
If the West is to survive, the radicalism in our universities must be expunged
Today, the world's wealthiest university is doing all it can to resist measures designed to protect the Jews.
Harvard is reportedly suing the Trump administration after it froze $2.2 billion of the school's funding in the wake of the hounding of Jewish students during Gaza protests. The administration accused the university of being 'more committed to activism than scholarship'.
Quite reasonably, Trump demanded that Harvard 'cease all preferences based on race, colour, religion, sex, or national origin'; take steps to ensure 'viewpoint diversity'; and conduct an audit of the programmes that 'most fuel antisemitic harassment'. Funding was frozen after the university refused.
The brewing legal punch-up between the commissars at Harvard, who sit upon an endowment fund of over $50 billion and an operating budget of $6.4 billion, and the gigantic crude instrument of Donald Trump speaks volumes about the moral squalor of universities and the struggle for the soul of the West.
Ironic, isn't it, that the university that restricted admission to Jews in the 1920s, leading other American and Canadian universities to follow suit, should be galvanised to such fierce resistance when required to protect them? Some education.
But then, such are the self-referential comforts of academia that many emperors strut around with no clothes. The repulsively smug former Harvard president, Claudine Gay, who memorably told a congressional committee that calling for the genocide of Jews only qualifies as harassment 'depending on the context', was forced to resign after she was accused of plagiarism and failed to properly handle anti-Semitism on campus.
Enter the Donald. The power and glory of the Trump approach, which cares little for comfortable niceties, may be toe-curling to certain sensibilities. But this is precisely what is required to break the status quo. And on this,Trump has morality on his side.
For decades, Ivy League colleges incubated the kind of abstruse, anti-Western ideology that seemed laughably fringe at the time but ended up taking us all for fools. The father of critical race theory, Derrick Bell, spent many years at Harvard.
The shameful protests in London over the weekend, which saw grown adults in ridiculous clothing waving placards bearing such charming slogans as 'the only good Terf is a dead Terf', is a direct inheritance of American queer theorists of the late 20th century, to whom I was enthusiastically introduced while studying English at Oxford.
The Israelophobia that now infects the bien-pensant is also the shameful legacy of ideas first incubated in American and French universities. People like the Palestinian-American author Edward Said and the revolutionary anti-colonialist Franz Fanon laid the ground for the anti-democratic radicalism that is now pumped out in various forms by any mouthpiece of the Left.
The corrosive concept of 'intersectionality', coined by the UCLA professor and critical race theorist Kimberlé Crenshaw, instructs all radical movements to make common cause with each other. Which returns us to the protests in London last weekend, at which activists chanted 'one struggle, one fight, Palestine, Trans rights' without seeing the internal contradictions of this statement.
Education is society's lifeblood; this makes it all the more shameful when we turn a blind eye to the poison of anti-Semitism encouraged by institutions that should be spreading knowledge instead of hate.
If the soul of the West is to survive the century, the ingrained radicalism found in many universities must be expunged. The cretins at Harvard have stooped so low that it falls to a man like Trump to school them, and I for one am here for it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
18 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Steve Parish says Crystal Palace will appeal against Europa League exclusion
The FA Cup winners have been demoted to the Conference League owing to what Europe's governing body says is a conflict of interest regarding former director and co-owner John Textor, who also owns part of Ligue 1 side Lyon. The American stepped away from Palace at the start of July, but the ownership issue relates to the end of last season when the club secured a first European appearance by beating Manchester City at Wembley. Crystal Palace fans have protested against UEFA's ruling (Yui Mok/PA). UEFA's ruling would mean Nottingham Forest, who finished seventh in the Premier League, taking Palace's place in the Europa League. 'We are still fighting,' Parish told the The Rest is Football podcast. 'There's an appeal process, so we go to CAS which is the court for arbitration and, you know, we're very hopeful. We think we've got great legal arguments. 'We don't think this is the right decision by any means. We know unequivocally that John didn't have decisive influence over the club. 'We know we proved that beyond all reasonable doubt because it's a fact.'


