Trump's Golden Dome may need to factor in up-close drone attacks like Ukraine's stunning strikes, USAF general says
Gen. David Allvin, the USAF chief of staff, said on Tuesday that it was "fascinating" to consider that the Golden Dome would not only counter "the larger ballistic, cruise, hypersonic missiles but also some of these closer-in, more effective ones."
Allvin was speaking at a conference three days after Ukraine unleashed a surprise attack on four air bases deep within Russia by sneaking the drones right up to the bases by truck and releasing them.
The attack exploited the fact that Russia stores many of its military aircraft out on the tarmac, unprotected by hardened shelters that might have helped shield them from the drones.
The Golden Dome, announced by President Donald Trump in May, is a planned layered air and missile defense system modeled loosely on Israel's missile shield, but is anticipated to include space-based satellite weapons for the first time.
It's intended to detect and defeat the most advanced threat the US faces: Large numbers of ballistic missiles that could be armed with nuclear warheads. It must also face the newer threat of hypersonic missiles designed for erratic and high-speed flight that could evade existing air defenses.
But Ukraine's attack, which used cheap drones at close range to make a deep strike, may force a rethink of the range of threats that the Golden Dome must defend — or be protected — against.
"We'll see how the conversation gets stirred up again based on this strike," Allvin told conference attendees at the Center for a New American Security, adding: "But it shows us that seemingly impenetrable locations need to pay more attention."
The space-based components of a future Golden Dome are safe from small drones. But that can't as easily be said for its land- and sea-based elements like early warning radars, ballistic missile defense warships and Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense systems.
Effective defenses from cheap drones are still being developed out of the cauldrons of combat in Ukraine and Israel, and are likely to be a mixture of physical and electronic shielding with more short-range weapons, including lasers.
Ukraine's fiery drone strike, which it claims destroyed or damaged at least 41 valuable bombers and fighter jets, hit sites thousands of miles into Russia that will likely have been considered less vulnerable to attack.
The gambit has set analysts chattering about the wide-ranging ramifications of the tactic for both Russia and Ukraine's Western allies — particularly military sites far from the front lines.
It's "only a matter of time" before NATO adversaries take up the tactic, Karl Rosander, the CEO and cofounder of the Swedish defence tech startup Nordic Air Defence, said.
The attack has also, once again, raised concerns about the US' own air base safety, with many air bases still vulnerable to aerial attack.
In this regard, the attack was "a sort of eyebrow-raising moment," Allvin added. "We've always known that hardening our bases is something that we need to do," he said, noting that this is within the DOD's budget.
However, he said, "it's been a matter of resource prioritization."
It's possible to make US air bases more defensible — some forward bases already are — but added that "if all we're doing is playing defense and we can't shoot back, then that's not a good use of our money."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A-10 Warthog Already Has The Capability To Use Laser-Guided Rockets To Shoot-Down Drones
We have just learned that one of the most successful adaptations of an existing weapon in recent memory — morphing laser-guided air-to-ground rockets into counter-drone weapons — can be accommodated on three USAF aircraft, not just two. First, the F-16 got the version of the Advanced Precision Kill Weapons System II (APKWS II) that takes 2.75″/70mm Hydra rockets and turns them into drone and cruise missile busters, followed very recently by the F-15E Strike Eagle. Now we have learned that the A-10 Warthog has also received at least the ability to employ these weapons in the air-to-air role, although the type's remaining service is now measured in months, not multiple years. In the recently released budget request for 2026, the Pentagon documentation states that APKWSs featuring guidance sections with specialized Fixed-Wing Air-Launched Counter Unmanned Aerial Systems Ordnance (FALCO) software installed are cleared for use on the F-16, F-15E, and the A-10. The rockets use laser guidance and a proximity fuze to explode near subsonic, low-maneuverability targets like drones and cruise missiles. TWZ was first to report on the testing of this configuration of APKWS back in 2019. APKWSs were first used operationally as anti-air weapons in the surface-to-air role, with Ukraine receiving the VAMPIRE system that has proven to be highly successful. Since then, APKWS II has entered operational U.S. service in the air-to-air role, and has become a standout in the Middle East, where F-16s swatted down Houthi drones with it at a fraction of the price of an air-to-air missiles, the cheapest of which costs nearly half a million dollars. The anti-air APKWSs costs less than a tenth of that. In May, we learned the F-15E — the USAF's most celebrated aerial drone hunter — could employ them, too. The rockets also dramatically expand the air-to-air magazine capacity of the aircraft they are mounted on (over six times the number of potential engagements in the F-15E's case). The A-10 as a drone hunter is an interesting prospect. The aircraft's loiter time, slow and low-flying capabilities, and even its unique air-to-air dogfighting agility, could come in as a real benefit for taking out long-range one-way attack drones, especially the most prevalent propeller-driven type. Where the A-10 would be less effective is in rapidly taking out faster-flying drones and cruise missiles. This is due to its lower speed, with less ability to 'run-down' multiple targets in a short time period during incoming saturation raids. Still, AH-64 Apaches have become critical counter-drone weapons, providing screening for lower-performance long-range one-way attack munitions, particularly in Israel. The U.S. Army is also expanding its use of the Apache in this role, and helicopters, including in Ukraine, are playing a larger role in counter-drone defense, in general. The A-10 has far superior speed capabilities over helicopters, so it does sit inside something of a sweet spot, performance-wise, for dealing with lower-end, long-range drones. The A-10 also lacks a radar, which would make it harder for it to independently spot an incoming aerial target at distance, lock its targeting pod onto it, and successfully engage it. This could potentially be overcome with a podded radar system, at least to a degree. Leveraging