logo
I gave my friends hats which said ‘Make America Hate Again'. That's what Trump is trying to do

I gave my friends hats which said ‘Make America Hate Again'. That's what Trump is trying to do

Irish Times11-06-2025
Back in my youth we were taught in Latin class about the problems faced by Rome because of neighbouring wetlands known as the Pontine Marshes. Although Romans did not fully understand how malaria infected humans, they connected the marshes with illness and death. Their combined engineering skills failed to drain the marshes and it was only in the 1920s that Mussolini made reclamation of the marshes his successful national prestige project.
I thought of the Pontine Marshes when
Donald Trump
promised American voters that he was going to 'drain the swamp' in Washington, DC. It was hard to see how he intended to effect a political revolution that could amount to draining the Washington swamp. The influence of powerful lobbyists and financial interests seemed to prosper between 2016 and 2020, when the
Republican Party
held the reins of power.
The image of draining a swamp was powerful. But what have we now in its place?
Trump
's second term has turned the Oval Office in the White House into a veritable political pigsty.
The Musk-Trump spat (which saw Musk asserting that Trump's name was to be found on the Epstein files and Trump countering with the claim that Musk had 'lost his mind') was remarkable. Trump is not now interested in an immediate reconciliation – presumably for fear of weakening his authority or appearing to reward those who inflict political damage on him.
READ MORE
Meetings in the Oval Office political pigsty are obviously distasteful to his visitors. Apart from the ambush of
Volodymyr Zelenskiy
and the
absurd encounter with South Africa's president Cyril Ramaphosa
(in which Trump made grossly untrue allegations about persecution of Boer farmers and attempted to prove his lies with fake photographs), other world leaders have simply sat for 45 minutes hoping that no diplomatic damage would be done.
Russia's president
Vladimir Putin
and China's president
Xi Jinping
have not participated in the ludicrous charades to which others have agreed.
Trump's promise to end the
Ukraine war
within 24 hours now appears as some form of sick joke. But apart from childish antics (including threats to abandon any role in the dispute) the question remains as to what, if any, is America's preferred outcome of the Ukraine war. Trump has vaguely spoken about sanctions. To what end? Does he think that Ukraine will buckle under a combination of aerial and missile attacks and meatgrinder attritional warfare along its eastern frontline? What has happened to his '
deal
' to Americanise half of Ukraine's mineral and energy resources? Is there any rational strategy in play, or is Trump simply both incapable of stopping Putin's invasion and unwilling to admit his abject weakness?
The evidence suggests that Trump's sole political yardstick is the state of US stock markets. Markets don't like war. For a president who has majored on controlling immigration, it is surprising to hear Trump advocate the introduction of golden visas for rich people, presumably including Russians, who wish to reside in the US in exchange for million-dollar investments. We had
similar schemes
in Ireland which turned out to be political failures. Why would America bare its security throat to an influx of dubious investor migrants from overseas states? Is that strategy a necessary part of making America great again?
While it is obvious that Trump's vision of American greatness is to be measured in the wealth of its plutocrat class, I find it hard to understand how public opinion in America is not revolted by events such as the $200 million 'gift' of a jumbo jet from Qatar
destined to become Trump's private property
, or the launch by Trump of a cryptocurrency fund designed for his personal enrichment.
Trump's promise to deport one million illegal migrants was easily made. Rounding them up and expelling them is a very different matter. They will turn out to be parents and spouses and sole economic providers of American citizens. They will turn out to be the fruit pickers, labourers, cleaners and counter staff of countless small enterprises. They may even include the maids and pool boys of Trump's billionaire coterie.
In Trump's first term, I gave a number of my friends Maga hats embroidered instead with the message 'Make America Hate Again'.
Sending marines and the National Guard to Los Angeles
and other cities that have tolerated illegal migrants for many many years is a cowardly, premeditated Trump stratagem to provoke communal hatred. Democrats need to be a lot more politically agile than they have been in the last four years to stop Trump's political rampage.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US right-wingers fear Superman's woke ideology. Trust me, guys, you'll be grand
US right-wingers fear Superman's woke ideology. Trust me, guys, you'll be grand

