logo
Judge dismisses ACLU's lawsuit against West Virginia over Morrisey's vaccine executive order

Judge dismisses ACLU's lawsuit against West Virginia over Morrisey's vaccine executive order

Yahoo3 days ago
Aubrey Sparks, legal director for ACLU-WV, argues in support of their lawsuit against the state Wednesday in front of Kanawha County Circuit Judge Kenneth Ballard. The judge dismissed the lawsuit on procedural grounds. (Lori Kersey | West Virginia Watch)
A Kanawha County judge has dismissed a legal action filed against the state Department of Health over its compliance with Gov. Patrick Morrisey's executive order requiring it to issue religious exemptions to the state's school-required vaccinations.
Circuit Judge Kenneth Ballard dismissed the suit — filed by plaintiffs represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia and Mountain State Justice — on procedural grounds without addressing the merits of the case. He agreed with an attorney representing the state that the ACLU had failed to meet a requirement that it notify the state 30 days in advance of filing the lawsuit.
'I think I'm jurisdictionally barred,' Ballard said from the bench Wednesday. 'I think that the petitioners here failed to satisfy the requirements of West Virginia Code 55-17-3 which requires either a …30-day notice or a pleading of injunctive relief.'
The judge said the ACLU's complaint and arguments sought a writ of mandamus with little discussion of a request for injunctive relief.
'I don't think you appropriately sought this injunctive relief, I think you only interjected it at the end in an effort to get around this rule,' Ballard said.
The ACLU and Mountain State Justice filed the lawsuit May 23 against the state Department of Health on behalf of Marisa Jackson, of Kanawha County, and Dr. Joshua Hess, of Cabell County. Jackson and Hess are both parents of immunocompromised students. Hess is also a pediatric hematologist and oncologist practicing at Marshall Health's Cabell Huntington Hospital.
The petition asked the court to compel the state's Department of Health and Bureau for Public Health to stop complying with the executive order requiring the state to allow religious exemptions for vaccine requirements.
The state is one of only five in the country that has not allowed religious or philosophical exemptions to school required vaccines.
Despite Morrisey's executive order, the state Legislature earlier this year voted down Senate Bill 460, which would have established those religious exemptions in state law.
The state Board of Education voted recently to direct county boards of education not to allow religious exemptions. In a separate legal action, a Raleigh County parent whose child was issued a religious exemption by the Department of Health is suing the state and county school boards for not accepting the exemption. A hearing is scheduled for Thursday in the Raleigh County lawsuit.
On behalf of the state, attorney Holly Wilson argued that the case can be dismissed for 'myriad reasons,' including that the plaintiffs did not offer pre-suit notice or meet a burden to show standing.
'But if this court decides that it wants to reach the merits or that it should reach the merits, petitioners lose,' she said. 'They can't show a clear legal right. They can't show a legal duty and certainly they can't show a legal duty that's non-discretionary.'
The state and Morrisey argue that the state's vaccine laws taken together with a 2023 Equal Protection for Religion Act require the state to allow religious exemptions.
Aubrey Sparks, legal director for the ACLU, argued that the ACLU was not required to give the state 30 days notice because of an exception in the law when parties are asking for injunctive relief.
Ballard dismissed the case without prejudice, meaning that the ACLU could re-file the lawsuit.
Sparks told reporters after the hearing Wednesday it's too soon to say whether the legal advocacy organization would do so.
'It's an open question about what our next steps are because I know that there's a lot of other lawsuits pending on this issue,' Sparks said. 'We want to understand what happens in those but we do feel fundamentally that what the state is doing here is unlawful. But then more concerningly, what the state has argued in this case is so profoundly unconstitutional that we all should be concerned.
'What they functionally came into this courtroom and said is that an act of the governor can just unilaterally swipe off the table any law that he thinks could burden someone's religious exercise, and that's just not supported and not permissible under our constitution.'
In a post on the social media platform X Wednesday, Morrisey called the judge's ruling the 'first skirmish of a longer fight.'
'But the ultimate outcome — whether resolved via litigation or a change in statute — is not in doubt,' he said. 'West Virginia is a radical outlier when it comes to onerous vaccine mandates — one of only 5 states in the nation without a statutorily-based, religious exemption. We have an EO based upon our state's religious freedom law that is very strong and must be given meaning. Sadly the state school board is ignoring this important law — they are over reaching and need to be stopped!'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New York hit with air quality alert as Canadian wildfire smoke spreads
New York hit with air quality alert as Canadian wildfire smoke spreads

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

New York hit with air quality alert as Canadian wildfire smoke spreads

New York was hit with an air quality alert Saturday as smoke from Canadian wildfires drifted across the state. The warning, issued by the state's Department of Environmental Conservation and the Department of Health, covers the five boroughs, Long Island, the Lower and Upper Hudson Valley and the Adirondacks. 3 Hazy skies blanketed New York on Saturday as wildfire smoke from Canada triggered an air quality alert across the state. Ron Adar / M10s / Advertisement Officials advised New Yorkers to stay indoors and skip strenuous outdoor activity. Pollution from fine particulate matter — PM2.5 — is expected to push the Air Quality Index over 100, hitting levels considered unhealthy for sensitive groups, including children, older adults and people with heart or lung conditions. 3 Officials warned vulnerable New Yorkers to stay indoors as fine particle pollution reached unhealthy levels. Getty Images Advertisement The tiny particles can cause eye, nose and throat irritation, along with coughing, sneezing and shortness of breath. They can also worsen asthma and heart disease. The alert is expected to remain in effect until Sunday. It's the latest smoke surge to cloud city skies this year. An alert was also issued in early June, when ozone pollution and wildfire haze from Canada triggered warnings across the tri-state. Advertisement 3 Smoke from hundreds of Canadian wildfires drifted south, clouding skies from the Adirondacks to the Big Apple. Robert Sabo for NY Post As of July 23, Canada has seen 3,345 fires in 2025 — scorching over 14 million acres, more than double the 10-year average. More than 50 remain out of control.

