logo
Copper mining and Mount Isa go hand-in-hand. Can one survive without the other?

Copper mining and Mount Isa go hand-in-hand. Can one survive without the other?

Dotted along an outback Queensland horizon, mining stacks rise from the red dirt below.
Marking the epicentre of one of the richest mineral deposits in the world, these towering cylinders bear the residue of more than 100 years of blood, sweat and tears.
For all that time, mining has sustained the city at its doorstep — Mount Isa.
Eighteen months ago, Swiss commodity trader Glencore announced it would close a significant portion of its Mount Isa Mines complex — the underground copper operation — by July this year.
In that time, the company has reduced the expected redundancies from 1,200 to 500.
But that hasn't eased the next big threat: to shutter other key assets if government doesn't intervene.
Separated only by the width of a rail track, it's hard to distinguish where the Mount Isa Mines (MIM) complex ends and the community begins.
It's always been that way.
Prospector John Campbell Miles stumbled upon the rocky outcrops that would become the city in 1923.
A year later, Mount Isa was born.
"From those days, Mount Isa has always been fighting for our existence," local historian Kim-Maree Burton said.
From company takeovers to stock market turmoil to industrial disputes, the local community has weathered each storm in its path.
"It's our character, regardless of the parental ownership, MIM is part and parcel of this city," she said.
"Could we have a city without the mine? I don't think so. Could we have the mine without the city? I don't think so.
"We're two peas in a pod, we need each other."
That's a sentiment shared by many of the 19,000 residents who call the place home.
A born and bred Mount Isan, former local business owner Brett Peterson wasn't surprised when Glencore announced it was ceasing operations at the underground copper site.
Threats to shutter other key assets like the copper smelter in Mount Isa and copper refinery in Townsville have stoked fears far and wide.
"I don't want Mount Isa to end up as a small town, there's too much happening here," he said.
Mount Isa is home to one of only two copper smelters in Australia and is the only one that can process third-party product.
In countries like China and Indonesia, treatment costs are heavily subsidised by local governments.
In a statement, Glencore interim chief operating officer Troy Wilson said the company could not keep up.
"Smelters and refineries like those in Mount Isa and Townsville must be able to compete internationally to survive," Mr Wilson said.
The company admitted these assets could close "this year if we cannot reach an agreement with the Queensland or federal governments."
Four-yearly maintenance on the copper smelter to the tune of $30 million is due in 2026.
But Glencore is seeking a much larger bailout, making a pointed comparison to the Whyalla Steelworks, which received a $2.4 billion package in February.
Queensland Premier David Crisafulli has been vocal on the need for these assets to stay operational, but neither the state nor federal government has promised any solid funding yet.
"Mount Isa's been pretty good to Glencore over a long period of time, I think Glencore needs to be pretty good to Mount Isa now because that is a city on its knees," Mr Crisafulli told the ABC earlier in June.
In a statement, a spokesperson for federal Minister for Industry and Innovation Tim Ayres said the Australian government was monitoring the situation and discussions were continuing.
"Closure of the smelter would have downstream impacts for a number of facilities … the Australian government will work with the Queensland government on the path ahead."
You only have to look at the remnants of once-bustling mining towns nearby to know what's at stake.
The town of Mary Kathleen 50 kilometres from Mount Isa was born off the back of the uranium boom of the 1950s.
At its peak, the community was entirely self-sufficient, with homes, a school, cinema, even an Olympic-sized swimming pool.
But by 1982, when the ore deposit was exhausted, the town was stripped bare and sold off at auction.
Mount Isa's population is already projected to decline, and the city council is preparing for a worst-case scenario of 50 per cent if no other projects start up.
But long-time residents are confident Mount Isa won't suffer the same fate as its neighbour.
"Mary Kathleen was totally different, it was a company town," Ms Burton said.
President of Commerce North West Johno Neilsen points to Mount Isa's critical role as a service hub in the outback as proof the city will survive.
"We've got the largest hospital in the region; health is a major employer.
"That's the saving grace; there's a lot of industries that are still prevalent in town."
For Mr Peterson, the looming threat of further closures isn't enough to make him pack up and abandon the city he's lived in all his life.
"But we need to see some change on the horizon," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The fight with China over the Darwin port
The fight with China over the Darwin port