datalinked target tracks from off-board platforms could also significantly offset this deficiency. On the other hand, the A-10 can also carry a lot of rockets, and I mean a lot. Extra magazine depth would be beneficial during combat air patrols that have to confront a sustained drone onslaught. Above all else, the A-10 paired with FALCO APKWSs would be most effective at defending a certain installation or limited geographical areas, such as an island outpost or forward staging area, against long-range one-way attack drones and even some cruise missiles. The same weapons can also be used against surface targets, especially long-range unmanned surface vessels. These are roles the U.S. military will have no shortage of as it prepares for a fight in the Pacific. The counter-air APKWS portfolio is set to grow dramatically, with BAE Systems working on a seeker kit for the rockets that adds a pseudo 'fire-and-forget' capability. In other words, an aircraft does not have to maintain a lock on the target and continuously lase it in order for the rocket to kill it. The new seeker would look where the laser spot is pointed, then lock on and fly autonomously to its target – no further laser designation needed. This will provide for far more flexible employment of these weapons, with more targets being able to be addressed in a given time period. Right now, two aircraft work together best to execute air-to-air APKWS engagements, one lasing and firing. This should be more easily handled by one aircraft with the new upgraded seeker kits, as well. At the same time, when it comes to the A-10, this is largely moot because the USAF has issued its final call to cull what remains of the Warthog fleet. According to its latest budget request, the Warthog's bacon will be fried by the end of the 2026 Fiscal Year. So we are talking about just 15 months left of the iconic attack jet gracing the skies, before they are all sent to bake in the Arizona desert. Before this budget, the A-10 fleet was planned to be fully retired by the end of 2028. On the other hand, the jet's seemingly ready-to-go efficient counter-drone capability could actually make it more attractive for transfer to Ukraine, something that has been raised in the past. In fact, this may be even more important than its ground attack capability, or even the fact that it is a hardy jet-powered aircraft that can lug around and launch advanced NATO munitions. Currently, Ukraine's fighter force, as well as helicopters and even dated Yak-52 trainers, are tasked with drone hunting. Augmenting this force with A-10s and freeing up the country's F-16s and Mirage 2000s, in particular, for more advanced work could be attractive to the war-weary country. Though there has long been talk about Ukraine acquiring A-10s, many have questioned their efficacy in the conflict. Working in the Shahed-busting role certainly blunts some of those criticisms. Of course, that is if the war continues on long enough to see anything like this come to fruition. Jordan has been raised as another potential taker for A-10s after their retirement from U.S. service. Starting last year, the Jordanian armed forces have found themselves contending with Iranian drones, as well as missiles, flying overhead on their way to targets in Israel on several occasions, and have taken action to shoot them down. Paired with FALCO APKWSs, Warthogs could also bolster Jordan's counter-drone arsenal. It's a bit ironic that just as one of the world's most iconic ground attack aircraft to ever fly is about to end its service, its air-to-air capability against drones could be one of the biggest missed opportunities brought on by its retirement. Contact the author: Tyler@
Hamilton Spectator
3 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Movie Review: In ‘Heads of State,' a buddy comedy with statesmen
Say what you will about the Idris Elba-John Cena vehicle 'Heads of State,' but it's surely the first buddy comedy about the fraying bonds of NATO. The potential collapse of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization plays a surprisingly pivotal role in this fitfully diverting, for-background-noise-only, straight-to-streaming movie. Elba plays the embattled British Prime Minister Sam Clarke, while Cena co-stars as the recently elected U.S. President Will Derringer, a former action star. 'Heads of State,' directed by Ilya Naishuller ('Nobody'), is mostly about their relationship, a tense and adversarial one challenged further when an assassination plot leaves them stranded together in Belarus. But that 'Heads of State,' which debuts Wednesday on Prime Video, is such a mild romp makes it all the more surprising to hear a line uttered like: 'If NATO falls, there's backstop against despots and dictators.'not It's a funny time to release a comedy set around international political disconnection and imperiled Western democracy. But if you were beginning to worry that 'Heads of State' is too timely, don't. Any nods to current events here serve more as reminders of how much 'Heads of State' — like most of Hollywood's output — is unengaged with anything resembling our political reality. You could argue that that's not necessarily a bad thing. You could also argue that the greater sin of 'Heads of State' is underusing Stephen Root. (He plays an expert working for the bad guys.) But the vaguest hints of real-world intrigue only cast a pale light on the movie's mostly lackluster comic chops and uninspired action sequences. The best thing going for 'Heads of State' is that the chemistry between Elba and Cena is solid. The 'Suicide Squad' co-stars trade barbs with a genial ease. Most of the time, those revolve around their characters' divergent histories — Clarke was a commando before becoming a politician — in debates like which one of them is 'gym strong' as opposed to 'strong strong.' That's one of the few decent gags in the script by Josh Applebaum, Andre Nemec and Harrison Query. But one problem in 'Heads of State' goes beyond the high-concept set-up. The best buddy comedies — 'Midnight Run,' '48 Hrs.,' 'The Nice Guys' — are predicated on opposites thrown together. Elba and Cena have their obvious differences. (Cena's Derringer is exaggeratedly optimistic here, too.) But ultimately they're both beefy dudes in suits. As the MI6 agent Noel Bisset, Priyanka Chopra Jones gives the movie a kick. But her scenes are left to the beginning and end of the movie. In between, we're left to wonder where she went, how two political leaders would have such non-existent security and whether a few half-decent jokes are enough to forgive the movie's geopolitical delusions. 'Heads of State,' an Amazon MGM Studios release is rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association for sequences of strong violence/action, language and some smoking. Running time: 113 minutes. One and a half stars out of four.
Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Analyst reboots Amazon stock price target on AI growth
Goodness, what's a motherboard to do? Artificial intelligence continues to make its presence felt in just about everything humans do, from setting up appointments and planning itineraries to suggesting what music to listen to and what movies to watch. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter On the business side, AI is being increasingly integrated into such diverse sectors as healthcare, cybersecurity, finance, retail, and manufacturing. It takes a lot of hardware to run all this stuff, and that can put pressure on companies that make semiconductors, motherboards, and other vital components. The Covid-19 pandemic was a key factor in the 2020-2023 global chip shortage, disrupting supply chains and logistics, while a 13% increase in global demand for PCs sparked by a sudden shift to working from home added to demand. In addition, the U.S. Department of Commerce in September 2020 imposed restrictions on, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp., which made it harder for China's largest chip maker to sell to companies with American ties. Bloomberg/Getty Images But by January 2023, Peter Voser, chairman of the chairman of Swedish-Swiss tech and engineering giant ABB told CNBC that the global semiconductor shortage was "being sorted out." Well, yes and no. "Semiconductor supply chains worked well in 2024, even as the industry grew by almost 20%," Deloitte said in its 2025 Global Semiconductor Industry Outlook. "At this time, there's no reason to believe 2025 supply chains will be less resilient, but as always, the risk is there." The study said, "the industry may be more vulnerable to supply chain disruptions than ever before", given how important generative AI chips are expected to be this year and beyond, and the relatively higher concentration of processor, memory, and packaging required for cutting-edge chips, "Although the industry is likely to become less concentrated geographically thanks to various chips acts-and initiatives like onshoring, reshoring, nearshoring, and friendshoring are all still in their early days-the industry remains highly vulnerable for the next year or two, at least," Deloitte said. Onshoring and reshoring involves bringing production back to a company's home country, while nearshoring relocates operations to a nearby country and friendshoring relocates production to countries that are considered allies. Deloitte added that the chip industry "can be notoriously cyclical." "The industry has flipped from growth to shrinkage nine times in the last 34 years," the firm said. "So, it may seem that the industry is seeing less extreme growth or shrinkage in the last 14 years, compared to 1990 to 2010, but the frequency of contractions seems to have increased." Amazon (AMZN) CEO Andy Jassy addressed the issue in May during the e-commerce and entertainment giant's first-quarter earnings call. "Our AI business right now is a multi billion dollar annual run rate business," he said. "It's growing triple digit percentages year over year. And as fast as we actually put the capacity in, it's being consumed." Related: Amazon CEO makes a seemingly impossible promise "I think we could be helping more customers and driving more revenue for the business if we had more capacity," he added. Jassy said that "there are other parts of the supply chain that that are a little bit jammed up as well, motherboards and some other componentry." "But some of that is just because there is so much demand right now," he said. "But I do believe that the supply chain issues and the capacity issues will continue to get better as the year proceeds." Bernstein raised the firm's price target on Amazon on July 1 to $235 from $230 and kept an outperform rating on the shares. The firm noted that the growth of Amazon Web Services (AWS), the company's cloud computing platform, decelerated sequentially in Q1 to +17% year-over-year, while AI contribution continues to grow triple digits year-over-year from a relatively smaller base compared with Azure, Microsoft's (MSFT) cloud-computing platform. Similar to their cloud service provider peers, Amazon remains supply constrained on not only chips, but also motherboards and other components, which has put a near-term cap on topline growth despite strong demand indications. The firm noted Jassy's comments about improving capacity throughout the year. Microsoft suffered a setback when its next-generation Maia AI chip, codenamed "Braga," which was originally planned for mass production in 2025, has been delayed until at least 2026. When the Braga chip goes into production, it is expected to fall well short of the performance of Nvidia's (NVDA) Blackwell chip, Reuters reported. Related: Fund-management veteran skips emotion in investment strategy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
