logo
‘Superman': Instant Oscar odds for the James Gunn reboot

‘Superman': Instant Oscar odds for the James Gunn reboot

Yahoo2 days ago
You will believe that a man can fly... to the Academy Awards.
After months of pre-release hype, James Gunn's highly anticipated Superman relaunch — which introduces David Corenswet as the Man of Steel — is landing in theaters on July 11. Fan reactions from early screenings have been largely out of this world, while critics' takes range from the enthusiastic to the Kryptonite-tinged. Attention has also been laser-focused on the film's opening weekend box-office prospects as a harbinger for both the future of the DC Comics cinematic universe and superhero cinema in general.
More from Gold Derby
Oscars 2026: A positively premature look at the state of the race based on initial prediction data
'The Young and the Restless' leads the 2025 Daytime Emmy nominations (so far) with top bids for series, actress, and actor
Gunn himself addressed the box-office question in a recent GQ interview, saying: "[People] hear these numbers that the movie's only going to be successful if it makes $700 million or something and it's just complete and utter nonsense. It doesn't need to be as big of a situation as people are saying."
When it comes to the awards race, Superman's Oscar track record places a distant second to his World's Finest partner, Batman. Gotham City's champion boasts multiple nominations and five statuettes across his multidecade big-screen crimefighting career. (Although, to be fair, two of those Oscars were for a solo movie starring his clown-faced nemesis, which also landed the extended Bat-franchise's only Best Picture nod to date.)
Comparatively, the Last Son of Krypton has only been invited to the Oscars twice. Richard Donner's inaugural Superman outing in 1978 scored four nominations and won a special achievement statuette for its pioneering special effects. He returned nearly three decades later courtesy of 2006's Superman Returns from Bryan Singer, which also mustered a VFX nod. (We're only counting live-action features; but it's worth noting that animation pioneer Max Fleischer received an Oscar nomination in 1942 for his classic Superman cartoon shorts.)
To date, Joker and Black Panther are the only two superhero comics-derived movies to break into the Best Picture race. Based on our viewing, Gunn's Superman is unlikely to join them. While it offers an agreeably fresh take on a tough-to-crack character and plenty of good humor, the film's cluttered storytelling and emphasis on fan facing worldbuilding has less to offer Oscar voters.
Corenswet is similarly poised to be passed over in the Best Actor category. Even as he creates a version of Superman that successfully stands apart from Christopher Reeve, the long shadow cast by his predecessor — who was never nominated for his beloved portrayal — never entirely dissipates. Nicholas Hoult's Lex Luthor also isn't the kind of grandiose supervillain performance that ticks the Best Supporting Actor Oscar box like, say, Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight or Al Pacino in Dick Tracy.
But Superman should still soar in some of the below the line races. See our snap predictions below.
Cracking the super-suit code is the first and most important task of any successful Superman movie. And Gunn's regular costume designer, Judianna Makovsky, meets that challenge by crafting an update on Superman's red-and-blue ensemble that feels both classic and contemporary. Corenswet's suit is sturdier than the thin leotard worn by Reeve, while also feeling hand-tailored — unlike Henry Cavill's more militaristic Man of Steel armor. Maovsky also creates distinct looks for the other metahumans in the cast, including Nathan Fillion's Green Lantern and Edi Gatheg's Mr. Terrific, the movie's breakout hero.
Here's a new band to add to your next comic book movie mixtape: The Mighty Crabjoys. The fictional rock group has become a running gag in the rebooted DC Comics cinematic universe and we hear their signature song over the movie's closing credits. Cowritten by Gunn, it's a spot-on parody of turn of the 21st century butt rock that also happens to be a pretty catchy tune. A live Mighty Crabjoys performance at next year's Oscars would be a surefire way to get the audience on their feet.
John Murphy and David Fleming know they can't possibly top the instantly recognizable Superman theme from John Williams — and they wisely don't try. Instead, the duo treat the "Superman March" as a ringer, weaving its grand notes into the soundtrack at key moments for extra super-oomph. But their own score also stands on its own two feet, incorporating crunchy electric guitar riffs that complement Gunn's rough-and-tumble action choreography.
Donner's Superman was previously nominated in this category, and Gunn's version has a richly mixed superhero soundscape as well. Fantastic Four: First Steps seems set to be its only other serious comic book-based competition, while the noisy dinos from Jurassic World: Rebirth could also break through among the summer blockbusters.
Granted, with Avatar: Fire and Ash on the way later this year, every other Visual Effects nominee is likely to be an also-ran. But with plenty of VFX eye candy — from giant kaiju creatures to teeth-rattling fistfights — Superman seems like a shoo-in to be one of the movies that gracefully loses to James Cameron's return to Pandora come 2026.
Best of Gold Derby
Everything to know about 'The Batman 2': Returning cast, script finalized
Tom Cruise movies: 17 greatest films ranked worst to best
'It was wonderful to be on that ride': Christian Slater talks his beloved roles, from cult classics ('Heathers,' 'True Romance') to TV hits ('Mr. Robot,' 'Dexter: Original Sin')
Click here to read the full article.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Caitlin Clark's Boyfriend Grabs Attention After Two-Word Message to Indiana Fever Star
Caitlin Clark's Boyfriend Grabs Attention After Two-Word Message to Indiana Fever Star

