Reddit begins age verification checks for UK users
In its announcement, Reddit said that that it will not have access to those photos and will only be saving their verification status, along with their birthdates. That way, users won't have to re-enter their birthdays every time they try to access restricted content. The announcement also said that Persona will only be keeping users' photos for seven days and will not be able to see their Reddit information, such as their posts and the subreddits they visit.
If a user is under 18, Reddit will hide restricted content from them and will limit ads in sensitive categories, like gambling. They will no longer be able to view sexually explicit content, anything that encourages suicide and disordered eating, as well as anything that incites hatred against other people based on their race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability and gender. Reddit will also restrict anything that encourages violence and any post that depicts "real or realistic serious violence against a person, an animal, or a fictional creature" for minors. They won't be able to see posts encouraging challenges that are highly likely to result in serious injury, along with posts encouraging people to ingest harmful substances. Content that shames people's body types and other physical features will be restricted, as well.
Users outside the UK will not be affected by the new rule, but Reddit said that it may need to verify the ages of people in other regions if they adopt similar laws. Reddit also said that it "would like to be able to confirm whether [users] are a human being or not" in the age of AI and will have more to announce about that later.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
This Crypto Trader Made More Money on Bitcoin Than 20 Altcoins Combined—His $100 Investment Strategy Will Surprise You
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. The age-old question of how to invest a modest sum in cryptocurrency has sparked fierce debate among seasoned investors in Reddit posts, with many delivering harsh truths about the limitations of small investments. But while the experienced traders make valid points about realistic expectations, they may be missing a crucial element of the investing journey. The Bitcoin Maximalist Case: Less Hassle, More Focus The overwhelming consensus among experienced crypto investors is clear: put that $100 entirely into Bitcoin. The reasoning is both practical and philosophical. 'By the time I bought a bunch of alts and even did a 2x total... I woulda been better off just buying Bitcoin,' shared one seasoned investor, highlighting a common experience. 'Also WAY less hassle at tax time. Having to log all the transactions into Koinly and tons of dexes and exchanges sucked. Just to make less money.' Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . This sentiment reflects the hidden costs of diversification that newcomers often overlook. Managing multiple cryptocurrencies requires tracking numerous wallets, understanding different Layer 2 solutions, analyzing tokenomics, and navigating complex tax reporting requirements. For a $100 investment, these complications often outweigh potential benefits. The 'Bitcoin maximalist' approach also stems from a fundamental belief in Bitcoin's role as digital gold. 'Bitcoin's price hasn't changed. Ever. 1 BTC is still 1 BTC. Fiat is what's losing value,' one investor noted, framing Bitcoin as a hedge against currency devaluation rather than a speculative investment. The Harsh Math of Small Investments However, the experienced community delivered some sobering calculations about $100 investments. 'If Bitcoin were to double from £80,000 [$106,200] to £160,000, you could turn £100 into a massive £200,' one skeptic pointed out sarcastically. 'The percentage returns are no longer viable with Bitcoin for most retail investors.' Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. This perspective highlights a crucial reality: Bitcoin's days of 100x returns are likely behind us. Even optimistic projections of Bitcoin reaching $500,000 would only turn $100 into $550—hardly life-changing money for most investors. The Alternative Perspective: Every Journey Starts Somewhere Yet this harsh realism may miss the forest for the trees. Critics of small investments often assume that $100 represents someone's entire investing capacity, when it might simply be a cautious first step. 'She will still get profit with $100. Or even $10. And that should be the goal... to get profit,' countered one investor, emphasizing that the habits and knowledge gained from small investments can be more valuable than the initial returns. The Diversification Debate: Safety vs. Potential While Bitcoin maximalists dominate the conversation, some investors advocate for strategic diversification. '75% BTC, 25% ETH. Eth will go up exponentially, so much potential. BTC has strong base. Won't be as volatile,' suggested one investor. Ethereum supporters point to its role as 'digital oil' powering decentralized finance applications, while others mention altcoins with real-world utility. However, these investments come with significantly higher complexity and Timing Trap Perhaps most importantly, the discussion revealed how waiting for the 'perfect' entry point can be counterproductive. 