logo
Snacks like M&M's, Skittles, and Doritos ‘Not recommended for human consumption' in US?

Snacks like M&M's, Skittles, and Doritos ‘Not recommended for human consumption' in US?

Time of India06-06-2025
HighlightsTexas Senate Bill 25 proposes mandatory warning labels on processed food products like M&M's, Skittles, and Doritos, stating they are 'not recommended for human consumption' if they contain certain controversial additives. The proposed legislation, supported by U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., aims to enhance food transparency and protect public health by informing consumers about potentially harmful ingredients. Major corporations, including PepsiCo, Mondelez, Coca-Cola, Conagra Brands, and Walmart, have expressed opposition to the bill, arguing that it could create confusion among consumers and is based on foreign standards rather than U.S. regulations.
A new legislative move in Texas has ignited nationwide debate as the state's GOP-majority legislature advances a bill requiring warning labels on various processed food products, including popular snacks such as M&M's, Skittles, and Doritos. The proposed labels would declare these items as 'not recommended for human consumption' if they contain additives restricted or banned in countries like the UK, Canada, Australia, or the European Union, as per a report by the New York Post.
Bill Targets Controversial Food Additives
Titled
Senate Bill 25
, the measure mandates that beginning in 2027, any food or beverage product sold in Texas containing synthetic dyes, bleached flour, or other controversial ingredients must carry a clearly visible warning label. The label would read:
'WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom.'
The legislation is part of a broader initiative supported by U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has made food transparency a cornerstone of his 'Make America Healthy Again' campaign. 'We are committed to protecting public health by ensuring families know what's in their food,' Kennedy stated earlier, as mentioned in a report by the New York Post.
Governor's Office Reviewing the Legislation
With the legislative session having concluded on Monday, Governor Greg Abbott now has 20 days to sign or veto the measure. A spokesperson from the Governor's office said that Abbott is carefully examining the implications of the bill. 'Governor Abbott will continue to work with the legislature to ensure Texans have access to healthy foods to care for themselves and their families,' said press secretary Andrew Mahaleris.
If enacted, the bill would require warning labels to be printed at a font size no smaller than the smallest existing FDA-mandated text on packaging. It also calls for the label to be prominently displayed with sufficient contrast for visibility.
Food Industry Pushes Back
The proposed labeling rule has met resistance from major corporations. In a joint letter dated May 19, industry leaders including PepsiCo, Mondelez, Coca-Cola, Conagra Brands, and Walmart urged Texas lawmakers to reconsider the bill, citing its sweeping scope and potential confusion for consumers.
'The food labeling provision in this bill casts an incredibly wide net — triggering warning labels on everyday grocery items based on foreign standards, not on regulations from Texas authorities or the U.S. FDA,' the letter argued.
Walmart, which was among the signatories, issued a statement saying it is closely tracking legislative developments and deferred further comment to the Texas Retailers Association, which also contributed input during bill discussions.
A consultant representing the retail association noted, 'Texas retailers and our members including Walmart worked hard on this bill, made some changes, and we'll see how it develops over the next 20 days.'
Consumer Groups Warn of Confusion and Costs
Industry experts and advocacy groups warn the proposed law could bring unintended consequences. John Hewitt, senior vice president of the Consumer Brands Association, has called for Governor Abbott to veto the measure. 'The ingredients used in the U.S. food supply are safe and have been rigorously evaluated,' Hewitt said. 'This legislation could result in inaccurate warning language, legal risks, and unnecessary alarm among consumers.'
As the state awaits Abbott's decision, the future of household snack names like Skittles, M&M's, and Doritos in Texas grocery aisles remains uncertain. If passed, Texas would become the first U.S. state to mandate such foreign-comparison warning labels on processed foods.
FAQs
What is Senate Bill 25 in Texas?
It's a proposed law that mandates warning labels on foods containing additives banned or restricted in the UK, EU, Canada, or Australia, targeting products like M&M's, Doritos, and Skittles.
What would the warning label say?
The label would read:
'WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2028 Presidential Candidates: JD Vance soars high, Kamala Harris fades in new poll for swing state
2028 Presidential Candidates: JD Vance soars high, Kamala Harris fades in new poll for swing state

