
LA riot coverage shows the media's Biden ‘miss' wasn't a miss at all — they just lie
These people have no problem lying right to your face — insisting that you doubt the evidence before your own eyes and instead believe their preferred version of events.
There is plenty of photo and video evidence showcasing the violent unrest in Los Angeles — everything from cars set ablaze to rioters hurling chunks of concrete at law enforcement officers and their vehicles.
An unlawful assembly was declared within hours of when the violence first broke out way back on June 6 — more than a week ago, when the rioters and arsonists initially clashed with federal officers. City law enforcement officials deployed tear gas and other crowd control methods that evening in an attempt to disperse the mob. Not long afterward, Los Angeles issued a citywide tactical alert, alerting the city's officers of an all-hands event.
Note that all of this occurred before President Trump had called up the National Guard.
In the early morning of June 8, after two days of escalation, the first National Guard troops arrived on the scene. Trump later called in the U.S. Marines to protect federal properties, which had already been attacked and vandalized.
The city's comically inept mayor, Karen Bass, imposed a curfew and declared a local emergency on June 10.
Despite the timeline, major media are going out of their way to downplay and dismiss the violence. They are trying to frame the narrative, maintaining simultaneously that the riots are 'largely peaceful' and that Trump somehow tricked the rioters into their violent and lawless behavior (notice the contradiction?) by sending in the troops days after they had started rioting.
It hasn't even been a year since journalists tried to convince you that Biden was 'sharp and focused.' They are already back to lying — telling you to ignore the evidence before your eyes and accept some version of time-travel that allows their narrative to make sense, that Trump somehow provoked the rioters to riot days after they had started rioting.
The Associated Press attempted to downplay the violence by highlighting a more violent historical example: 'LA protests far different from '92 Rodney King riots.'
Well, yeah — and United Flight 93 wasn't as deadly as Flights 11 and 175. But that's not really the point, is it?
'Offline, in real-world Los Angeles, most Angelenos are having a perfectly normal day,' wrote self-appointed media ombudsman and CNN analyst Brian Stelter. 'But online, the fires and riots are still raging. Seeking clicks, clout and chaos, unvetted social media accounts are preying on fears about where last weekend's clashes will lead. … [T]he powerful algorithms that fuel social media platforms are feeding users days-old and sometimes completely fake content about the recent unrest in L.A., contributing to a sense of non-stop crisis.'
Stelter complained elsewhere that people have been getting a false impression of the riots because of 'hours-old' video — one hell of a claim, considering how much mileage we got out of five-year-old footage of the January 2021 Capitol riot.
On June 10, the day Bass imposed a curfew and declared a local emergency, PBS reported on the ground, '[T]he scene here has been pretty quiet, almost festival-like … Of course, we mentioned some looting, but, in general, last night was pretty nonviolent … Also keep in mind that this is happening in a very small slice of the city. It's only a few blocks of downtown L.A., and in the rest of the city, Angelenos are going about their lives as normal.'
We might as well say that nearly all of Iran was not bombed the other day — it's just as true.
At ABC News, there has been praise for the rioters' supposed self-control, with reporter Mary Bruce alleging, 'We've witnessed many of the protesters self-policing, keeping others in check.'
On Wednesday, NBC News' Liz Kreutz attempted to extinguish the idea that L.A. was on fire. 'You could be in Santa Monica or another part of LA and not even feel the impact of these protests,' she said. 'They are very much concentrated [to] a very small pocket of downtown LA, around the federal building, around City Hall.'
'And we should say there are some agitators and people that have been really instigating things with police,' she added. 'But for the most part, especially during the day, many of the protesters gathering have been peaceful.'
At the New Yorker, an editorial cartoon featured the caption, 'The protesters seem to be doing some sort of joyful synchronized dance. Is it time to call in the Marines?'
The New York Times, meanwhile, took a more predictable line, publishing an article that opined the debate has been flooded with dis- and misinformation. This is true, but the Times gives the game away when it focuses exclusively on 'nutpicking' pro-Trump right-wingers while giving a pass to those who lie or misinform to downplay what has been happening.
'Fake Images and Conspiracy Theories Swirl Around L.A. Protests,' read the headline, its subhead adding, 'Disinformation spreading on social media platforms has stoked an already tense situation.'
The article mentions actor James Woods. It quotes a university professor who alleges right-wingers are 'building up the riots in a performative way' to help support Trump's claims that Los Angeles had been taken over by 'violent, insurrectionist mobs.' The report mentions a viral photo of bricks, which was falsely cited as evidence that the riots are well-organized and funded.
The article references Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.). It references anti-George Soros conspiracies. It quotes another university egghead who asserts that things such as the bogus bricks claim are 'catnip for right-wing agitators and grifters.' The article also suggests the Russians may be involved in spreading false narratives regarding the riots.
Oddly missing from the report are mentions of Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), who risibly claimed on June 10 that there had been 'no violence' in Los Angeles before the National Guard was called up. The article fails to mention a June 7 viral video, which claims to showcase a Los Angeles school worker's 'frustration over parents having to leave their children's graduation ceremony because ICE raided an elementary school's graduation today.' That video was an outright lie, and it has garnered eight million views — far more than any falsehood cited in the Times's reporting.