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Caitlin Clark's Boyfriend Grabs Attention After Two-Word Message to Indiana Fever Star

Caitlin Clark's Boyfriend Grabs Attention After Two-Word Message to Indiana Fever Star originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Caitlin Clark turned in an impressive double-double on Sunday as she helped lead the Indiana Fever to a dominant 102-83 home win against Paige Bueckers and the Dallas Wings. Advertisement Clark won the highly anticipated battle against Bueckers by dropping 14 points, three rebounds, 13 assists, five steals, a block and two triples in 25 minutes of action. Bueckers' team-high 21 points were impressive, but it was far from enough to help Dallas avoid a shellacking at the hands of a determined Fever side. Among the hordes of supporters who rallied behind Clark on Sunday was her boyfriend, Connor McCaffrey, whom she first met while they were both in college at Iowa University several years ago. Clark and McCaffery made their relationship public in August 2023 after Clark posted a photo of them together on social media. They appear to be going as strong as ever these days, and Clark's emotional message for McCaffery on Sunday is a testament to this notion. The Fever star took to Instagram to share a heartfelt birthday post for her man. 'happy happy happy birthday con🥳 you make everyday better and I couldn't be more grateful. may this be the best year yet , i love you 🖤🖤' she wrote. Advertisement McCaffery, who is currently employed as an assistant coach for Butler University, kept his response short and sweet, replying with a brief two-word message. 'Love u ❤️' he posted. McCaffery's message drew all sorts of reactions from the fans on social media. As of writing, it already has 397 likes and a string of comments. 'the comment I was looking for,' a reaction read. 'we were at today's game and wanted to shout your bday out on the Jumbotron or make a poster!' a supporter wrote. 'ur kinda famous now huh? Lol,' another said. Indiana Fever guard Caitlin Clark (22) takes photos of her teammates warming up before the game against the Washington Faith Morgan-Imagn Images 'where the I,' asked a user. 'love you? Really? Nah..' commented another. Advertisement 'Take care of the 🐐' demanded a fan. Clark's rise to fame has been unprecedented, and the 23-year-old has had to navigate a challenging path on her way to the top. As she expressed in her post, she's very grateful that McCaffery has been by her side all the way. Related: Fans Notice the Same Thing About Paige Bueckers Before Caitlin Clark, Fever Game Related: Caitlin Clark Turns Heads With Outfit for Fever-Dream Related: Aliyah Boston Had Two Words for Sophie Cunningham on Friday This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 14, 2025, where it first appeared.

MGA's Miniverse™ Goes Mobile! New Make It Mini™ Game Brings Big Fun in Tiny Form
MGA's Miniverse™ Goes Mobile! New Make It Mini™ Game Brings Big Fun in Tiny Form

