What Pritzker's running mate pick says about his national plans
Gov. JB Pritzker made his reelection bid official on Thursday, but stopped short of introducing a new running mate now that current Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton is running for U.S. Senate.
Why it matters: With rumors swirling that Pritzker could run for president in 2028, his new running mate could be next in line to ascend to the governor's mansion.
What they're saying:"I wanted to set a standard for my successors that if you desire to hold this office, you must be first in line to sing our state's praises and last to belabor her shortcomings," Pritzker said Thursday.
I want it to be the expectation and not the exception that if you want to be Governor of Illinois, well then you better love her like she deserves."
Context: If Pritzker won reelection in 2026, it would not prohibit him from running for the Democratic nomination for president in 2028.
He could hold onto the governor's seat while running for the White House, or he could step aside and give the job to the lieutenant governor.
State election law says the lieutenant governor would take over as governor until the next election cycle.
Flashback: It's only been since 2014 that the candidates for governor and the lieutenant governor have run together. Before that, the elected offices were split on the ballot.
Zoom in: Since Democrats have a slew of statewide officeholders, the list is long on possible replacements for Stratton.
Illinois Treasurer Mike Frerichs, Comptroller Susana Mendoza and Attorney General Kwame Raoul have all won statewide elections and could be big draws for a Pritzker ticket.
Yes, but: If they ran for lieutenant governor, they could not run for reelection for their respective offices, which are all on the ballot in 2026.
This could create an opportunity for the Illinois GOP to swoop in and win a statewide office, which they currently do not hold.
The intrigue: It's not just the statewide offices factoring into who might be interested for the state's No. 2 job.
The Chicago mayoral race takes place in early 2027, and Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias is rumored to be kicking the tires on a potential run.
Between the lines: Pritzker could also go with a lesser-known Democrat as his running mate, much like he did by choosing Stratton in 2018, who was a fresh state representative from Chicago.
Current Deputy Gov. Andy Manar and former Deputy Gov. Christian Mitchell are two possible names.
Also, Chicago City Clerk Anna Valencia, who ran unsuccessfully for Secretary of State in 2022.
The bottom line: Pritzker's reelection campaign has started, but the domino effect for Illinois Democrats could shuffle names on the 2026 ballot.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
14 minutes ago
- New York Post
Who'll end Christian slaughter, grad schools will survive loan caps and other commentary
Foreign desk: Who'll End Christian Slaughter? 'On Friday June 13, over 500 Christians' were murdered by Islamic terrorists in Nigeria, reports The Free Press' Madeleine Kearns. 'The jihadists broke into homes and shelters, murdering people with machetes,' then 'doused their victims' bodies and homes in petrol and set them ablaze.' And, 'though exceptional in scale and barbarity,' it's just 'part of a pattern of persecution that Christians in Nigeria have come to expect.' Consider: 'Since 2009, Islamists' across Nigeria 'have destroyed over 18,000 churches,' 'murdered over 50,000 Christians' and displaced 'a further 5 million Christians.' Yet Western governments and media 'have turned away from the issue.' Will anyone move to stop the carnage? Libertarian: Grad Schools Will Survive Loan Caps Advertisement A provision in the Republican Big Beautiful Bill 'may make considerable inroads to correcting a decades-long student loan policy that has driven expensive programs and large debt burdens for students,' cheers Reason's Emma Camp. The House bill 'eliminates the Graduate PLUS loan program, which allows graduate students to borrow an unlimited sum of money from the government,' instead capping grad-student borrowing at $100,000, 'with a $150,000 limit for professional programs, and a lifetime cap of $200,000 for all students.' These caps could 'force colleges to lower their prices once their students no longer have access to an infinite pile of government money.' Indeed, If we want more affordable medical schools, 'the first step should involve actually incentivizing medical schools to stop overcharging students.' Conservative: Dems' NYC-led Coastal Elitism 'One interesting aspect of the rise of' socialist Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani 'is what it says about New York City's dominance of national Democratic politics at this moment,' muses the Washington Examiner's Byron York. 'The New York contingent essentially is the leadership of the Democratic Party today,' since congressional leaders Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer as well as stars Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders are all current or former New Yorkers. 'After the 2024 election, Democratic pollster Mark Penn wrote that Trump was elected by 'Americans who feel abandoned by the coastal elites and a Democratic Party that moved too far from mainstream America.'' 