
He Was At 'Ground Zero' In Kashmir - Inside Story Of Ghazi Baba Encounter
On December 13, 2001, the heart of India's democracy, the Parliament, was attacked by five Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorists and the mastermind, Rana Tahir Nadeem, aka Ghazi Baba, became India's most wanted.
The operation to track and hunt Ghazi Baba lasted for two years, ending with his encounter in 2003, making it one of the most significant anti-terror operations in India's recent history, but a story that remained largely unknown for almost two decades. NN Dubey, a key figure in the operation to kill Ghazi Baba, spoke to NDTV, sharing the untold story of the encounter and how his shirt saved his life.
Ghazi Baba was the mastermind of the 2001 Parliament attacks
'A Difficult Phase For Security Forces'
Narendra Nath Dhar Dubey, a Deputy Inspector General in the BSF, gave a context to the situation in the region in the early 2000s, which was marred by ambushes on security forces, an era of suicide bombings and attacks on civilians.
"The start of the millennium from 2000 onwards has been very difficult for the security forces to handle the terrorism in Kashmir. We (security forces) were facing a multifaceted battle because that was the phase when the era of suicide attacks had just started in Kashmir," Mr Dubey said.
The officer said Delhi Police, the Special Cell, the Army and the BSF were on a hunt to track down Ghazi Baba since attacks on security forces and civilians were a part of the module. The officer said the "Maximum cop killings in Jammu and Kashmir happened between 2001 and 2003, and protecting civilians, jawans (soldiers) was important because any casualty had a demoralising effect".
Ghazi Baba, who was from Pakistan, was one of the most dreaded terrorists operating in the state. He masterminded the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly, Parliament attack, and two car blasts at the army headquarters in Srinagar. He was also reportedly involved in the kidnapping of six foreigners in Pahalgam in 1995.
Mr Dubey said that getting local support was another challenge because there was a fear that "you could get killed by the terrorists", and in the case of Ghazi Baba, it was much needed because he chose one of the difficult areas of Kashmir - Ganderbal, Zakura and the Tral mountains to hide and small troops can't go in to kill him.
"The area is difficult, and it was close to the line of control and used to involve a huge operation of multiple battalions if you want to trace out one person. It was a physically, topographically and geographically difficult task," he said,
The Border Security Force was not just a guardian of the border, but also fought terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir from the late 1980s. The force had well-established itself in the region for over 15 years, carrying out its operations with the Army and Jammu and Kashmir Police, before handing it over to the Central Reserve Police Force much later in 2005.
The role of the BSF has been largely underappreciated despite establishing a strong foothold in the region, when special units of the Army, like the Rashtriya Rifles, were not even established until 1997. From the late 1980s to at least 1997, the BSF, along with other troops, was a premier counter-insurgency force in the region. The force also played a significant role in the release of Rubaiyya Sayeed, daughter of former Home Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, who was kidnapped by JKLF terrorists in 1989.
'We Found Him In An Unprepared Position'
At a time when drones and advanced surveillance and reconnaissance systems were non-existent, as they are right now, there was a heavy reliance on human intelligence, especially in the dense jungles of Kashmir. The challenges were not just geographical for the BSF but also logistical.
Mr Dubey, who was in the face of action, said that "In the late 90s, the maximum resources were having Maruti Gypsies and Tata vehicles. And there was no bulletproof vehicle. So, how did we improvise the vehicle? We used to put a piece of wood on the side. That's the maximum we could do and filled sandbags, which made the payload of the Gypsy double to its load and we used to put the layers on the bottom, on the floor of the Gypsy, on the rear side and there was no bulletproof plate on the front end."
"Bulletproof jackets were not in sufficient numbers in those days. The person who used to enter that zone of tracing and killing had a jacket. Helmets were there 100%, and in the first phase, there were no rocket launchers or automatic grenade launchers. They came later in 1997." The BSF was physically establishing a foothold in the region, and Mr Dubey said, "Knowing every village, area, locality details of those who surrendered and sympathisers, etc., was crucial."
After the Parliament attacks, the Delhi Police had arrested an accused who gave information about a place where other handlers were reportedly hiding. The cops recceed the place in a helicopter.
Mr Dubey shared that the BSF had arrested the Deputy Chief of Jaish, who had a complete idea of the den of terrorists.
"We worked it out very meticulously, and invested almost two and a half days to zero in on the point where Ghazi Baba must have been hiding. We chose a very odd hour to rush to raid his hideout without allowing him to escape...We raided the house post midnight and found him in a very unprepared position."