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

The fight with China over the Darwin port

Sam Hawley: A decade ago, a Chinese company was given the green light to take control of a key Australian port, the Port of Darwin. Now, the Albanese government is scrambling to take it back in a move that the US has long encouraged, but China has warned against. Today, veteran defence analyst Alan Dupont on why the deal was allowed in the first place and the risks of letting it continue. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. News report: Alongside the inevitable Panda diplomacy, Albanese will likely be tough on China, albeit behind closed doors. News report: If there is one issue Australia could try to leverage with China, it is the Port of Darwin. A Chinese company called Landbridge has a 99 year lease over the port and the Albanese government wants to tear that up. News report: China's also likely to press the prime minister to ditch his election promise, something that Treasurer Jim Chalmers says won't happen. Jim Chalmers, Treasurer: We've made it very clear that we will see the Port of Darwin returned to Australian hands. That's what we committed to during the election. Sam Hawley: Alan, the Port of Darwin, it's become a big issue in our diplomatic relationship with China, although Anthony Albanese says it wasn't discussed during a meeting with the Chinese president during his trip to Beijing last week. Reporter: Did the president express any objection to your plans about bringing the Port of Darwin back into Australian hands or any potential response that China might take to that? Anthony Albanese, Prime Minister: No, it wasn't raised. Sam Hawley: Is that surprising to you, given it's a rather big issue? Alan Dupont: Well, it's not surprising to me in the sense that it's not a sort of issue that the president of China is going to discuss with the prime minister. But it's not to say it's not an insignificant issue, because it certainly was taken up by Chinese Premier Li Qiang in the follow up meeting. And he made it quite clear that China would not be happy if Australia was to take the lease back from the Landbridge company. Li Qiang, Chinese Premier: I trust that Australia will also treat Chinese enterprises fairly and also properly resolve the issues they encounter in terms of market access and investment review. Sam Hawley: All right, well, Alan, to understand what's actually going on, I think we should just step back to 2015, because that's when Landbridge, this Chinese company, signed a very long lease to control the port. Just remind me of what happened back then. Alan Dupont: Yes, well, I think the first thing to remember is just a totally different era in Australia's relations with China, when China was essentially seen as a benign trade partner. Everybody was in sort of in the China basket. More China was good. And in 2015, the Northern Territory government decided to put the lease of the port out to tender and Landbridge won the bid by a substantial margin. It bid far more than the other competitors, which is interesting in itself. And it was granted the lease. News report: A deal worth $506 million has won Chinese company Landbridge Group the bid for Darwin's 99-year lease. The government hopes the company's connections will open doors to greater territory trade in Asia, particularly China. Alan Dupont: Now, when Adam Giles, who was the Northern Territory Chief Minister at the time who made the decision, was asked whether he had consulted with the Commonwealth government, the federal government, he said, yes, we've run it past Defence and they've given it a clean bill of health, which is actually correct. Adam Giles, then-NT Chief Minister: Defence as an agency signed off on that, and we're quite happy with the approval process on that. It didn't need formal approval. Alan Dupont: So he ran it past Defence. Defence said no problems from a security point of view. And so the Northern Territory government went ahead with it. And the reason they did that is because they wanted to have the money from the lease, from the successful tenderer, which is over half a billion dollars, so that they could develop the harbour as the main gateway into Northern Australia. So it's quite an important economic sort of fillip, if you like, for the Northern Territory government. Sam Hawley: OK, and just to make clear, Darwin, of course, is a gateway to Asia. The port is the nearest port from Australia to Asia. So it is actually a really important Australian infrastructure, isn't it? Alan Dupont: No, absolutely. It was then and is now, even more so now. But you're absolutely right. It is the major port in Northern Australia. And unfortunately, at the time, it was pretty moribund. It just wasn't making money. So I think the Northern Territory government saw an opportunity here to beef up the infrastructure and they put some of the money into a shiplift, which was going to be an added attraction to the port so they could lift large ships up and repair them. So that was another offering they could get out of the actual money from the lease. Sam Hawley: All right. So Landbridge, this Chinese company, it receives a 99 year lease. Just tell me, what sort of links does this company actually have to the Chinese government? Alan Dupont: Well, Landbridge is owned by a gentleman called Ye Cheng, who is a billionaire and has very direct and specific links to the Chinese government, as most businesses do in China. And the bottom line is that if the Chinese government wants Landbridge to do something, it will have to do it, have to comply, because that's spelled out in the national security law that governs all commercial businesses in China. Sam Hawley: Well, as you say, back then the federal government at the time did agree that this should go ahead. But there were people who were raising objections, including Anthony Albanese and the then president of the United States, Barack Obama. Alan Dupont: Yes. Well, not everybody was happy with the decision even back then in 2015. News report: The US president, Barack Obama, has told Mr Turnbull his country would have appreciated being consulted about the deal before it was announced. Alan Dupont: I know that Bill Shorten, who was the leader of the Labor Party at the time, did ask for details of why the decision had been made. Bill Shorten, then-Labor leader: We would like them to explain whether or not they've done all the foreign investment review processes. We want to hear from our security and defence experts. Alan Dupont: And I think the local Labor opposition in the Northern Territory did criticise the decision at the time. So it's fair to say that Labor generally weren't particularly happy or supportive of it. But I don't think they made too big a deal about it at the time. It's only later on that it's become a controversial issue. Sam Hawley: All right. OK. So, Alan, we know this lease is now at the centre of a geopolitical storm. And ahead of the last election, Anthony Albanese pledged