Germany backs Israel after Iran war in first high-level visit - Region
Germany's interior minister, Alexander Dobrindt, expressed support for Israel on Sunday during a visit to the site of an Iranian missile strike near Tel Aviv, one of dozens launched in response to Israel's aerial assault on Iran earlier this month.
It was the first visit by a senior foreign official since the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, which began on 13 June when Israel launched a large-scale bombing campaign and ended last Tuesday after the United States, Israel's main ally, announced a ceasefire.
Israeli authorities claim they targeted only military infrastructure and nuclear facilities. But at least 627 civilians were killed and nearly 4,900 injured in Iran, according to official figures.
The toll includes senior military officials and nuclear scientists targeted in their homes, along with family members, in densely populated areas of Tehran.
Israel reported being hit by more than 50 missiles during the war, with 28 people killed. The government has imposed strict media controls, limiting independent verification of casualties or targets on either side.
'We must deepen our support for Israel,' Dobrindt said in Bat Yam, south of Tel Aviv, where an Iranian strike killed nine people. He spoke while standing in front of rubble from one of the missile impacts.
Israel has claimed the campaign was aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, an allegation Tehran has consistently denied.
Israeli foreign minister Gideon Saar called Dobrindt's visit a gesture of 'solidarity' and urged renewed sanctions on Iran.
He did not address the mounting civilian death toll or growing condemnation of Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, where Israeli forces have enforced a two-month siege, blocked aid, and killed civilians at US- and Israeli-coordinated distribution points.
Rights groups and UN officials have accused Israel of using starvation as a weapon and targeting civilians with impunity. Several governments and legal experts say the campaign bears the hallmarks of genocide, while the International Court of Justice has ordered Israel to take all necessary steps to prevent such acts.
On 17 June, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, speaking at the G7 summit in Canada, said Israel was doing the 'dirty work … for all of us' by targeting Iran's nuclear programme. His comment drew criticism from opposition figures and rights groups, who accused him of minimising civilian suffering and endorsing breaches of international law.
Follow us on:
Facebook
Instagram
Whatsapp
Short link:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al-Ahram Weekly
41 minutes ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Water is Egypt's only existential threat, Nile rights non-negotiable: FM Abdelatty on GERD - Foreign Affairs
Egypt's Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty has described water security as Egypt's sole existential threat, stressing that the country will not allow its historical Nile water rights to be compromised. Speaking in an interview with presenter Lamis El-Hadidy on ON TV Sunday evening, Abdelatty said: 'We [Egyptians] must trust the state and its institutions—they are fully aware of the importance of this issue and will not hesitate to defend Egypt's water rights.' He noted Egypt's annual water needs exceed 90 billion cubic metres, while its Nile share stands at just 55.5 billion. Per capita water availability is under 500 cubic meters per year—well below the United Nation's (UN) water poverty threshold of 1,000. 'This poses a major water challenge for the state… placing Egypt in a state of severe water scarcity.' Regarding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), Abdelatty stated that negotiations with Ethiopia have stalled after 12 years of talks, accusing Addis Ababa of using the process to enforce a fait accompli. Between 2020 and 2024, Ethiopia unilaterally completed the dam's five-stage filling and began operating two turbines—without an agreement on filling or operations with its downstream nations, Egypt and Sudan. In December 2023, Cairo announced the end of negotiations, citing Ethiopia's refusal to engage on proposed legal or technical solutions. Red Sea security, Suez Canal traffic Abdelatty also addressed security in the Red Sea, saying Egypt is the most affected by disruptions to navigation. 'More than $8 billion in direct net losses have resulted from the decline in Suez Canal traffic.' Ship traffic through the canal has dropped by over 65 percent, he said, with monthly losses from reduced Red Sea navigation reaching $600 million. The Suez Canal, which previously carried 12 percent of global trade, has seen shipping diverted via the Cape of Good Hope since Houthi attacks near the Bab El-Mandab Strait intensified in late 2023. Yemen's Houthi rebel group says the attacks target ships linked to Israel, the US, and the UK in support of Palestinians. Despite a US-Houthi ceasefire deal brokered by Oman last month, the Houthis later stated Israel was not part of the agreement. Abdelatty said Egypt is in contact with Iran to help pressure the Houthis to halt attacks. 'We are speaking with the Iranians to pressure the Houthis to refrain from targeting ships. This is one of the main topics in our discussions… and we are engaging with all regional and international parties.' He added that the Omani foreign minister is expected in Cairo this week to discuss Red Sea maritime security. Red Sea coastal states council Abdelatty called for the rapid activation of the Council of Arab and African Coastal States of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, established in 2020 by eight littoral countries of the region. 