Coke Florida Provides 5,500 Students With Supplies in 2025 Backpack Giveback
Since launching the Backpack Giveback initiative in 2018, the company has distributed over 35,500 supply-filled backpacks to students across Florida. Each year, the number of donations has grown, reinforcing Coke Florida's continued commitment to supporting students in need. The initiative is a long-standing cornerstone of the company's Education pillar, which focuses on three key areas: Youth Development, Access to Resources, and College Scholarships.
'Supporting education remains one of our top priorities because we believe it's the foundation for thriving communities,' said Percy L. Wells, II, Group Vice President of Government Relations, Public Affairs, and Communications. 'As many families navigate financial challenges, we're proud to help ease the burden of the back-to-school season. A new backpack filled with supplies may seem small, but it can make a big difference in helping students show up confident, prepared, and ready to learn.'
As the 2025 school year approaches, Coke Florida remains committed to helping students start strong and stay focused on their futures - one backpack at a time.
About Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC
Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC (Coke Florida) is the sixth largest Coca-Cola bottler in the United States. Coke Florida makes, sells, and distributes products of The Coca-Cola Company in an exclusive territory that covers over 21 million consumers across 47 counties in Florida. The company employs over 5,000 associates and operates four Green Circle Certified manufacturing facilities and eighteen distribution centers. Founded in 2015 and headquartered in Tampa, Coke Florida is one of the largest Black-owned businesses in the United States. In 2025, Coke Florida was recognized as a US Best Managed Company Gold Standard Winner by Deloitte Private and The Wall Street Journal. To learn more, visit www.cokeflorida.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
12 hours ago
- Business Insider
OT Management, LLC Introduces Structured Day Trading Framework Aimed at Institutional-Grade Discipline for Retail Traders
OT MANAGEMENT, LLC has introduced a structured educational approach to day trading aimed at addressing common misconceptions and behavioral pitfalls among retail traders. According to Strategic Partner Daniel John Impens, the firm's methodology is designed to mirror institutional trading frameworks through systematized execution and risk management tools. In a recent interview at OT Management's Boston office, Impens outlined the company's approach, which he describes as distinct from speculative trading. 'Most retail participants engage with markets without a structured methodology,' said Impens, who previously held roles at Fisher Investments, Goldman Sachs, and J.P. Morgan. 'Our focus is on replacing emotional decision-making with process-driven systems.' The firm's day trading initiative, referred to as the Retail Trader Rhythm Camp, emphasizes data analysis, scenario planning, and execution discipline. It forms part of OT Management's broader framework, the Collective Capital Alliance, which includes proprietary tools such as: Rhythm Detection Tool – for identifying market pacing and risk cycles Execution Journal System – for logging decisions and outcomes Discipline Scoring Engine – to track and assess behavioral patterns Strategy Replication Module – for simulation-based testing Impens notes that the educational program delays access to live markets until participants demonstrate structured planning through simulated environments. 'Trading should be viewed as a repeatable process, not an instinctive reaction,' he added. Founded in 2016 and registered with the SEC (Registration No. 801-126317), OT MANAGEMENT, LLC operates from Boston, Massachusetts. The firm reports that its tools are designed to bridge the methodological gap between institutional and retail trading practices. For additional information, users can visit or contact cs@ About OT Management, LLC Founded in 2016, OT Management, LLC is a Boston-based financial education firm focused on system-based day trading methodologies for retail traders. The company emphasizes structured execution strategies, data-driven decision-making, and disciplined risk management. Its leadership includes Daniel John Impens, a former executive at Fisher Investments, Goldman Sachs, and J.P. Morgan. OT Management is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC Registration No. 801-126317).
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin-To-Ethereum Rotation: Genius Move Or FOMO Trap? Here's What The Data Shows
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. As Ethereum trades near multi-month highs and Bitcoin's dominance faces fresh challenges, the ETH/BTC ratio is currently sitting at 0.058, sparking intense debate on Reddit among crypto veterans about whether now is the time to rotate capital from Bitcoin into Ethereum for potential alt season gains. The strategy—known in crypto circles as 'the rotation'—involves temporarily swapping Bitcoin holdings for Ethereum during periods when altcoins typically outperform the flagship cryptocurrency, then rotating back to Bitcoin after capturing those gains. It's a high-stakes game of market timing that has created generational wealth for some traders while leaving others with costly tax bills and diminished holdings. Don't Miss: Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. The Case for Making the Move Proponents of the Bitcoin-to-Ethereum rotation point to compelling historical patterns and current market dynamics that suggest significant upside potential for ETH relative to BTC. Over the past 90 days, Ethereum has dramatically outpaced Bitcoin with a 102% gain compared to Bitcoin's more modest 22% advance, demonstrating the kind of explosive relative performance that rotation traders seek. The fundamental case for Ethereum has strengthened considerably, particularly with the Genius Act legislation accelerating institutional adoption of stablecoins—90% of which operate on Ethereum's network. This regulatory tailwind, combined with Ethereum's transition to a deflationary monetary policy since moving to proof-of-stake, creates a compelling structural argument for continued outperformance. Galaxy Research projects the ETH/BTC ratio could reach between 0.03 and 0.045, suggesting substantial room for growth from current levels. For context, the ratio has historically peaked much higher during previous market cycles, with some traders targeting ranges between 0.049 to 0.088 based on technical analysis of past bull markets. Trending: Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . Tax-conscious investors have found creative workarounds to execute this strategy without triggering immediate capital gains. By using lending protocols to collateralize Bitcoin holdings