Can growth survive a decade of disruption?
Across the Middle East, governments and institutions are pushing forward with long-term transformation agendas despite these headwinds. This is not a sign of immunity to risk but rather a reflection of the region's ambition to shape its own trajectory. Growth cannot be assumed. It must be built, step by step, through leadership that reads the signals of change and adapts without hesitation.
In this context, some strategic priorities will define which institutions are equipped to sustain progress in a world that rewards speed but punishes fragility.
Digital as infrastructure
Digital transformation has moved past from being a competitive differentiator. It has become foundational to institutional relevance. The most meaningful progress is taking place in the systems that operate behind the interface. These are the infrastructures that support scale, enable intelligent decisions, and respond to market dynamics in real time.
As regulatory expectations evolve around artificial intelligence, data privacy, and operational resilience, digital capability is no longer a matter of customer experience alone. It is now essential to compliance, stability, and long-term viability. Financial services are increasingly delivered through third-party environments including retail, logistics, and healthcare. This shift demands that institutions design technology to integrate, not just operate, and prioritise security, compatibility, and consistency at every level.
Cybersecurity and trust as core competencies
Digital trust has become a strategic issue. It is no longer confined to risk departments or audit reports. It sits at the center of how institutions are evaluated by customers, regulators, and partners. Trust today is defined by how institutions manage identity, protect data, and communicate during incidents.
Cybersecurity must be treated as a forward-looking investment, not a reactive function. Customers are interacting through digital channels by default. Their expectations are shaped by platforms that operate at the highest levels of transparency and reliability. In this environment, institutions cannot afford to treat trust as a legacy advantage. It must be maintained, reinforced, and actively governed.
Talent that reflects market reality
As economic cycles compress and technological shifts accelerate, institutions need people who can operate under pressure, adapt quickly, and lead across functions. The most valuable employees are not just subject-matter experts. They are systems thinkers with the ability to connect trends, navigate ambiguity, and drive outcomes.
The workforce of the future will not be built through static recruitment models. It requires investment in learning, exposure to real-world problem-solving, and a culture that values experimentation over process for its own sake. Leadership is no longer defined by seniority or tenure. It is measured by decision-making quality in uncertain environments.
Growth that is context-aware and selective
Institutions must be strategic in how they pursue growth. Market entry or expansion should be based on more than opportunity. It must be grounded in policy alignment, infrastructure maturity, and the presence of real demand. Institutions that succeed in this environment are those that understand nuance, move deliberately, and stay disciplined even when conditions appear favourable.
Growth should be seen as a commitment to creating long-term value within well-understood contexts. This includes evaluating how financial ecosystems are evolving, identifying gaps that can be addressed collaboratively, and ensuring that expansion aligns with regulatory and social expectations in each market.
Reframing engagement around people's lives
The expectations of customers have shifted. They now look for financial experiences that integrate into daily life, support planning, and adapt to change. Banking is no longer about isolated transactions. It is about enabling individuals and businesses to move forward with confidence.
Real-time budgeting, automated investment, and integrated insurance are no longer fringe services. They are becoming central to what customers expect from financial partners. Institutions must not only deliver these services but do so in ways that are intuitive, responsive, and responsible. Meeting these expectations requires more than technology. It requires a mindset that places the customer's needs at the heart of how strategy is developed and executed.
Strategy built to endure
In a world where conditions shift rapidly and certainty is limited, institutions must design their strategies to last. This involves building models that absorb shocks, sustain relevance across cycles, and deliver value regardless of market volatility.
