Physical threat from Iran to people in UK 'now comparable with Russia'
Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee said the danger to Brits from the Middle East country has increased 'significantly' in the past three years.
At particular risk are Iranian dissidents and Jewish or Israeli 'interests', with attacks on those targets not considered attacks on the UK, the report says.
It explains: 'It rather sees the UK as collateral in its handling of internal matters – i.e. removing perceived enemies of the regime – on UK soil.'
The committee cites comments from the Homeland Security Group, part of the Home Office, which said 'the greatest level of threat we currently face from Iran' is the threat of physical attack.
That risk is comparable with the one posed by Russia, it added.
Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here.
The report quotes the Intelligence Community as saying Russia and China 'have a scale and a capability which Iran cannot match', but Iran has 'a risk appetite which is very 'pokey' indeed'.
According to the source, in terms of threat to the UK, Iran 'would be top of the Championship rather than the Premier League, but rising'.
The report on Iran is the result of evidence-taking which came to an end in August 2023 – meaning it does not take into account the impact of the attacks by Hamas on Israel on October 7 the same year, or their aftermath. More Trending
That includes the bombardment of Gaza by the Israeli army, the escalation of conflicts with Iranian proxies including Hamas and Hezbollah, and the direct strikes on Iran by Israel and the US last month.
A release issued alongside the report says: 'The landscape in the Middle East has changed significantly since the Committee concluded its evidence-taking, however the Report's recommendations remain relevant.'
The committee also criticises successive governments for their 'fire-fighting' approach to tackling the threat from Iran.
Its report says: 'The government must stop its short-termist, reactive approach: 'longer-term' must mean the next five, ten, and twenty years, not 6-12 months.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Labour's welfare reform bill passes Commons despite 47-strong rebellion
MORE: Houthi rebels celebrate sinking ship laden with explosive materials in Red Sea
MORE: Date revealed when every phone in the UK is going to get an emergency alert
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
24 minutes ago
- Spectator
Jewish doctors are sick of the BMA
Around sixty Jewish doctors, including senior consultants and general practitioners, have left or are planning to leave the British Medical Association. Their decision is not a fleeting protest, but a serious response to what they consider to be a deeper institutional malaise that has gone untreated for too long. Many Jewish doctors feel their concerns have been ignored The BMA, whose purpose is to protect its members' welfare, is now regarded by many Jewish doctors as compromised. They feel that it is no longer impartial, no longer safe. For a professional body that prides itself on care, inclusion and advocacy, this represents a systemic failure of grave consequence. The resignations follow the 2025 Annual Representative Meeting in Liverpool last month, for which dozens of motions were submitted, several of which were selected for debate, relating to Israel, Gaza, and the Palestinians. The resigning doctors say that these topics were disproportionately represented in a deliberately divisive and one-sided way, which may have contravened the BMA's own behavioural code as outlined in its Code of Conduct. The BMA, however, says that 'at ARM, four of more than 75 motions debated related to Israel and Gaza, the selection of which followed proper, rigorous and democratic processes.' Of only three motions picked on international relations, all were related to Israel, Palestinians, and antisemitism. None were included about any other international healthcare matters. In the emergency motions, a further motion was chosen which was critical of Israel, at the expense of more urgent issues such as the Ten Year Health Plan which is of particular concern to GPs but also all doctors. Among the motions passed this year were calls to boycott the Israeli medical association and a demand that the UK government support genocide charges at the International Court of Justice. Jewish doctors were also shocked by protests outside the meeting featuring old shoes as a gesture of solidarity with Palestinians – symbols that, for many, carry searing associations with Holocaust remembrance. The BMA said it is 'deeply concerned…that some Jewish members have raised issues regarding this year's conference' but that 'some of these issues relate to a protest which was held by an external group outside of the conference'. The BMA also told us that 'within these motions, policy was passed decrying antisemitism and calling for support for Jewish doctors' and that the motions also made 'principled calls on medical neutrality that apply to all conflicts worldwide'. But many Jewish doctors feel their concerns have been ignored. Dr Peter Albert, an acute medicine consultant in Luton and Dunstable hospital, is among those who have resigned. He describes a long-building disquiet: 'My discontent with the BMA has been growing over the past 18 months, chiefly in response to the BMA's biased approach to the conflict sparked when the terrorist group Hamas invaded Israel on 7th October 2023.' He says that attempts to cast the atmosphere as legitimate political criticism are disingenuous: 'How patronising of the BMA to explain to us what is and is not antisemitism.' The BMA said that there was no place for antisemitism within the organisation and that it condemned such discrimination 'in the strongest possible terms'. The issue at stake is not political dissent, but what seems to be an institutional failure to protect a minority. Under the Equality Act 2010, harassment includes 'unwanted conduct related to a protected characteristic which has the purpose or effect of violating a person's dignity, or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.' Critically, it is the effect that matters. That so many Jewish doctors now report feeling unsafe or unwelcome, irrespective of the BMA's stated intentions, places the organisation at risk of breaching this duty – something the BMA says it is 'confident' it did not do. But under the Macpherson principle, the perception of the victim is also integral to understanding a racist incident. The impact of this climate within the BMA for Jewish doctors cannot simply be dismissed. The