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

MGA's Miniverse™ Goes Mobile! New Make It Mini™ Game Brings Big Fun in Tiny Form

Play, Collect, and Create Your Favorite Make It Mini Lines in This New Digital Experience MGA's Miniverse "Make It Mini" Mobile Game Icon MGA's Miniverse "Make It Mini Game" Screen Shot LOS ANGELES, July 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- MGA Studios, an independent subsidiary of MGA Entertainment (MGA), the largest privately held toy and entertainment company in the U.S., announced today the launch of MGA's Miniverse™ mobile game, , the first-of-its-kind, NFC powered, connected toy-to-life and mobile game ecosystem. Make It Mini is a mobile game that extends the play and engagement with MGA's Miniverse Make It Mini™ viral DIY collectible lines and empowers users with creativity and never-before-seen community tools. Collect, create, and compete in Miniverse style! First, collect capsules from MGA's Miniverse Make It Mini lines and open your mystery capsule. Next, launch the mobile game and scan the NFC-enabled 'recipe card' included in your capsule. Then, dive into the fun - create and build customizable spaces, play with all the items you unlocked and collected, and compete in exciting, digital challenges within the app. Users can vote for their favorite creators, win rewards, and build their own collections. There are endless possibilities to expand! Inspired by the popular MGA's Miniverse toys and connected by MGA's Toytap™ technology, this cozy game lets you 'make it mini, make it yours' by designing small spaces, making mini-items, and bringing dream worlds to life. Bring your favorite Miniverse minis directly into this unique digital experience. Completely free to play, this game combines interior design, room makeover, and mini collectibles into one experience. The app is ideal for fans of meditation-style gameplay, Miniverse enthusiasts, and anyone who loves cute, miniature worldbuilding. Download Make It Mini, collect and scan your toys, and start building your mini empire. 'Make It Mini is a major milestone for MGA's Miniverse,' said Jason Larian, President of MGA Studios. 'By bringing our hit DIY collectibles into an interactive mobile game, we're giving fans a whole new way to engage with the MGA's Miniverse brand. From unboxing and crafting to collecting and competing, the game captures everything fans love, now in a digital format. It's a powerful new platform that expands the Miniverse experience and brings our growing community together.' Using Make It Mini food, furniture and spaces items, players channel their inner mini-world designer to create and compete in fun challenges to decide who's the best, most creative mini-maker. Make unique foods and unpack adorable mini furnishings to fill with cute kawaii décor all in a cozy, creative space controlled by you. Make It Mini is available to download on iOS on the App Store and Android on Google Play and is available globally on July 11, 2025. About MGA StudiosMGA Studios is an independent subsidiary of MGA Entertainment, Inc. and a Delaware C-corp. The company is focused on developing and growing a safe digital environment for children and families to come together and enjoy wholesome entertainment across digital and physical platforms. MGA Studios has rights to more than 7,000 trademarks, patents, and copyrighted works and has financial backing of MGA Entertainment, Inc. For more information, please visit About MGA EntertainmentMGA Entertainment is the largest privately held toy and entertainment company in the U.S., known for its commitment to creativity, quality, and innovation. Headquartered in Los Angeles with offices globally, the company creates innovative, proprietary, and licensed consumer products and entertainment properties, including toys, games, dolls, apparel, consumer electronics, home décor, stationery, sporting goods, movies, and television series. The MGA family includes award-winning brands such as L.O.L. Surprise!™, Little Tikes®, Rainbow High™, Bratz®, MGA's Miniverse™, Yummiland™, CarTuned™, Wonder Factory™, Slime Life™, BABY born®, and Zapf Creation®. For more information, please visit or check us out at LinkedIn, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook. Contact:Sophie GoldbergFINN Partners for MGA Entertainmentmga@ Photos accompanying this announcement are available at A video accompanying this announcement is available at in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

‘Johnny Mnemonic' predicted our addictive digital future
‘Johnny Mnemonic' predicted our addictive digital future