Trapped From All Sides, No Escape Possible
"He was not sure that we would have an exact idea of where he was hiding...and we trapped him inside his den, all escape routes were covered and he had not other option other than to fire back at us," said Mr Dubey, who was commanding the operation and led from the front. The officer was the first to enter the house and was welcomed by a volley of gunfire and grenades.
The troops searched the ground and the first floor. Upon reaching the second floor, they found the house vacant, but Mr Dubey got suspicious when he noticed two wardrobes. He ordered his men to hit the mirror fixed on the wardrobes. Upon hitting it, a trapped door opened, and terrorists opened fire.
"Everything happened in lightning speed, but we did not give anyone a chance to get into a defensive position or hide; everything was just frontal." In the gunfight, BSF lost Constable Balbir Singh, a young soldier who jumped in front of Mr Dubey when terrorists fired on his commanding officer. Mr Dubey also suffered multiple bullet injuries.
Mr Dubey had a shattered arm, bullet wounds to his leg and armpit. The officer led his men despite serious injuries.
He said his "Condition was bad at that time, but before we got all these injuries, Ghazi Baba and his associate Rashid Bhai were killed...Rashid, a terrorist from Pakistan, was killed in the process of escaping from one of the balconies." Ghazi Baba was killed on the exit of the hideout in Noorbagh, Srinagar.
The BSF found 20 RDX bombs, 22 detonators, four rockets and a satellite telephone from Ghazi Baba's hideout.
Balbir Singh came from the Shekhauti area of Rajasthan. He was a young soldier in his early 20s who was highly motivated, a father of a one-year-old and a hero who lived up to the motto of BSF - 'Jeevan Paryant Kartavya' (Duty Unto Death).
Remembering Balbir Singh, Mr Dubey said, "Balbir was very young and he had a one-year-old child, andand just two days before the operation, the young man called me and he had just returned from leave and he was not part of my team for the operation...that day he approached the Batallion Havildar Major that I want to be part of the raiding team and the next morning when we set out for the operation, I had forgotten my jacket and my wife and had handed over to him and that was the last memory. He was very young, and he had a very long life to live, which was curtailed by a fraction of a second."
Mr Dubey and Constable Singh suffered injuries when terrorists started firing, but Balbir Singh, in disregard of his safety, jumped in front of his commanding officer to save him and took the bullets when a terrorist tried to escape and opened fire at Mr Dubey; Constable Singh suffered injuries to his abdomen and was killed in action.
Balbir Singh was posthumously awarded the Shaurya Chakra, India's third-highest peacetime gallantry award. NN Dubey was conferred with Kirti Chakra, the second-highest peacetime gallantry award.
President APJ Abdul Kalam conferring the Kirti Chakra to NN Dubey at a ceremony in Rashtrapati Bhavan
'It Was A Very Lucky Save'
Mr Dubey suffered eight bullet injuries on his body and had a shattered arm. He showed the resilience of a soldier in the face of action. The officer narrowly escaped death when the bullets hit the steel commendation rolls pinned on his shirt and deflected, saving his chest and his life.
Mr Dubey, a battle-hardened soldier, was awarded the Director General's Commendation Roll (DGCR) thrice for outstanding service. The 1x1 steel insignia is pinned to the shirt and is worn as a badge of honour. On the night of the operation, Mr Dubey was wearing the shirt, with DGCRs pinned to his uniform, on top of which he wore his parajacket. He was shot in the arm multiple times, but was confused about how they did not hit his chest.
Mr Dubey said, "I was evacuated to the hospital...The next day, when I came back from my anaesthesia effect, even then, I couldn't understand. On the third day, I was just wondering why these 2-3 shots on my armpit should have been on the chest. So, I was not able to solve that mystery. My wife came with the crushed steel insignia, which was found by the washerman who was washing the blood-sunk uniform after being handed it over by the operation theatre."
Bullet marks on Mr Dubey's uniform. He suffered eight bullet injuries in the encounter.
"There was a pin in the blood-stained uniform. The washerman washed it and got pricked by the pin in his hand. He gave it to his wife. So, the complete plate of the pin was crushed. I was lucky enough that my complete chest-left heart area was protected, and the bullets were deflected on the armpit. So, it was a very lucky save."
The life of Narendra Nath Dhar Dubey, Kirti Chakra, is being presented on the big screen, with Emraan Hashmi playing the role of the BSF officer who led his men in the face of action to kill Ghazi Baba. Based on true events, the film 'Ground Zero' became the first movie to get a premiere in Srinagar after 38 years.