and borrow stablecoins or additional Bitcoin to purchase Ethereum, traders can gain ETH exposure while maintaining their original BTC position on paper—though this approach carries its own risks around loan-to-value ratios and liquidation scenarios. The Bear Case: Too Late to the Party? However, seasoned crypto veterans are increasingly cautioning that the optimal entry window for this rotation may have already closed. After Ethereum's 100% surge over the past three months, critics argue that attempting the swap now amounts to 'FOMOing' into an already extended move. The margin of error for timing the eventual rotation back to Bitcoin has become significantly tighter compared to earlier opportunities when Ethereum traded below $2,000. Bitcoin maximalists maintain that BTC remains the superior long-term store of value, pointing to year-to-date performance where Bitcoin is up 25% compared to Ethereum's 11% gain. Market structure concerns add another layer of complexity. The ETH/BTC ratio recently dropped to 0.022, its lowest level since 2020, and some analysts worry that the 2017-style altcoin euphoria that drove massive relative outperformance may not materialize in the current institutional-dominated market lending protocol strategy that appeals to tax-sensitive investors carries substantial risks, particularly the possibility of liquidation if Ethereum fails to perform as expected or if Bitcoin experiences an unexpected rally. Given Bitcoin's tendency for sudden, explosive moves, traders could find themselves 'stuck with debt' while watching their collateralized Bitcoin appreciate without them. The Verdict: Risk Management Over FOMO For retail investors considering this strategy, the key consideration isn't whether Ethereum might outperform Bitcoin—it very well could. The critical question is whether the potential gains justify the risks of market timing, tax implications, and the possibility of missing Bitcoin's continued institutional adoption cycle. The safest approach may be gradual portfolio rebalancing rather than wholesale rotation, allowing investors to maintain exposure to both assets while managing downside risks. As one seasoned trader noted, 'In crypto, permanent capital beats performance chasing.' Those determined to execute a rotation strategy should consider starting with smaller position sizes and maintaining strict exit rules, remembering that in previous cycles, the window between altcoin peaks and Bitcoin resuming its dominance has often been measured in weeks, not months. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Image: Shutterstock This article Bitcoin-To-Ethereum Rotation: Genius Move Or FOMO Trap? Here's What The Data Shows originally appeared on
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
Trump-backed cane sugar Coke tastes different, but health benefits are a myth
Our favorite soda is being made great again. Or is it? Early in my career, I was puzzled when a lab colleague asked me to bring back a few cans of Coke from my trip home to Brazil. I soon learned that sodas in the United States are sweetened with high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) instead of cane sugar, and that many people miss the original flavor of sugar-sweetened versions. What I've learned about sweeteners since then feels especially relevant now, as Coca-Cola's decision to reintroduce cane sugar into at least one of its American-sold products, allegedly prompted by President Donald Trump's encouragement, has reignited discussion over what goes into our sodas. While sucrose, the chemical name for cane sugar, could be the most common sweetener in our kitchens, many other substances also taste sweet to us. These include glucose, fructose and intensely sweet compounds like saccharin (a synthetic sweetener), steviol glycosides (extracted from the leaves of Stevia rebaudiana) and even ultrasweet proteins. One of the most intriguing of those proteins is brazzein, my personal favorite, which was discovered in the West African plant Pentadiplandra brazzeana and is now produced at scale by engineered microbes in large fermentation tanks. Some of these substances are packed with calories, while others are virtually calorie-free. The way our bodies metabolize them varies widely. Coca-Cola's reintroduction of cane sugar in its products line is a big deal, not just because it affects a multibillion dollar market, but also because beverages operate in an intensely competitive market space with razor-thin margins, where even a few extra cents per can carry real weight. Cost, technical advantages and national interests might explain why soda manufacturers switched to corn syrup. The technical advantages to using HFCS versus cane sugar include the level of sweetness. You can pack a lot of sweetness into HFCS because it is more soluble in water than cane sugar, and it is often easier for the industry to manage syrups versus powders. There is also a strategic advantage for the U.S. economy. With the help of tariffs imposed on imported sugar in the late 1970s, adoption of HFCS allowed replacing sugar imports with a U.S.-grown and -produced alternative. This explains why the industry made the switch, but does soda sweetened with HFCS taste the same? And is sugar really any healthier than HFCS? Even though the sweetness level of the final product can be adjusted to be exactly the same, some consumers notice slight differences in taste and mouth feel when HFCS replaces sugar cane in beverages. Some say that the cane sugar version is 'crisper,' or that the HFCS version tastes more 'syrupy,' while others will either not notice the change or quickly get used to it. However, beyond the perception in our mouths, our bodies handle these sugars in different ways. After we swallow products containing sucrose, our body breaks each molecule into one molecule of glucose and one of fructose. Glucose is one of the most important sources of energy for our body, essential for the functioning of our brain, which might explain why we are hardwired to crave sweets so much. Fructose, however, is almost solely metabolized in our livers, and because it isn't as readily consumed as an energy source, it may saturate liver capacities and lead to more fat accumulation. Overconsumption of either of these sugars increases likelihood of obesity and fatty liver disease, ultimately leading to type 2 diabetes and other severe health problems. The bottom line is simple: The potential difference in health impact between cane sugar and HFCS is minor when compared with the well-established risks of excessive consumption of sugar. Both are added sugars that contribute to the growing burden of metabolic disease when consumed in excess. Hopefully, the discussion around corn syrup versus cane sugar won't lead us to lose sight of the importance of reducing overall sugar consumption − perhaps by opting for the diet versions of our favorite sodas, as President Trump has.