to return the port of Darwin to Australian hands. But what do we know when it comes to national security risks? Are there any risks to the security of the port of Darwin? Are there legitimate concerns, in your view, regarding the Chinese ownership of this port? It's not like Chinese warships can pull up to it, right? Alan Dupont: Yeah, that's correct. I mean, look, there's been a bit of hyperbole about it at both ends of the spectrum here. I do think there are national security implications, but they're not quite what people would think. I don't think the Chinese Landbridge is going to suddenly start spying on Australian Navy ships. I mean, why would it need to do that? I mean, their satellites are quite capable of monitoring what goes on in Darwin Harbour. Sam Hawley: They can do it anyway. Alan Dupont: That's right. So it's not so much that from a technical espionage point of view. It's really about the fact that you have to see the lease in terms of China's broader strategic ambitions in the region. And also, they saw it useful as making it more difficult for the US to actually beef up its capabilities in northern Australia if the US saw this as a problem and the US did see it as a problem. So China is quite happy to see that happen, because obviously it would like to decouple Australia from the US alliance if it can possibly do so. So you have to see it in terms of that broad strategic context rather than just a commercial decision. Sam Hawley: Yeah, right. And as you said, the world is a different place than it was 10 years ago. And China spent that decade building up influence in the region, right? So there is, what, more reason for concern now? Alan Dupont: Yes, I think that's right. I mean, it's a totally different environment now, obviously, than it was back in 2015. And as you're aware, now it's become a political issue here in Australia at two levels. One is that the China hawks see this as a big problem. It's a perception problem as much as a real problem. The US is not happy with it. But the other thing is it's become politicised too. Anthony Albanese, Prime Minister: What we will do is negotiate in the interests of Australian taxpayers, in the national interest. It will come back under Australian control. We would never have flogged this off. Alan Dupont: Both parties have committed to taking the lease back, preferably in commercial grounds. But if necessary, they will play the national security card through the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act, which it's set up and designed to protect Australian critical infrastructure, of which Darwin Port would be considered an important part of that. So that's where we are at the moment. Sam Hawley: What sort of influence do you think the Americans are playing in this decision, if any at all? As you've said, the Americans do not want Chinese ownership of this port, and they've been pushing for a long time for that to end. Alan Dupont: Yeah, look, I mean, the Americans have been actually tiptoeing around this rather than coming in strongly about it. I mean, clearly they're not happy to have the Chinese, a Chinese company in charge of the port. But I wouldn't overestimate the US pressure side of this. I think it's probably much more an Australian internal decision. I think there was some embarrassment on the part of Defence that this was given a clean bill of health, when later on, I think if it had gone back up to Defence two years later, there's no way that the lease would have been approved now. Sam Hawley: All right. Well, of course, as we've mentioned, the Chinese are not happy about this at all. What has the company Landbridge actually had to say in response to this? Alan Dupont: So the Australian CEO of Landbridge, Terry O'Connor, I mean, he's a straight commercial guy. And he's saying, look, you know, I'm just running a port here. Terry O'Connor, Landbridge non-executive director for Australia: What we've seen is the port continue to be used as a political football in an election cycle. We've seen a bit of hysteria around the fact that it's owned by a private Chinese individual. I call them myths and mistruths often being said around the port. One that continues to amuse me is the perception that we're somehow connected with the People's Liberation Army in China. We're not. Alan Dupont: But, you know, there are broader considerations here. And the point is that the government is now committed to doing it. And the issue is how they do it. Right. And I think I don't think the government has fully understood the complexity of this. So it's looking to engineer a commercial buyout, preferably by an Australian provider of port management. But it's going to be difficult to find one to take that on board because it's not an easy thing to do. They're not companies with the expertise. If we can't get a commercial buyout, if, for example, Landbridge doesn't sell regardless of the offer, then we only have no alternative but to play the national security card. In which case China is going to say, well, what is the legitimacy of taking this lease back? When we complied, when the Landbridge complied with all the provisions of it? In fact, the Chinese ambassador has talked about I think his term was a ethically questionable decision. So you can see that there's a lot of obstacles ahead to actually engineer this. And how Albanese does it is going to determine how China responds. Sam Hawley: Yeah. OK, well, let's then look, Alan, at how China could actually respond to this. We know it's a volatile relationship. Regardless of the way it happens, will there be a backlash from China, do you think? Alan Dupont: Yeah, well, look, they could do a number of things. They could just make a pro forma protest and let it go through to the keeper, so to speak, in the interest of the broader relationship. Or if they really wanted to go to town, they could actually do something quite serious in terms of our trade relationship, for example. So I think, you know, there's a lot of different outcomes here. It could be a relatively minor thing and easily dealt with, but I suspect it's going to be somewhere in between. And it's going to be fascinating to see how it plays out. Sam Hawley: Sure is. So will Anthony Albanese stick to his guns on this? He's not going to back out amid threats from China, is he? I mean, this could get ugly. Alan Dupont: Well, so now he's made that decision, it would be very difficult for him not to see it through. So I think he's got to now engineer an outcome where the lease is taken back from Landbridge, but not in a way that really offends China. And I'm not entirely sure how he's going to do that. Sam Hawley: Alan Dupont is the chief executive of geopolitical risk consultancy, the Cognoscenti Group, who until recently advised the Northern Territory government on boosting defence investment. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead. Audio production by Sam Dunn. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. Thanks for listening.