Share
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Process to remove Justice Varma begins as RS chair admits notice
The process for the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma was set in motion on Monday with parliamentarians submitting notices to the presiding officers of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, and Chairman of the Upper House Jagdeep Dhankhar taking note of the move. While the notice submitted to the Rajya Sabha Chairman had signatures of 63 opposition members, the one submitted to the Lok Sabha Speaker was a bipartisan effort with 152 members, including Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, supporting the move. Both Houses, sources said, may accept the motions on Tuesday, and their Chairs are likely to jointly initiate formalities for the constitution of an enquiry committee according to the Judges (Inquiry) Act. The committee includes three members, including either the Chief Justice of India (CJI) or a Supreme Court judge, a High Court Chief Justice -- both recommended by the CJI -- and a jurist picked by the Chair of the House where the motion is admitted. In this case, the Chairs of the two Houses are likely to act jointly. The committee will then probe the charges levelled against Justice Varma. It will be asked to come out with a report in three months. The inquiry report will be tabled in Parliament, followed by a discussion in both Houses after which there will be voting on the motion for the removal of Justice Varma. Justice Varma was repatriated from the Delhi High Court to the Allahabad High Court after burnt wads of currency notes were found at his official residence here on March 14. Dhankar mentioned in the House that he has received a notice of motion for setting up a statutory committee for the removal of Justice Varma of the Allahabad High Court. "It is signed by more than 50 members of the Council of States and thus, it meets the numerical requirement of signing by members of Parliament for setting in motion a process for removal of a high court judge," he said. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said in a post on X that 63 opposition members had submitted the notice to the Rajya Sabha chairman for removal of Justice Varma. BJP leaders said they were also gathering signatures of its party MPs and those of its allies for the removal of Justice Varma. Dhankhar asked Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal whether a similar notice has been submitted in the Lok Sabha. The Law Minister said 152 Lok Sabha members have submitted a similar notice to the Speaker. The Rajya Sabha Chairman said that according to the Judges (Inquiry) Act, when notices of a motion are submitted on the same day in both the Houses of Parliament, a committee to examine the charges levelled against the judge will be constituted by the Lok Sabha Speaker and the Rajya Sabha Chairman. "The secretary general will take the necessary steps in this direction," the Rajya Sabha Chairman announced. Though Justice Varma has denied any wrongdoing, the inquiry panel constituted by the then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna concluded that the judge and his family members had covert or active control over the storeroom where the cash was found, proving his misconduct serious enough to seek his removal.


India Today
37 minutes ago
- India Today
Jagdeep Dhankhar resigns as Vice President, cites health concerns
On this episode of To The Point, the monsoon session of Parliament begins with the opposition demanding a discussion on Operation Sindhu and the Pahalgam terror attack. The government has agreed to a 25-hour debate in Parliament next week, but the opposition continues to press for a specific date and the Prime Minister's attendance. Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, accused the government of silencing him, stating, "I am the leader of opposition, I have the right, but they never let me speak." The programme also covers the motion submitted by over 200 MPs for the impeachment of Justice Yashwant Verma, the acquittal of 12 convicts in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case, and South Indian actors being summoned by the Enforcement Directorate in an illegal betting case. A heated debate unfolded over Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi's repeated allegations that his mic is silenced in Parliament, a claim he made as recently as March 18, 2025. The discussion saw sharp exchanges on parliamentary rules versus conventions, with one panelist questioning the Leader of the Opposition's conduct. The debate also touched upon 'Operation Sindhu,' with claims that it paralyzed Pakistan's military readiness. Another major focus was the controversial voter list revision in Bihar, which has led to protests in Patna and a challenge in the Supreme Court. A key question raised during the fiery debate was, "Where is accountability in this nation? That is the problem what is happening." The issue of accountability was raised in the context of intelligence failures and the performance of the government.


