New Council Tax warning to people inheriting a home from bereaved relative
Under current rules, most local authorities offer a grace period of up to six months during which Council Tax is not payable on a property that has been left empty due to the death of its owner.
However, the process of obtaining probate, selling the property and completing conveyancing often exceeds this timeframe, which can leave families vulnerable to unexpected charges.
The warning comes after one council in England reportedly imposed a second home levy on an estate property, even though it was not used as a second home.
The six-month exemption did not apply in this case because the property was legally in the son's name at the time of the owner's death, meaning the council considered it a second home from a technical perspective.
Andrew Wilkinson, head of inheritance disputes at Lime Solicitors, described the decision as 'incredibly harsh'.
He said: 'It's deeply concerning to see councils imposing hefty council tax bills on grieving families who are already navigating the complex probate process. In all my years of practice, this isn't something I have seen before, and it feels extremely unfair, especially when executors are actively trying to deal with the estate.
'In most cases, it takes many months, often over a year, to obtain a grant of probate, arrange a sale and complete conveyancing. That means most families are already struggling with delays before they even get the chance to put the property on the market. If councils start piling on charges prematurely, it only adds to the emotional and financial stress.
'Families dealing with estate properties should proactively communicate with their local council to explain the situation and timelines. This can help in negotiating any available exemptions or reliefs. Additionally, if a property is expected to remain vacant for an extended period, renting it out might be a viable option to offset council tax liabilities, though this comes with its own set of responsibilities and considerations.'
The warning comes amid a nationwide crackdown on second homes - part of a UK Government-led effort to tackle the housing shortage in popular towns and rural communities.
On April 1, 2025, more than 200 local authorities across England implemented new powers allowing them to levy a 100 per cent Council Tax premium on properties that are furnished but not the owner's main residence.
The policy, introduced by Michael Gove in 2023, was originally aimed at curbing the 'scourge' of second homes in coastal towns where housing supply is under pressure. However, its rollout is now affecting a far broader range of properties.
Andrew said: 'This policy was designed to free-up housing, not penalise bereaved families. The loss of a loved one is already a challenging time. Families shouldn't be further burdened by unexpected financial pressures due to administrative oversights or rigid policies.
'It's imperative councils handle such situations with the sensitivity and understanding they deserve. Probate is complex enough without councils jumping the gun on tax.'
Most councils in Scotland have information on inherited homes after someone dies on their website.
Guidance on the South Lanarkshire council website states: 'If a property is unoccupied because the occupier has died, as long as it is unoccupied, and liability for Council Tax falls solely to the estate of that person, it could be exempt from Council Tax.
'If the property was owned jointly with someone else, is owned by someone else, or is held in a Trust, liability for Council Tax will fall to that owner, or Trust, and this exemption category won't apply.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
18 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
MPs urge ministers to introduce long-awaited rules on supply chain deforestation
The Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) wrote to Environment Secretary Steve Reed calling for urgent action to tackle the issue in supply chains. Under the previous Government's proposals, businesses will be prohibited from using or selling goods containing palm oil, cocoa, beef, leather and soy linked to deforestation. This due diligence system was part of the 2021 Environment Act but ministers are yet to bring forward the necessary secondary legislation or set a timetable for when they will do so. EAC chairman Toby Perkins asked Mr Reed to set out a specific date for introducing the legislation 'ideally before the New Year' so that the rules can be in place for the new financial year in April. The letter said: 'Delays in bringing forward this legislation makes the Cop15 agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, and the UK's commitment to ending deforestation and forest degradation by 2030, harder to achieve. 'However, it also leaves businesses with uncertainty and will leave them with less time to prepare and comply with the regime. 'On 2 June, in your response to the Committee, you recognised the urgency of taking action to ensure forest risk commodities are not driving deforestation and stated you would set out the Government approach in due course.' Several British supermarkets recently warned that they are in 'limbo' waiting for the Government to introduce the new rules. In an open letter earlier this month, retailers such as Tesco, Sainsbury's and Lidl said deforestation presents an increasing risk to supply chain stability as well as food security. But they also said the UK could suffer millions in export losses to the European Union if Government inaction leaves businesses unprepared to comply with the bloc's own deforestation rules, which are due to come into force at the end of this year. Asked recently whether the Government has a timetable for introducing the legislation, the Environment Secretary told the PA news agency: 'Currently no, but we are working at pace so we can do this as quickly as possible.' On the supermarkets' letter and whether the Government is looking to speed up progress on introducing the rules, Mr Reed said: 'Absolutely.' 'I agree with the supermarkets,' he said. 'The previous Government was just dragging their heels without ever coming to a conclusion about what we do about protecting forests in other countries as well as in our own country. 'And of course forests, trees, woodlands were very important for capturing carbon and cleaning the atmosphere so we don't want to be importing food that has been grown where the forests have been destroyed. 'The Government is working with supermarkets, with food producers and internationally to make sure we get the outcome and we can do that as soon as possible to give everybody certainty about how we move forward on this.' PA has contacted the Environment Department for comment.