The Times article has not been updated to include ABC's Jimmy Kimmel telling his 1.5 million primetime viewers on June 11, during which a curfew was in place and an unlawful assembly declared, that 'There's no riot outside.' Nor does the Times article mention when the hosts of 'The View,' which is part of ABC's news division, falsely claimed, '[It has] been peaceful for days, and then suddenly these guys showed up and flipped everybody out,' and 'These protests were very, very orderly, they weren't violent, and they occurred in about a four-block radius.'
The Times apparently couldn't be bothered to track these falsehoods. It is too busy publishing stories with headlines such as, 'Not Far From Tense Clashes, Life Goes on in L.A.,' and subheads such as, 'Trump officials have cast demonstrators waving the Mexican flag as insurrectionists, but for many protesters who are Mexican American, the flag represents pride in their heritage.' Amusingly, the Times has also been running overly defensive pieces, including one which falsely described the riots as 'largely peaceful' not once or twice, but three times.
Perhaps most laughable of all is the Los Angeles-based ABC News reporter who said at the outset of the riots, 'It could turn very volatile if you move law enforcement in there in the wrong way, and turn what is just a bunch of people having fun watching cars burn into a massive confrontation and altercation between officers and demonstrators.'
On June 9, an amateur videographer captured footage of protesters hurling cinder blocks from an overpass onto California Highway Patrol officers below. The footage shows one officer being struck directly in the skull, knocking his helmet off and splitting his head open. He is seen later surrounded by his colleagues, his face drenched in blood spurting from the fresh wound.
The media have a serious problem. As far as the Biden story is concerned, and all the recent attempts to explain how they 'missed it' or were 'tricked' into believing the former president was sharp as a tack, it is all self-serving baloney. Their halfhearted defenses are pure theater. It is CYA mode of the highest order.
These people have no problem lying right to your face, and they are showing it once again. They only care that they can get away with it.
Becket Adams is program director of the National Journalism Center at the Young America's Foundation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hassett says market won't influence Trump tariffs: ‘These are the final deals'
National Economic Council (NEC) Director Kevin Hassett said on Sunday that a market reaction to President Trump's tariff policies will not deter him from proceeding with his plans to levy fees on imports. In an interview on NBC News's 'Meet the Press,' Kristen Welker asked the White House economic adviser whether Trump could change the tariff rates again, if the market reacted as it did in April, when the tariff announcement sent stocks tumbling. 'The markets have seen what we're doing and celebrated them, so I don't see how that would happen,' Hassett responded when asked about a future change to the tariff rates. Welker pressed Hassett: 'Okay, but not ruling it out?' 'No, I would rule it out,' Hassett responded. 'Because these are the final deals.' Trump signed an executive order Thursday that modified tariff rates for dozens of countries after he had twice delayed plans to implement 'reciprocal' tariffs on other nations. Tariff rates range from as high as 41 percent on goods from Syria to as low as 10 percent, the baseline established for all imports. The executive order states that all imports will face a 10 percent tariff. The order goes into effect Aug. 7. Some nations have negotiated separate trade agreements to lock in tariff rates. For example, Indonesia and Thailand agreed to a 19 percent tariff, South Korea and Japan negotiated deals that included a 15 percent tariff, and the United Kingdom struck a deal for a 10 percent tariff. Certain other nations that have not negotiated deals will face higher rates. Hassett touted the tariff deals that the president has struck and said those rates are 'more or less locked in' as other countries might continue to press for negotiations, even after the tariffs kick in. 'We have eight deals that cover about 55 percent of world GDP with our biggest trading partners, the EU and Japan, Korea and so on,' Hassett said. 'I expect that those matters are more or less locked in, although there will have to be some dancing around the edges about exactly what we mean when we do this or that. 'For the deals that aren't ready yet, they're going to get the reciprocal rates soon, and then we would expect that there might continue to be negotiations with those countries,' he added.