Australia's success hinges on this decade, PM says
Australia's success hinges on this decade, PM says

News.com.au

time6 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Australia's success hinges on this decade, PM says

How successful Australia is this century hinges on what happens in the country over the next decade, Anthony Albanese has told NewsWire in an exclusive interview. Lounging in the conference room of a Royal Australian Air Force Airbus, donning a grey Joy Division T-shirt, the Prime Minister was noticeably relaxed as he and his China delegation jetted home toward Canberra. It was a tough trip to China. He carried the interests of Australia's business community, iron ore giants, tourism sector and researchers while navigating a delicate diplomatic relationship with Xi Jinping – a mission overshadowed hawkish hints out of the White House. At home, the opposition was quick to criticise him for not producing anything tangible, despite several agreements signed while there and $20bn in trade barriers removed over the past year. 'I think it's disappointing that they've broken with what is normal protocol, and been critical of this visit with our major trading partner,' Mr Albanese said. 'It shows that they haven't really changed their position or their attitude towards China, and that's disappointing.' 'I think it's disappointing that they've broken with what is normal protocol, and been critical of this visit with our major trading partner,' Mr Albanese said. 'It shows that they haven't really changed their position or their attitude towards China, and that's disappointing.' In an increasingly uncertain world, he sees China and its exploding middle class as key to Australia's economic future. The relentless march of China's economic growth is undeniable. In Shanghai, one of the three cities Mr Albanese visited, the growth is exemplified by the transformation of the metropolis' centre. Where rice paddies once dotted the area when he visited some 30 years ago now stands towering skyscrapers draped in neon. Meanwhile, the city's 25 million or so inhabitants get around in state-of-the-art electric vehicles. With China leading a middle class boom in Asia, Mr Albanese said his government's focus was on implementing 'long term changes that Australia needs' to not only survive, but to thrive. 'The world is changing fast, and you can either shape that change, or it will shape you,' he said. 'And we've just been to a part of the world, in China, that's obviously changed very quickly over recent decades. 'And so there's a link – one of the reasons why that was an important visit is that the connections in our trade and economic relationships have a real difference for jobs and the economy. 'In Australia, one in four of our jobs is trade-dependent.' 'The world is changing fast, and you can either shape that change, or it will shape you,' he said. 'And we've just been to a part of the world, in China, that's obviously changed very quickly over recent decades. 'And so there's a link – one of the reasons why that was an important visit is that the connections in our trade and economic relationships have a real difference for jobs and the economy. 'In Australia, one in four of our jobs is trade-dependent.' Mr Albanese said his domestic agenda and international agenda worked hand-in-hand, and with 94 lower house seats following the May election, he is in a strong position to power on with both. Among the big ticket items for the first sitting fortnight are slashing student debt by 20 per cent and legislating penalty rates. Longer term items include speeding up the renewables transition, building 1.2m homes and making more things in Australia and keeping it sustainable. 'I feel a sense of responsibility,' Mr Albanese said. 'I really believe this decade will determine how successful Australia is for the decades to come, because this is … the transition to net zero is critical. 'The transition nature of the workforce changes. 'They're dealing with artificial intelligence and new technologies that will have an impact on the nature of work, all of these things. 'And I think it is more difficult than it was for previous generations.' He added that while he was able to get a 'secure job' after finishing high school, now people 'work in multiple jobs'. 'It's a different world,' he said. During his trip, Mr Albanese was keen to reframe the Australia-China relationship from its increasingly militaristic nature to more friendlier terms. It was a message that went down well in Beijing, if Chinese state media is a measure. Whether it went down well in Washington is another matter. Though, Mr Albanese made clear throughout his diplomatic and business blitz that chasmic differences remained between Australia and China. Any suggestion that Australia was realigning itself geopolitically was firmly met with his mantra: 'We will agree where we can, disagree where we must, and engage in the national interest.'

