safety net that vulnerable people rely on".But he said he could not let benefits "become a snare for those who can and want to work".
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Cutting personal independent payments: potentially devastating or justified?
As predicted (Starmer offers 'massive concessions' on welfare bill to Labour rebels, 26 June), an attempt has been made to salvage the welfare bill. Discontented MPs and disabled people alike will welcome the assurance that people currently receiving personal independence payments (Pip) or the health element of universal credit will be protected from changes. But the episode is damaging, has caused thousands of disabled people needless worry, and may come to be seen as pivotal in Keir Starmer's tenure. There is something deeply invidious about having two classes of benefit recipients – the protected current recipients, and those making future claims. At the same time, it is clear that the benefits system does need reform and, in particular, needs to support people into work rather than taking a punitive and brutal approach to cost saving. How Starmer has ended up in this position is fascinating, if it were not extraordinary for a government with such a majority and the potential to make radical and equitable change to be repeatedly wrongfooted. U-turns look weak and messy, and presenting them as a response to active listening is unlikely to convince anyone. Starmer claims not to be ideological, and there is the issue; policy is being shaped not by a coherent strategic vision and principle-driven aspirations for better lives, opportunities and genuine equality, but by economic necessity and caution. It's a flawed model, certain to intensify divisions between ministries, Labour members, taxpayers, benefit recipients and the wider electorate. There is major learning and reflection needed by the government; the optics have gone badly wrong, but the welfare reform chaos is a symptom of a much deeper political Melanie HenwoodHartwell, Northamptonshire I am a social worker and I support cutting Pips. I have encountered a number of young adults trapped in a cycle of welfare dependency, unemployment and chaotic lifestyles. They share a belief that the state must fund every aspect of life, and a lack of understanding that benefits come not 'from the government' but are redistributed from taxation of the population. Pip is often claimed on the basis of anxiety or depression, but the idea of working to support oneself, or seeking training or education to make work more attainable, is absent from their thinking. The answer? Probably a combination of education, early interventions and nudges towards culture change, including reducing the availability of Pip. In the long term the status quo won't help the young people I work and address supplied What is not being made clear in government statements and coverage of the cuts to disability benefits is the personal independence payment's relationship to work. Pip is paid to help with the additional costs arising from disability. It is paid to people in work and out of work. It is crucial in enabling people to stay in work, paying for technical and personal support, health needs, travel and other costs. It also enables people who cannot work full-time to work. What will happen to these working people when they can no longer afford the additional costs? It's clear the government does not understand the role of Pip in enabling BetteridgeManchester As we approach the parliamentary vote on the new welfare bill, spare a thought for the many Pip recipients who received the benefit when it was known as disability living allowance. I suspect, for many, the scars still linger from that government change to the system. What that revealed was that disability allowance was not directed to those most in need of it due to their disability. Rather, receiving the new benefit depended upon one's ability to fill out a 40-page form. Next, it depended on having the physical and mental resilience to challenge the result and take it to a tribunal. This was a protracted and stressful period of time. For many, who made it that far, the tribunal reversed the DWP scoring and people found that they had their old level of benefit reinstated. Just a shame that stress makes many medical conditions far worse for the individual. Many years ago, I believed that the DWP wanted to help those with serious disabilities. These days, I have as much faith in them as they appear to have in disabled people (DWP letters now seem to be written with a subtext of 'you're a fraud and we'll catch you').Name and address supplied Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Sun
33 minutes ago
- The Sun
Giant 90s shopping centre to be demolished ‘as soon as next year' in new plans
GIANT 90s shopping centre to be demolished to make way for new development after years of residential disputes. Developers have announced new revised plans with a scaled-back design, promising hundreds of new homes in South Bristol. 2 The plans Broadwalk Shopping Centre is set to be demolished as soon as next year after the proposed new plans were finally approved. The developers are Broadside Holdings, who are planning to knock down the centre, along with the multi-storey car park and bingo hall at the back of the centre. In its place, nearly 500 new homes will be built in the small village of Knowle, located in South West Bristol. Shops and a pedestrianised street have also been included in the plans to develop the area. Controversy around the development The journey to the sites approval has not been smooth sailing, and the new plans do not resemble the original ideas for the development. Initially, Broadside Holdings wanted to have approximately 850 new flats. In order to have this number, they would have had to build three ten-storey tower blocks overlooking Redcatch Park, which has a children's playground and community garden located inside. 2 As a result, the community in the area were unhappy with the plans. However, while Broadside did get planning permission for the more than 800 flats on the site in 2023, the controversial circumstances which led to the approval led to legal action. Local resident Laura Chapman took Bristol City Council to court over the way it granted planning permission for the original Redcatch Quarter plan. Chapman crowdfunded with residents of the Knowle Neighbourhood Planning Group and the Broadwalk Redevelopment Community Group to bring the legal action to the council. As a result of the action, the development revised its plan, compromising with the local area, so that Chapman would drop the judicial review process. Development compromise The developers compromised massively on their original idea, and recently announced the newly approved plan. Broadside has cut the number of new homes proposed from 850 to 492. Instead of flats, the development will be made up of houses to prevent the flats overlooking and impacting the park. While there will still be shops and a pedestrianised street, the size and the number of shops have been scaled back. Local services such as a new dentists surgery and library are still included. It is believed that construction on the site could start as early as next year, with plans for it to be finished by 2030. To maintain communication with the local community two drop-in sessions are being hosted at Knowle Methodist Church on Friday July 11. The first takes place between 12 noon and 3pm, and the second between 4pm and 7pm.
Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Revealed: Why Premier League clubs are ready to spend big on transfers THIS WEEK - with Man United set for positive conclusion in race for Brentford's Bryan Mbeumo
The transfer window is set to hot up this week - following the arrival of the new reporting year under the Premier League 's financial rules. Mail Sport understands that a number of clubs have deals on hold until they can register the spend on 2025-26's accounts rather than 2024-25. This year's window has, so far, been slow-paced with relatively few high-profile moves aside from Liverpool 's £116m swoop for Florian Wirtz and Manchester United 's £62.5m capture of Wolves ' Matheus Cunha. Manchester City have been the most active, with Pep Guardiola undertaking a flurry of activity ahead of the Club World Cup as he seeks to rebuild his squad. However, that situation is now likely to change, with sides already at the limit on this year's Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) hanging fire until Tuesday. Many do not want to fall foul of the regulations, which can result in the ultimate sanction of points deductions. Meanwhile, sources have disclosed that United's pursuit of Brentford's Bryan Mbeumo is set to lead to a positive conclusion. United have lodged two failed bids for the Cameroonian forward, the last of which was £55m plus £7.5m in add-ons. It is understood that the Bees believe 25-year-old Mbeumo is worth more than Cunha, a theory they believe is backed up by statistics from his time in west London. Mbeumo scored 20 goals to Cunha's 15 last season, and seven assists to the Brazilian's six. United feel they have offered a fair price, but the player has told his club he wants to move to Manchester and a breakthrough is the expected outcome, according to those with knowledge of the situation.