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

US right-wingers fear Superman's woke ideology. Trust me, guys, you'll be grand

Kellyanne Conway , former senior counsellor to Donald Trump , was recently on Fox News objecting to the supposed wokeness of James Gunn's Superman . 'We don't go to the movie theatre to be lectured to and have somebody throw their ideology on to us,' she bellowed. Trust me, Kellyanne, you will be grand. You can attend the big stupid superhero flick with no fears of encountering spittle-flecked agitprop. Few will confuse it with a social-realist rebuke in the style of Ken Loach or with Maoist propaganda of the Jean-Luc Godard school. Not since the McCarthyite witch hunts have right-wing commentators worked so hard to find subversive material in Hollywood pabulum. The stakes are now much lower, but the noise is much louder. There are so many more platforms from which to shout. The paranoiacs have so many more deranged friends at the head of government. [ Superman review: Utterly charmless. And as funny as toothache Opens in new window ] Another of this week's film stories (we'll keep you in suspense for now) puts the silliness in perspective. There is a sense that the current spat is a playground game – one in which Gunn seems happy to participate. 'Superman is the story of America,' he told the Times. 'An immigrant that came from other places and populated the country.' READ MORE There should not be anything controversial in that. The notion of Superman, refugee from the planet Krypton, being an immigrant, is far from a new one. In a recent article for the Hollywood Reporter, Andrew Slack and Jose Antonio Vargas recalled a campaign they launched in 2013 that asked Americans to reveal their immigration stories while declaring 'Superman is an immigrant'. Batman was the borderline fascist vigilante; Superman was the do-gooder who identified with the huddled masses. Back in 1987, Christopher Reeve only donned the cape for a fourth time on the condition he have some creative control. Superman IV: The Quest for Peace, an anti-nuclear parable, ended up as the wokest ever superhero flick – nothing comes close – some 30 years before the w-word colonised dunderhead right-wing discourse. Evil millionaires take over the Daily Planet. Superman piously addresses the United Nations. The villain really is called Nuclearman. We can forgive the younger Kellyanne Conway for missing that one. The film was so atrocious it banished the franchise to the Fortress of Solitude for close to 20 years. Never forget that Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, the creators of Superman, were second-generation Jewish immigrants and that the character emerged as the Nazis were taking over Germany. On the very first page of Action Comics, the publication that launched the man of steel, he is described as 'champion of the oppressed!' [ From the archive: Superman flies into right-wingers' wrath Opens in new window ] None of this dissuaded Dean Cain, who played Superman on the TV show Lois & Clark, from getting his tights in a twist. 'I think that was a mistake by James Gunn to say it's an immigrant thing, and I think it's going to hurt the numbers on the movie,' he said, apparently forgetting that, in season four of Lois & Clark, an antagonist (satirically, one assumes) calls the immigration cops on the man in blue and red. Might Cain be proven correct? What about continuing complaints from right-wingers that – denied by Gunn – the global conflict at the film's centre is modelled on the current Middle Eastern conflict? Might Superman, to parrot an unavoidable saw of the era, go broke by going woke? Not a bit of it. Gunn's film landed with a $217 million opening weekend. That is the third-biggest debut of the year to date. By one measure this is the best-ever opening for a solo Superman picture. The message here is not, alas, that audiences are on the search for politically charged mainstream entertainment. But nor are they, like Ms Conway, terrified that the superhero will begin lecturing them on agrarian reform or dialectical materialism. Ninety-five per cent of the audience pays absolutely no attention to the disputes that so inflame the attention of social media. The supposedly wokearific Snow White failed because it looked like a dud. The allegedly radical Superman (which I thought ghastly) succeeded because folks were hungry for the title character. Meanwhile, another gloomier corner of cinematic discourse was reminded that one of their saints really did have views worth abhorring. Stellan Skarsgård wasn't saying anything we didn't know about Ingmar Bergman, but his confirmation was stark and direct . 'Bergman was manipulative,' he told us earlier in the month. 'He was a Nazi during the war and the only person I know who cried when Hitler died.' One can only imagine how TikTok would have reacted if it had been around at the time of Bergman's The Seventh Seal or Persona. The conversation would have been exhausting, repetitive and unenlightening. But it would have been about something that actually mattered. Almost nobody really cares if Superman is a communist or not.

Government starts fund to help businesses hardest hit by US trade war as 15pc-20pc tariffs loom
Government starts fund to help businesses hardest hit by US trade war as 15pc-20pc tariffs loom

Irish Independent

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Government starts fund to help businesses hardest hit by US trade war as 15pc-20pc tariffs loom

Coalition scrambling to avoid recession as jobs and businesses in the firing line The Government is planning to do 'everything it possibly can' to avoid a recession, as the Sunday Independent can reveal details of a new fund for those Irish businesses worst ­affected by US tariffs. With US president Donald Trump pushing to impose a 15pc minimum tariff rate on all EU goods, the Government is now bracing for 'quite stark' impacts on the Irish economy — even if the new rate is lower than the 'devastating' 30pc tariffs Trump previously floated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store