logo
Singapore's job vacancies, unemployment up in Q1, with US tariff impact yet to be seen: MOM

Singapore's job vacancies, unemployment up in Q1, with US tariff impact yet to be seen: MOM

Business Times2 days ago

[SINGAPORE] Both job vacancies and unemployment rose in the first quarter of 2025, causing the ratio to stay unchanged, according to the Ministry of Manpower's (MOM) Labour Market Report on Friday (Jun 27).
Resident and non-resident employment grew at a slower pace than in the previous quarter, said the report, in an update to the Apr 28 advance release.
But MOM noted that Q1's rise in job vacancies has yet to reflect the impact of US President Donald Trump's tariff announcement on Apr 2. In polls conducted after the announcement, firms 'remained measured in their outlook for manpower planning', said MOM.
Manpower Minister Tan See Leng said in a media briefing that the slight rise in the unemployment rate suggests that employers remain cautious in hiring amid heightened global uncertainty.
'We expect this caution to continue and hiring demand to moderate further, especially with the impact of the US Liberation Day tariffs,' he said.
But he reassured Singaporeans that there are 'still good job opportunities available', especially in growth sectors.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The government will continue monitoring the tariff situation, and – with other members of the Singapore Economic Resilience Taskforce – is reviewing further measures to help businesses and workers navigate the uncertainties, he said.
The government is also working with institutes of higher learning to increase access to job opportunities for fresh graduates, he added.
Slower employment growth
In Q1, resident employment edged up by 300, and non-resident employment rose by 2,000 – in contrast to increases of 1,400 and 6,300 respectively in Q4.
The rise in non-resident employment was driven by work permit holders, mainly in jobs such as driving buses or trucks, 'which residents were less likely to take up', said MOM.
Total employment growth eased to 2,400, down from 7,700 in Q4, with MOM noting that figures may not add up due to rounding.
The fall is due to both seasonal and structural factors, said Ang Boon Heng, director of MOM's manpower research and statistics department.
Singapore should not expect 'very large' increases in employment, as its labour force participation rate is already high, he added.
Wait and see
Any impact from Trump's tariffs will likely show up in Q2 or Q3, 'depending on how the situation evolves', said Ang.
As the labour market typically responds with a lag, firms are 'waiting for greater clarity' before making adjustments to their workforce, he added.
He expects 'a slight softening' of the labour market – especially for trade-reliant sectors, as firms stay cautious – but not a 'big correction', as business sentiments have held steady so far.
In the longer term, uncertainty will weigh on business sentiments, he added, noting that the unemployment rate rose in Q1.
Labour market still tight
There were 81,100 job vacancies in March, up from 77,500 in December 2024. But as unemployment also rose, job vacancies per unemployed persons held steady at 1.64, with MOM describing this as the labour market staying tight.
The increase in job vacancies was broad-based across sectors, but MOM noted signs of slowing demand in manufacturing: 8,000 vacancies in March, down from 8,200 in December.
Vacancies 'likely to be filled by residents' rose to 59,400 from 53,800 before, continuing to account for about 70 per cent of all vacancies.
These were concentrated in growth sectors such as health and social services, professional services, information and communications, and financial and insurance services.
Unemployment rates as of March were higher across the board: 2 per cent overall, up from 1.9 per cent; 2.9 per cent for residents, up from 2.8 per cent; and 3.1 per cent for citizens, up from 2.9 per cent.
The resident long-term unemployment rate edged up to 0.9 per cent, from 0.8 per cent before, but was comparable to non-recessionary norms, said MOM.
But resident and citizen unemployment rates improved marginally in April, edging down to 2.8 per cent for residents and 3 per cent for citizens.
No deep cuts yet
In Q1, retrenchments declined slightly to 3,590 – higher than the advance release's estimate of 3,300 – from 3,680 in the preceding quarter.
This was driven mainly by fewer retrenchments in wholesale trade, as well as community, social and personal services. Retrenchments rose in sectors such as manufacturing, construction, as well as transportation and storage.
The incidence of retrenchment remained unchanged at 1.5 retrenched per 1,000 employees, which MOM described as 'well within non-recessionary norms'.
Retrenched residents also got back into jobs more quickly. The resident re-entry rate into employment within six months of retrenchment improved to 60.6 per cent, from 58.1 per cent in Q4.
Fewer employees were placed on short work-week or temporary layoff: 570, down from 660 in Q4.
'Together, these suggest that while firms are exercising caution in hiring, they are also holding back from deeper workforce cuts, reflecting a measured approach in workforce management amid ongoing economic uncertainty,' said MOM.
However, while Singapore's external demand outlook has 'improved slightly' with the de-escalation of global trade tensions, 'the near-term global economic outlook remains uncertain'.
Polls in April and May found a modest rise in hiring intentions, with 42.2 per cent of firms planning to hire for Q3 – up from 40.5 per cent of firms planning to hire for Q2, when polled between January to March.
But this was driven only by a few sectors – including professional services and financial services – while hiring sentiments softened in most other sectors.
Wage expectations remained stable, with 21.2 per cent of firms indicating plans to raise wages in Q3. This was comparable to 21.7 per cent of firms planning to raise wages in Q2, in the last survey.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

G-7 agrees to exempt US multinationals from global minimum tax
G-7 agrees to exempt US multinationals from global minimum tax

