logo
Louisiana researchers leave labs to rally for science at State Capitol

Louisiana researchers leave labs to rally for science at State Capitol

Yahoo08-03-2025
Scientific researchers at the "Stand Up For Science" rally at the Louisiana State Capitol on March 7, 2025 (Piper Hutchinson/Louisiana Illuminator)
A crowd of Louisiana scientists gathered Friday at the State Capitol to protest the Trump administration's proposed research funding cuts.
The gathering of over 100 professors, students and other researchers was part of a nationwide 'Stand Up for Science' demonstration, with scientists from across the country walking out of their labs in defense of their profession.
In his first weeks in office, President Donald Trump and his administration have made drastic moves to upend how science is funded. The White House has paused funding for many scientific projects believed to be related to diversity, equity and inclusion and proposed slashing resources for administrative costs related to research funded by the National Institutes of Health.
'[The administration is] throwing the regular conduct of science into chaos, and so it's extraordinarily detrimental,' Ravi Rau, an LSU physics professor of more than 50 years, said in an interview.
The group, some of them clad in long white lab coats, held signs with slogans such as 'Science Makes America Great,' 'Defunding science is defunding the future' and 'Defunding U.S. science gives China the win.' They also sung out chants like 'no science, no future.'
Their protest came with a warning: Any loss of funding for American research would have catastrophic impacts for the United States' global standing and for local economies across the nation.
While the Trump administration's federal funding cuts are largely on pause amid ongoing litigation, universities are preparing for the possibility of major reductions in government research dollars. LSU could lose $12 million if the administration's proposed cut to indirect costs for National Institutes of Health grants are allowed to go into effect and would lose tens of millions more if other agencies followed suit.
Any major loss in federal research funding would ultimately impact the economy, as each dollar spent by universities on research has a ripple effect. One report found each dollar spent on NIH-funded research has an economic impact of $2.46 dollars.
Louisiana universities have active NIH grants worth about $300 million, creating an economic impact for the state of over half a billion dollars. Hundreds of millions of more grant dollars went to hospitals and other organizations in the state.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Loss of federal grants also risks the pipeline that educates graduate students to take jobs in academia and in private industry. Many graduate students, both those seeking master's degrees and Ph.Ds, have their salaries and tuition covered by federal grants, as well as the research they conduct in pursuit of their degree.
'By threatening the sources of research funding, we're harming our own economy, and we're restricting our own workforce,' said Sam Bentley, a geology professor at LSU. 'Most people can agree, regardless of political bend, that sensible economic growth and having a highly trained, successful workforce is really important.'
Brandon Shuck, a professor of geophysics at LSU, warned that the loss of workforce development could impact the oil and gas industry in Louisiana, one of the state's legacy industries.
Offshore drilling involves complex technology, Shuck said, and requires highly-trained scientists like those educated in his department to prevent disasters like the Deepwater Horizon explosion that killed 11 rig workers.
The 2010 accident off the coast of Louisiana was the largest marine oil spill in world history, releasing approximately 134 million gallons of crude into the Gulf of Mexico.
'We learned a lot from that scientifically about why that happened and how we could prevent it,' Shuck said. 'So we need science in order to do these things. And I think if we don't have a steady pipeline of scientists in Louisiana, the state will suffer from that.'
Students at the rally expressed fears their futures are evaporating in the heat Trump is putting on universities.
'I am going to be competing against so many people for the few remaining jobs in a country that has demonstrated a complete lack of respect or regard for the dignity of scientists,' Hodges said.
'It seems that I am swimming upstream against the current, and they just dammed the river,' he added.
While critics have argued federal funding should not go to scientific research that does not have direct applications, the scientists gathered on the steps all agreed that there is no applied research without basic science.
Investing in that research now is necessary for the applied science of the future, Jonathan Snow, a geology professor at LSU, said in an interview at the rally. While the value of basic scientific research may not be readily apparent to the public, scientists are in agreement that this research is necessary for life saving discoveries and other scientific breakthroughs.
'Basic science basically won World War II,' Snow said. 'Basic science drove innovation in all kinds of war-making technologies, from radar to the atomic bomb.'
'None of those were commercial products for before the war … they were all developed out of academic scientific enterprise,' he added.
Beyond the economic impact, protesters raised concerns about how attacks on academia impact the fabric of American society.
Rau, the physics professor, said universities have played a key role throughout history in preserving knowledge necessary for Western Civilization's existence.
Without research and the preservation and dissemination of knowledge, society cannot thrive and may struggle to survive, Rau said.
'They're certainly risking our society,' he said of the Trump administration. 'They're certainly risking our country and its stature within the society.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Charlamagne Tha God Brutally Claims Trump Is ‘Losing It As Badly As Biden'
Charlamagne Tha God Brutally Claims Trump Is ‘Losing It As Badly As Biden'

