‘You voted for It, we killed It': DA torches GNU over VAT hike as political parties hit back
Democratic Alliance (DA) leader John Steenhuisen is adamant that the decision to reverse the controversial 0.5 percentage point increase in value-added tax (VAT) was a direct result of the DA's legal challenge.
'Well, I think it's very clear from the beginning that we were opposed to the VAT hike,' Steenhuisen said in an interview with eNCA on Friday.
'We made it very clear before we went into the vote in Parliament, and now all the other parties have come around to our viewpoint.'
He criticised other parties for trying to take credit for the reversal.
'It's kind of like somebody setting a house on fire and then expecting credit when they throw a bucket of water on it,' he said.
'We are in this situation because those parties represented at the press conference yesterday were the perpetrators of the VAT hike. They're the ones who voted for it.'
His comments come after Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana announced that the VAT rate would remain at 15%.
The National Treasury said the increase, originally scheduled to take effect on May 1, was withdrawn following consultations with political parties and a review of parliamentary recommendations.
Despite being part of the ANC-led Government of National Unity (GNU), the DA has had tense relations with the ruling party, especially after refusing to support the 2025 Budget Fiscal Framework that included the VAT increase.
The DA, along with opposition parties such as the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), voted against the budget and took the matter to the Western Cape High Court.
Following Godongwana's announcement, the DA quickly claimed victory.
Steenhuisen insisted the change would not have occurred without the court pressure.
'If it wasn't for the court action and the dreadful day Treasury had in court, where it became clear their arguments were not gaining traction, there would have been no volte-face from the Finance Minister,' Steenhuisen said.
'The Minister of Finance had been adamant in court papers that there was no alternative to the VAT increase. What changed? It was the very real prospect of losing the case.'
Meanwhile, other political parties have also claimed credit.
uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party secretary general Floyd Shivambu told supporters outside Jacob Zuma's court hearing in Pietermaritzburg on Thursday that Jacob Zuma's party had led public resistance to the VAT increase.
'It's only the MK Party that went to the streets to reject the VAT increase,' Shivambu said.
'While others were trying to discuss VAT in court and in Parliament, it's only us who went to the ground.'
Other parties, including ActionSA, Build One SA, and the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), said they engaged the ANC directly to find alternative solutions.
Build One SA leader Mmusi Maimane praised the negotiations with the ANC, calling them key to the VAT reversal.
However, on Thursday, IOL News reported that Patriotic Alliance (PA) deputy leader Kenny Kunene accused the DA of hypocrisy, slamming the party's claim of victory as dishonest.
'They woke up this morning after seeing the statement from the minister and claimed victory — that's quite hypocritical,' Kunene said during a multi-party media briefing in Sandton.
He alleged that the DA attempted to use the VAT hike as leverage to push for state asset privatisation and political appointments within the GNU.
'They tried to use it to change what Parliament had already resolved,' Kunene said.
'So a party of extortionists has failed to serve South Africans on an important matter of national interest.'
Kunene further claimed that the DA made demands during negotiations, offering to support the VAT hike if certain conditions were met, including the scrapping of the National Health Insurance (NHI) Bill, the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Bill, and the privatisation of a state port.
'When the extortionists could not get their way, they ran to court,' Kunene said.
'The DA has no moral authority to claim victory for the removal of the VAT increase.'
IOL Politics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
ANC slams DA National Dialogue boycott
JOHANNESBURG - The ANC has hit back at the DA's decision to both boycott the National Dialogue, as well as to oppose budgets of Ministers Thembi Simelane and Nobuhle Nkabane. Spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu-Motsiri says the DA needs to decide whether they are part of the GNU, or an opposition party within the executive. The DA has been outraged by President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to fire Deputy Trade, Industry and Competition Minister, Andrew Whitfield. Meanwhile, Ramaphosa says he exercised his constitutional prerogative and responsibility when he fired Whitfield.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Malema urges DA to respect Ramaphosa and government protocol
Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema has criticised the Democratic Alliance (DA) for issuing what he called 'unnecessary threats' after the party gave President Cyril Ramaphosa an ultimatum over the dismissal of Andrew Whitfield. The DA demanded that Ramaphosa reverse Whitfield's removal as Deputy Minister of Trade and Industry. President Cyril Ramaphosa fired Whitfield for travelling to the United States without obtaining his permission. The DA labelled the move hypocritical, pointing to Ramaphosa's failure to act against ANC ministers accused of corruption. SABC News reported that Malema called on the DA to respect the president and government processes. He stated that, 'They've no reason to complain. They went into a marriage knowing very well that they were going with the ANC-corrupt government into a marriage. These are unnecessary threats.' He said the DA had compromised its principles by joining a government led by the ANC. Malema said, 'If the DA was anti-corruption, the DA was pro-poor, the DA was to ensure that they would restore the dignity of our people, they should have allowed the ANC to govern as a minority party. Nothing was forcing them to go into government.' He added that by joining the ANC-led government, the DA had lost the moral ground to oppose it from within. 'You cannot oppose the government you are part of,' Malema said. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