Growth will not favour those who simply react to change. It will favour those who act with discipline, lead with foresight, and remain accountable to the environments they operate in. That is the work ahead, and that is how institutions will prove their resilience.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Introducing my son to Lebanon helped me heal my relationship with home
As the wheels touch down on the tarmac at Beirut's Rafic Hariri International Airport, my wife and I turn to our 20-month-old son, Dia, kiss his soft head and whisper: 'Welcome home.' Then we both cry. It's his first time in Lebanon – a trip long delayed by an interminable war. Like many Lebanese born in the diaspora, my relationship to the country has always been complicated. Raised abroad, I absorbed it through Sunday meals at Lebanese restaurants in London, family stories and summer visits. As a teenager and young adult, I would go on to live there for 10 years, turning it into a site of belonging and often heartbreak. For the past five years, I've been estranged from it. I had seen a lot during my years in Lebanon, but nothing broke me like the August 4 Beirut port explosion. I felt I lost too much that day. I almost lost my father, who was in a building by the port. We couldn't locate him for hours. I lost far less important things – our company's brand-new office, my car, work projects. After that trip, I left broken. Something had snapped in my already tense relationship with a country that was often exhausting to live in, however much I loved it. Since then, I've only returned for work, family emergencies or deaths. My relationship with Lebanon calcified into something unpleasant. But something shifted on this trip. I came back as a different person. I came back as a father. Lebanon today feels hopeful but precarious – a country both limping out of war and still staggering from the collapse of 2019. The streets are tired. Shoots of wild grass protrude from the pavements and highways. I have become obsessed with these unkempt public roads. They remind me of the way Lebanon looked at the end of the civil war. The country has the air of an aristocratic home fallen into disrepair – once proud, now crumbling, its residents unable to afford its upkeep. But still full of life and stories. But none of that matters when I see my son here. To see how he belongs to this place. He's surrounded by doting grandparents. Even the neighbours beam when they see him. He devours zaatar and stuffed vine leaves. He's wide-eyed with curiosity. As Lebanese, our link to the motherland can often be tied to the kind of nostalgia these scenes can evoke. Nostalgia is a powerful, sometimes dangerous thing. It led many in our diaspora to invest life savings in Lebanon out of duty or hope, only to watch them vanish in the banking collapse. I used to be so weary of that dangerous form of nostalgia that led people to be irrational. But I find myself understanding it this time. For me, returning to Lebanon has always carried a hint of regression. Like anyone revisiting their parents' home, you slip back into old habits, old roles. You unlearn everything that's happened in the intervening years. But this time is different. There's no regression – only transformation. I'm here not as a son, but as a father. I'm not trying to make sense of my place, I'm building a bridge for my son between his heritage and his future. In a recent therapy session, while speaking about my connection to the Mediterranean, I had a surprising realisation: it wasn't the sea I was so anchored to. It was the mountain. I wanted to see if Dia had the same connection. On a visit to Jaj – a village 1,200 metres above the historic coastal town of Byblos – my wife's aunt left some cherries unpicked in the garden just for Dia. He picked them himself, dropping them into a plastic tub with glee. Nour noticed the cherries at the top had been pecked at. 'The top of the tree is for the birds,' her aunt said. 'The bottom is for us.' One simple sentence. Centuries of understanding how to live with the land, not just on it. And now, my son is learning that wisdom. And through him, so am I. Back in Beirut, we realise the city is not exactly toddler-friendly. Pavements are often a suggestion. When they do exist, they're broken, cluttered, blocked by scooters and cars. Electrical cables dangle from poles. It's whatever the opposite of baby-proof is. One afternoon, Nour suggests we might find more space to roam by taking Dia to my alma mater – the American University of Beirut. I haven't set foot there in years. I don't often reminisce about my time there, or much else. But walking through the main gate feels like a reckoning. I tell the security guard I remember my student number – a strange fact to recall from 2001. He pulls up my record, and there it is: my old ID photo. I barely recognise the boy in the image – fresh-faced and naive. Closer in age to Dia than to me now. I'm carrying my son and pointing at the ID photo on the screen, wondering if he'll recognise me. He smiles. Maybe he does. Maybe he's just happy to be here too. As he runs around the grounds of the 19th-century campus, I remember something Nour told me recently – about mycelium networks that connect trees underground, allowing forests to share resources and nutrients. That's how I feel, watching my son plant his feet on this soil. He's connected to people he's never met, to land he's never seen. And in watching him, I realise I'm part of that network too, in a way I haven't felt in years.
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
What happens if Iran were to acquire the bomb?
The recent attacks on Iran and its nuclear facilities shocked the global community. While the world watches closely for further developments and hopes for a diplomatic resolution to this crisis, the attacks on Iran and its next steps will have a profound impact on the nuclear non-proliferation regime. The existing nuclear non-proliferation regime, established to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, is based on the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), negotiated in 1968. It enjoys nearly universal membership and was instrumental in preventing the acquisition of nuclear weapons by another two dozen states, as was predicted before the treaty was put in place. Iran, a party to the NPT, threatened to withdraw even before the attacks. If Iran were to leave the NPT and focus on resurrecting its nuclear programme to build nuclear weapons, it would deal a major blow to the non-proliferation regime and its credibility. Moreover, regardless of Iran's decision about its membership in the NPT or pursuit of nuclear weapons, the damage to the efforts to curtail the proliferation of nuclear weapons has already been done. The 21st century has witnessed several attacks by nuclear-armed states against non-nuclear-weapon states, including the 2003 invasion of Iraq, with the rationale of preventing the alleged acquisition of nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction. Some countries, like