
Urgent air fryer recall as owners warned to unplug it immediately
Owners are being urged to check if their appliance falls under the affected brand and model and, if so, to unplug it and stop use immediately.
Ireland's Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) issued an urgent recall today about the Haden 11L Stackable Air fryer.
It was sold in The Range stores to an estimated 52 customers across Ireland.
The CCPC explained: "The risk reported to the CCPC is that of fire. When used for prolonged periods on the highest heat setting, the heating element can cause the outer plastic casing to warp or melt. This may result in burn injuries if touched and presents a potential fire hazard."
The issue affects ALL batch numbers of the affected appliance, which is of the brand Haden and also has the SKU number 387933.
If you own this air fryer, you are urged to stop using it immediately and return it to any The Range store for a full refund or store credit.
The CCPC added: "Customers should stop using the product immediately and return it to any The Range store for a full refund or store credit. If customers have any further queries in relation to this recall, please contact The Range customer care team here."
This comes just months after a major recall was issued for certain batches of Tower air fryers, also due to a potential fire risk.
Tower Housewares announced the voluntary recall on its website, citing a "low risk" defect that could cause overheating and, in some cases, lead to a fire.
A spokesperson explained: "We have become aware that a small number of Tower Air Fryers have a manufacturing defect which may result in overheating that under certain circumstances could pose a risk of fire.
"The fault has been deemed low risk by Trading Standards, however the safety and well-being of our customers is our top priority, and we have made the decision to voluntarily recall these models as a precautionary measure."
The issue affects specific batches of air fryers manufactured between January 2022 and April 2023.
The affected models are:
If you own one of these models, you are urged to stop using it immediately and submit your details for further instructions. Tower recommends that users check their appliance's rating label to verify whether they own an affected product.
A spokesperson said: "Cease use and check whether you own one of the affected air fryer models. You can check this by accessing the model number on the appliance rating label."
If you have an affected air fryer, visit Tower's website here to follow the step-by-step process for confirming whether your model is included in the recall and to check available replacement options.
Tower explained: "If you own an affected model we're here to make the process as simple as possible. Simply follow the step-by-step instructions to confirm if you have an affected model, and if so what replacement options are available to you."
Tower air fryers are widely sold across Ireland through retailers and online platforms including Argos, Dealz, Tesco Ireland, Amazon and the Tower Housewares website.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Daily Mirror
5 days ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Urgent recall issued for children's clothes sold by Next amid strangulation risk
An urgent recall has been issued for a number of children's clothing items sold by Next over fears they may lead to strangulation and choking. The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) announced this week that Jainco UK Limited is carrying out a recall of Miss Dresses and Knitted Top, Shorts and Headband Outfit Set. According to the CCPC, the product poses "a strangulation and choking hazard due to excessively long decorative cords that do not comply with safety standards." The brand is Miss and there are five items included in the recall notice. The products being recalled are pictured below and the item numbers are the following: F83773, F83782, F83775, F83781 and F85623. Jainco UK Limited is recalling its Miss Dresses and Knitted Top, Shorts and Headband Outfit Set The product was sold online via Next and it is understood that there are approximately 11 affected products in the Republic of Ireland. Parents and guardians who purchased one of these products are urged to stop using it immediately and to keep it out of the reach of children. Customers who may have given any of these items as a gift are also urged to ask the recipient to dispose of the item safely. In a statement, a Next spokesperson said: "Miss has made us aware of a problem with the above items. "Unfortunately, it's come to light that there's a potential problem with the decorative cords on the products which are too long. This could present a strangulation / choking hazard for children. "As the above items don't meet strict technical specifications, Miss has taken the precaution of recalling the items, and request that you return your impacted product to Next immediately for a full refund. "Please 'contact us' to arrange a collection and full refund." Get all the big crime and court stories direct to your phone on our new WhatsApp service. Sign up here.