Labor to act on key cost-of-living promises in first week of parliament
Labor to act on key cost-of-living promises in first week of parliament

The Australian

time6 hours ago

  • The Australian

Labor to act on key cost-of-living promises in first week of parliament

Australians are weeks away from receiving a 20 per cent cut to their student debt, with Labor vowing to scrap HECS and HELP debt as the government's first priority once parliament resumes, following the government's landslide election victory. The changes will be applied to all student debts as they on June 1, 2025, with the average HELP debt of $27,600 set to receive a reduction of about $5520. The HECS reform will also reduce the repayment threshold for debts from $56,156 to $67,000. Rates of repayments will also be lowered then current levels, with someone on $70,000 paying $1300. Despite the Coalition not supporting the measure during the campaign, education spokesman Jonno Duniam said he expected the Bill to 'pass' parliament. Labor will pursue action on its election vows to slash student debts and introduce paid prac ahead of parliament returning on Tuesday. Picture: NewsWire/ Nicholas Eagar Speaking to the ABC on Sunday, he said that while the legislation would still need to go through party room and shadow cabinet, he believed 'the Australian people spoke pretty clearly … around the policies the Labor Party took,' adding the party was 'not really in the business of standing in the way of cost of living relief'. Labor will also seek to introduce its cost-of-living election promises, including the $150 energy rebate top up, the 30 per cent discount on home batteries, paid prac measures for student nurses, teachers, social workers and midwives, plus a $10,000 cash bonus for trainee builders who finish their construction apprenticeship. It will also begin work on legislating a two-week increase for Government Paid Parental Leave and laws to add superannuation on government paid parental leave, while also increasing the Super Guarantee to 12 per cent. Education Minister Jason Clare will also use the first sitting week to introduce Bills to tighten protection settings in childcare centres, including provision to allow anti-fraud officers to inspect centres with a warrant or police supervision. The Coalition has also said it's open to working with the government to get the Commonwealth to pull funding on centres which fail to meet safety standards after a Victorian former childcare worker Joshua Brown was hit with more than 70 child abuse charges. While Labor holds a thumping 94-seat majority, out of a total 150 seats, in the Lower House, the government will still need to negotiate with either the Greens (which hold 10 seats), the Coalition's 27 senators, or the 10-member crossbench. Politicians are set to return to Canberra on Tuesday for the first sitting fortnight of the 48th parliament. Picture: NewsWire/ Martin Ollman After an election bloodbath, the Coalition will return with a significantly reduced 43 seats, while the Greens have been reduced to a single seat. Ahead of the official opening of the 48th parliament, Sussan Ley warned that while the Coalition would 'provide a constructive path for any legislation that makes Australia stronger,' it's 'good will is not a blank cheque'. As it stands, the opposition has already vowed to fight Labor's proposed superannuation tax on balances over $3m, with the Coalition also set to eye accidentally released treasury advice to Jim Chalmers which urged him to consider new taxes to increase the budget outlook. '⁠Anthony Albanese is yet to explain why his departmental officials secretly advised the Treasurer that Labor would need to raise taxes on Australians,' the Opposition Leader said. 'We will seek answers on behalf of Australian taxpayers, not one of whom should face a new tax that they didn't vote for.' It will also continue to attack Labor over its handling of Australia-US relations, following further fallout from Donald Trump's tariff trade war, with Anthony Albanese yet to secure a meeting with the US President. Jessica Wang NewsWire Federal Politics Reporter Jessica Wang is a federal politics reporter for NewsWire based in the Canberra Press Gallery. She previously covered NSW state politics for the Wire and has also worked at and Mamamia covering breaking news, entertainment, and lifestyle. @imjesswang_ Jessica Wang

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store