ADR moves Supreme Court against ECI's voter list revision in Bihar
The petition alleges that the ECI's move is arbitrary and could potentially disenfranchise millions of voters.
ADR, a non-partisan electoral watchdog, has urged the apex court to intervene, arguing that such an extensive revision exercise so close to the polls undermines the integrity of the democratic process.
The organisation has sought the court's direction to halt the ongoing revision process until a thorough and fair verification mechanism is ensured. The controversy stems from the ECI's June 24 directive announcing the SIR exercise in Bihar.
The revision, which includes the verification of existing voter data and new registrations, is being carried out just months before the state is scheduled to go to polls. This has raised concerns among several political parties, especially those in the Opposition.
Hours after the poll-panel gave its direction on June 24, the Opposition including Lalu Yadav's RJD, Congress, AIMIM, CPI, CPM and other political parties opposed this move and attacked the poll body for acting on the directions of the ruling BJP.
Earlier, this week, nearly a dozen political parties of INDIA bloc leaders went to meet the poll panel officials including the Chief Election Commissioner to raise their objections against the SIR, although, the poll-panel through its Press statements has defended the move.
'Commission stated that SIR is being conducted in accordance with provisions of Article 326, RP Act 1950 and instructions issued on June 2024, 2025. Party representatives raised concerns related to SIR. Each concern which was raised by any member of the political party was fully addressed by Commission', the poll panel said on X after their meeting with INDIA bloc leaders earlier this week.
Similarly, the Congress' senior leader Pawan Khera while addressing a Press conference this week did not rule out the option of approaching the judiciary against the poll panel's directive.
With the filing of this petition by ADR, it seems that the issue is likely to intensify in the coming days.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
13 minutes ago
- United News of India
Mahua Moitra moves SC against ECI's special electoral roll revision in Bihar
New Delhi/Kolkata , July 6 (UNI) Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra has filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the Election Commission of India's (ECI) June 24 order, which mandates a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar. The Krishnanagar MP has sought the quashing of the order, terming it "unconstitutional" and in "violation" of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 21, 325, and 326 of the Constitution of India, as well as provisions of the Representation of People Act, 1950 and the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. 'Just filed writ petition in Supreme Court challenging ECI notification to conduct SIR in Bihar & seeking a stay on conducting the same in other states including Bengal,' Moitra posted on her X handle. The petition argues that the ECI's directive introduces "extraneous and legally unsanctioned" requirements for retaining or including names in the electoral rolls, including the production of documents proving citizenship — such as proof of citizenship of one or both parents. In the petition filed through Advocate Neha Rathi, the Trinamool Congress MP argued that these requirements are not envisaged by Article 326 of the Constitution or by any provision of the RP Act, and they create arbitrary hurdles for eligible voters. On June 24, the EC announced a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections scheduled later this year. As part of the process, voters are required to submit one of 11 approved documents, such as a birth certificate or passport, to verify their date and place of birth. Those born before July 1, 1987, need only provide their own documents. However, those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, must also submit one parent's documents, while individuals born after December 2, 2004, must provide documents for both parents. According to the plea, the ECI order excludes commonly accepted identity proofs like Aadhaar and ration cards, disproportionately burdening voters — especially those in rural and marginalised communities. Current field reports from Bihar, the petition notes, suggest that lakhs of voters face imminent risk of disenfranchisement due to these stringent document requirements. 'This is the first time the Election Commission has initiated such an exercise, where voters already listed on the rolls and having voted in past elections are now being asked to revalidate their eligibility. She warns that the move may result in widespread disenfranchisement, undermining democratic principles and the conduct of free and fair elections,' Moitra argued in her petition. The petition also raises concerns about procedural inadequacies. It highlights that the order mandates the exclusion of names from the draft rolls if fresh enumeration forms are not submitted by July 25, 2025 — a deadline the petitioner calls arbitrary and unreasonable, especially for voters needing time to procure documents. The MP has additionally sought a direction to prevent the ECI from extending similar revision drives