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Charlamagne Tha God Brutally Claims Trump Is ‘Losing It As Badly As Biden'

Charlamagne tha God has claimed that President Donald Trump is 'losing it as badly as [former President Joe] Biden.' The radio host's comments came more than a month after Trump ordered an investigation into his predecessor's aides for allegedly covering up Biden's supposed cognitive decline. 'Is Trump really losing it as badly as Biden? Hmm. Let's run through this official list of dementia symptoms from the Mayo Clinic, all right?' Charlamagne said, referring to the private American academic medical center, while appearing as a guest host on 'The Daily Show' on Tuesday. He continued, 'Now, first, I want to say that doctors warn it's unethical to diagnose someone you haven't actually examined, but I'm not a doctor, OK? So let's fucking go!' The 'Breakfast Club' host, who pulled out the list on a clipboard, went on to point out memory loss as a first symptom of dementia. Charlamagne played a clip of the POTUS declaring he was 'surprised' Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell was appointed, seemingly forgetting that he appointed him in 2017. 'Memory loss, check,' Charlamagne quipped to the audience while dramatically making a check mark on the symptoms list. 'He's stealing Biden's whole flow, word for word, bar for bar. I bet Biden's somewhere watching this, thinking, 'Where am I?'' Naming 'problems with communication' as another symptom, he then played separate footage of Trump mispronouncing the word 'cryptologic.' Elsewhere in the segment, Charlamagne alleged that Trump has no 'coordination and movement control,' another symptom of dementia, while showing a clip of the world leader awkwardly dancing to 'Y.M.C.A.' by the Village People. 'I don't get why Trump chose Y.M.C.A as his signature song. That dance involves coordination and spelling at the same time. Are you trying to kill this man?' he joked. Wrapping up his message, Charlamagne played multiple clips of Trump appearing to become agitated with the press before accusing the POTUS of having 'rage issues.' 'The bad news is, Trump has rage issues,' he added. 'The good news is there's no way he's remembering the nuclear codes, OK? Now, that's my whole checklist, and I've reached my diagnosis. This guy needs to be put into a retirement home immediately.' Watch Charlamagne tha God's appearance on 'The Daily Show' below. Related... Trump Snaps, Abruptly Ends CNN Interview After Being Questioned About New Epstein Photos Supreme Court Allows Trump To Remove 3 Democrats On The Consumer Product Safety Commission The Trump Administration Hopes You Never See These Stories — Which Makes Them More Important Than Ever

Trump's Fed battle is not like his other political tussles
Trump's Fed battle is not like his other political tussles

Los Angeles Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump's Fed battle is not like his other political tussles

