DMW issues deployment ban on new hires for Iran, Jordan amid conflict with Israel
'New hires are prohibited. Returning [Overseas Filipino Workers] are allowed, technically speaking. But they still can't travel because the airspace is closed,' DMW Secretary Hans Cacdac said in a press conference on Thursday.
The DMW issued Advisory No. 19 s. 2025 reiterating restrictions in the deployment of OFWs to Israel, Iran, Jordan, and Lebanon.
Cacdac advised Jordan-bound OFWs to likewise postpone their trips, given the kingdom shares a common border with Israel.
'The same is true with Jordan-bound OFWs, they are turned back. So we issued an advisory, huwag na kayo pumunta muna. We included that in our advisory to recruitment agencies. Don't send new hires to Jordan because they will just be turned back,' Cacdac added.
(Don't go there at this time.)
There is an existing deployment ban in Israel in the aftermath of the October 7 Hamas attacks against Israel in 2023.
Cacdac warned that non-compliant recruitment agencies will be held liable.
'That's part of our regulatory authority over them. When we speak in a regulatory sense, then they have to comply. And yes, on the cost of travel, we'll have them pay for that,' Cacdac said.
As of Thursday, Cacdac said that there are also 58 Filipinos who are either Israel-bound or Jordan-bound but are stranded in Dubai and Abu Dhabi.
Of the 58, the DMW has been able to arrange a flight for four Israel-bound Filipinos to return to the Philippines via an Etihad flight in Abu Dhabi.
'We have been helping them,' Cacdac said.
While it is not within DMW's purview to make recommendations on alert levels that determine whether there should be a mandatory repatriation or a voluntary one, Cacdac said the agency is focused on helping Filipinos in need, regardless of the situation.
'The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) officials are the political and security experts. We honor their leadership at the one country team level so it is the ambassador's call, it is the Secretary of Foreign Affairs' call , and we will always defer to the DFA's judgment,' Cacdac said.
Tensions are high in the Middle East after Israel launched a preemptive attack against Iran six days ago, supposedly to deter Tehran's nuclear program. —RF, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

GMA Network
35 minutes ago
- GMA Network
Makabayan solons push for repeal of Anti-Terror law
"It has only served to justify attacks against ordinary Filipinos and those who champion their rights. We must repeal this law to protect our fundamental freedoms,' ACT Teachers party-list Rep. Tino said. (Photo from ACT Teachers Party-list FB post) A bill repealing the Anti-Terrorism law, a 2020 measure which allows detention of terrorism suspects for as long as 24 days without a warrant, has been filed in the House of Representatives. Party-list Reps. Antonio Tinio of ACT Teachers and Renee Louise Co of Kabataan sought the repeal, which they branded as 'Terror Law,' under their House Bill 1272. 'The chilling effect of this law has undermined the work of human rights defenders, journalists, teachers, students, and grassroots organizers. The Terror Law has no place in a society that values democracy and human rights," the lawmakers said. "It has only served to justify attacks against ordinary Filipinos and those who champion their rights. We must repeal this law to protect our fundamental freedoms,' Tinio added. Under the Anti-Terror law, terrorism is committed by any person who, within or outside the Philippines, regardless of the stage of execution, engages in acts intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to any person, or endangers a person's life; engages in acts intended to cause extensive damage or destruction to government or public facility, public place or private property; or engages in acts intended to cause extensive interference with, damage or destruction to critical infrastructure. The opposition lawmakers said that such a broad definition of terrorism allows state forces to arbitrarily tag individuals and organizations as terrorists based on mere intent or suspicion. They said the state's duty to ensure peace and security must never come at the expense of people's rights and freedoms. They cited the case of Japer Gurung and Junior Ramos, the Aeta farmers who were freed after the court junked terrorism charges against them due to insufficient evidence. 'The true path to peace and justice lies not in repression, but in addressing the roots of poverty, inequality, and social unrest. We call on our colleagues in Congress to support the immediate repeal of the Terror Law,' they added.—LDF, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
PH welcomes Quad's statement of concern on South China Sea situation
