logo
Govt invokes nationalisation order

Govt invokes nationalisation order

Express Tribune25-02-2025
NIT, in which the government has only 8.9% shares, had offloaded its 23% shareholding in PECO, which the government termed illegal. photo: FILE
Listen to article
The bureaucracy is trying to take over management of a publicly listed company by invoking the "notorious" 53-year-old Nationalisation and Economic Reforms Order of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto that torpedoed the economy, revealed proceedings of a parliamentary committee meeting.
In order to stop further destruction of Pakistan Engineering Company (PECO), the existing shareholders complained to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) National Coordinator Lt General Sarfraz Ahmad, Arif Habib, one of the key shareholders, told the National Assembly Standing Committee on Privatisation on Tuesday.
The State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) Act empowers boards to appoint managing directors of government-owned companies but the government wants to exercise this right in case of a public listed company by invoking the Nationalisation and Economic Reforms Order of 1972, revealed Arif Habib, who owns a 25% stake in PECO.
PECO affairs have to be managed under the Companies Act 2017. Then president Zulfikar Ali Bhutto had promulgated the Nationalisation and Economic Reforms Order in 1972 to nationalise industries. This is considered a key reason behind the destruction of Pakistan's private sector and it took 20 years before former prime minister Nawaz Sharif liberalised the economy.
"I explicitly conveyed to the board of directors that the company's affairs have to be governed by Economic Reforms Order 1972," said a letter written by a joint secretary of the federal government.
Pakistan had enacted the SOEs Act in 2023 as part of its commitments to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund to free public sector companies from the clutches of bureaucracy and politicians.
Habib said that he had taken up the matter with the prime minister and SIFC's Lt General Sarfraz Ahmad. On Tuesday, he also met Minister for Economic Affairs Ahad Cheema on the instructions of the PM.
The hurdles created by the bureaucracy in smooth functioning of the economy and businesses were one of the reasons for setting up the SIFC – a hybrid civil-military body.
Privatisation Commission Secretary Usman Bajwa said that the cabinet had decided in August last year to place Peco on privatisation list.
PECO has been part of the privatisation programme since the 1990s and yet the small company could not be privatised, said Arif Habib.
Bajwa said that until the issue of selling 23% shares by National Investment Trust (NIT) in the stock market back in 2003 remained unresolved, the entity could not be privatised. He added that in July 2023, the Cabinet Committee on Privatisation had set up a three-member secretaries committee to resolve the share sale issue but its report had not yet been finalised.
The mentioning of just two examples – the 2003 alleged illegal share sale and the 2023 secretaries committee underscores the bureaucracy's attempts to maintain the status quo.
The SIFC last month removed a federal secretary, who did not move a summary seeking permission of the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) for export.
NIT, in which the government has only 8.9% shares, had offloaded its 23% shareholding in PECO, which the government termed illegal. In 2004 – a year after the sale, Arif Habib bought those shares and he currently holds 25% shareholding.
Usman Bajwa said that the Ministry of Industries had not provided clarity on the sale of 23% shares and "terms it an illegal transaction". "We are not proceeding with PECO privatisation until this 23% sale issue is resolved," he stressed.
"People say Pakistan is not progressing. Can it progress when small issues like the sale of shares remain unresolved for decades," questioned Arif Habib.
He mentioned that the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) conducted two separate inquiries on the sale of shares and gave the clean chit.
"The government does not feel and raise the real issues the company is facing, which are either privatisation or its revival," said Arif Habib.
There used to be a time when the company had 25,000 employees and the Chinese PM visited it in 1964, but now it has been restricted to two plots, he said.
Habib pointed out that the government "appoints managing directors, who do not know the basics of PECO business". One MD did not even know the price of electric towers and sold them below production cost, he added.
The financial crisis follows years of catastrophic mismanagement under former MD Mairaj Anis Ariff, a nominee of the Ministry of Industries whose tenure saw the company incur losses exceeding Rs1.2 billion, according to the board.
Standing Committee Chairman MNA Farooq Sattar said that PECO could not be left in the current state of affairs and the Ministry of Industries should have proved its case before NAB. He told the Privatisation Commission to resolve all outstanding issues in the next 40 days.
Sattar said that the government should find a solution to the payments owed by PECO. Arif Habib proposed that the government could recover its loans by selling one property located in Lahore.
The government should also make a decision whether it wants to privatise PECO or revive it. Arif Habib called for setting up a garments city on the piece of land in Lahore. The company has a monopoly over manufacturing high-voltage transformers, provided it is revamped.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dar highlights Pakistan's potential in fintech, digital banking
Dar highlights Pakistan's potential in fintech, digital banking