President Trump is once again floating the idea of firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, ostensibly in objection to excessively high interest rates. But this debate is not about monetary policy. It's a power play aimed at subordinating America's central bank to the fiscal needs of the executive branch and Congress. In other words, we have a textbook case of 'fiscal dominance' on our hands — and that always ends poorly. I'm no cheerleader for Powell. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he enthusiastically backed every stimulus package, regardless of size or purpose, as if these involved no trade-offs. Where were the calls for 'Fed independence' then? And where were the calls for fiscal restraint after the emergency was over? Powell failed to anticipate the worst inflation in four decades and repeated for far too long the absurd claim that it was 'transitory' even as mounting evidence showed otherwise. He blamed supply-side disruptions long after ports had reopened and goods were moving. And as inflation was taking a stubborn hold, Powell delayed raising interest rates — possibly to shield the Biden administration from the fiscal fallout of the debt it was piling on — well past the point when monetary tightening was needed. If this weren't the world of government, where failure can be rewarded — and if there had been a more obvious alternative — Powell wouldn't have been invited back for another term. But he was. And so Trump's pressure campaign to prematurely end Powell's tenure is dangerous. I get why with budget deficits exploding and debt-service costs surging, the president wants lower interest rates. That would make the cost of his own fiscal agenda appear more tolerable. Trump likely believes he's justified because he believes that his tax cuts and deregulation are about to spur huge economic growth. To be sure, some growth will result, though the effects of deregulation will take a while to arrive. But gains could be swamped by the negative consequences of Trump's tariffs and erratic tariff threats. No matter what, the new growth won't lead to enough new tax revenue to escape the need for the government to borrow more. And the more the government borrows, the more intense the pressure on interest rates. One thing is for sure: The pressure Trump and his people are exerting on the Fed is a push for fiscal dominance. The executive branch wants to use the central bank as a tool to accommodate the government's frenzy of reckless borrowing. Such political control of a central bank is a hallmark of failed monetary systems in weak institutional settings. History shows where that always leads: to inflation, economic stagnation and financial instability. So far, Powell is resisting cutting rates, hence the barrage of insults and threat of firing. But now is not the right time to play with fire. Bond yields surged last year as investors reckoned with the scale of U.S. borrowing. They crossed the 5% threshold again recently. Moody's even stripped the government of its prized AAA credit rating. Lower interest rates from the Fed — especially if seen as the result of raw political pressure — could further diminish the allure of U.S. Treasuries. While the Fed can temporally influence interest rates, especially in the short run, it cannot override long-term fears of inflation, economic sluggishness and political manipulation of monetary policy driven by unsustainable fiscal policy. That's where confidence matters, and confidence is eroding. This is why markets are demanding a premium for funds loaned to a government that is now $36 trillion in debt and shows no intention of slowing down. But it could get worse. If the average interest rate on U.S. debt climbs from 3.3% to 5%, interest payments alone could soar from $900 billion to $2 trillion annually. That would make debt service by far the single largest item in the federal budget — more than Medicare, Social Security, the military or any other program readers care about. And because much of this debt rolls over quickly, higher rates hit fast. At the end of the day, the bigger problem isn't Powell's monetary policy. It's the federal government's spending addiction. Trump's call to replace Powell with someone who will cut rates ignores the real math. Lower short-term interest rates will do only so much if looser monetary policy is perceived as a means of masking reckless budget deficits. That would make higher inflation a certainty, not merely a possibility. It might not arrive before the next election, but it will inevitably arrive. There is still time to avoid this cliff. Trump is right to worry about surging debt costs, but he's targeting a symptom. The solution isn't to fire Powell — it's to cure the underlying disease, which is excessive government spending. Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. This article was produced in collaboration with Creators Syndicate.

Bondi reportedly told Trump that he's named in Epstein files
Bondi reportedly told Trump that he's named in Epstein files

USA Today

time27 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Bondi reportedly told Trump that he's named in Epstein files

The attorney general reportedly told President Donald Trump in the spring that he and many others were named in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney General Pam Bondi told President Donald Trump in the spring that he was named multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein, according to reports in the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. A White House official did not dispute the reports, telling USA TODAY the president's name is mentioned in the binders of Epstein documents that Bondi prepared for MAGA influencers in February. But the official rejected any suggestion that Trump did any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. Bondi told the president that he and many other figures were named in the documents, according to reports from the Journal and the Times. The Journal cited "senior administration officials," while the Times cited three people familiar with the exchange. Being named in such documents doesn't mean the person broke the law. 'The fact is that the President kicked him out of his club for being a creep," said White House Communications Director Steven Cheung, referring to Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Florida. "This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media, just like the Obama Russiagate scandal, which President Trump was right about," Cheung said. The Justice Department didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. This story is developing and will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store