EU-China engagement shouldn't be reduced to a couple's therapy session
25th EU-China summit should have provided a space for such a commemorative moment, allowing both sides to display diplomatic pageantry and the symbolism of a forward-looking relationship.
Instead, an initial two-day summit was watered down to a single-day event in Beijing on July 24, where President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang met European Council President Antonio Costa and European Commission President
Ursula von der Leyen
There was no joint EU-China summit communique, a standard diplomatic practice to show that a summit concluded successfully. Mired in tensions and seemingly irreconcilable differences, EU-China relations have entered a midlife crisis.
To be fair, even during better days, relations were never particularly cosy. Rather, it was a relationship built upon necessity: despite ideological differences, choosing each other was a geopolitical and strategic choice – a necessary evil – to safeguard multilateralism and multipolarity.
China's diplomatic tradition has long valued symbolism and protocol. The toned-down summit ensued after a string of meetings between Chinese diplomats, including Chinese Foreign Minister
Wang Yi , and their European counterparts over the past month to carefully craft and control messaging – a foreign ministers' strategic dialogue on July 2, the seventh China-France high-level dialogue on people-to-people exchanges on July 4 and the sixth EU-China high-level climate dialogue in Beijing on July 14.
The 25th EU-China summit nonetheless served more as a face-saving event for China and a damage control mechanism for the EU. Despite the EU's acknowledgement of 'the importance it continues to attach' to its relationship with China and 'its commitment to deepen engagement', the summit was akin to a couples therapy session. EU leaders vented a list of grievances and expectations to China without proposing concrete solutions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
How historical amnesia fuels US-China conflict
This August marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in Asia. Contrary to the narrative often presented by Western commentators, the conflict did not begin in 1941, but in 1937, when Japan invaded China. Advertisement Unfortunately, this has been forgotten. In a breathtaking display of historical ignorance, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly declared during his first visit to Japan: 'We share a warrior ethos that defines our forces. Japan is our indispensable partner in deterring communist Chinese military aggression.' For the record, Japan's aggression against China predated 1937 by decades. The first Japanese attack occurred in 1894-95, resulting in the seizure of Taiwan as spoils of war. In 1904-05, Japan's victory over Russia expanded its reach into Manchuria. Imperial Japanese infantry amid the occupation of Manchuria in 1931 following the Mukden Incident. Photo Getty Images By 1910, Korea had been annexed as a Japanese colony. In 1931, the Japanese Imperial Army manufactured the Mukden Incident as a pretext to carve out Manchukuo from China's northeast: a date still commemorated in China every September 18 . Then, in 1937, came the Lugouqiao, or Marco Polo Bridge, incident – again orchestrated by the Japanese Imperial Army. Only then did full-scale war ensue. At the G7 summit in May 2023 , world leaders gathered at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park, which documents the horrific aftermath of the US' atomic bombing on August 6, 1945. What it does not document is why Hiroshima was bombed. Advertisement Japanese aggression against China led to a US oil embargo in 1941. Rather than withdraw, Japan chose to attack the colonial possessions of Britain and the Netherlands and launched a surprise assault on Pearl Harbour – resulting in America's entry into the war and ultimately leading to the atomic bombings. Unlike Germany, Japan has never fully and honestly confronted its wartime history, especially in relation to China.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong's policy change for children of non-local talent ‘to ensure fairness'
Hong Kong's plans to impose a required residency period for children of non-local talent before they can apply for subsidised tertiary education is part of efforts to ensure fairness and the reasonable use of public funds, a minister has said. Advertisement Secretary for Education Christine Choi Yuk-lin on Saturday defended the coming policy change, noting the number of relevant applications had increased fivefold between 2022 and last year. In a bid to provide a transition period, the policy will initially require such dependants to have lived in Hong Kong for at least one year before they can apply in the 2027-28 academic year as local students and receive reduced fees. The threshold will then be increased to two years for 2028-29 applications. 'Everyone is naturally concerned about a small number of individuals – dependants of talent scheme arrivals who may have never lived in Hong Kong but have completed their secondary education exams in mainland China or elsewhere as private candidates,' she told a radio programme. Advertisement 'They then use their [Diploma of Secondary Education] results and their local resident status to apply for subsidised university places at our government-funded tertiary institutions at local students' fees.'
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China toughens import rules on Vietnamese durians after detecting health risks
Chinese authorities have tightened oversight of imported Vietnamese durians this year after finding 'excessive levels' of two potentially harmful substances in the popular, high-value fruit. The General Administration of Customs of China now requires enhanced pre-export safety checks and compliance testing before shipments leave the source country, with 'qualified' test reports to be attached to durians, a customs official told the Post, requesting anonymity due to internal rules. She said the administration had intensified testing for the organic compound alkaline yellow and the metal cadmium in Vietnamese durians, after discovering concentrations that 'seriously endangered the health of domestic consumers' at the start of 2025. 'In order to effectively prevent food safety risks, the General Administration of Customs immediately took action.' Under the stricter rules, Vietnamese durians are subject to 'batch by batch' testing – with any unqualified fruits returned or destroyed. Exporters are in turn suspended from shipping the fruit to China, she said. Fresh durian shipments from Vietnam fell by about 45 per cent year-on-year from January to June in value terms, customs data showed. Vietnam's shipments totalled US$611.5 million over the first half of 2025.
