Apple's India pivot is making China insecure. Baidu users call it a ‘reluctant migration'
Though Apple has been exploring manufacturing alternatives for a while, this latest shift has reignited the debate with fresh urgency. Chinese commentators have seized the moment, especially in light of American President Donald Trump's revived tariff threats on Apple products made outside the US – including in India – to issue broader warnings.
Apple's pivot to India has struck a nerve in China, prompting a flurry of sharp responses across state media and online forums. A supply chain adjustment is being reframed in Beijing as a cautionary tale about Western fickleness, India's limitations, and China's enduring industrial strength.
Dismissive commentary
In Chinese discourse, Apple's so-called migration is being portrayed as reluctant and externally driven. The prevailing view is that India, beyond offering cheap labour, contributes little that is of strategic value. Most components are still sourced from China, with India's weaker infrastructure and higher operational costs making the shift more symbolic than substantive.
This narrative reflects a broader tendency to downplay India's potential and emphasise its industrial shortcomings – low yield rates, fragmented supply chains, labour unrest, and persistent quality issues. Job creation aside, the argument goes, India risks remaining an assembly hub without deeper production capabilities. In contrast, China continues to dominate high-end manufacturing and core component production, reinforcing its lead in innovation.
A Weibo post claims that Apple's continued reliance on China is not due to labour costs but due to a skilled talent pool and business-friendly policies. It dismisses India, and many countries in Southeast Asia and Africa, as lacking these core advantages. India, the Weibo user contends, is harder to navigate and less profitable.
Some commentary veers into open hostility and racism: 'Who dare use a curry-flavoured mobile phone?'
Also read: China is seeking closer ties with Southeast Asia. It's not just a response to Trump
India: a backup plan
Apple's expansion into India is being seen less as a strategic realignment and more as a reluctant hedge – driven not by confidence in India's capabilities but by geopolitical anxiety. Prominent Chinese economist Fan Gang, president of the China Development Institute, attributes the United States' unease to China's continued rise.
On platforms such as WeChat and Baidu, users frame the move as reactive. 'Even Trump,' one post notes, 'wants jobs brought back to the US, not handed to India.' The 'America First' agenda, they argue, undercuts offshoring to low-cost economies like India.
Chinese analysts highlight India's structural constraints: poor infrastructure, an underdeveloped industrial base, and continued dependence on Chinese components. Xiang Ligang, Director General of Beijing-based Information Consumption Alliance, notes that modern manufacturing depends less on wages and more on infrastructure and industrial integration – areas where India still falls short.
Even those who recognise India's potential remain sceptical. Zhang Jiadong, associate research fellow at Fudan University, points to the positives: India's young population, vast labour pool, and improving industrial base. But he also highlights its incomplete supply chains and weaker state coordination compared to China's strategic industrial planning.
Apple's massive footprint in China is cited as evidence that decoupling remains a political illusion. Over 80 per cent of iPhones are still made in China, supported by more than 150 top-tier suppliers and critical capabilities in rare earth processing and precision assembly. In this view, Apple's current strategy is best described as 'China-plus'—a diversification tactic to placate Washington, not a real departure from Beijing. If Apple indeed withdraws from China, it is the tech giant, not Chinese consumers or manufacturers, that stands to lose the most. This 'lose-lose' scenario reflects the deep entanglements caused by globalisation, and prompts fresh reflection on the future of global supply chains, a Baidu commentary added.
Across online forums, Apple's India move is being framed as symbolic. As one Baidu user post puts it, 'Foxconn's Zhengzhou makes 150 million iPhones a year. India? Just 30 million.' Any meaningful shift, if it comes at all, is being seen as years away.
The consensus is that, though India is gaining importance, China remains at the centre of Apple's manufacturing gravity. Labour may be cheaper elsewhere, but China offers scale, sophistication, and state-backed stability. As commentator Zhang Quan argues, Apple's move reflects pressure, not belief. According to another commentator, Xu Sanlang, while Indian manufacturing is growing rapidly, it's a long way from China in terms of scale, diversity, and competitiveness.