South Wales Guardian
18 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
MPs urge ministers to introduce long-awaited rules on supply chain deforestation
The Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) wrote to Environment Secretary Steve Reed calling for urgent action to tackle the issue in supply chains. Under the previous Government's proposals, businesses will be prohibited from using or selling goods containing palm oil, cocoa, beef, leather and soy linked to deforestation. This due diligence system was part of the 2021 Environment Act but ministers are yet to bring forward the necessary secondary legislation or set a timetable for when they will do so. EAC chairman Toby Perkins asked Mr Reed to set out a specific date for introducing the legislation 'ideally before the New Year' so that the rules can be in place for the new financial year in April. The letter said: 'Delays in bringing forward this legislation makes the Cop15 agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, and the UK's commitment to ending deforestation and forest degradation by 2030, harder to achieve. 'However, it also leaves businesses with uncertainty and will leave them with less time to prepare and comply with the regime. 'On 2 June, in your response to the Committee, you recognised the urgency of taking action to ensure forest risk commodities are not driving deforestation and stated you would set out the Government approach in due course.' Several British supermarkets recently warned that they are in 'limbo' waiting for the Government to introduce the new rules. In an open letter earlier this month, retailers such as Tesco, Sainsbury's and Lidl said deforestation presents an increasing risk to supply chain stability as well as food security. But they also said the UK could suffer millions in export losses to the European Union if Government inaction leaves businesses unprepared to comply with the bloc's own deforestation rules, which are due to come into force at the end of this year. Asked recently whether the Government has a timetable for introducing the legislation, the Environment Secretary told the PA news agency: 'Currently no, but we are working at pace so we can do this as quickly as possible.' On the supermarkets' letter and whether the Government is looking to speed up progress on introducing the rules, Mr Reed said: 'Absolutely.' 'I agree with the supermarkets,' he said. 'The previous Government was just dragging their heels without ever coming to a conclusion about what we do about protecting forests in other countries as well as in our own country. 'And of course forests, trees, woodlands were very important for capturing carbon and cleaning the atmosphere so we don't want to be importing food that has been grown where the forests have been destroyed. 'The Government is working with supermarkets, with food producers and internationally to make sure we get the outcome and we can do that as soon as possible to give everybody certainty about how we move forward on this.' PA has contacted the Environment Department for comment.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
How the Scotch whisky tariffs deal was struck
The world's biggest whisky market has long been an enticing prospect for Scotch exporters, but was protected behind 150% was symbolic of India's long-time attachment to developing its own industries behind high barriers to trade, believing that its huge population was a sufficient marketplace in which to develop its economy in its own more than 30 years, the trade barriers have been gradually have learned that they have skills that can compete globally, notably in IT, pharma, back office processing, and increasingly in manufacturing. It has slowly woken up to the benefits of further lowering obstacles to as more people have joined India's middle class, by the hundreds of millions, they have put more pressure on their government to give them access to imported whisky is one of them, successfully marketed as a signal of prosperity and an international, sophisticated having a 150% tariff and other non-tariff barriers, Indian imports of Scotch have grown to become the biggest national market by volume, overtaking France, while the USA is the biggest by of India's imported Scotch is in bulk for blending with domestically-produced whiskies, which can be sold at a premium price. The UK-India trade deal struck in early May and being signed between the countries' prime ministers at Chequers on Thursday cuts that tariff in half and then sees it cut to 40% within 10 still a hefty tariff, while the average Indian tariff on imported UK goods falls from 15% to 3%, and most