Fast Company

timean hour ago

  • Fast Company

‘Johnny Mnemonic' predicted our addictive digital future

In the mid-1990s, Hollywood began trying to envision the internet (sometimes called the 'information superhighway') and its implications for life and culture. Some of its attempts have aged better than others. Perhaps the most thoughtful is the 1995 film Johnny Mnemonic, the screenplay for which was written by cyberpunk pioneer William Gibson, based on his 1981 short story. The film tells the story of Johnny (played by Keanu Reeves), whose vocation is couriering large amounts of data uploaded to a digital memory bank installed in his brain. As Johnny is asked to carry more and more data, his memory bank crowds out or burns away his own organic memories. Desperate to earn enough for a brain operation to restore them, he agrees to a final, dangerously large data haul that may cost him his life. Johnny Mnemonic brought Gibson's projections of our online future to millions who might never have encountered them in his books. A fan of Gibson's books (especially Neuromancer), I remember watching the movie in the mid-2000s and thinking that its effort to visualize and expand the world of the short story felt plasticky and forced. Critics at the time saw something similar, with The New York Times calling it 'incomprehensible' and 'visually garish,' Variety condemning it as a 'confused mess of sci-fi clichés,' and Roger Ebert awarding it just two out of four stars. But in 2025, Johnny Mnemonic hits me differently. The internet is 30-some years old, and many of Gibson's most prescient ideas have now been more fully realized. If Johnny Mnemonic got some of the details wrong, its larger metaphorical themes of tech addiction, transhumanism, and our drift toward digital spaces have only become more clear. I think Gibson was feeling the zeitgeist of a future moment when we all have to decide how much of our organic lives we're willing to give away as our digital lives grow larger. This story is part of 1995 Week, where we'll revisit some of the most interesting, unexpected, and confounding developments in tech 30 years ago. This tension between digital and organic memory arguably began at the turn of the century, when Google established itself as the de facto directory of the information available online. Suddenly, we had access to a vast public store of shared knowledge, data, and content. Studies soon showed that people were forgoing committing information to (organic) memory because they knew it was readily available via Google. Researchers from Columbia, Harvard, and the University of Wisconsin discovered the 'Google Effect' in a 2011 study, which showed that people are far more likely to remember where data is stored than the actual data itself. Increasingly, the value of consumer tech products seems to be measured by their ability to addict—by how much of the user's time and brain space they can claim. Addiction hijacks the brain, reserving more and more time and attention for the object of desire. Every major technology wave in the last three decades has resulted in increased dependency on digital devices and content. Mobile phones proved remarkably addictive. A number of recent studies peg our daily use at between 3.5 and 4.5 hours per day. Pew Research found in early 2024 that 16- to 24-year-olds (tomorrow's adults) often spend more than six hours a day looking at their smartphones. Numerous studies have shown strong correlations between smartphone addiction and mental and physical health problems, including anxiety, depression, poor sleep, and academic struggles. Mobile phone makers have been forced to add features to help people moderate their screen time, but usage continues to rise. The social media revolution in the 2010s introduced highly addictive digital spaces where almost three-fourths of Americans now spend an average of 2 hours and 10 minutes per day (and that's just a third of their total online time). The addictiveness was and is a feature, not a bug. 'The thought process that went into building these applications . . . was all about: 'How do we consume as much of your time and conscious attention as possible?'' Facebook founding president Sean Parker said at an Axios event in 2017. Congress has introduced several bills to restrict addictive design, but none have passed. In the mid-2010s, Facebook discovered that angry, hyperpartisan content was even more potent catnip for keeping people scrolling and posting. In the 2020s, TikTok 's AI algorithm set a new standard for addictiveness. It processes thousands of signals indicating a user's tastes and beliefs to serve a tailor-fit stream of short videos designed to keep them swiping. The app reached 2.05 billion users worldwide in 2024, with users averaging around an hour per day. A 2024 Pew Research report found that about 58% of U.S. teens use TikTok daily, including 17% who said they use it 'almost constantly.' These tech waves build on each other. Internet usage increased with mobile devices; mobile usage increased with the social web. Generative AI apps may prove even more addictive and intrusive. OpenAI's ChatGPT is the fastest-growing consumer app in history, amassing 100 million users just two months after launching in late November 2022, and 500 million weekly active users by March 2025. ChatGPT generates everything from computer code and companionship to custom images and video. Internet sites and social platforms no longer rely strictly on human-created content—they'll soon generate much of it using AI. This might be a personalized companion, a business coach, or even a version of a loved one who's gone, like the