Libya, agreed to give up the pursuit of nuclear weapons and were nonetheless attacked later. Ukraine, which inherited a nuclear weapons arsenal from the Soviet Union, gave them back to Russia and joined the NPT as a non-nuclear-weapon state. Many in Ukraine today ask themselves whether the decision to forgo nuclear weapons was the right one, and whether Ukraine would have been attacked if it had chosen to keep them. Countries also look at North Korea, which left the NPT and rushed to build nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching the US as a deterrent against military attacks. So far, this strategy has worked, and North Korea continues to expand and enhance its nuclear arsenal, proudly exhibiting it to ensure the US and others get the message. With the waning reliability of US commitments to its allies, some states may decide that they can only protect themselves with the ultimate deterrent – nuclear weapons. In South Korea, for example, public opinion already favours the nuclear weapons option. Iran's nuclear programme has made countries in the Middle East and beyond nervous for decades. We've heard disconcerting statements from Turkey and Saudi Arabia regarding a potential pursuit of nuclear weapons if Iran were to acquire the bomb. Would attacks on Iran and its nuclear programme shift the calculus of some of these countries regarding their own nuclear ambitions, serving as a catalyst for further nuclear proliferation? Iran insists on the peaceful nature of its programme. However, several elements of it were developed without a particular need for an existing or even planned nuclear energy programme and have been a source of proliferation concern. Iran was on the verge of having everything, including significant stocks of highly enriched uranium, but the bomb itself. It played the nuclear hedging game for over two decades but vastly expanded and accelerated it in the last couple of years. Future proliferators will take note of the risks posed by the ambiguity of their intentions while acquiring nuclear technologies and capabilities that could lead to weaponisation. It remains to be seen whether Iran will leave the NPT and focus on resurrecting its nuclear programme. Iran has already moved forward with the suspension of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards, a key component of the non-proliferation regime that inspects nuclear activities and facilities and is a legal obligation under the NPT. It would be in its own interest to return to full co-operation with the IAEA and offer full transparency of its nuclear programme. Ultimately, further proliferation in the region, ignited by Iran's withdrawal from the NPT and pursuit of nuclear weapons, would be against Iran's own interests. Beyond a diplomatic solution to the existing crisis, there are several steps that NPT states could pursue to prevent further proliferation in the Middle East and beyond. One of these is an explicit legal obligation or regional agreement not to pursue national programmes for uranium enrichment and reprocessing of spent fuel – two critical elements of the nuclear fuel cycle capable of producing fissile material for nuclear weapons. In this regard, the UAE stands as an example of steering clear of any ambiguity in its nuclear power programme. In its agreement on nuclear co-operation with the US (the so-called 123 agreement), it took on an obligation not to pursue these sensitive technologies. Another option is for any new facility involving enrichment and reprocessing to be established as an international or multilateral facility subject to international safeguards. One could argue that robust regional and international co-operation on nuclear energy and its peaceful applications could eventually pave the way for co-operation, transparency and trust-building among countries in the region. Another way to alleviate proliferation concerns in the Middle East is the establishment of a regional verification arrangement to supplement IAEA safeguards, modelled on the Brazilian-Argentine Agency for Accounting and Control of Nuclear Materials (ABACC). Such an arrangement could build confidence in the peaceful nature of nuclear activities. In recent years, interest in nuclear power as a carbon-neutral energy source has significantly increased, including in the Middle East. It holds the promise of reliable and clean energy, with uses in various other applications beyond electricity generation, including desalination of water and many other benefits. For this promise to be realised, the NPT must hold firm, and the system of checks on proliferation must remain in place.
UAE Moments
6 hours ago
- UAE Moments
♉ Taurus: Daily Horoscope for July 5th, 2025
Dear Taurus, today the universe invites you to embrace change and transformation. The Sun trine Moon aspect brings a harmonious energy that supports personal growth and self-discovery. Love Horoscope Today, Taurus, your heart is a garden ready to bloom. The Sun trine Moon aspect encourages you to nurture your relationships with love and patience. You may find yourself feeling more connected to your partner or loved ones, as if the universe is whispering secrets of harmony and understanding to you. Embrace these moments of closeness and let them guide you towards deeper emotional bonds. If single, be open to new encounters; someone special might just be around the corner, waiting to share in your journey of love. Career Horoscope In the realm of work, Taurus, today is a day to harness your determination and focus. The cosmic energies encourage you to tackle tasks with precision and dedication. You may find yourself inspired to take on new challenges or explore innovative solutions to existing problems. Remember, your natural wisdom and authenticity are your greatest assets in the workplace. Use them to build strong connections with colleagues and achieve your professional goals. Trust in your abilities and let your hard work pave the way for success. Health Horoscope Your well-being is in focus today, Taurus, as the cosmic energies align to support your inner peace. Take a moment to breathe deeply and center yourself amidst the hustle and bustle of daily life. Engage in activities that bring you joy and relaxation, whether it's a leisurely walk in nature or indulging in a creative hobby. Remember, your body is a temple, and nurturing it with care and attention will help you maintain balance and vitality. Trust in the universe to guide you towards a state of harmony and well-being. Finance Horoscope Financially, Taurus, today is a day to be cautious yet optimistic. The Moon's influence encourages you to review your financial plans and make adjustments if necessary. Avoid impulsive spending and focus on building a solid foundation for the future. Consider seeking advice from a trusted financial advisor or exploring new investment opportunities that align with your long-term goals. Remember, patience and perseverance are your allies in achieving financial stability and success. Trust in your natural wisdom to guide you towards prosperity.