Much of the Chinese discourse is outdated and deliberately focused on limitations. The India pivot clearly unsettles China. Even where its potential is acknowledged, the narrative quickly shifts to global interdependence, where China is portrayed as indispensable. This reveals not only deep insecurity but also China's instinct to contain India – on the border and in the economic arena.
Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation. She tweets @sanahashmi1. Views are personal.
(Edited by Zoya Bhatti)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Oppo Reno 15 5G series mobiles launch: Specs, features and what to expect
Oppo recently launched the Reno 14 and Reno 14 Pro in India with significant camera and performance upgrades. Now, rumours surrounding the next generation Reno series have already started to surface, and we may already have a launch date. Reportedly, the Oppo Reno 15 series could make its debut as soon as November this year. However, this could possibly be a China launch, and it will later be announced in the global markets. Now that the launch is not too far away, tipsters have also started to leak the smartphone's key features, giving us a glimpse into what Oppo may launch with the new Reno 15 series. Oppo Reno 15 and Reno 15 Pro launching soon with upgraded features, here's what we know so far.(Ijaj Khan/ HT) Also read: Oppo F29 Pro Review: Polished performer that delivers where it matters Oppo Reno 15 series launch date The Oppo Reno 15 series is already in the works and could make a China debut later this year. The series will likely consist of two models, the Oppo Reno 15 and Reno 15 Pro, both slated to get major upgrades during launch. According to a tipster who goes by the name Smart Pikachu, they shared a post on the Chinese social media platform Weibo claiming that Oppo could launch the Reno 15 series in November. This is expected to be a China launch, and the global launch will likely take place a few months after the China launch. Also read: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, Flip 7 FE, and Watch 8: Here's everything announced at Galaxy Unpacked July event Alongside the launch timeline, the tipster also revealed that the Reno 15 series could have a 6.3-inch display and 6.8-inch display models. The smartphone is also said to maintain a sleek and lightweight design, like the current Reno 14 series models. The Reno 15 series is also rumoured for a major camera upgrade that will likely include a new flagship image sensor, and that it will provide improved colour reproduction. A previous leak also tipped that the Reno 15 series could feature a 200MP main camera. The smartphone could also feature an upgraded periscope telephoto lens for advanced zooming capabilities. Lastly, the tipster also revealed that the Oppo Reno 15 series will likely come with bigger batteries, offering improved battery life. However, it should be noted that the global variant of the smartphone may differ from the Indian variant in terms of specifications and features. Therefore, we will have to wait until the India launch of the new-generation Reno series to know what it has in store for users.
Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
Vietnam Urges US Business Group to Help in Tariff Talks: Media
Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh called on a US business group to continue supporting his country's attempt to secure a final tariff agreement with the Trump administration after the two countries basically reached a consensus on the deal's framework, local media reported. Chinh made the request during a Friday meeting in Hanoi with the U.S.-Asean Business Council, The Investor website reported, citing the Vietnamese government's news portal. The group represents companies such as Apple Inc., Boeing Co. and Inc., according to its website. Leaders of the Southeast Asian nation were caught off guard by President Donald Trump's announcement last week that they had agreed to a 20% tariff, Bloomberg News reported. Vietnam seeks to lower the rate, people familiar with the matter said. Read More Vietnam Surprised by Trump Tariff Decision, Seeks Lower Rate Vietnam, which last year had the world's third-biggest trade surplus with the US, was the second country after the UK with which Trump announced a trade agreement. The US president has been issuing tariff letters to dozens of trading partners since then, slapping on duties as high as 50% ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline. Chinh said the two countries had basically reached a consensus on the deal's framework, but he called on the US business group to help Vietnam obtain a reasonable and detailed tariff agreement for individual products and for some groups of goods, The Investor reported. The prime minister urged council representatives to oppose the use of trade defense measures against Vietnamese exports and actions that would undermine bilateral ties between the two countries, according to the report. He also asked companies to push the US to recognize Vietnam as a market economy. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