'We are engaging with our Arab and African brothers to expedite the establishment and operationalization of the Council.' He reiterated that Red Sea security is the responsibility of its coastal states alone, rejecting any foreign military presence in the region. 'This is a red line and a clear Egyptian position.' At a press conference in January 2025 with the foreign ministers of Eritrea and Somalia, Abdelatty stated that Egypt rejects any non-littoral military presence and supports Somali sovereignty. 'We reaffirm our commitment to Somalia's stability… and support the government in extending state control… and combating terrorism.' Tensions rose after Ethiopia signed a deal with Somaliland in early 2024, granting it access to the Red Sea in exchange for recognizing the breakaway region. Somalia views Somaliland as part of its territory. 'We have conveyed our position on the Red Sea to all relevant actors in the region, including Turkey... Our stance is very clear: we will not accept, under any circumstance, the permanent presence of any non-coastal party on the Red Sea.' In December 2024, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan announced a Somali-Ethiopian agreement to end their year-long dispute, calling it a 'historic' step toward renewed cooperation. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Al-Ahram Weekly
an hour ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Egypt pushes for lasting Gaza ceasefire, post-war reconstruction plan: FM Abdelatty - Foreign Affairs
In an interview aired on Sunday evening with presenter Lamis El-Hadidy, Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty outlined key elements of a potential Gaza ceasefire agreement currently being developed by the United States, with mediation from Egypt and Qatar. 'We hope for a sustainable solution and a lasting ceasefire. What is currently on the table is a first step—a 60-day ceasefire in exchange for the release of hostages and the rapid entry of humanitarian and medical aid into Gaza,' Abdelatty said. 'The hope is that this will build the momentum necessary to sustain the ceasefire and transition to the second phase, which is based on the 19 January agreement.' He stressed that the proposed agreement would serve as a foundation for a longer-term truce supported by international guarantees. 'There is an American understanding of the importance of including guarantees in any forthcoming agreement to ensure it holds. Renewed aggression would seriously threaten regional stability.' Asked about Hamas's involvement, Abdelatty confirmed its participation. 'Of course Hamas is part of the talks, as the deal concerns the release of hostages and Palestinian detainees.' He also noted a shift in Washington's focus toward Gaza, saying any deal must include firm guarantees to prevent renewed conflict. 'We hope to reach an agreement on Gaza within a week or two.' His comments came after US President Donald Trump claimed on Friday that a ceasefire could be reached 'within the next week'—a statement met with scepticism from Israeli officials. Gaza reconstruction conference to follow ceasefire Egypt is preparing to host an international conference on Gaza's post-war reconstruction and governance within weeks of a ceasefire agreement being reached. The initiative is part of a broader Arab–Islamic plan, endorsed at the extraordinary Arab Summit in Cairo on 4 March and later supported by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the European Union (EU), China, and Russia. 'We are working vigorously to convene the Gaza Reconstruction Conference in Cairo, to implement the Arab–Islamic plan,' Abdelatty said, adding that coordination is ongoing with the United Nations and the World Bank. He confirmed that all preparatory work—including the agenda, expected outcomes, and logistical planning—has been completed. The two-day conference will feature four workshops focused on the role of the private sector in early recovery, security arrangements, governance of Gaza, and the question of who will administer the territory. Abdelatty said Egypt's priority is enabling Palestinians to remain on their land and resist displacement by launching swift recovery projects, including temporary housing for displaced families. He addressed previous proposals to redevelop Gaza into a "riviera," rejecting any such plans. 'Displacement is a red line for both Egypt and Jordan,' he said. On governance, he stressed the need for clarity. 'No party will invest in reconstruction without a clear vision for Gaza's security and administration. The central question remains: who will govern Gaza?' Post-war governance and Palestinian statehood Governance, Abdelatty said, is 'a critical question' for Palestinians and the international community alike. Egypt's position is that the Palestinian Authority (PA) should lead, reaffirming the territorial and political unity of Gaza and the occupied West Bank. 'Our proposal includes forming a non-factional technocratic committee to administer Gaza for six months, in coordination with the PA.' He said Egypt has suggested redeploying trained Palestinian police to manage security in the Strip. Regarding a possible Arab or international peacekeeping force, he stated that Cairo would not oppose such a deployment—if it were part of a clear political framework leading to the establishment of a Palestinian state. 'Any international presence, potentially including Arab forces, must be linked to a defined political horizon,' he said. Egypt's participation remains on the table under those conditions. Abdelatty stated that the international community now overwhelmingly supports the necessity of a two-state solution and the realization of a Palestinian state. He stressed that Egypt prefers to speak of 'realizing the Palestinian state' rather than invoking the 'two-state solution,' which he said currently allows Israel, whose government opposes it, to act as a veto-wielding party. 