False claims Rodrigo Duterte 'won US anti-corruption award' stem from parody news site
It includes a picture of the Southeast Asian nation's former leader.
The post surfaced as campaigning for mid-term elections in the Philippines kicked off, with the political future of Duterte's daughter in the balance (archived link).
The House of Representatives impeached Vice President Sara Duterte in early February following the spectacular implosion of the fragile alliance between her family and that of President Ferdinand Marcos.
An impeachment trial, on charges that could see her barred from office, will be held in the Senate where a dozen open seats are up for grabs in the May vote.
Similar claims the ex-president received an award for fighting corruption were also shared on Facebook, including in a pro-Duterte group with over 150,000 members, as well as on Instagram.
"PRRD the best Philippine president. Nobody can put a good man down!" read one comment on the posts, using initials for the former leader.
Another read: "Congratulations! We need to be led by another Duterte -- VP Sara Z. Duterte."
But the former president has not been recognised by the US State Department as an international anti-corruption champion, as the posts claim.
Former US Secretary of State Antony Blinken launched the International Anti-Corruption Champions Award in 2021, and Duterte does not appear in the lists of champions for 2022, 2023 or 2024 (archived here, here, here and here).
The only awardee from the Philippines is Mayor Victor Sotto of the Pasig City suburb of the capital Manila, who was recognised in 2021 (archived here and here).
Sotto was described as "a standard-bearer for a new generation of Philippine politicians who prioritize anticorruption and transparency initiatives in their election campaigns and in office".
Text at the bottom of the circulating picture reads "CDN STRICAL", indicating it is from "Cebu Dairy News" which parodies local media organisation CDN Digital (archived here and here).
In their X bio, Cebu Dairy News describes itself as: "Cebu's leading satire/spoof/parody news entity."
AFP has previously debunked posts misrepresenting content from Cebu Dairy News.
Philippine news organisations Rappler and Vera Files debunked claims the post was genuine news when it circulated in October 2021 (archived here and here).
AFP has debunked other false claims swirling around the upcoming Philippine elections.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Police investigate fire at Conor McGregor's pub, suspect intentional criminal act
Conor McGregor's pub was torched in a suspected arson attack at 3am in Dublin.A man fled after using flammable liquid at the entrance. No injuries 'The pub is open… You wouldn't get through it with a rocket launcher. She's spotless.'#ConorMcGregor Conor McGregor's Black Forge Inn caught fire once again Friday – and police think it was likely an intentional criminal act. According to multiple reports including The Irish Independent, the fire began the early morning hours in Dublin. Police and fire responded to the scene where the blaze was extinguished. No injuries were reported. However, authorities say they think the fire was set with malicious intent. Video of smoke bellowing out of the establishment was posted on social media. Black Forge Inn has arson history Friday's incident isn't the first time McGregor's pub has caught fire since he purchased it for $2 million in 2020. In 2022, another incident of arson occurred with subjects throwing a petrol bomb at the building. While a fire had been started, the bomb did not ignite. Conor McGregor's chill response McGregor referenced the incident multiple times on social media in the hours that followed Friday's fire. In a since-deleted Instagram post, McGregor seemed unconcerned by Friday's events. "The pub is open for business today, folks," McGregor said (h/t Daily Mail). "You wouldn't get through it with a rocket launcher. She's spotless. Up the Forge! Built different baby." On X, he posted an aerial shot of the Black Forge Inn, which appeared to still be in good shape. "Unbeatable," McGregor wrote. UNBEATABLE! @blackforgeinn 🇮🇪
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
5 questions for Danielle Citron
Danielle Citron is a University of Virginia School of Law professor. As a leading expert in online privacy and harassment, she has advised Facebook (now Meta), Twitter (now X), Bumble, Spotify and TikTok on issues like trust and safety. She also served on then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris' task force to combat online exploitation and abuse of women between 2014 and 2016. Citron won the MacArthur Foundation's 'Genius Grant' in 2019 in recognition of her work on sexual privacy on online platforms. Citron talks to us about how tech companies have dismantled many of the safety features in their systems, and how the country itself has strayed from its once-bipartisan wariness of data collection. The following has been edited for length and clarity. What's one big, underrated idea? That data collection is not an imperative and not a given. Since the late 1950s, with the advent of data banks, we have essentially presumed that data collection is a good, almost in some religious way. We have long ignored this important inclination that collection itself is endangering our privacy and civil liberties. We've had moments of agreement in Congress in the 1970s that we shouldn't be collecting data unless we have congressional authorization and a really good reason. These are Democrats, Republicans — we were really worried that amassing of information was control, and would lead to really dangerous power in the government and private sector What technology right now do you think is overhyped? What we overhype is the magical idea that AGI [artificial general intelligence] will synthesize information in a way that's close to thinking. Normatively it is so troubling, because humanity is messy and wonderful. It's the joy and love and grief. There's some things I think are under hyped. The promise for me of all this data is health. Let's cure Type 1 diabetes, let's work on cancer. We're underleveraging where it most matters, and we're over leveraging on fake promises. What do you think the government could be doing now about tech that it isn't? [Implementing] the precautionary principle. I thought we'd learned our lessons. We built cars without seat belts, and a lot of people died. And then the car industry faced liability. They then had to internalize the costs. We have learned time and time and again that when you build things just because you can, you don't