Straits Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

G-7 agrees to exempt US multinationals from global minimum tax

US President Donald Trump was deeply critical of the landmark minimum global tax rate of 15 per cent agreed by 140 countries in 2021. PHOTO: NYTIMES LONDON - The Group of Seven (G-7) nations said on June 28 they have agreed to exempt US multinational companies from a global minimum tax imposed by other countries – a win for President Donald Trump's government, which pushed hard for the compromise. The deal will see US companies benefit from a 'side-by-side' solution under which they will only be taxed at home, on both domestic and foreign profits, the G-7 said, in a statement released by Canada, which holds the group's rotating presidency. The agreement was reached in part due to 'recently proposed changes to the US international tax system' included in Mr Trump's signature domestic policy Bill, which is still being debated in Congress, the statement said. The side-by-side system could 'provide greater stability and certainty in the international tax system moving forward,' it added. Nearly 140 countries struck a landmark deal in 2021 to tax multinational companies, an agreement negotiated under the auspices of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). That agreement, deeply criticised by Mr Trump, includes two 'pillars,' the second of which sets a minimum global tax rate of 15 per cent. The OECD must ultimately decide to exempt the US companies from that tax – or not. The G-7 said it looked forward to 'expeditiously reaching a solution that is acceptable and implementable to all.' On June 26, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had signalled that a 'joint understanding among G-7 countries that defends American interests' was in the works. He also asked US lawmakers to 'to remove the Section 899 protective measure from consideration in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill' – Mr Trump's policy mega-Bill. Section 899 has been dubbed a 'revenge tax,' allowing the government to impose levies on firms with foreign owners and on investors from countries deemed to impose unfair taxes on US businesses. The clause sparked concern that it would inhibit foreign companies from investing in the United States. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

What is Canada's Digital Services Tax and Why It Sparked a Trade War With US?
What is Canada's Digital Services Tax and Why It Sparked a Trade War With US?

International Business Times

time4 hours ago

  • International Business Times

What is Canada's Digital Services Tax and Why It Sparked a Trade War With US?

Trade tensions between the United States and Canada reached a boiling point this week as President Donald Trump abruptly ended trade negotiations in response to Canada's Digital Services Tax (DST). Trump described the tax as "a direct and blatant attack" on American businesses and warned that new tariffs on Canadian goods would be imposed within a week. Canada confirmed it will enforce the DST starting Monday, following months of tense discussions. The tax was introduced under the Trudeau government in June 2024 and applies a 3% levy on revenue earned by large digital firms—particularly those with over €750 million in global revenue and more than $20 million in Canadian digital sales. This move primarily targets major US tech firms like Amazon, Google, Meta, and Uber, with retroactive application to January 2022, creating a US$2 billion bill due by the end of June. Under Canadian law, companies are required to register with the Canada Revenue Agency by January 31, 2025, and file returns by June 30, 2025. Penalties include fines of $20,000 per year for failure to register, and late filing could result in additional financial penalties of up to 5% plus 1% monthly interest. Trump reacted strongly, ending trade discussions and stating on social media that Canada would regret its decision. He asserted, "We have such power over Canada. They were foolish to do it." Trump insisted Canada would eventually retract the tax but made clear he was indifferent to their decision. The tax has long been a sore point for US policymakers who claim it unfairly singles out American digital companies. Industry leaders welcomed Trump's firm approach. Matt Schruers of the Computer & Communications Industry Association praised the administration's move, saying it protected US digital exports from discriminatory treatment. In response to the DST, tech companies have started passing costs to Canadian customers. Google, for example, introduced a "Canada DST Fee" of 2.5% on ads purchased in the country. Despite US pressure, Canada remains resolute. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne confirmed the government is moving forward, and Prime Minister Mark Carney stated negotiations will continue but only on Canada's terms. Canada relies heavily on trade with the US, with nearly 80% of its exports heading south. It is also America's top foreign supplier of oil, uranium, steel, and electricity. The highly integrated auto sector could be significantly affected by any new tariffs. This dispute is not isolated. The US had earlier initiated consultations under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement regarding the DST. Canadian business groups have warned of potential harm to both economies if the situation escalates.

G-7 agrees to avoid higher taxes for US companies
G-7 agrees to avoid higher taxes for US companies

Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • Straits Times

G-7 agrees to avoid higher taxes for US companies

US President Donald Trump signed an executive order in January declaring that a landmark 2021 global corporate minimum tax deal was not applicable in the US. PHOTO: NYTIMES LONDON - The United States and the Group of Seven (G-7) nations have agreed to support a proposal that would exempt US companies from some components of an existing global agreement, the G-7 said in a statement on June 28. The group has created a 'side-by-side' system in response to the US administration agreeing to scrap the Section 899 retaliatory tax proposal from President Donald Trump's tax and spending Bill, it said in a statement from Canada, the head of the rolling G-7 presidency. The G-7 said the plan recognises existing US. minimum tax laws and aims to bring more stability to the international tax system. G-7 officials said that they look forward to discussing a solution that is "acceptable and implementable to all". In January, through an executive order, Mr Trump declared that the global corporate minimum tax deal was not applicable in the US, effectively pulling out of the landmark 2021 arrangement negotiated by the Biden administration with nearly 140 countries. He had also vowed to impose a retaliatory tax against countries that imposed taxes on US firms under the 2021 global tax agreement. This tax was considered detrimental to many foreign companies operating in the US. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store