'There is no partner at present. The current Israeli government rejects the two-state solution,' he said. Moreover, he stressed the need for joint action and pressure to realize the Palestinian state, as it is the only guarantee for regional security and stability. 'We are facing an international system that lacks unified rules and standards applicable to all ongoing conflicts.' He criticized the lack of consistent international standards in dealing with conflicts, noting that some states 'place themselves above international and humanitarian law'—a reality Egypt cannot accept. On the question of Hamas's weapons, Abdelatty argued that if a genuine political path to statehood were in place, no group would have justification to bear arms and that the PA must be empowered to perform its security duties in Gaza. Middle East security and Iran–Israel dynamics Abdelatty dismissed speculation about redrawing the map of the Middle East as 'an illusion,' warning that force and military dominance do not bring stability. He said Egypt remains committed to its peace treaty with Israel but has consistently warned Israeli leaders that overwhelming force will not deliver long-term security. 'Regional security requires the will of all states involved—not just one.' He argued that no nation—no matter how powerful or well-supported—can unilaterally shape the region, pointing to the failures of past hegemonic approaches as evidence that lasting security depends on cooperation and inclusion. Asked whether the current Israel–Iran ceasefire would hold, Abdelatty said Egypt is engaged in daily communications with relevant parties and encouraging renewed negotiations between Tehran and Washington. He stated that the recent conflict had not fundamentally altered the regional balance of power, as it was only an attack and a response. He called for a regional security framework that includes nuclear security, reiterating Egypt's demand for a WMD-free zone, and pointed out that Iran is a signatory to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), while Israel is not. Abdelatty voiced concern over the Dimona nuclear facility near Egypt's border and the risk of Iranian retaliation, noting that both Egypt and Jordan are 'in the area of fire.' He said Egypt–Iran ties are gradually improving, citing the renaming of a street in Tehran that previously honoured the assassin of President Anwar Sadat. He expressed hope for complete diplomatic restoration and future cooperation in trade and tourism. Despite weaknesses in the international legal system, Abdelatty said Egypt will continue pushing for accountability and the rule of law as the only path to real security.
Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Iran's supreme leader is facing his gravest challenge yet – and has few options left
CNN — For nearly four decades, Iranian Supreme Leader For nearly four decades, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has navigated internal dissent, economic crises and war, but the unprecedented strikes by Israel and the United States on Iran mark his greatest challenge yet. What he decides next will have huge significance for Iran and the rest of the Middle East. But such is the cost of the assault his options are few. It's a huge test for an 86-year-old in declining health with no designated successor. The extent of the damage inflicted on Khamenei's regime remains uncertain, but it struck at the heart of its power. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a key military force upholding the Islamic Revolution's ideals, suffered the loss of a string of seasoned commanders. Iran's nuclear facilities, where near-weapons-grade uranium was being enriched, were severely damaged, and key scientists driving the program's advancement were assassinated. Khamenei's regional armed proxy groups were already severely weakened by Israeli attacks, and billions spent on his regime's nuclear program were lost in 12 days – another economic wound at a time of sanctions and soaring inflation. So penetrating were the Israeli strikes that Khamenei delivered his speeches during the conflict from an undisclosed location, signaling lingering concern over his safety. He was not among the hundreds of thousands attending nationwide funerals for the assassinated military commanders and nuclear scientists on Saturday. And it was several days after the ceasefire took effect before the supreme leader delivered a defiant video message to the Iranian people. 'This president (Donald Trump) exposed that truth – he made clear that the Americans will only be satisfied with the total surrender of Iran, and nothing less,' Khamenei said. He also, predictably, declared victory over Israel and the US – a message that triggered a blunt response from Trump. 'Look, you're a man of great faith, a man who's highly respected in his country,' Trump said. 