Economic Times

time9 hours ago

  • Economic Times

2028 Presidential Candidates: JD Vance soars high, Kamala Harris fades in new poll for swing state

A recent Emerson College Polling survey conducted in North Carolina has offered the first look at how prospective 2028 presidential election candidates fare among likely voters in a key swing state. While the actual election remains years away, the results provide early signals of party dynamics and voter preferences as both Republican and Democratic fields take shape. North Carolina has long been considered a battleground state with the power to sway national results. As a microcosm of broader U.S. political sentiment, primary polling in states like North Carolina can reveal emerging frontrunners and influential voter attitudes. With the 2028 cycle already stirring interest, these early tests offer insight into name recognition, party enthusiasm, and the evolving face of each party's July 28–30, 2025, pollsters surveyed 1,000 registered voters across North Carolina, including categorised subgroups of likely Republican and Democratic primary voters. The survey carries a margin of error of ±3 percentage points. These early results are especially notable given that major candidates have yet to officially declare runs, as mentioned in a report by Newsweek. Among likely Republican primary voters, Vice President J.D. Vance dominates with 53% support, far ahead of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (7%) and Senator Marco Rubio (5%). Conservative figures such as Vivek Ramaswamy and Nikki Haley draw lower single-digit support. Nearly 15% remain undecided, potentially leaving space for shifts as the field evolves. These results align with national polling: in a May Emerson poll, Vance led the GOP primary with 46% support, while DeSantis captured 8%, and Rubio 12% in other surveys. On the Democratic side in North Carolina, Pete Buttigieg holds a narrow lead with 17%, followed by Kamala Harris at 12% and Gavin Newsom at 10%, with 24% undecided. This pattern reflects broader national trends: a June Emerson national poll showed Harris in the lead at 30% among Democratic primary voters, though Buttigieg and Newsom gained in second and third positions with single-digit percentages, as per a report by Newsweek. Besides candidate preferences, the poll highlights key voter sentiments: 40% of North Carolinians report their family's finances are worse off than a year ago, while 28% say finances have improved and 32% report stability. These concerns may shape priorities for primary voters as they evaluate 2028 contenders on issues such as the economy, inflation, and job security, as per a report by Newsweek. Columbia University political scientist Robert Y. Shapiro observed that early Democratic polling largely reflects name recognition rather than policy appeal. He added that Republican figures like DeSantis and Rubio carry baggage from past losses in high-profile contests, while Vance benefits from his vice-presidential platform and alignment with former President Trump's MAGA presidential hopefuls are unlikely to formally announce candidacies until after the 2026 midterm elections, a traditional milestone in modern campaigns. In the interim, potential candidates such as Buttigieg, Newsom, and Harris may increase national visibility through media appearances, speeches, and policy the Republican side, Vance's commanding early lead positions him as the presumptive frontrunner, though undecided voters and favorable candidate shifts could alter the landscape as the next cycle approaches. Vance's Strength in GOP Primaries: With over half the Republican support in North Carolina, Vance emerges as the early favorite. Competitive Democratic Field: Buttigieg holds a slim edge in North Carolina, but the national picture remains fluid as voters weigh familiar names. Economic Anxiety: Many North Carolinians feel financially strained, underscoring economic messaging as a decisive factor. High Undecided Vote Share: With nearly a quarter to 15% undecided across party lines, there's significant room for jockeying. Long Road Ahead: True clarity will likely emerge post-midterms, once major candidates formally enter the race. While still early in the eight-year presidential cycle, the Emerson College poll in North Carolina underlines evolving allegiances and growing clarity around frontrunners. For Republicans, Vice President Vance is off to a strong start, while Democrats face a more fragmented field. The poll was conducted between July 28–30, 2025, surveying 1,000 registered voters in North Carolina. The survey has a ±3 percentage point margin of error.

Trump vs Senator: US President tells Chuck Schumer to 'go to hell' amid nominations row
Trump vs Senator: US President tells Chuck Schumer to 'go to hell' amid nominations row

Hindustan Times

time9 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump vs Senator: US President tells Chuck Schumer to 'go to hell' amid nominations row

Amid the row over nominations in the Senate, US President Donald Trump told Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer to "go to hell." In a Truth Social post, Trump slammed Schumer's demand for federal funds to be released and called on Republicans to avoid striking a deal in the Senate. Hours after President Trump told Schumer to "go to hell," the Senate headed for its August recess and failed to reach a deal over Trump's nominations.(AP) "Senator Cryin' Chuck Schumer is demanding over One Billion Dollars in order to approve a small number of our highly qualified nominees, who should right now be helping to run our Country. This demand is egregious and unprecedented, and would be embarrassing to the Republican Party if it were accepted," Trump wrote on Truth Social. The president further alleged that Schumer was under "tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics." "Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL! Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing," Trump added in his post. Schumer responded to Trump's social media post and told reporters that the President "did not get his way." "He bullied us, he cajoled us, he called us names, and he went home with nothing," Schumer further said. Senate heads for recess after nomination bid fails Hours after President Trump told Schumer to "go to hell," the Senate headed for its August recess and failed to reach a deal over Trump's nominations. The house is now set to resume in September and Republicans are expected to change Senate rules to speed up the pace of confirmations for Trump's nominations. Since the start of his term, Senate Democrats have blocked many nominees this year as part of an attempt to block out unanimous consent votes. Amid this move, Trump has added pressure on GOP senators to move quickly. The latest tussle between Democrats and Republicans comes amid Trump's nominations to the judiciary. Ahead of Saturday's session, Trump had placed great pressure on Republicans to reach a deal and cancel the August recess if needed. However, after his public attack on Schumer, Trump told Republicans to pack it up and go back to their respective states.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store