ghostly AI character who advises Johnny in the film. This is likely to further increase the share of our time spent in digital spaces. These technologies capture our brains by capturing our attention, but the tech industry is already developing devices that capture space in our physical bodies—just like Johnny's memory bank. Neuralink's brain–computer interface (BCI) is implanted in the brain and can translate brain activity to communicate with external tech devices. In the near future, we may choose to use such interfaces to augment our brains with specialized knowledge bases or connect 'memory prosthetics' that allow us to store, retrieve, or even offload memories digitally. Some in AI circles even believe the only way humans can stay relevant in the age of AI is by integrating AI models with their brains. Human–computer fusion is a major theme in Gibson's work. In Neuromancer (arguably Gibson's most revered book), the protagonist Case has a bodyguard/sidekick named Molly who has implanted cybernetic eyes that see in the dark, display data to her, and improve her spatial vision during fights. His characters often use 'dermal sockets' in the skull behind the ear to gain new skills (like operating weapons or vehicles). Case and Johnny use these neural interfaces to plug their brains and nervous systems into an alternative, digital world referred to as 'cyberspace' or 'the matrix.' The best-known description of this realm comes from Neuromancer: 'A consensual hallucination experienced daily by billions of legitimate operators, in every nation . . . A graphic representation of data abstracted from the banks of every computer in the human system. Unthinkable complexity. Lines of light ranged in the nonspace of the mind, clusters and constellations of data. Like city lights, receding.' In the decades after Johnny Mnemonic, tech companies would invest heavily in developing virtual reality spaces for both consumers and businesses. Companies like Second Life, Microsoft, Magic Leap, Oculus Rift, and more recently Meta and Apple, have taken up the chase. But so far, the tech industry's attempts at creating entertaining, social, and functional digital spaces have failed to go mainstream. After Facebook sunk billions into building the 'metaverse'—even appropriating part of the term as its company name—mainstream consumers decided it wasn't the new digital 'town square' and not a place they wanted to spend their time. But that was mainly due to shortcomings in the hardware and software, not a cultural rejection (like with video phones or Google Glass). As extended reality (XR) hardware gets smaller, more powerful, and more comfortable, and digital experiences become more believable, XR could yet go mainstream. It could still become another wave of addictive technology that traps users in digital space. Gibson's presentation of technology in Johnny Mnemonic betrays an awareness of its addictive qualities. Johnny's last and biggest courier job looks like a drug deal. He meets a crew of Chinese underworld figures in a Beijing hotel room to pick up the data. The upload procedure itself, with its careful assortment of digital paraphernalia, smacks of an allegory to administering a dangerous drug like heroin. Because Johnny lacked enough space in his memory bank for the data, his post-upload reaction looks like an overdose. His body shakes. He grinds his teeth. He perspires heavily. After staggering to the bathroom, he's physically jolted by hallucinatory flashes of the data as it bursts through the limits of his memory bank and into his brain. Staring into the mirror, he discovers his nose is bleeding. Later, Johnny's love interest, Jane (Dina Meyer) is shown to suffer from a tech-related disease. She has a system of interconnected contact points on her inner forearm—like the track marks of a junkie. She suffers from a condition called NAS (nerve attenuation syndrome), or the 'black shakes,' a neurological disorder caused by overexposure to computers and other electronics. Asked for the cause of NAS, Henry Rollins's Spider character (an anti-corporate activist and underground cybernetic doctor) gestures around at all the electronic equipment in his lab and huffs: 'All this . . . technological civilization, but we still have all this shit 'cuz we can't live without it!' Later in the film, an associate named J-Bone (Ice-T) informs Johnny that the data he's carrying is actually the cure for NAS, complete with clinical trials data, and the property of a big pharma multinational. The company, Pharmakom Industries, had been hiding the cure from the public to continue selling drug treatments for the disease's symptoms. That too has a prophetic ring. In 2025, I already reserve a large part of my cognitive capacity for my online, digital life. Most of us do, and we're already shouldering a heavy cognitive load of digital information—and paying for it. We're more stressed, depressed, isolated, and lonely. As digital devices like Neuralink bring the digital world even closer to our brains, the side effects may become more visceral. By giving up part of his brain to someone else's data, Johnny gave up part of his memories. He gave up part of his identity—part of himself. At times, as data burst from the limits of his memory bank, pieces of it flashed in his mind like broken images and mingled with flashes of his own, real memories. One day, an AI implant may introduce a foreign intelligence into our brains that mixes with our organic, 'earned' knowledge and experience. Did Johnny ever wonder where the digital part of him ended and his real self began? Will we?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store