Daily Record
18 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Will The Open be held in Scotland again? Talks held with Donald Trump's son to end 12 year exile
The Scottish venues have not been used for the showpiece event in a dozen years but talks have been held to possibly end that exile Open chief Mark Darbon has spoken with Donald Trump 's son over a future for the competition at Turnberry. But the R&A boss has outlined the key issues currently preventing the Ayrshire track and Muirfield from hosting The Championship. The Scottish venues have not been used for the showpiece event in a dozen years. Muirfield last staged in 2013, while Turnberry has not had an Open since 2009. Speaking on the eve of Royal Portrush staging for the second time in six years, R&A chief executive Darbon says there has been dialogue with both venues, but lay-out concerns remain. He said: 'I think we've been extremely clear on our position in respect of Turnberry. We love the golf course but we've got some big logistical challenges there. We've got some work to do on the road, rail and accommodation infrastructure around Turnberry. 'We'd need to address those logistical challenges should we return. We'll continue to assess the feasibility and work collaboratively not just with the venue but with local and national government to understand what may be possible and that process at Turnberry is no different to any of our other locations.' Trump is heading to Scotland soon and, when asked if the fact he was owner was having an impact on the decisions, he replied: 'It's a somewhat hypothetical question in that unless we address the logistical challenges, it's difficult for us to go back. 'I met a couple of months ago with Eric Trump and some of the leadership from the Trump golf organisation and from Turnberry. We had a really good discussion. 'I think they understand clearly where we're coming from. We talked through some of the challenges that we have so we've got a good dialogue with them.' Darbon added: 'We have an ongoing dialogue with the UK government given that we're a major event that creates significant value into the UK economy. We've spoken to them specifically about Turnberry and I think they've made it clear that the decision around where we take our championship rests with us. 'I would find it difficult to predict whether there will be any discussion on The Open if the President is making a visit here.' As regards Muirfield, Darbon said: 'We love the course. We're in a discussion with the venue right now. 'There's some things that we need to evolve at Muirfield, the practice ground in particular is a challenge for us with a modern Open and there's some work we need to do with the venue to facilitate some of the infrastructure that we require, some cabling to enable the scale of the production that we have these days. 'We'd love to be back there in the future. We're open minded to solutions and we'd love to be back there in the future.' Meanwhile, Darbon confirmed Saturday tee-times have been tweaked due to Saturday's band parade in Portrush. He said: 'I think we recognise that when we bring The Open Championship to town we are a guest in the community in which we operate. So recognising the events that are taking place on Saturday we've worked really collaboratively with the organisers and across multiple agency groups to ensure primarily that both events can run as seamlessly as possible. 'We're making a slight tweak to tee times. It's not dramatic. It'll be 15 minutes or so earlier. At the same time, this is an outdoor sport. The weather can play a big role. It's very difficult to be precise on finishing times. But we're looking at some marginal adjustments.'


STV News
18 minutes ago
- STV News
John Swinney: It's in Scotland's interest I meet Donald Trump
Scotland's First Minister has said it is in the interests of the country that he meets US President Donald Trump. John Swinney said he had an 'obligation' to 'protect and promote' Scotland. He said there would be an opportunity during his meeting to discuss tariffs, Gaza and Ukraine. Swinney will meet the Republican politician later this month when he is expected to visit his golf courses in Aberdeenshire and Ayrshire. Trump will also meet Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in Aberdeen, he has said. Speaking during a visit to Rutherglen, the First Minister said Scots would expect him to meet a US president visiting Scotland. He said: 'I've taken a decision that's in Scotland's interest to meet with the president of the United States so that I can use every opportunity to protect and to promote the interests of the people of Scotland. 'There's obviously a range of issues that we can cover around the international situation that's causing such anxiety to people in Scotland, around the situation the Middle East, and the situation in Ukraine, and the domestic issues that are important to us around about the implications of, for example, trade and tariffs on some of our key sectors, including Scotch whisky. 'So I think people in Scotland would expect their First Minister to meet with the president of the United States to put forward Scotland's position.' Earlier this week, Trump said he would go to Aberdeen, which he said was the 'oil capital of Europe'. 'They have so much oil there,' he said. 'They should get rid of the windmills and bring back the oil. '[Because] the windmills are really detrimental to the beauty of Scotland and every other place they go up.' Asked about those comments, Swinney said he supported renewables in Scotland, which he said was key to the future of the country. He said: 'There's going to be different views expressed by different political leaders, and I'm a supporter of renewable energy. 'I think it's important that we use the opportunities that we have in Scotland to capture the natural and sustainable energy that surrounds us and it's all around us, and we should take those opportunities, which the Scottish Government has done in a sustainable way. 'We've got to protect the planet. We've got to protect our communities, and that's at the heart of the Government's agenda in Scotland.' The Scottish Greens, who were previously in Government with the SNP, have criticised the First Minister for his plans to meet the president. Co-leader Patrick Harvie said the meeting was 'tragic' and 'out of step with Scotland's values'. But Swinney defended the decision, saying: 'The people of the United States have elected their president, and that's their choice, and he's coming to visit Scotland. 'And I think for me, my obligation of what members of the public would expect of their First Minister is for me to engage with the leader of the United States to protect and to promote the interests of Scotland.' On Wednesday, the Scottish Secretary also defended Swinney's decision to meet Trump, along with Sir Keir's decision, saying it was 'the right thing to do'. Ian Murray praised the Prime Minister for putting in a 'lot of effort' to 'cultivate' a relationship with the president. He said US tariffs and the situation in Ukraine could be on the agenda for the discussions. He said: 'At this stage we have no sight of what the president's programme is, but we do know the First Minister and the Prime Minister will meet him, and it is right for them both to do so.' He said the meetings were 'the right thing to do because those relationships are incredibly important in terms of our own national interest'. He added: 'We should make sure we are working very closely with our allies for the benefit of Scotland and the whole of the United Kingdom.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country