to other states. She claims the ECI has already issued instructions for the rollout of a similar exercise in West Bengal starting August 2025. Drawing parallels with the controversial National Register of Citizens (NRC), the plea underscores that the revision exercise appears to follow a similar structure and could disproportionately affect the economically and socially vulnerable populations. Interestingly enough, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday strongly criticised the new guidelines under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process, alleging they are intended to target West Bengal ahead of its 2026 Assembly elections, and indirectly accused the Election Commission of acting as an agent of the BJP. Criticising the Election Commission for taking the decision unilaterally, the chief minister had said, 'This is alarming for democracy. 'India became independent in 1947. Why are people born between 1987 and 2004 being targeted? I don't understand.' The West Bengal chief minister had claimed that the Election Commission could not take such steps without consulting political parties, underscoring that India is a democratic nation with a federal structure, and that no political party or elected government should be treated as subservient. 'Is this being done so that the younger generation cannot vote? How will the poor obtain their parents' documents? Is this NRC in disguise? Are they trying to implement NRC through this? Let them clearly state their intention. Is this what's happening in our country?' Mamata had questioned. UNI XC SSP
Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
Trade agreements struck earlier have taught India how to raise its game
India's trade policy is undergoing a significant transformation. Free trade agreements (FTAs) are increasingly being leveraged as a tool to boost exports, attract foreign investment and improve industrial competitiveness. For decades, India had approached FTAs with caution. However, the new approach is characterized by economic complementarity, strategic alignment, reciprocity and far-sighted discourse. Old FTAs, uneven gains: India's early FTAs with Asean, Japan and South Korea have not yielded the desired outcomes. Instead, the trade deficit with these countries has widened significantly. While the Asean-India Trade in Goods Agreement (AITIGA) of 2009 helped expand trade volumes, it also widened our trade deficit with Asean from $6 billion in 2009 to over $45 billion by 2022 (it's now at $38 billion). Our experience has been similar with Korea and Japan; imports surged while exports stagnated, particularly in sectors where India had held a comparative advantage, like garments, pharma, etc. These early agreements had several structural and design issues. Also Read: The India-UK free trade deal is a game-changer for bilateral trade relations First, tariff concessions were asymmetrical (especially under the AITIGA), with India offering more liberal market access to all Asean countries, while Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand opened up their markets through far fewer tariff lines than India did. Second, non-tariff barriers such as complex certification procedures, sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) regulations and technical standards have impacted India's exports. Japan's SPS measures are particularly stringent, making it extremely challenging for Indian exporters of farm produce and other food items. Third, the agreements struck earlier primarily covered goods. Most of those FTAs have limited provisions for services or professional mobility, areas where India is competitive. Earlier FTAs also did not include strong safeguard or review clauses either, leaving little recourse for industries impacted by import surges or trade diversion. Also Read: Export thrust: India should move goods like a horse to trade like a tiger Our new playbook: India's recently signed FTAs with the UAE, Australia and the UK offer a new playbook. Take the India-UAE Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA). Since it was signed in 2022, India's exports to the UAE have grown at an average annual rate of over 14%. This is also among India's first modern FTAs. It has chapters on digital trade and e-commerce. The India-Australia Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement has also yielded positive outcomes, with a much higher 77% utilization rate by Indian exporters within a year of signing the pact. Its success has encouraged the two countries to negotiate a CECA. The positive outcomes of these new deals are not accidental. They are the result of a strategic approach formulated with lessons learnt from the past. First, India is choosing its partners more judiciously, focusing on developed markets like the UK, EU and US which have complementary interests and offer meaningful market access for India's goods and service exports. Second, agreements are now broader in scope. They go beyond goods to include investment, intellectual property, digital trade and skilled labour mobility. In the India-UK negotiations, for instance, India secured London's liberalization of professional-mobility rules and will enter into mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) on qualifications for various professional services. Both sides also