'There are probably a lot of things Democrats might do to broaden their appeal beyond the coastal areas, but' elevating Mamdani 'is definitely not one of them.' Advertisement Antisemitism beat: 'Kosherizing' Jew-Haters Just before New York's mayoral primary, late-night host Stephen Colbert's guests were Zohran Mamdani and City comptroller Brad Lander, notes Commentary's Seth Mandel. 'All three were there' to 'help elect Zohran Mamdani mayor.' Mamdani — 'the poster child for progressive anti-Zionism's conquest of the mainstream Democratic Party' — had defended the phrase 'globalize the intifada,' which calls for violence against Jews, and 'Colbert can be effective at shielding left-wing anti-Semites from criticism.' Then again, the TV host doesn't 'hold a candle in that department to Brad Lander': Indeed, the comptroller's 'alliance with Mamdani' is the 'culmination of years of Lander's efforts to kosherize anti-Semitism.' He's part of the story of 'the collapse of New York's Jewish-political establishment.' Sen. Chuck Schumer, who kissed 'Mamdani's ring,' is 'the capstone of this project.' From the right: Lefties' Chronic Mental Misery Advertisement Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) 'said last week that Donald Trump supporters are mentally ill,' but 'it's her side that is not well,' snarks the Issues & Insights editorial board. 'Nine in 10 conservatives self-report their mental health to be excellent (51%)' versus only 20% of liberals. Meanwhile, 'only 19% of conservatives say their mental health is poor, while 45% of liberals say they have poor mental health.' 'This is not a new development related to Trump returning to the White House. A decade ago, University of Toronto researchers similarly 'found that conservatives are more emotionally stable than liberals.' 'Democrats, progressives, socialists, anti-capitalists, and the rest who reside under the leftist umbrella are unhappy, and they want everyone else to be just as miserable as they are.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
Wall Street Journal
17 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
A Government Agency Worth Saving
Some underperforming government agencies should be restructured rather than closed. This is true of the Office of Financial Research, which Congress created after the 2008-09 financial crisis to help anticipate and avert future crises. Senate Republicans in the 'big, beautiful bill' are trying to shut down the office, arguing that it is redundant, has failed to prevent financial crises and poses data security concerns. To be sure, the OFR has not measured up to its original purpose. But it would be a huge mistake to end access to the data and intelligence that OFR collects during a time of international uncertainty and market turmoil.
New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
The Supreme Court was entirely right to slap down lower-court federal judges who keep trying to play king
Hail to the Supreme Court for definitively slapping down the lower-court judges who've been issuing nationwide injunctions against President Donald Trump's orders and actions. Though the case touched on birthright citizenship, the court didn't remotely decide that question, nor even offer much hint of how the justices will eventually come down on it. Rather, the court announced that the nation's thousand-plus federal district court judges can no longer routinely stop the Executive Branch dead in its tracks. Advertisement Their rulings can only apply to the plaintiffs actually represented in the case. Though the door is still open to much broader rulings — if the litigants do what's necessary to get certified for a class-action case. But no longer can a single trial-court federal judge in Oregon, Rhode Island or wherever put on hold a president's order to, say, stop billions in spending across the country. Advertisement This is a win not just for Trump, but for the presidency itself — and for the voters of America who elect an executive to institute policy. In just five months, Trump has been slapped with at least 25 national injunctions on everything from spending reforms to education policy and deportation policies. It's a practice without precedent until recent years, though the shoe was on the other foot in the Biden and Obama eras. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Which is why Justice Elena Kagan, one of the three dissenters in Friday's ruling, in the past has decried 'all kinds of abuses of nationwide injunctions.' Yet Democrats and the three liberal justices are again screaming about authoritarian rule and the end of democracy, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson insisting: 'Everyone, from the President on down, is bound by law.' Which is true, as Justice Amy Comey Barrett noted in her opinion, except: 'That goes for judges too.' Advertisement In other words, 'Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.' Exactly: It's up to the Supreme Court to issue national rulings on such constitutional issues; the lower courts should restrict themselves to the litigants before them. 'No kings' must apply to these judges, too.