'Keep on saying that and you never buy any. Bitcoin prices not changed in half a year now,' one investor noted about market timing attempts. Dollar-cost averaging emerged as the preferred strategy, allowing investors to build positions gradually rather than trying to time market bottoms. The Bottom Line While experienced traders correctly emphasize realistic expectations about $100 investments, they may underestimate the educational value of starting small. The key isn't the initial amount—it's developing the discipline, knowledge, and long-term perspective that successful investing requires. For newcomers, the message is clear: start with Bitcoin, keep it simple, and view that first $100 as tuition for a much larger financial education. Read Next: Accredited investors can —with up to 120% bonus shares—before this Uber-style disruption hits the public markets Image: Shutterstock This article This Crypto Trader Made More Money on Bitcoin Than 20 Altcoins Combined—His $100 Investment Strategy Will Surprise You originally appeared on 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Business Insider
16 hours ago
- Business Insider
I'm an avid traveler and finally found a useful way to use ChatGPT to plan my trips that saves me hours
ChatGPT saved me hours of research when planning a trip to Door County, Wisconsin. Whereas I normally do a lot of background research before planning a trip, AI could do it for me. I found it was really good at giving a comprehensive overview of a destination. Before I plan a trip, I have a straightforward goal: Learn everything there is to know about the place I'm visiting. I know, I know. That sounds time-consuming. And truthfully, for me it is. But for ChatGPT? I stumbled upon this AI use case when starting to plan a relatively uncomplicated trip to Door County, Wisconsin, for later this summer. Rather than doing the hours of background reading that I usually do to get the lay of the land in a new destination, I let OpenAI 's chatbot do it for me. For context, I travel frequently in my personal life and cover travel for Business Insider, but until now, I'd yet to find a use case for AI that I felt really made my trip planning process more efficient. I'd experimented with AI-powered trip planning tools but had never found them particularly useful. I'd also tried using ChatGPT as a glorified Google, describing to it vaguely what my interests were and asking it to recommend restaurants or attractions. The results were less than promising. From what I could tell, our individual tastes are still too personalized — and chatbot answers too universal — for specific recommendations to be helpful. But for replacing all my pre-planning background reading? It was great. AI does all my background reading for me Let me give you a sense of my usual process. Once I know I am visiting a place, I will Google the most generic things a tourist could think to ask: Top attractions. Must-do activities. Neighborhood guide. Best restaurants. One-day itinerary. Three-day itinerary. Weeklong itinerary. I will do all of these searches, open more tabs than any browser should be reasonably expected to host, and then, I read. I read the top 10 or so results for every search. Then I do more niche searches like best neighborhoods to live in or best vintage shopping, and do the process all over again, this time also rifling through countless Reddit threads where locals discuss the goings-on in their own neighborhoods. Next, I move to social media — often TikTok — to scroll all the videos I can find about the destination to get some visual context and, most importantly, to learn which restaurants or attractions are viral so that I can avoid them. It takes hours, and it's arguably more information than a tourist technically ever needs. But by the time I am done, I feel I have a shockingly full understanding of a place, as both a tourist destination and even as a place where real people live. I feel I could recommend to my friends which neighborhood would be uniquely right for them, which highly-rated restaurants are overrated, and which niche museum is actually a lot cooler than the one ranked first on TripAdvisor. The process is excessive, but it gives me confidence that when I get to the hard planning stage — selecting a neighborhood, narrowing down hotels or Airbnbs, booking restaurant reservations — that my hard-earned PTO is being put to its best possible use. Luckily for me, it turns out ChatGPT is pretty good at doing this. ChatGPT helped me plan my trip to Door County, Wisconsin I was recently planning a trip to Door County, which is a small peninsula in northeast Wisconsin situated between Lake Michigan and Green Bay that's known for being one of the prettier natural places in this part of the Midwest. I wanted to book a house on the water for a busy travel weekend, so I knew I needed to do it