
Sweden's Klarna receives licence from UK's Financial Conduct Authority
The Swedish fintech, which until now has focused on buy now, pay later services, will now be able to provide UK-based customers with debit cards and Klarna accounts.
Customers will be able to save and manage money in their accounts, top up their debit cards, shop and receive funds, and earn up to 10% cashback when they make purchases.
'This authorisation marks Klarna's next big step in the UK — moving beyond flexible payments into everyday financial management,' said Abby Vickers, head of Klarna Financial Services UK.
'While traditional banks are still playing catch-up, Klarna is giving consumers a smarter way to spend — and now, to manage their finances too.'
Vickers added that the licence 'lays the foundation for future product expansion, strengthening Klarna's ambition to disrupt traditional retail banking as it becomes a true everyday spending and saving partner for consumers'.
The move sets Klarna up to compete with the likes of popular digital banks such as Revolut and Monzo.
Following Brexit, Klarna Bank AB, a fully licensed Swedish bank, continued to provide regulated services in the UK under the FCA's Temporary Permissions Regime (TPR). In 2023, the fintech then established a new, UK-based entity to provide all consumer-facing services in the UK.
Klarna is currently preparing a New York IPO, its second attempt to list after its first launch was delayed by market turmoil linked to President Trump's trade war.
The shift away from its buy now, pay later focus has intensified since the postponement.
Klarna is seeking to boost investor sentiment after recording a loss of $99mn (€85.7mn) in the first quarter of 2025, significantly more than the $47mn (€40.7mn) loss reported a year earlier.
Customer credit losses also rose by 17% year-on-year. This means that more customers failed to repay Klarna what they owed, raising doubts about the sustainability of the firm's business model.
The Swedish fintech hit a peak valuation of around $46bn (€39.8bn) in 2021 after a funding round led by Japan's SoftBank. The company then lost around 85% of its valuation in 2022 as it struggled with a period of high interest rates, prompting major job cuts.
The fintech has held a banking licence in Sweden since 2017, and CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski has previously said the company is considering a US banking licence.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fashion Network
11 hours ago
- Fashion Network
US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup
Legal disputes over augmented reality (AR) technology are escalating across fashion and beauty. The latest case involves Chanel, which California-based AR company Zugara is suing for allegedly infringing on its patented face-tracking process. Zugara filed the lawsuit on July 22 in Texas, claiming the French luxury house's virtual makeup try-on tool unlawfully replicates a patented system the firm developed for real-time cosmetic simulation. The tech company is known for providing AR tools to major clients such as Nestlé, Pepsi, Toyota, AT&T, and the U.S. Air Force. At the center of the case is a patented method that tracks users' eyes and lips to digitally apply makeup in real time. While there are several ways to achieve this effect, Zugara alleges that Chanel's 'Virtually Try-On' tool copies the specific sequence outlined in its patent. Zugara previously filed a similar complaint against Estée Lauder, which was reportedly settled out of court. Chanel's virtual try-on experience allows users to test makeup looks inspired by its Croisière 2025 runway show. The tool features curated palettes, limited-edition products, and options to customize makeup virtually before purchasing. Unlike virtual reality, which immerses users in a fully digital environment, augmented reality enhances real-world images by overlaying digital elements. In the beauty sector, AR try-on tools have become popular for offering personalized, contact-free shopping experiences. But the rise of AR tools has sparked more than just innovation. Legal challenges involving beauty brands and tech firms are becoming more common—particularly around the collection of biometric data. In the U.S., companies such as Charlotte Tilbury Beauty, e.l.f. Beauty, Mary Kay, and Ulta have previously been sued for allegedly capturing facial data without user consent. As companies like Apple and Meta push forward with AR-enabled devices, experts warn that biometric tracking, facial scanning, and consumer privacy will continue to raise legal and regulatory questions across the retail and tech industries.


Fashion Network
13 hours ago
- Fashion Network
US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup
Legal disputes over augmented reality (AR) technology are escalating across fashion and beauty. The latest case involves Chanel, which California-based AR company Zugara is suing for allegedly infringing on its patented face-tracking process. Zugara filed the lawsuit on July 22 in Texas, claiming the French luxury house's virtual makeup try-on tool unlawfully replicates a patented system the firm developed for real-time cosmetic simulation. The tech company is known for providing AR tools to major clients such as Nestlé, Pepsi, Toyota, AT&T, and the U.S. Air Force. At the center of the case is a patented method that tracks users' eyes and lips to digitally apply makeup in real time. While there are several ways to achieve this effect, Zugara alleges that Chanel's 'Virtually Try-On' tool copies the specific sequence outlined in its patent. Zugara previously filed a similar complaint against Estée Lauder, which was reportedly settled out of court. Chanel's virtual try-on experience allows users to test makeup looks inspired by its Croisière 2025 runway show. The tool features curated palettes, limited-edition products, and options to customize makeup virtually before purchasing. Unlike virtual reality, which immerses users in a fully digital environment, augmented reality enhances real-world images by overlaying digital elements. In the beauty sector, AR try-on tools have become popular for offering personalized, contact-free shopping experiences. But the rise of AR tools has sparked more than just innovation. Legal challenges involving beauty brands and tech firms are becoming more common—particularly around the collection of biometric data. In the U.S., companies such as Charlotte Tilbury Beauty, e.l.f. Beauty, Mary Kay, and Ulta have previously been sued for allegedly capturing facial data without user consent. As companies like Apple and Meta push forward with AR-enabled devices, experts warn that biometric tracking, facial scanning, and consumer privacy will continue to raise legal and regulatory questions across the retail and tech industries.


Fashion Network
13 hours ago
- Fashion Network
US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup
Legal disputes over augmented reality (AR) technology are escalating across fashion and beauty. The latest case involves Chanel, which California-based AR company Zugara is suing for allegedly infringing on its patented face-tracking process. Zugara filed the lawsuit on July 22 in Texas, claiming the French luxury house's virtual makeup try-on tool unlawfully replicates a patented system the firm developed for real-time cosmetic simulation. The tech company is known for providing AR tools to major clients such as Nestlé, Pepsi, Toyota, AT&T, and the U.S. Air Force. At the centre of the case is a patented method that tracks users' eyes and lips to digitally apply makeup in real time. While there are several ways to achieve this effect, Zugara alleges that Chanel's 'Virtually Try-On' tool copies the specific sequence outlined in its patent. Zugara previously filed a similar complaint against Estée Lauder, which was reportedly settled out of court. Chanel's virtual try-on experience allows users to test makeup looks inspired by its Croisière 2025 runway show. The tool features curated palettes, limited-edition products, and options to customise makeup virtually before purchasing. Unlike virtual reality, which immerses users in a fully digital environment, augmented reality enhances real-world images by overlaying digital elements. In the beauty sector, AR try-on tools have become popular for offering personalised, contact-free shopping experiences. But the rise of AR tools has sparked more than just innovation. Legal challenges involving beauty brands and tech firms are becoming more common—particularly around the collection of biometric data. In the U.S., companies such as Charlotte Tilbury Beauty, e.l.f. Beauty, Mary Kay, and Ulta have previously been sued for allegedly capturing facial data without user consent. As companies like Apple and Meta push forward with AR-enabled devices, experts warn that biometric tracking, facial scanning, and consumer privacy will continue to raise legal and regulatory questions across the retail and tech industries.