Business Recorder

time21 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Dar highlights Pakistan's potential in fintech, digital banking

NEW YORK: Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Senator Ishaq Dar on Thursday met with leading investment, banking and IT professionals here, wherein he highlighted Pakistan's potential in fintech, infrastructure, sustainable finance, digitization and tokenization of assets, and digital banking. The deputy prime minister pointed to ongoing reforms, rapid digitalization, and enhanced compliance with global AML/CFT standards, all of which were contributing to stronger investor confidence. He also highlighted Pakistan's improving macroeconomic indicators, including the first current account surplus in 14 years, diminishing inflation, and upgrades in sovereign credit ratings by global agencies. DPM Dar also shed light on strategic initiatives, including the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), established to streamline investment processes across priority sectors, including agriculture, IT, minerals, energy, and tourism. The participants, affiliated with institutions such as Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, BNP Paribas, JP Morgan, and Goldman Sachs, engaged in a candid discussion on Pakistan's investment landscape. They shared valuable perspectives and expressed interest in exploring private sector-led initiatives that could contribute to Pakistan's growth and complement broader efforts to strengthen economic ties between Pakistan and the United States.

12 PTI workers sentenced for 6 months
12 PTI workers sentenced for 6 months

Business Recorder

timea day ago

  • Business Recorder

12 PTI workers sentenced for 6 months

ISLAMABAD: Two different courts on Thursday sentenced 12 Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) workers for six months each in cases registered against them under the Peaceful Assembly and Public Order (PAPO) Act, 2024. Judicial Magistrate Ahmed Shehzad Gondal and Judicial Magistrate Mureed Abbas, while announcing their reserved verdicts in cases registered at Ramna and Tarnol police stations, sentenced 12 PTI workers in jail for six months for participating in a protest on November 26without permission. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