New York Post
6 minutes ago
- New York Post
Prez rips Lara Trump guest, Charlamagne tha God, after he made brash claim about Epstein and the GOP
President Trump unleashed on Charlamagne tha God — calling him a 'sleazebag' and 'Low IQ individual' — after the talk radio star went on Lara Trump's Fox News show to saying he believed the Epstein scandal could end MAGA's hold on the Republican party. Appearing on 'My View' with the president's daughter-in-law on Saturday, Charlamagne — real name Lenard Larry McKelvey — claimed that 'traditional conservatives' were about to take over the GOP again. Trump wasn't having it. Advertisement 'The very wonderful and talented Lara Trump, whose show is a big ratings success, put racist sleazebag Charlamagne 'The God,'' Trump fumed on Truth Social in the wee Sunday morning hours. 'Why is he allowed to use the word 'GOD' when describing himself?' 3 Charlamagne tha God posited that the GOP is going through significant upheaval over the Jeffrey Epstein drama. Getty Images 'He's a Low IQ individual, has no idea what words are coming out of his mouth, and knows nothing about me or what I have done – like just ending 5 Wars, including a 31 year bloodbath between Republic of the Congo and Rwanda.' Advertisement While Trump didn't reveal a specific grievance with what Charlamagne said on Lara's show, it came after 'The Breakfast Club' co-host weighed in on the scandal over the Trump administration's delay in releasing files related to pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. 3 Lara Trump had a spirited exchange with Charlamagne tha God. Getty Images Charlamagne claimed that the Epstein row is a 'political coup going on right now in the Republican Party that people are not paying attention to.' Last month, the MAGA base erupted over a July 6 Justice Department and FBI memo that concluded the evidence suggests Epstein killed himself and did not have an 'incriminating client list.' Advertisement Trump had ripped into elements of the MAGA base for harping on the issue and blamed Democrats for kicking up the 'Epstein Hoax.' 'I think that traditional conservatives are going to take the Republican Party back,' Charlamagne said. 'I think this Epstein thing is going to be a way for traditional conservatives to take their party back, I really do.' He added: 'I think they know this is the issue that has gotten the base riled up. The MAGA base isn't letting this issue go, and for the first time, they know they can probably take the party back and not piss off the MAGA base.' The 'Breakfast Club' host described Trump as a 'once-in-a-lifetime, one-on-one, political juggernaut.' Still, he panned Trump's performance across the board and contended that Americans are still struggling economically under his watch. Advertisement 'Right now people are hurting,' Charlamagne argued. 'He campaigned on immediate change. Day one change.' He also pointed to former US ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley as a Republican he could see himself backing. 3 President Trump did not seem pleased with Charlamagne tha God's appearance on Lara Trump's 'My View' show. Getty Images Trump further dinged Charlamagne and accused him of not knowing about his accomplishments in office. 'He didn't know that, or India and Pakistan or, wiping out Iran's nuclear capabilities, or closing the horrendous open Border, or creating the greatest economy, where prices and Inflation have come way down,' Trump vented, referring to his efforts to end wars overseas. 'But this dope, Charlamagne, would vote for Sleepy Joe or Kamala? Remember, one year ago our Country was DEAD, now it's the 'HOTTEST' Country anywhere in the World. MAGA!!!'


Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Full List of Democrats Who Voted for New Trump-Pick Confirmations
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Several Democrats voted over the weekend to confirm nominees appointed by President Donald Trump, including for the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice. Newsweek contacted the Democratic National Committee via online form for comment on Sunday. Why It Matters Democrats appear to be divided over how to approach Trump and his administration. While many have been hesitant or slow to confirm his nominees, several Senate Democrats broke with party expectations by voting in favor of his nominees, which ultimately helped advance some of his picks. As reported by Newsweek, the Democrats' bind over how to handle Trump spilled out on the House floor this week when New Jersey Senator Cory Booker delivered an impassioned speech on the Senate floor Tuesday, criticizing his fellow Democrats for what he perceives as "complicity" with Trump's administration. Booker's remarks were instigated by an exchange with other Democratic senators over a package of law-enforcement funding bills. The seal of the U.S. Senate on December 27, 2012, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. The seal of the U.S. Senate on December 27, 2012, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. PAUL J. RICHARDS/AFP viaWhat To Know The official Trump-pick confirmations and the Democrats who voted for them are as follows: Adam Telle: Department of Defense Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Martin Heinrich (New Mexico) John Hickenlooper (Colorado) Tim Kaine (Virginia) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) Jason Reding Quinones: Department of Justice Dick Durbin (Illinois) Andrew Puzder: Department of State Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) John Arrigo: Department of State Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Mark Warner (Virginia) Sean Cairncross: Executive Office of the President Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Martin Heinrich (New Mexico) John Hickenlooper (Colorado) Tim Kaine (Virginia) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut) Lisa Blunt Rochester (Delaware) Cory Booker (New Jersey) Maria Cantwell (Washington) Tammy Duckworth (Illinois) Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) Andy Kim (New Jersey) Ben Ray Luján (New Mexico) Ed Markey (Massachusetts) Jeff Merkley (Oregon) Chris Murphy (Connecticut) Patty Murray (Washington) Jon Ossoff (Georgia) Alex Padilla (California) Brian Schatz (Hawaii) Adam Schiff (California) Chuck Schumer (New York) Tina Smith (Minnesota) Chris Van Hollen (Maryland) Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts) Ron Wyden (Oregon) Marcus Molinaro: Department of Transportation Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Miriam Cantwell (Washington) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Andy Kim (New Jersey) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Brian Schatz (Hawaii) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Luke Lindberg: Department of Agriculture Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Martin Heinrich (New Mexico) John Hickenlooper (Colorado) Tim Kaine (Virginia) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) What People Are Saying New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, in a speech on the Senate floor Tuesday regarding specific bills: "This, to me, is a problem with Democrats in America right now, is we're willing to be complicit to Donald Trump…to let this pass through when we have all the leverage right now." "We are standing at a moment where our president is eviscerating the Constitution of the United States of America, and we're willing to go along with it today. No. No. Not on my watch." What Happens Next With more key positions still awaiting confirmation, the spotlight now turns to upcoming Senate hearings, where further bipartisan cooperation—or division—could shape the direction of Trump's agenda.