agreed on a convention to prevent double contributions that exempts Indians on short stints in the UK from making social security payments there. Third, trade agreements are being integrated with India's domestic policy agenda, with efforts to deploy tariffs and other tools in support of 'Make in India' and various production-linked incentive schemes, even as investments are encouraged that would help Indian manufacturing assimilate into global value chains. India's Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement with the European Free Trade Association is a case in point. Fourth, India is looking to build trade resilience. New Delhi is negotiating deals with Chile and Peru to establish long-term resource partnerships, given their huge reserves of critical minerals such as copper and lithium, which are essential for various elements of India's clean-energy transition. Crucially, lessons from the past have ensured that negotiated 'rules of origin' are effective, while safeguard mechanisms and review clauses are well integrated. Also Read: India should hold its ground in trade negotiations with the EU On the horizon: India must ensure no repeat of past mistakes in its trade deals. Non-tariff barriers (NTBs) could pose a challenge, particularly in developed markets with high standards. Ficci recommends including the negotiation of MRAs on testing, certification and inspection to tackle NTBs in future agreements. Further, all pacts must include periodic review clauses and safeguard triggers. For instance, an 'auto-trigger mechanism'—which ups tariffs automatically once imports exceed a certain threshold—could be considered. A similar clause is in place under the India-Mauritius deal. Finally, India must use and embed data more systematically into agreements, not just at the negotiation stage, but well into implementation too. The author is president, FICCI.
The Hindu
44 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Major relief to voters, EC makes big decision on documents ahead of Assembly elections in Bihar
Amid the uproar over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, Bihar Chief Electoral Office made a big announcement in the form of advertisement asserting that voters can get verified in the electoral rolls even without submitting the mandatory documents. 'If you (read voters) provide the required documents, it will be easier for the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) to process the application. If you are unable to provide the required documents, the ERO can take a decision on the basis of local investigation or other documentary evidence,' the Election Commission (EC) said in the advertisement published on front pages of all the local newspapers of Bihar on Sunday (July 6, 2025). This is for the first time that such a decision has been taken after continuous questioning by the Opposition leaders. In the advertisement an appeal has been made to the voters that as soon as they receive the enumeration forms form from the BLO, fill it immediately and provide it to the BLO along with the necessary documents and photo. Then in the next line it added, If the necessary documents and photo are not available, then just fill the form and provide it to the BLO. Aadhaar card, PAN card, MGNREGA job card, voter identity card, driving licence, and bank passbook are unfortunately not acceptable for the SIR process. The 11 documents being accepted are include birth certificates, passports, education certificates, permanent residence, forest rights, and caste certificates, the family register prepared by State and local authorities, land or house allotment certificates issued by the government, as well as documents issued to government employees or pensioners, and other documents issued by a range of public authorities before 1967. A source in the office of Bihar CEO said that the 11 documents which were asked earlier still exist and voters should not get confused. 'The EC has made some changes keeping the problems being faced by the voters to furnish the documents and that's the reason ERO will take the final call after physical verification of the voters. At least the voters should fill the form even without the photo and require the document and submit it to the BLO, ' an official told The Hindu. On Friday (July 4, 2025) a delegation of INDIA bloc leaders headed by Tejashwi Yadav met Bihar Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) Vinod Singh Gunjiyal to raise the objection over the SIR. The INDIA bloc leaders had termed the SIR impractical and anti-democratic. Along with this, it demanded recognition of Aadhar card, ration card and MGNREGA card to add in the list of key documents for the verification and revision of the voter list. As per the data till 7:00 p.m., on Saturday (July 5, 2025), a total of 1,12,01,674 enumeration forms have been collected in Bihar, which is 14.18% of the total number of potential voters. In addition, the total number of enumeration forms uploaded was 23,90,329, out of which 23,14,602 forms were uploaded through BLOs, while 75,789 forms were uploaded by general voters through online mode. Mr. Gunjiyal has appealed that all the voters of Bihar should actively participate in the SIR and fill the counting form through offline and online mediums so that no eligible voter is left out.