BMA's choice to entertain so many motions on the Israel-Gaza conflict has created an atmosphere of imbalance and exclusion. These Jewish members no longer see the BMA as a representative home. Many of those resigning are GPs. Unlike hospital doctors, who have the option of joining the apolitical HCSA union, GPs rely entirely on the BMA for professional representation. For some, resignation therefore means forfeiting the protection of their employment rights. Others who remain are choosing to fight from within and may not yet feel able to speak publicly. There are also those who stay silent out of fear. That so many have already chosen to walk away is profoundly telling, especially given how small a proportion of the British population, and of the BMA's membership, is Jewish. It is important to recognise that those who serve on the BMA council and its committees are, by all appearances, intelligent, educated and public-spirited individuals. They have devoted their careers to the NHS, to the health of the nation, and to the collective strength of the profession. It would be extraordinary if such people, decent professionals motivated by service, failed to hear the plea of their Jewish colleagues. It is difficult to imagine that they are driven by antisemitism or would ignore it once clearly brought to their attention. Their integrity must now be tested not by their intentions, but by their actions. This crisis is not about shielding Israel from legitimate criticism. It is about the ethical duties of a professional association to safeguard all of its members from bias, exclusion and hostility. When the very institution designed to protect doctors becomes, for some, a source of injury, the condition is critical. It would be wrong to suggest that so many Jewish doctors are acting in bad faith. When exclusion is felt, and fear becomes real, it is not the critic's intent that matters, but the Jewish member's experience. The answer is not complicated. The BMA should return to its proper role: representing doctors in employment disputes and professional affairs, not entangling itself in divisive foreign policy debates for which it has neither the mandate nor the expertise. The government has made a poor enough job of diplomacy without medical unions following suit. If the BMA still aspires to be a home for all doctors, it must start by listening to those who now feel they no longer belong.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Gaza truce talks on verge of collapse, Palestinian officials say
Negotiations between Israel and Hamas in Qatar on a new Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal are on the brink of collapse, according to Palestinian officials familiar with the details of the senior official told the BBC that Israel had "bought time" during Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington this week and deliberately stalled the process by sending a delegation to Doha with no real authority to make decisions on key points of include the withdrawal of Israeli troops and humanitarian aid he left the US on Thursday, Netanyahu had maintained a positive tone, saying he hoped to complete an agreement "in a few days". He said the proposed deal would see Hamas release half of the 20 living hostages it is still holding and just over half of the 30 dead hostages during a truce lasting 60 days. Since last Sunday, Israeli and Hamas negotiators have attended eight rounds of indirect "proximity" talks in separate buildings in have been facilitated by Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdul Rahman Al Thani and senior Egyptian intelligence officials, and attended by US envoy Brett mediators have relayed dozens of verbal and written messages between the Hamas and Israeli delegation, which has included military, security and political on Friday night, Palestinian officials familiar with the negotiations told the BBC they were on the verge of collapse, with the two sides deeply divided on several contentious said the most recent discussions had focused on two of those issues: the mechanism for delivering humanitarian aid in Gaza and the extent of the Israeli military has insisted that humanitarian assistance must enter Gaza and be distributed via United Nations agencies and international relief on the other hand, is pushing for aid distribution via the controversial Israeli- and US-backed mechanism run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).According to mediators involved in the process, there has been some limited progress on bridging the divide over this issue. However, no formal agreement has been second major sticking point is over the extent of the Israeli the fifth round of talks, Israeli negotiators reportedly handed mediators a written message stating that Israel would maintain a limited "buffer zone" inside Gaza that was between 1km and 1.5km (0.6-0.9 miles) according to a Palestinian official who attended at least two of the rounds of talks, viewed this proposal as a possible starting point for when Hamas requested and received a map outlining Israel's proposed withdrawal zones, the document contradicted the earlier message, showing far deeper military positions. The map was said to indicate buffer zones that were up to 3km deep in certain areas and confirmed a continued Israeli presence in vast swathes of covered all of the southern city of Rafah, 85% of the village of Khuzaa east of Khan Younis, substantial parts of the northern towns of Beit Lahia and Beit Hanoun, and eastern neighbourhoods of Gaza City, such as Tuffah, Shejaiya and officials saw the map as a bad-faith manoeuvre by Israel, further eroding trust between the officials accused the Israeli delegation of deliberately stalling to create a positive diplomatic backdrop for the Israeli prime minister's recent visit to Washington."They were never serious about these talks," one senior Palestinian negotiator told the BBC. "They used these rounds to buy time and project a false image of progress."The official also claimed that Israel was pursuing a long-term strategy of forced displacement under the guise of humanitarian alleged that Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz's plan to move Palestinians to a "humanitarian city" in Rafah was part of a broader effort to permanently relocate them."The goal of concentrating civilians near the Egyptian border is to pave the way for their expulsion either across the Rafah crossing into Egypt or out through the sea," the official Monday, Katz briefed Israeli reporters that he had instructed the military to prepare a plan for a new camp in Rafah that would initially house about 