'You have to tell the truth. You got beat to hell.' Once a nimble leader who used political and economic maneuvering to secure his regime's survival, the aging Khamenei now governs an eroding and rigid state. With uncertainty surrounding his succession, the state of his nuclear program, and the strength of his proxy groups, he faces a critical choice: rebuild the same regime or open up in a way that could threaten his hold on power. No surrender Over the decades, Khamenei has confronted a relentless cascade of challenges that together have shaped his regime. Inheriting a nation that in 1989 was wrecked and isolated by war with Iraq, he faced the daunting task of resurrecting his fractured economy and society. He had to manage internal dissent and rivalries within Iran's complex clerical circles, confront unyielding international economic pressures, all while preserving the revolutionary ideals of sovereignty and independence. He has enforced harsh internal repression amid waning public support, notably when women's rights protesters demonstrated for weeks the death of a woman at the hands of the 'morality police,' and when mass protests erupted in 2009 over alleged electoral fraud. Exiled Iranian groups established 24/7 media outlets broadcasting anti-regime propaganda and separatist groups leaked the secrets of his nuclear program. Israel's spy agencies appear to have deeply infiltrated Iran, assassinating nuclear scientists and launching cyberattacks against Iran's infrastructure. But not once – until now – has he had the world's strongest military strike his country, and a US president talk about his possible assassination in a social media post. Israeli and American strikes on Iran, long-anticipated but widely doubted, marked only the second time since the 1979 Islamic Revolution that a foreign nation directly attacked the country, following Iraq's invasion under Saddam Hussein in the 1980s. Khamenei's main external leverage points – an advanced nuclear program and a network of proxy groups encircling Israel – are now paralyzed. Internally, Khamenei remains Iran's most powerful figure, backed by a loyal support base and institutions built to safeguard his authority. Yet, with Iran reeling from recent attacks and Khamenei in hiding, the aging leader may intensify repression to preserve the revolution's conservative ideals. 'Iranian doctrine was built around the projection of power in the region and the deterrence of adversaries, but the former is ebbed and the latter has failed. Set against a minimal goal – survival – the regime lives to fight another day, but no doubt it is weakened,' Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group, said. Amidst the chaos, the Iranian regime must now address these internal and external problems, Vaez said, this requires 'more fundamental rethinking than Khamenei is likely to entertain.' 'Even if there is quiet on the military front, there must be a reckoning within the system and likely considerable finger-pointing behind the scenes. The intelligence failure has been comprehensive, upper echelons of the military have been wiped out, and Iran must still contend with deep challenges that preceded the war – an economy in difficult straits, deep social and political discontent,' Vaez said. Deep distrust Facing unprecedented pressure and dwindling options, Khamenei, who previously issued a fatwa forswearing the development of nuclear weapons, might consider weaponizing Iran's nuclear program as its best form of protection. Parliament last week signaled its intent to halt cooperation with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. Developing a nuclear bomb would be a major reversal in Iran's public stance – Israel says its offensive was aimed at stopping Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon, but Tehran has always insisted its program is peaceful. When asked if he would consider bombing Iran again if intelligence reports conclude that Tehran could enrich uranium at concerning levels, Trump said: 'Sure, without question, absolutely.' But Trump claimed 'the last thing' Iran is 'thinking about is a nuclear weapon.' President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation at the White House in Washington, DC, on June 21. Carlos Barria/Reuters One possibility for Khamenei is to seize an opportunity to harness the rare unity in Iran against Israel's strikes, for example, by introducing further reforms. In his speech, he reflected on the moment as one of collective strength. 'By God's grace, a nation of nearly 90 million stood as one – united in voice and purpose – shoulder to shoulder, without any divisions in demands or intentions,' he said. But as Vaez argued, Khamenei may have a limited appetite for a fundamental political and economic rethink. That conservatism may also preclude another option – embracing a warming neighboring region and pursuing a new agreement with Washington. Iran's Arab neighbors historically saw Iran's expansionist policies as a threat, but more recently have opted to repair ties with Tehran, and expressed a desire to cooperate to avoid costly conflict. But Khamenei's distrust of the West, deepened by Trump's unilateral abrogation of a nuclear treaty in his first term and Israel's unprecedented strikes this month – launched two days before an Iranian delegation was due to hold a new round of talks with the US – leaves uncertainty over how he will approach any upcoming negotiations. In an intensifying attempt to bring Tehran back to the negotiating table, the Trump administration has discussed possibly helping Iran access as much as $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear program, easing sanctions, and freeing up billions of dollars in restricted Iranian funds, CNN reported this week citing four sources familiar with the matter said. Trump denied the report. But if Trump wants a deal with Iran, his unorthodox public messaging to Khamenei, including implicitly threatening his assassination, could ultimately derail the talks, Iranian officials said. 'If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted to X on Friday. In his latest speech, the supreme leader projected an image of unyielding resilience, signaling to the United States and Israel – both nuclear powers – that military action alone cannot dismantle his damaged yet still fortified, republic. But with unclear succession to his rule, and the loss of his powerful leverages, he now faces the task of guaranteeing the survival of the Islamic Republic he inherited.
