Trans student sues University of Kansas after being fired for speaking to media about housing policy
TOPEKA — An interview with a news outlet cost a former University of Kansas resident assistant his job and his home. Now, he's suing the university for violating his free speech rights.
The lawsuit filed in federal court Thursday says KU restricted Anthony Alvarez' speech and fired him without cause in retaliation.
Alvarez, who is trans, talked to a media outlet on Feb. 26 during a campus protest over the university's decision to end Grace Pearson Scholarship Hall's gender-inclusive living arrangements. Alvarez, a 21-year-old student, expressed his frustration with the elimination of inclusive spaces where students feel safe. While he identified himself as a proctor, akin to a resident assistant, he did not claim to speak in his official capacity as a resident assistant for KU.
The university placed Alvarez on probation for failing to refer media inquiries to senior KU staff. Before the window to appeal the probation closed, Alvarez was subsequently fired from his position, and he was forced to rescind an offer to continue as a proctor the next academic year.
'I think it's a bad sign that for infractions as little as this, you could get fired and kicked out and very quickly find yourself in a position where you have to find a place to live,' Alvarez told Kanas Reflector in April.
The lawsuit argues Alvarez 'engaged in protected speech by speaking to a member of the media in their capacity as a private citizen on a matter of public concern — specifically by criticizing Defendant KU's policies and practices related to housing policies for LGBTQ+ community members as applied to recent state and federal legislative directives.'
Precedent for resident assistants, who are students and employees of a university, fired for speech is largely undeveloped. However, First Amendment challenges, added restrictions and demands for universities and rollbacks of LGBTQ+ rights are becoming commonplace under President Donald Trump's second administration.
A vocal advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, Alvarez testified in January against a bill in the Kansas Legislature that bans gender-affirming care for minors and restricts the use of state funds for promoting gender transitioning. The bill made it through the House and Senate, was vetoed by Gov. Laura Kelly and ultimately became law after the Republican-controlled Legislature overrode the veto.
Representing Alvarez is Barry Grissom, former U.S. Attorney for Kansas, who argued in the complaint that as a result of KU's actions, Alvarez experienced a 'loss of living quarters, income, reputational damage, emotional distress, and the deprivation of constitutionally protected rights.'
Grissom filed suit not only to address the university's retaliation toward Alvarez but also to garner a judgment from the court on whether the policy that led to Alvarez' probation and termination is constitutional, Grissom said in a Thursday news release.
'Terminating a public employee after they speak to the media and criticize that employer's policies is certainly in line with some of the challenges we have seen of late to the First Amendment, one of the bedrock principles of the American legal system,' Grissom said in a statement to Kansas Reflector.
He continued: 'Speech that the government does not agree with is exactly the kind which the First Amendment was intended to protect — yet each day, there are seemingly more people affected by policies like the one which cost Mr. Alvarez his job.'
The lawsuit names KU; Sarah Waters, executive director of KU housing and resident life; and Emily Chellgren, assistant director of resident life, as defendants. Multiple attempts beginning Friday morning to reach KU for comment for this story were unsuccessful. By Friday afternoon, most staff members had set up out-of-office messages for Memorial Day weekend. KU also did not respond to requests to comment in past coverage of this story.
Alvarez is asking for a jury trial in Kansas City, Kansas, and compensation for damages and attorney and case-related expenses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
22 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Lake Election Board finalizes precinct consolidation, split recommendations
The Lake County Board of Elections met in special session to take a look at all 350 precincts and determine to consolidate or split them. The meeting, held on Wednesday, lasted for close to four hours as board members voted on precinct information provided by Michelle Fajman, election board director and Jessica Messler, assistant director. Board president Kevin Smith said re-precincting is something that has to be done by each county every four years. 'It's a statutory obligation to review and recommend to the secretary of state,' Smith said. The special meeting was held because the deadline to send information to the secretary of state is (Friday) Aug. 1. The board at the July 15 meeting directed Fajman, a Democrat, and Messler, a Republican, to review and make recommendations to the board. Both Fajman and Messler came to the meeting on Wednesday with separate lists of suggestions about the best way to either consolidate or split precincts. Smith said state law advocates that if the precinct has under 600 active voters it should be consolidated with another precinct, but if it has more than 2,000 active voters, then it can be split or divided into two precincts. There are exceptions to the rule including the precincts can't cross congressional, senate, house or township lines, Fajman said. Lake County Republican Chairman Randy Niemeyer, who spoke briefly at the beginning of the meeting, said the goal is to keep elections efficient, accessible and at a low cost to voters. Niemeyer said keeping costs down was one of his main objectives because most of the election funds are derived from property taxes which will be reduced by some $30 million by 2028. He said by consolidating the precincts with under 600 active voters it can reduce costs and result in a savings. The reductions, over a 10-year period, can mean a savings of around $700,000 to consolidate precincts. Niemeyer called the lengthy process of going through the various precincts 'the ultimate in transparency,' since the board voted along party lines to either approve or deny the precinct proposal changes. The information compiled will be sent to the secretary of state who will have the final say, Niemeyer said. 'At the end of the day, the secretary of state will make the final call. The process (at the board meeting on Wednesday) was vetting it and sending proposals to the state so they have all the facts,' Niemeyer said. Secretary of State Diego Morales gave a deadline of Aug. 1 for counties to provide information, Fajman said. 'He will make his consolidation decisions by Sept.1,' she said. Once final maps of the precincts are finalized, a legal ad will be posted in area newspapers. 'There will be a legal ad, then we will notify voters,' she said. In other business, the board approved a request from Lake Central School Corp. officials to hold a school referendum in the fall election. The school board voted during a special meeting on June 30 to place the school funding question on the ballot in a special election on Nov. 4. The referendum, first approved with over 53% support in 2018, is set to expire at the end of next year.