think about the risks and the harms that aren't in view, and you don't test for them. We really ought to think hard about regulation that requires, especially when it comes to certain technologies, that we just don't build [things] unless we've got not only a proven use case, but also an assessment of harms. What has surprised you most this year? Having worked on trust and safety for the last 20 years voluntarily — pretty much no one paid me to help them on nonconsensual intimate imagery and stalking and threats and harassment — what surprises me is the gutting of both trust and safety staff at these big companies and their ripping apart of their commitments. I really bought into the story that there was some virtue to what we were doing. I feel like I got snookered into thinking this was genuine. I thought they had seen that people were feeling safer on the platforms. It's just the eyeballs are much more worth it to them, because the salacious sells better. What book most shaped your conception of the future? 'Databanks in a Free Society' by Alan Westin and Michael Baker. It's a report for the National Academy of Sciences. It's like 600 pages in which they show how many data banks we have. We get a sense for counties, localities, states, the federal government amassing information and sharing it. If we looked at this book and took it seriously, we would've really in earnest said, 'Hold on, we've got to do something.' This isn't new, this is not unregulable, this isn't something we don't understand. We've been building databases of information effectively since the mid-1960s, and we've been sharing it through network systems since the early 1970s. Intel cancels chipmaking plans in the EU Intel is canceling billion-dollar projects in Germany and Poland, which POLITICO's Pieter Haeck reports will have major consequences for the European Union. During an earnings call late on Thursday, Intel said that it was nixing plans to build a €30 billion chip-manufacturing complex in Magdeburg, Germany, and a €5 billion plant in Wroclaw, Poland. The facilities were set to begin production in 2027, and national governments had pledged to contribute large subsidies to the efforts. In a note tied to the earnings call, Intel announced that it also expects to cut 15 percent of its employees this year. Intel's moves are spoiling the EU's ambitions to boost its domestic infrastructure for manufacturing semiconductors. The bloc has pledged to increase its share in the global microchips value chain to 20 percent by 2030. Yet the EU reported last year that it has only raised its share to 10.5 percent. California's AI rules could set a new national standard After much dissension, California privacy regulators have finalized rules on automated decisionmaking tools, POLITICO's Tyler Katzenberger reports. On Thursday, the California Privacy Protection Agency's (CPPA) board passed the regulations in a unanimous vote. The nation-leading protections enable consumers to opt out of some automated systems that make decisions on everything from college admissions to hiring. However, California's Office of Administrative Law still has to approve the policy plan. Labor and privacy advocates, business groups and Big Tech companies such as Apple and Google have been bickering over the scope of the rules. Tyler reports that none of them are happy with the final result, as many of their recommendations didn't make it into the final plan. While companies handling personal data do have to submit to regular audits and risk assessments, the regulations won't apply to generative AI systems and first-party behavioral advertising. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Hong Kong police offer rewards for tips leading to the arrest of 19 overseas activists
Advertisement According to a Facebook statement by the group on June 30, its election drew some 15,700 valid votes through mobile app and online voting systems. It said the candidates and elected members came from various regions, including Taiwan, Thailand, Australia, the US, Canada, and Britain. While the group calls itself Hong Kong Parliament, its electoral organizing committee was founded in Canada and its influence is limited. Among the 19 activists, police have already offered 1 million Hong Kong dollars ($127,400) for information leading to the arrest of Yuen, Ho, Fok, and Choi when previous arrest warrants were issued against them. For the remaining 15 people, rewards of 200,000 Hong Kong dollars ($25,480) were offered, urging residents to provide information about the case or the people. Advertisement 'The investigation is still ongoing. If necessary, police will offer bounties to hunt down more suspects in the case,' police said. They also called on those wanted to stop their actions while they still can, saying that they hoped the activists 'will take this opportunity to return to Hong Kong and turn themselves in, rather than making more mistakes.' Yuen said in a Facebook live broadcast that the election was not quite successful in drawing active participation, and that the police campaign would help the group rally support for the resistance movement. 'It helps us with a lot of advertising,' Yuen said. During the live chat with Yuen on Facebook, Sasha Gong, another person targeted by the bounties, accused Hong Kong of becoming a police state. She said she is US citizen and would report her case to the US authorities and lawmakers. Over the past two years, Hong Kong authorities have issued arrest warrants for various activists based overseas, including former pro-democracy lawmakers Nathan Law and Ted Hui. They also canceled the passports of some of them under a recent security law introduced in the city last year. The moves against overseas-based activists have drawn criticism from foreign governments, especially given the former British colony was promised that its Western-style civil liberties and semi-autonomy would be kept intact for at least 50 years when it returned to Chinese rule in 1997. In March, the United States sanctioned six Chinese and Hong Kong officials who it alleged were involved in 'transnational repression' and acts that threaten to further erode the city's autonomy. But Beijing and Hong Kong insist the national security laws were necessary for the city's stability. Hong Kong police have maintained that the Beijing-imposed law applies to permanent residents in Hong Kong who violate it abroad. Advertisement In retaliation for the US move, China in April said it would sanction US officials, lawmakers, and leaders of non-governmental organizations who it says have 'performed poorly' on Hong Kong issues.