ANC's 'better life for all' mantra remains a pipedream
Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu On June 26, 1955, the Freedom Charter was adopted in Kliptown, Soweto in Johannesburg. This document envisioned a free South Africa post-apartheid. It gave hope of a better future where people's dignity would be restored, and racial stratification be a thing of the past. This gave hope for a better life for all South Africans. Of the ten clauses in the Freedom Charter as the focal points, a few stood out and have been ventilated over the years. The first clause stated that 'The people shall govern.' This assumed that a government of the people would be constituted, not the apartheid government which represented a white minority. The fourth promise was that 'The land shall be shared among those who work it.' Implicit in this vision was that the black majority who tilled the land would own it. The eighth clause stated that 'The doors of learning and culture shall be opened.' This brought a glimmer of hope to the students. There were other promises of the sharing of the country's wealth and assurance that all racial groups would have equal rights. The year 2025 marks 70 years since the adoption of the Freedom Charter. This happens at a time when the ANC is no longer the governing party but is part of a multiparty coalition government following its failure to obtain the required fifty-plus-one threshold in the 2024 general election. However, the ANC has led South Africa during the first six administrations since 1994. As such, it had enough time to implement the promises of the Freedom Charter. Five questions arise. The first question is 'how far have the promises of the Freedom Charter been achieved under the ANC government? Secondly, to what extent have opposition political parties held the ANC accountable so that it could deliver on the promises contained in the Freedom Charter? Thirdly, following the ANC's dismal performance in the 2024 general election, are opposition parties capitalising on the ANC's weakness or are they allowing the ANC to regain its lost ground? Fourthly, to what extent is the ANC regrouping as it prepares for the 2026 Local Government Election (LGE)? Lastly and importantly, what can we expect in the much-anticipated LGE given the current politics in the country? On the first question, it depends on who is being asked. Many South Africans believe that the ANC has reneged on its promise to implement the clauses of the Freedom Charter. They base their assessment on the condition of their lives and unfulfilled promises made by the ANC in each election. However, the ANC holds the view that of the ten clauses, only two have not been fulfilled. These are clause three which says, 'The people shall share in the country's wealth' and clause four which says, 'The land shall be shared among those who work it.' But even with these clauses, the ANC claims that it is a work in progress. ANC national chairperson Gwede Mantashe argues that the ANC has lived to the ideals of the Freedom Charter. Therefore, it is safe to say that the answers to the first question are subjective. The second question is more important. The mandate of opposition political parties (especially the main opposition) is to keep the governing party on its toes. After the 1994 general election, the National Party (NP) was pushed to the opposition benches. It failed to hold the ANC accountable. Instead, it split into two and eventually collapsed. In 1999, the Democratic Party (DP) of Tony Leon assumed the position of being the official opposition. From 2004 to 2024 the Democratic Alliance was the official opposition party. It failed to hold the ANC accountable. Despite its scathing attack on the ANC, it is now co-governing with the ANC in the multiparty coalition. The third question speaks to the current situation. The newly formed Mkhonto Wesizwe Party (MKP) is the official opposition. Together with the EFF and other smaller parties, it should be positioning itself as an alternative. However, currently, the party is unstable. This instability is exemplified by the recent swearing-in of nine new members in the National Assembly and some movements in the KwaZulu-Natal Legislature. Even in the leadership of the party outside parliament, there is instability. The recent removal of Floyd Shivambu from the position of Secretary General and his subsequent media briefing which laid bare his sour relations with the party confirm instability in the SG position. The EFF is also facing problems of its own – including a decline in its support base. The fourth question speaks directly to the ANC. The party is on record talking about the renewal agenda. However, this seems to be political rhetoric rather than something tangible. KwaZulu-Natal where the party recorded its highest loss has seen more activity. Firstly, the provincial leadership structure was reconfigured. A few days ago, the ANC's 11 regions were disbanded by the current leadership. While these might be touted as part of the renewal process, some might argue that it has the potential to further divide the party. In parliament, the ANC faced a backlash on the budget issue – especially the proposed 2% VAT hike. This happened against the backdrop of what happened in the sixth administration when the ANC used its numbers to protect President Ramaphosa after the Phala Phala saga. Even the party's working relations (or lack thereof) with the DA have drawn interest from the public. So, is the ANC really renewing itself or is the renewal agenda only existing on paper? The last question about next year's LGE touches on all political parties – both those who are in the coalition and opposition parties. The former must account to the electorate about what they have been doing since the start of the seventh administration. Opposition parties must explain to the public if they have held the coalition government accountable or if they were fixated on their internal issues. As we reflect on the Freedom Charter, objective reflections are crucial. * Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu is Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Non-Racialism and Democracy at Nelson Mandela University. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