Politico
24 minutes ago
- Politico
On the Senate's ‘Kumbaya' committee, John Kennedy is suddenly singing off-key
'We're just going to do what we can to get the appropriations process moving again, and that's something we haven't had here in quite a while,' Thune said. 'So there's a lot of muscle memory we're trying to engage.'' The Senate is 'trying to find a sweet spot,' Thune added. Kennedy ultimately reached a deal with leadership this week to get a separate vote on funding for Congress. He said he wanted to be able to vote against the Legislative Branch bill without having to oppose a two-bill package focused on the departments of Veterans Affairs and Agriculture. He's angling to make a similar protest vote against the bill funding the Department of Interior and environmental projects, which would complicate Thune putting it in a second spending package that he wants to bring to the floor next month. But Kennedy's position frustrated colleagues who say he didn't articulate any policy concern with the congressional funding bill beyond believing it spent too much money. And his willingness to take a verbal sledgehammer to the Senate's talks is grating on some fellow Republicans who are straining to keep them on track. 'What we're seeing is different, and I don't know why,' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said about recent tactics from Kennedy and other senators. 'When I came on the Appropriations Committee, it was kind of like an unspoken rule, if you will — that we would be there to not only support the Republican bills, but as appropriators, we kind of held together … and we made the process work.' 'We don't have that right now, which is unfortunate,' she added. Besides publicly badmouthing the bipartisan process, Kennedy made other moves to rankle his Appropriations colleagues — starting with his vocal support for Trump's pursuit of 'rescissions.' Those spending clawbacks essentially serve to undo the spending panel's work. Not only did Kennedy vote for a first $9 billion package last month, he has also been backchanneling with White House budget director Russ Vought about additional requests. Democrats, and some Republicans, are warning that would blow up the appropriations process, but Kennedy called it 'naive' to think if the White House held off that Democrats would want to 'share a cup of hot cocoa and a hug with us.' Meanwhile, his frequent claim that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is responsible for breaking the government funding process has particularly rankled Democrats. Sen. Brian Schatz of Hawaii, who is on the Appropriations Committee and likely to be Schumer's next No. 2, said the idea that 'you're going to blame the Democratic leader, and you control both chambers and the presidency, is plainly goofy.' 'If he wants to vote no on his own bill, I suppose he's entitled to do that. It's a little weird, but he's entitled to do it,' Schatz said. 'But there's no reason he should block the Senate from considering the legislation that he's presumably helped to craft.'
an hour ago
Before the attacks, Senate candidates seek to define themselves in Kentucky
CALVERT CITY, Ky. -- Three Republicans competing to succeed longtime Sen. Mitch McConnell tried to define themselves before the political attacks that could come Saturday when they share the spotlight at the Fancy Farm picnic, a daunting rite of passage for candidates seeking statewide office in Kentucky. 'You're going to hear some barbs tomorrow, but what I want to focus on is my vision for serving in the United States Senate,' Daniel Cameron, one of the candidates, told a GOP crowd Friday evening. Cameron's rivals in next year's Senate primary — U.S. Rep. Andy Barr and businessman Nate Morris — used their speeches at the event to introduce themselves to Republican voters in western Kentucky. All three could shift into attack mode against each other Saturday afternoon at the Fancy Farm picnic — the Bluegrass State's premier political event. Politicians compete to land the sharpest — and sometimes most outlandish — barbs, and have to endure shouting and heckling from their rivals' supporters. The picnic could turn into a Republican skirmish since Democratic politicians are mostly skipping the event. McConnell, the longest-serving Senate party leader in U.S. history, revealed in February, on his 83rd birthday, that he won't seek another term in Kentucky and will retire when his current term ends. His pending retirement has set up a fierce competition for his seat. Warming up for their appearance that will air on statewide TV at Fancy Farm, the three GOP rivals kept to one script they've all shared — lavishing praise on Republican President Donald Trump. Barr portrayed his congressional experience as an advantage that sets him apart. He represents a district stretching from central Kentucky's bluegrass region to the Appalachian foothills. 'I'm an 'America First' fighter in the United States Congress," Barr said Friday night. 'Other people like to talk about being a Trump guy or being with Trump. I've been with President Trump from day one. I'm not just talking about supporting President Trump. I've done it. I'm continuing to do it.' Giving voters a glimpse into his political philosophy, Barr said: 'I'm a guy who was raised in the era of Ronald Reagan. I believe in limited government, free enterprise and a strong national defense.' Morris, a tech entrepreneur, portrayed himself as a populist and a political outsider while trying to attach himself to Trump's popularity in Kentucky. 'What we've seen with this president is that he has put emphasis back on the American worker," Morris said Friday night. "And the people that have been in Washington for all this time -- the elites – they sold out the American worker.' Morris also touted his hardline stance on immigration. He said he supports a moratorium on immigration into the United States until every immigrant currently in the country illegally is deported. Cameron, who is Black, used his speech to rail against diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. 'We don't need … an America built on DEI," Cameron said. "We need a country that's built on MEI – merit, excellence and intelligence.' Cameron entered the Senate campaign with one clear advantage — a higher statewide name recognition than his rivals. Cameron served one term as state attorney general and lost to Democrat Andy Beshear in the 2023 governor's race. 'You've been with us in the past," Cameron told the GOP group Friday night. "I hope that you'll be with us this time. We're going to get it done because we know that what happens in this seat will have reverberations across this country.'