quickly. So, instead of embarking on my usual trip planning odyssey, I did something that I had previously been very skeptical about: I turned to AI. The kind of comprehensive overview that I get from reading all the top Google results, ChatGPT was able to give me with just a few prompts. I asked which popular attractions are frequently called overrated and which ones people say are worth weathering the crowds. I asked it to include any tips or tricks on the best times to visit certain places, and to provide several sample itineraries that were varied so I could get a complete picture of my options. I even described my vague travel preferences — good food, good drinks, nature, away from crowds, vintage shops, where locals actually go — and asked it what town I should stay in. It gave me a quick summary of what each of the towns were best known for and which were most likely up my alley. I also asked follow-up questions and played devil's advocate, as AI can tend to repeat marketing-speak or be overly optimistic. In about half an hour I felt like I understood visiting Door County almost as much as I would've if I had spent those hours consuming everything myself. It's able to summarize the 90% of recommendations that pop up on every list and then also include the more unique ones. The responses were not perfect. It recommended at least two restaurants that closed several years ago. And to be clear, I doubt that I know Door County as well as I would if I had done all that reading myself. But I felt like I knew it enough to be confident in my choices while planning — enough so to book a rental home that same night, a decision that would generally take me a lot more time. And yeah, I'm still going to do a bit of excessive reading for the hidden gems. What can I say? Old habits die hard.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Switch 2 owner warns other gamers against buying second-hand games online after their console was banned for breaching Nintendo's anti-piracy rules
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A Nintendo Switch 2 owner was reportedly banned after playing legitimate second-hand games that were later found to be cloned Reddit user 'dmanthey' says they were able to reverse the ban after speaking to Nintendo Nintendo has been cracking down on piracy by restricting consoles caught using piracy tools A Nintendo Switch 2 owner is warning players about buying pre-owned physical games after being banned for unknowingly playing cloned versions. Last month, it was reported that Nintendo was cracking down on piracy and had begun blocking access to online services on the Switch 2 if players were caught using MIG Flash, a tool used to create copies of games. But it seems that even innocent players aren't safe from the company's strict anti-piracy policy. As reported by IGN, Redditor 'dmanthey' shared a post saying that they were banned by Nintendo after loading up some original Switch games they bought from Facebook Marketplace. The user explained that although the physical copies were legitimate, they later discovered that the games had already been copied by the original owner, which was the reason their console was restricted. "Switch 2 users - be careful buying used Switch 1 games. You can get banned if a bad actor dumped it," 'dmanthey' said. "Got banned and unbanned after simply downloading patches for 4 Switch 1 games I bought from Facebook marketplace." Dmanthey explained in the thread that they unknowingly played original Switch cartridges that were cloned using a piracy-enabling device. "Basically, a thief buys/rents a game. They make a copy for themselves using the MIG dumper," the user said. "They resell the original game and keep a copy for themselves on their MIG. Then both of you get banned when the Switch 2 goes online. Only one of you has the carts, so that's the person that will be unbanned." Thankfully, dmanthey was able to get unbanned after speaking to Nintendo's customer service and providing evidence of their purchase and conversation from the Facebook Marketplace seller. "I contacted Nintendo support and found out I was banned," they said. "They had me pull up the Facebook Marketplace listing and take some pics of the cartridges. The whole process was painless and fast." 'Dmanthey' added, "The amount of info they had is crazy". "They could see my ddwrt endpoints, the brand of my memory card, they even knew that I had an EVGA mouse and keyboard plugged into my Switch 2," they continued. Another user was faced with a similar situation last month after they purchased pre-owned Switch 2 from Walmart, only to find that it had been 'bricked' by Nintendo after booting it up. You might also like... The Nintendo Switch 2 is the company's least ambitious console to date, but its improvements are astronomical I've spent 40 hours exploring Death Stranding 2: On the Beach, and it's an incredible sequel that builds upon its unique predecessor to become a masterpiece I've spent 150 hours with The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild, and the Switch 2 Edition is an incredible upgrade