The Philippines on Thursday welcomed the strongly worded statement issued by top diplomats of the United States, Japan, Australia and India condemning coercive and unilateral actions in the disputed South China Sea. The foreign ministers of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue or Quad met in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday where they reaffirmed their commitment to a "free and open Indo-Pacific" amid the increasingly assertive posturing by China in the disputed waters and in the East China Sea, where Japan and China have competing claims. Manila said the joint communique issued by the ministers at the end of their meeting reflects the growing international concern on the increasingly assertive and dangerous actions threatening the region's peace and security. Without naming China, the US's Marco Rubio, India's S. Jaishankar, Japan's Takeshi Iwaya, and Australia's Penny Wong expressed "strong opposition to any unilateral actions that seek to change the status quo by force or coercion." "By highlighting the continuing dangerous and provocative actions, and the use of force and coercion in the South China Sea, the Quad Foreign Ministers has kept focus on the incidents that the Philippines has regularly contended with in the West Philippine Sea," a statement by the Department of Foreign Affairs said. "Their statement demonstrates the strong objection by the international community against such illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive actions in the West Philippine Sea and the South China Sea." In 2012, President Benigno Aquino III signed an administrative order renaming the stretch of waters in the South China Sea closer to the Philippines' western coast as West Philippine Sea. The DFA also thanked the Quad ministers' "unequivocal support" for the 2016 arbitral tribunal decision that denigrated China's massive claim in the strategic waters. The Philippine government challenged the validity of China's sprawling territorial claims in the South China Sea and sought to clarify the territorial entitlements of certain Chinese-occupied features under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas, or UNCLOS. Manila won the case against China, which refused to recognize the ruling. The landmark decision further "cemented" its status as "an unassailable part of the corpus of international law," the DFA said. "Such a landmark ruling under international law deserves full compliance in furtherance of the peaceful settlement of disputes," it added. China claims the South China Sea virtually in its entirety and has deployed much larger fleets of coast guard, navy and suspected maritime militia ships in the past years to assert that extensive claim against smaller claimant states, which are the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan and Brunei. Confrontations have spiked between Chinese and Philippine coast guard and navy ships in the disputed waters in recent years. "Desiring to maintain regional peace and stability in the South China Sea and in the wider Indo-Pacific, the Philippines will continue to uphold the rules-based order governed by international law, particularly UNCLOS, and will continue to prioritize effective diplomacy and the constructive management of differences in addressing the situation at sea," the DFA said. — BM, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Lawmakers eye ban on online gambling promotions, linkage to e-wallets
A bill banning the promotion of online gambling and its linkage to electronic wallets (e-wallets) has been filed in the House of Representatives. Bukidnon Reps. Keith Flores, Jose Alba, Audrey Zubiri, Laarni Roque and Arlyn Ayon made the proposal under their House Bill 721 or the Anti-Online Gambling Promotions in E-Wallet Act. Under the bill, the following acts of operators of e-wallet mobile applications are deemed illegal: redirecting users to any online gambling platform, website, or application through links, QR codes, or similar digital means distributing information online on the placing, receiving, or transmitting of a bet or wager through any online gambling website, platform, or application displaying, publishing, or hosting online gambling advertisements within their applications or user interfaces promoting gambling activities online to the general public Any operator, natural or juridical, of an e-wallet platform or similar digital payment application found to have violated the proposed law will be fined P100,000 to P500,000 and will be given a warning for the first offense. The penalty for the second offense is pegged at P500,000 to P1 million on top of suspension of operations for 30 days at maximum. For the third and subsequent offenses, the fine is P1 million to P5 million and permanent revocation of the business license. If the offender is a foreigner, the person will be deported immediately after payment of fines without further proceedings by the Bureau of Immigration. "All four of Bukidnon's representatives in Congress are united on making sure gambling operations go back to onsite operations only and without linkages to e-wallets," Flores said in a statement. 'Alongside financial inclusion and the ease of transactions, a troubling social and cultural trend has emerged: e-wallets have become gateways to gambling by providing direct access to digital casinos and sports betting platforms. Economically vulnerable Filipinos are lured into gambling activities that may lead to financial ruin and social harm,' the authors added in their explanatory note. The lawmakers said that the e-wallets' service of providing loans is also being used by gamblers to continue betting, creating a vicious cycle of debt and dependency. 'Online gambling is a moral, financial, and public health concern. Without proper safeguards, e-wallets risk becoming traps for vulnerable Filipinos. Thus, this bill aims to ensure responsibility and accountability among e-wallet platforms to prevent their exploitation in promoting gambling-related activities and behaviors,' the lawmakers said.—LDF, GMA Integrated News