GENIUS Act, 2025 versus VAO, 2025
GENIUS Act, 2025 versus VAO, 2025

Business Recorder

timea day ago

  • Business Recorder

GENIUS Act, 2025 versus VAO, 2025

The global proliferation of crypto and virtual assets has triggered an urgent regulatory response across jurisdictions. The ability of digital assets to democratize finance and fuel innovation is matched only by the risks they pose in the hands of bad actors, including money launderers, terrorist financiers, and unregulated entities. Against this backdrop, legislative efforts in the United States and other regions have focused on a dual goal, fostering innovation while protecting consumer interests and financial stability. The United States' recently enacted Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act, commonly referred to as the Genius Act, 2025 ['the Act'], is emblematic of this delicate balancing act. As Pakistan begins its regulatory path with the Virtual Assets Ordinance, 2025 [VAO, 2025], it is important to adopt a comparative perspective. The Act, signed into law in July, is a significant piece of legislation establishing a robust federal framework for issuance and oversight of payment stablecoins. At its core, the Act delineates a categorical distinction between 'permitted payment stablecoin issuers' and all other actors, mandating that only federally or state-qualified issuers are legally allowed to issue stablecoins in the United States. The Act explicitly prohibits issuance or sale of stablecoins by non-permitted entities after a three-year transition period, thereby closing the door on regulatory arbitrage and unlicensed operations. The legislative architecture of the Act places enormous emphasis on prudential regulation. The Act mandates a 1:1 reserve backing for all issued stablecoins, allowing only specific high-quality liquid assets such as treasury bills, insured deposits, and overnight repurchase agreements. Rehypothecation of reserves is strictly prohibited, and issuers must maintain monthly disclosures verified by registered public accounting firms. Moreover, stablecoin issuers are bound by strict anti-money laundering (AML), sanctions compliance, and customer due diligence obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. These standards position stablecoins more akin to bank-issued financial products than unregulated digital tokens. The Act further carves out the scope of permissible activities for issuers, limiting their operations to issuance, redemption, and reserve management, and explicitly prohibits offering interest or yield on stablecoins. This restriction is aimed at preventing the emergence of quasi-banking entities and ensuring that stablecoins are used solely for payments and settlements. Furthermore, the Act establishes a rigorous vetting process for public companies seeking to issue stablecoins, particularly those not primarily engaged in financial services, thereby safeguarding integrity of the financial system from commercial exploitation of user data and behavioral analytics. A unique feature of the Act is its embrace of federal-state dualism. State-qualified issuers are permitted, provided their regulatory frameworks are substantially like the federal regime. The Stablecoin Certification Review Committee, comprising top federal financial authorities, oversees certification and annual recertification of state regimes. This structure balances federal uniformity with state innovation, fostering a harmonized yet flexible regulatory environment. On the contrary, jurisdictions like the European Union (EU) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have taken parallel, yet distinct, regulatory approaches. EU's Market in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation is comprehensive, covering a broad spectrum of crypto assets including utility tokens, asset-referenced tokens, and e-money tokens. Unlike the Act's laser focus on stablecoins, MiCA provides a pan-European licensing regime and subjects issuers to capitalization, governance, and whitepaper disclosure requirements. Meanwhile, UAE's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai offers a layered licensing model, emphasizing operational segregation, cybersecurity, and real-time audit requirements. VARA's risk-based approach is technologically agile and emphasizes regulatory sandboxes to foster innovation. Additionally, MiCA and VARA address the same foundational concerns, consumer protection, market integrity, and financial stability, but they adopt divergent tactics. MiCA leans toward harmonization and centralized oversight via the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), whereas VARA champions bespoke compliance, dynamic risk scoring, and modular regulation. The Genius Act, on the contrary, injects a strong banking ethos into the crypto realm, creating a regulatory perimeter that closely mirrors traditional financial institutions. Turning to Pakistan's VAO, 2025, one finds a nascent but ambitious attempt at entering the regulated crypto economy. The Ordinance establishes a dedicated regulatory authority with powers to license, supervise, and sanction Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs). It introduces registration requirements, capital adequacy norms, and fit-and-proper criteria for directors and senior management. Like the Act, the VAO, 2025 mandates AML compliance and allows for enforcement actions against non-compliant actors. However, its scope is broader in defining 'virtual assets', encompassing not just stablecoins but all forms of digital tokens. Despite its breadth, the VAO, 2025 suffers from operational and structural deficiencies. Unlike the Act, which delineates the exact composition of permissible reserves, redemption procedures, and auditing norms, Pakistan's framework remains vague on critical prudential aspects. There is no explicit requirement for 1:1 reserve backing or a monthly third-party audit. Moreover, the VAO, 2025 lacks a clearly defined licensing pipeline with timelines, appeal mechanisms, or transparency in decision-making. The Act, on the contrary, stipulates defined review periods, hearing rights, and judicial recourse, making it procedurally robust and constitutionally sound. Another fundamental shortfall in VAO, 2025 is the absence of tiered regulatory pathways for different scales or types of VASPs. The Act allows for a threshold-based transition to federal oversight when stablecoin issuance surpasses US$10 billion, preserving scalability and regulatory proportionality. In Pakistan's case, theVAO, 2025 does not differentiate between fintech startups and large-scale platforms, thereby imposing a one-size-fits-all compliance burden that could stifle innovation. From a critical standpoint, while the Act advances the regulatory frontier by establishing clear lines of authority, prudential discipline, and enforcement tools, it also leans heavily toward centralization. The exclusion of non-permitted entities, prohibition of interest-bearing features, and constraints on product design might overturn the growth of DeFi applications and algorithmic stablecoins. The Act, in essence, privileges safety over innovation, a trade-off that may not sit well with proponents of crypto-native decentralization. However, the VAO, 2025 reflects an intent to integrate into the global regulatory fabric, but lacks the depth and precision necessary for effective enforcement and industry confidence. Absence of granular compliance obligations, definitional clarity, and regulatory sandboxes indicates a policy framework still in its formative stage. Without substantive revisions, the Ordinance risks being perceived as an aspirational document rather than an enforceable regulatory instrument. To enhance its standing as a crypto-friendly jurisdiction, Pakistan must pivot toward a more standardized and dynamic regulatory architecture. This includes codifying explicit reserve management protocols, enabling tiered licensing models, establishing sandbox environments for innovation testing, and ensuring alignment with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards on virtual assets. Pakistan should also consider bilateral cooperation with regulatory authorities in advanced jurisdictions to foster knowledge sharing and cross-border compliance harmonization. Only through such comprehensive reforms can Pakistan transform its VAO, 2025 into a credible, innovation-friendly, and enforcement-ready framework that attracts investment, safeguards consumers, and fortifies financial integrity in the digital asset space. (Huzaima Bukhari & Dr Ikramul Haq, lawyers and partners of Huzaima & Ikram, are Adjunct Faculty at Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), members Advisory Board and Visiting Senior Fellows of Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE) and Abdul Rauf Shakoori is a corporate lawyer) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store