JPMorgan Tells Fintechs to Pay Up for Customer Data Access
(Bloomberg) -- JPMorgan Chase & Co. has told financial-technology companies that it will start charging fees amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars for access to their customers' bank account information – a move that threatens to upend the industry's business models. The largest US bank has sent pricing sheets to data aggregators — which connect banks and fintechs — outlining the new charges, according to people familiar with the matter. The fees vary depending on how companies use the information, with higher levies tied to payments-focused companies, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private information. A representative for JPMorgan said the bank has invested significant resources in creating a valuable and secure system that protects consumer data. 'We've had productive conversations and are working with the entire ecosystem to ensure we're all making the necessary investments in the infrastructure that keeps our customers safe,' the spokesperson said in a statement. The fees — expected to take effect later this year depending on the fate of a Biden-era regulation — aren't final and could be negotiated. The charges would drastically reshape the business for fintech firms, which fundamentally rely on their access to customers' bank accounts. Payment platforms like PayPal Holdings Inc.'s Venmo, cryptocurrency wallets such as Coinbase Global Inc. and retail-trading brokerages like Robinhood Markets Inc. all use this data so customers can send, receive and trade money. Typically, the firms have been able to get it for free. Many fintechs access data using aggregators such as Plaid Inc. and MX, which provide the plumbing between fintechs and banks. The fees — which vary based on the use cases currently under discussion — could be passed from the aggregators to the fintechs and, ultimately, consumers. The aggregator firms have been in talks with JPMorgan about the charges, and those are constructive and ongoing, another person familiar with the matter said. There have been some concerns about the number of times aggregators request customer data, the person said. Shares of fintech firms and payments companies including Block Inc. and Affirm Holdings Inc. fell Friday on the news, with PayPal dropping as much as 6.5%. JPMorgan's move comes as the fate of a controversial data-sharing rule hangs in the balance. The open-banking measure, finalized in October by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, enables consumers to demand, download and transfer their highly-coveted data. It also requires banks to share that data with another lender or financial services provider for free. Proponents argue the rule enables customers to access a wider pool of financial services, fosters greater competition and boosts data security. But the banking industry, which immediately sued to block the measure, said the arrangements could stoke fraud and expose them to greater liability. Under Donald Trump, a much-stripped back CFPB has asked a federal judge to vacate the open-banking rule, leaving its future in question. That judge has authorized the Financial Technology Association, a trade group with members affected by the fees, to defend the rule. The issue has become contentious at times. PNC Financial Services Group Inc. sued Plaid in 2020 alleging it copied the look of PNC's login screen, misleading the bank's customers into providing Plaid with their login credentials. The firms resolved the legal battle with a customer-data sharing deal last year. JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said in April that customers should know exactly what data is shared and how it is used. Third parties should pay for banking system access and be prevented from using the data beyond what was authorized, he said. His bank has no problem with data sharing, provided it's properly done, he wrote in his annual letter to shareholders. 'Third parties want full access to banks' customer data so they can exploit it for their own purposes and profits,' he said. 'Banks provide fantastic services, and it's time to defend ourselves – in the public realm or in court if need be.' Steve Boms, executive director of the Financial Data and Technology Association of North America, said JPMorgan's move exploits regulatory uncertainty 'to levy an arbitrary and punitive tax on competitive offerings.' He called it a 'blatant effort to curtail innovation and undermine a stronger American financial system.' JPMorgan's proposed fees in some cases would eclipse the revenue certain companies generate on a single transaction by as much as 1000%, one of the people familiar said. Lower-income customers may also be harmed by restricted access to payments and budgeting apps through fees, said David Silberman, a senior advisor to the Financial Health Network and a former top CFPB official. 'Consumers are getting a lot of value today by permissioning access to their financial data by trusted third parties,' Silberman said. (Updates with additional background, comments, throughout.) More stories like this are available on