See where gender identity care is restricted and where it's protected
See where gender identity care is restricted and where it's protected

CNN

timea day ago

  • CNN

See where gender identity care is restricted and where it's protected

The US Supreme Court's decision to uphold Tennessee's ban on gender identity care for transgender minors earlier this summer has fueled ongoing polarization around LGBTQ issues and controversial policies across the nation. The high court has also agreed to take on more cases dealing with trans rights in its next session that begins in October. Twenty-seven states have passed laws limiting access to gender identity health care for transgender children and teenagers, according to KFF, a nonpartisan health policy think tank. An estimated 40% of trans youth ages 13 to 17 live in these states. There have already been more anti-LGBTQ bills introduced in state legislatures so far this year than in any full year since at least 2020, a CNN analysis of American Civil Liberties Union data found. These bills span various aspects of everyday life, including bathroom access, school sports and identification documents. CNN is tracking where these laws are being passed and where these bills are being introduced. This story will be updated. Gender identity care includes medically necessary, evidence-based care that uses a multidisciplinary approach to help a person transition from their assigned sex— the one the person was designated at birth — to their affirmed gender, the gender by which one wants to be known. Most of the states limiting gender identity care for trans minors adopted their bans in 2023, a record-breaking year for such laws. So far this year, one state — Kansas — has passed a ban, prohibiting the use of state funds to provide or subsidize health care for transgender youth. Not all laws are currently being enforced, however. The ban in Arkansas has been permanently blocked by a federal court, though the state said it would appeal the ruling. Montana's ban is also permanently blocked, according to KFF. Though Arizona has a 2022 law on the books banning surgical care for transgender minors, Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs signed an executive order in 2023 ensuring access to gender identity health care. Nearly 600 anti-LGBTQ bills have been introduced into state legislatures as of July 11, which is already more than any other year on record, according to the ACLU. Education and health care continue to be key targets. There were more bills restricting student and educator rights — enforcing school sports bans and targeting students' access to facilities consistent with their gender identities, for example — than any other category of bills, according to a CNN analysis of ACLU data. Legislators in Texas have introduced 88 anti-LGBTQ bills so far this year, more than double the number of bills being considered in any other state. Four of those — including one that limits changes to gender markers on state medical records — have been passed into law. In late July, Texas lawmakers are reconvening for a 30-day special session. On the agenda is a transgender bathroom bill. Lawmakers in every state, except for Vermont, have filed at least one anti-LGBTQ bill in 2025, according to a CNN analysis. Twenty-two states have signed those bills into law.

See where gender identity care is restricted and where it's protected
See where gender identity care is restricted and where it's protected

CNN

timea day ago

  • CNN

See where gender identity care is restricted and where it's protected

LGBTQ issues FacebookTweetLink The US Supreme Court's decision to uphold Tennessee's ban on gender identity care for transgender minors earlier this summer has fueled ongoing polarization around LGBTQ issues and controversial policies across the nation. The high court has also agreed to take on more cases dealing with trans rights in its next session that begins in October. Twenty-seven states have passed laws limiting access to gender identity health care for transgender children and teenagers, according to KFF, a nonpartisan health policy think tank. An estimated 40% of trans youth ages 13 to 17 live in these states. There have already been more anti-LGBTQ bills introduced in state legislatures so far this year than in any full year since at least 2020, a CNN analysis of American Civil Liberties Union data found. These bills span various aspects of everyday life, including bathroom access, school sports and identification documents. CNN is tracking where these laws are being passed and where these bills are being introduced. This story will be updated. Gender identity care includes medically necessary, evidence-based care that uses a multidisciplinary approach to help a person transition from their assigned sex— the one the person was designated at birth — to their affirmed gender, the gender by which one wants to be known. Most of the states limiting gender identity care for trans minors adopted their bans in 2023, a record-breaking year for such laws. So far this year, one state — Kansas — has passed a ban, prohibiting the use of state funds to provide or subsidize health care for transgender youth. Not all laws are currently being enforced, however. The ban in Arkansas has been permanently blocked by a federal court, though the state said it would appeal the ruling. Montana's ban is also permanently blocked, according to KFF. Though Arizona has a 2022 law on the books banning surgical care for transgender minors, Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs signed an executive order in 2023 ensuring access to gender identity health care. Nearly 600 anti-LGBTQ bills have been introduced into state legislatures as of July 11, which is already more than any other year on record, according to the ACLU. Education and health care continue to be key targets. There were more bills restricting student and educator rights — enforcing school sports bans and targeting students' access to facilities consistent with their gender identities, for example — than any other category of bills, according to a CNN analysis of ACLU data. Legislators in Texas have introduced 88 anti-LGBTQ bills so far this year, more than double the number of bills being considered in any other state. Four of those — including one that limits changes to gender markers on state medical records — have been passed into law. In late July, Texas lawmakers are reconvening for a 30-day special session. On the agenda is a transgender bathroom bill. Lawmakers in every state, except for Vermont, have filed at least one anti-LGBTQ bill in 2025, according to a CNN analysis. Twenty-two states have signed those bills into law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store