trade will have no tariffs at all. That includes soft drinks, down from a 33% tariff - an Irn Bru, sahib?But it's a very significant boost to the prospects of selling more branded Scotch and pushing into premium markets for single has made the difference that got this deal done?One key to this has been Diageo. With around 40% of Scotch production, it has the brands and the marketing heft that already reach into India's middle has also been crucial to weakening the resistance to tariffs of India's domestic distillers, by becoming the largest of bought the United Distillers empire inherited and expanded by Vijay Mallya, the flamboyant businessman who paid big for Scotch distiller Whyte & his empire collapsed and he hit big legal problems (still unresolved), Diageo took control in 2015, but had to offload Whyte & Mackay to avoid the attention of the competition the company that is the main domestic distiller became the same company that is the biggest winner if tariffs come course, a trade deal is a lot more complex than alcoholic spirits. And they have been less of a concern for the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He comes from Gujarat, a state that has long banned consumption or sale of alcohol, with a few exceptions recently put in may reckon on continued Indian obstacles from non-tariff barriers, including labelling, customs delays, retail restrictions, and India's sclerotic legal system, but the trade deal has tried to secure gains on these. One of Mr Modi's personal interests is in the global export of yoga – the Hindu version rather than its western among the categories of workers given special measures in the trade deal are yoga teachers, as well as has other, more significant asks of the UK, which have also been a reason for previous British ministers to stall a among them has been access for its companies to place Indians into the British labour market. Companies such as Wipro and Tata Consulting Services have vast numbers of IT specialists they can place with clients, but Britain has resisted allowing more companies have invested in UK subsidiaries and bought British companies, such as Jaguar Land Rover. They also want to be able to place their own people from India in British factories and offices, at least trade deal allows for a smoother process, and more predictable "locked-in" work visa rules, for longer periods than they've been able to secure UK government's description of that deal is defensive, emphasising what it will not do – it won't increase immigration figures, and it will not mean that these migrant workers will have the right to remain in Britain parts of the trade deal extend to car trade in both directions, where India's reputation for car manufacturing has greatly improved under Japanese and Korean and clothing imports with low, or no, tariffs are expected to drive down some costs for British consumers. Economic modelling The total value of this is calculated by the UK government at £6bn of additional investment in the UK, as a stimulus to create 2200 British jobs over its initial 15 years and to add £4.5bn to total output, including a £190m gain to the Scottish economic modelling suggests exports from the UK rising by more than £15bn over the projections for trade growth without a deal. In recent years, they've been worth around £ a big number, but not huge in terms of economic growth more widely. Its significance lies in being the biggest and most significant deal struck by the UK government since Brexit, when Westminster regained the power to strike deals on sends a signal. India and the UK are open for business, and touting the gains from freer trade, rather than wanting to put up new barriers. The contrast is clear with the American president, arriving in Britain as Narendra Modi Scotch whisky industry is very pleased by the India deal, but remains very concerned about the prospect of further barriers to sales in the USA. There is already a 10% could have a 25% added to it in July next year, with the end of the suspension of a tariff on single malt whisky, including the more valuable was introduced as collateral penalty in the dispute over state subsidies for Boeing in the US and Airbus in the EU, with a reciprocal tariff on bourbon heading east, and it was then suspended while Joe Biden was does not require Donald Trump to impose that tariff once more. Unless he chooses to change it, it will automatically return next American Independence Day, 4 of Sir Keir Starmer's meeting with the US President somewhere in the Aberdeen area, whisky industry source says "he must not be allowed to leave Scotland without an agreement to avoid that happening".