600,000 Palestinians - and eventually the whole 2.1 million to the plan, the Palestinians would be security screened by Israeli forces before being allowed in and not permitted to both domestically and internationally, have condemned the proposal, with human rights groups, academics and lawyers calling it a blueprint for a "concentration camp".With the talks at a critical juncture, the Palestinian side is calling on the US to intervene more forcefully and pressure Israel to make meaningful such intervention, mediators warn, the Doha negotiations could collapse is a scenario that would further complicate regional efforts to reach a durable ceasefire and avert a broader humanitarian catastrophe in in Doha say there is still a narrow window for compromise, but that the situation remains fragile."This process is hanging by a thread," one regional official said. "Unless something changes dramatically and quickly, we may be heading towards a breakdown."The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken least 57,823 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Mhairi Black: UK is following a familiar script over Gaza
On Thursday, at least 15 Palestinians – of which eight were children – were killed in an Israeli strike while queuing for nutritional supplements in front of a clinic in central Gaza. For more than 20 months, Israel has decimated Gaza with unconditional and unrestrained bombardment, and has created a man-made famine. Israeli strikes have continually targeted schools, hospitals and aid centres – all of which constitute war crimes. Yet, if you watched the UK news over the last two weeks, you might think the biggest horror facing the world right now was two bands performing at Glastonbury. READ MORE: TRNSMT main stage act calls out politicians' attempts to cancel Kneecap A report from Al Jazeera said there are satellite images showing Israeli plans to create a concentration camp in southern Gaza. The images show large tracts of land being cleared of buildings in preparation for the forced transfer of Palestinians. We know to expect this since Israel's defence minister has said it is its intention to forcibly move the entire population of Gaza – more than two million people – out of their homes. Given the atrocities inflicted upon Jewish people during the Second World War, you would expect there to be a natural degree of horror at the thought of building new concentration camps, and forcibly seeking to move or destroy an entire group of people. Of course, there is a deep history and link between the experiences and historic persecution of Jews and the creation of the state of Israel. However, it is crucial to remember that Israel is exactly that – a state. It is not a religion. Yet, our leaders in Britain continually capitulate to the idea that to criticise the actions of the Israeli government in any way is antisemitic. For example, the BBC claims to be an impartial source of news and a beacon of free speech, yet was more than happy to de-platform the unapologetically pro-Palestine band Kneecap on the basis that they are pro-Palestine. The BBC also apologised for broadcasting punk rap duo Bob Vylan's performance after the singer's 'death to the IDF' chants. You may find this distasteful or even violent but it is not antisemitic. The IDF is a military organisation, not a religion. It is a war machine used by Israel to commit war crimes. Calling for an end to a military organisation that consistently murders innocent civilians fleeing violence perpetrated against them by that very military organisation should not be controversial. The very fact that Keir Starmer, Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage are all more outraged about bands playing Glastonbury than they are at the genocide of the people of Gaza is as barbaric as it is illogical. READ MORE: Protests against Palestine Action ban set to take place this weekend However, when you consider the history of Britain's actions in the world, maybe it is logical? Its history is littered with examples of invading foreign countries to force our will and propaganda onto them, while extracting and profiteering from their wealth and resources at their expense. Any domestic resistance to this exploitation has always been immediately labelled as terrorism. Even if we only consider events from living memory, there were the mass arrests, torture and murders of Mau Mau leaders in Kenya in the 1950s. Up until 1960, in Malaya (now Malaysia), British forces herded hundreds of thousands of people into fortified camps. They heavily bombed rural areas, tortured and murdered innocent civilians for no reason other than to preserve the colonial profits Britain enjoyed from Malaya's rubber and tin. Cocoa and oil were extracted from Nigeria through exploitation. In South Africa, black labour was responsible for British diamond profits under apartheid. In Canada and Australia, indigenous kids were forcibly removed from their families to learn how to live 'sophisticatedly'. The UK's military interventions in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan just so happened to coincide with our oil and gas interests. Through the actions in both Ireland and India, we know that Britain is no stranger to creating a man-made famine. Britain has always been the portrait of privilege built by the pain of others. Modern-day Britain refuses to acknowledge or learn from the racist and imperialist mistakes of the past, mainly because those in power do not view them as mistakes. Our history is soaked with elitism, and the blood and tears of foreign generations whose toil sustained that elitism. The UK still thinks of itself as an imperial world power, able to divvy up land and resources to whoever it pleases, when the reality is that the world has moved on. Today – July 12 – Northern Ireland will see multiple Orange marches similar to the ones held in the west of Scotland last week. READ MORE: How TRNSMT's gender balance is shaping up in 2025 – see the graphs It is difficult to take Starmer and John Swinney seriously when they call for bands like Kneecap and Bob Vylan to be cancelled for an alleged, perceived religious intolerance when they criticise Israel when, simultaneously, local councils are granting marching licences for an organisation whose followers routinely sing chants about being 'up to their knees in Fenian blood', and have built a bonfire with a mock migrant boat filled with brown faces at the very top waiting to be set alight. The hypocrisy and double standards are bewildering. Maybe it is time to stop looking for logic and instead look for – and reward – honesty and bravery.