Economic Times
39 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India must enhance its potential as trade and tech partner, and look beyond US
Aap up and away, kya? What is the nature of India's current foreign policy problem, or at least predicament? Donald Trump's episodic statements and social media posts are attention-grabbing. His inner circle's pay-as-you-go diplomacy is alarming. The endless, but unavoidable, wait for tranche 1A of the bilateral trade deal is exasperating. Yet, tactical responses (or non-responses) to any or all of these should not detain us from a strategic re-appraisal. The US' retrenchment from global commitments is creating gaps in three areas - the world's trade and economic system; security frameworks; and provision of international public goods. There is far from a total withdrawal, but the 800-pound gorilla is slimming down to a 700-pound gorilla. What's more, the fat is not being reduced evenly across sectors, regions and geographies. As such, there is the 'known unknown' of the quantum of decline - the notional 100 pounds - but also an 'unknown unknown' of the consistency of American retrenchment: the where, when and for how long. No one nation, partnership or coalition can fill the gap America leaves. This is as true for consumer demand as it is for security architecture. To be sure, different groupings can address some of the gaps in different regions and domains. Read along with fitful, but still inexorable, US-China great power competition, this is leading to two parallel processes of hedging for countries such as India: Tech & security: There's straightforward hedging between the US and China in the digital and strategic technology spheres, as well as security and security-adjacent domains. Here, the space for hedging is like many others, is making its choices. These choices are systemic choices. They have a greater resilience and buy-in in US government agencies, and tech and business constituencies. They will advance with or without the White House's outright support. Sometimes they could even do so in spite of it. Of course, pace and visibility will be modulated. US plus one: Then, a second process involves hedging between the US and like-minded, non-China partners. Here, the space for hedging is actually expanding. Actors such as India seek, if not alternatives, then at least complements and supplements to their export and trade, supply chains, defence and security, and tech relationships with the US. Skewed dependencies are sought to be mitigated to the degree possible. There are attempts to diversify. India and Europe looking to do more together in trade, defence supply chains and innovation is one example. India-Australia cooperation in rare earths is another. Increasing partnerships involving non-US Quad countries, as well as non-Quad countries, in the Indo-Pacific is a said that, in some domains, even a partial withdrawal of the US footprint is so substantial that no new arrangement can entirely fill it. Nevertheless, it is what it is. Volatility and unpredictability are now a way of then, does India navigate the Trumpian age? Revisit the basics. In 1991 (liberalisation), 2000 (Y2K), 2014 (Modi mandate), or 2020-21 (post-Covid), excitement about India was rooted in its potential as a trade and tech partner, as a market for key countries, and as a possible sourcing and supply chains hub for many more. Everything else - cultural and civilisational wealth, democratic and transparency credentials - was, and remains, a useful add-on. Minus economic leverage, India is not a vishwa guru, or even a vishwa mitra; it is a vishwa also-ran. In a time of tariffs and turbulence, with global trade rules being upended and the whole notion of most favoured nation being hollowed out, India once more needs to make its economy and trade attributes the headline of its external strategy. It is not enough to conclude free trade agreements - more accurately, feasible trade agreements - with, depending on who in the government is describing it, 'complementary economies', 'partners to our West' or 'rich countries'. The game is much more gritty, granular and painstaking. India offering a meaningful trade relationship, an economic stake or a supply chain must-have to as many countries as possible is the hard, slow and relentless mechanism to building foreign policy leverage. In such a reckoning, they are simply no non-partners - no countries one can afford to ignore. There will be limitations to what India can do with China and Pakistan, but aside from that, India will need to strive to make itself indispensable to some economic imperative or the other with about every will include individual Asean countries, neighbouring countries - in some of which reckless application of Indian quality control orders (QCOs) has caused legitimate pushback - as well as problem countries such as Turkiye. In the end, what unique economic stake and proposition India offers another nation is the best metric of its foreign policy influence. An aggregation of such stakes and propositions will make for composite national relevance in a smash-and-grab world Minister Narendra Modi's two visits this week - to the UK to conclude a trade deal that, among other things, could give Scotch a market advantage over bourbon, and to the Maldives, where bloody-minded economic engagement has outlasted political acerbity - offer a glimpse of what could be. There'll still be about 200 countries to go. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. From near bankruptcy to blockbuster drug: How Khorakiwala turned around Wockhardt Paid less than plumbers? The real story of freshers' salaries at Infy, TCS. What if Tata Motors buys Iveco's truck unit? Will it propel or drag like JLR? As deposit ground slips under PSU banks' feet, they chase the wealthy If data is the new oil, are data centres the smokestacks of the digital age? Stock Radar: M&M likely to break out from 1-year consolidation range; time to buy? Will consumer stocks see a comeback this festive season? 12 stocks to keep an eye on even when analysts are not bullish Don't fear volatility, focus on businesses: 5 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of up to 27% Best way to deal with volatility, just ' Hold' for wealth creation: 7 large-cap stocks with an upside potential of up to 41%