Irish Daily Mirror
20-07-2025
- Irish Daily Mirror
Full list of air fryers recalled as owners told to stop use immediately
Air fryers have become increasingly popular in Ireland, with many households investing in them as a way to eat healthier while cutting down on energy costs. By using rapid hot air circulation to cook food, air fryers drastically reduce the need for oil, helping to lower calorie intake and saturated fat consumption compared to traditional frying methods. Beyond their health benefits, air fryers also promise to be more economical than using an oven. Many Irish homes are struggling with the ongoing cost of living crisis, and air fryers can cook food faster, which means reduced energy consumption and lower electricity bills. But despite their growing presence in Irish kitchens, some air fryers have been flagged as a serious safety risk. In recent months, several major recalls have been issued due to fire hazards. Owners of certain models are now being urged to stop using them immediately. Tower Vortx 8L Dual Basket Air Fryer Earlier this month, RKW Ltd issued an urgent recall of the Tower Vortx 8L Dual Basket Air Fryer after it was discovered that a manufacturing defect could cause the device to overheat and catch fire during use. Tower 8 Litre Vortx Dual Basket Air Fryer More than 5,300 of the affected air fryers were sold in Lidl stores across Ireland in 2024. Brand: Tower Model: T17129L Batch numbers: PO264626, PO264638, PO264628, PO264634, PO264632, PO264630, PO271391, PO271397, PO271395, PO271399, PO271393, PO271401 The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) has urged consumers to unplug the appliance immediately and check the batch and model number against the label on the unit. Instructions for checking your model and batch number are available on the Tower Housewares Recall webpage here. If your air fryer is affected, contact towerproduct@ for further support. Tower 2.2L Manual Air Fryer, Tower 4L Manual Air Fryer, Tower 4L Digital Air Fryer and Tower 2L Compact Manual Air Fryer Earlier this year, several other Tower-branded models were pulled from shelves due to similar fire risks. An estimated 55,000 units were sold in Ireland between 2020 and 2024 through major retailers including Argos, Dealz, Tesco, Lidl, Amazon and the Tower Housewares website. The affected models are: T17023 Tower 2.2L Manual Air Fryer T17061BLK Tower 4L Manual Air Fryer T17067 Tower 4L Digital Air Fryer T17087 Tower 2L Compact Manual Air Fryer The CCPC warned that these models may overheat and ignite due to a manufacturing defect and echoed the same advice: "It is important that consumers should stop using the affected products immediately, unplug them and contact Tower Housewares." Tower Housewares recalls air fryers (Image: CCPC) Consumers can check whether they own one of the affected units by checking the model number on the appliance rating label. To do this, see the steps on the Tower Housewares Recall webpage here. Anyone who purchased theirs via Amazon can also contact the retailer directly through their account to explore available remedies. Haden 11L Stackable Air Fryer In June, a separate recall was issued for the Haden 11L Stackable Air Fryer, which was sold to around 52 customers at The Range stores. SKU number: 387933 Batch: All batches affected According to the CCPC, when used for extended periods at the highest temperature setting, the heating element can cause the plastic casing to warp or melt, posing a burn injury and fire hazard. The Range recalls the Haden 11L Stackable Air Fryer (Image: CCPC) Owners are advised to stop using the product immediately and return it to any The Range store for a full refund. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.

Irish Times
20-07-2025
- Irish Times
Dublin's new tallest building: This tower of darkness should never have been allowed
The random tower that has reared up on Tara Street in Dublin photobombs itself into almost every important vista in the city centre. It intrudes into the historic precincts of Trinity College as well as College Green and looms up behind O'Connell Bridge House in views along the Liffey quays. It can also be seen from Lower Grafton Street, Parnell Square East, St Stephen's Green West and numerous other locations. Although some high-rise cheerleaders are no doubt thrilled by such a brazen jump in scale within the city's historic core, there is nothing elegant about Marlet Property Group 's vertical slab of build-to-rent apartments rising from the top of Longstone House, an 11-storey office block opposite Mulligan's pub on Poolbeg Street. It's a dark and brooding alien edifice redolent of a sci-fi portal of darkness and as menacing as Darth Vader in The Empire Strikes Back. Why it presents such a black picture is a story in itself. As originally designed by Henry J Lyons Architects , it was light in colour and intended to have 'a calm presence ... to reflect and converse with the Dublin sky'. But the three members of An Bord Pleanála who dealt with an appeal by An Taisce against Dublin City Council 's decision to grant permission decreed that it should be redesigned – to have more impact. Light or dark, the new tower should never have been built. There was no provision for it either in the Dublin city development plan 2016-2022 or in the 2009 George's Quay local area plan. While this local plan envisaged that there might be a 'mid-rise marker building' at the corner of Tara Street and Poolbeg Street, it clearly specified that any such building on the site 'shall not exceed a maximum of 12 storeys in height'. READ MORE What Dublin got instead is now the city's tallest building, at 82m – 3m higher than the dreary brick-clad Capital Dock tower on Sir John Rogerson's Quay, designed by O'Mahony Pike Architects for Kennedy Wilson. But that tower created its own environment at the nether end of Docklands, whereas Marlet's erection – part of its College Square development, of which Longstone House forms two sides – has been inserted into the Georgian city, between the Custom House and Trinity College. The only tall building envisaged by the George's Quay local area plan was for a site directly adjoining Tara Street station, specified to be 'a maximum of 22 storeys (88 metres)' in height. These were the precise dimensions of a tower proposed by the developer Johnny Ronan – also designed by Henry J Lyons Architects – that An Bord Pleanála finally approved in April 2019 after it had been refused twice by Dublin City Council and once by the board itself. Using this as a precedent, and apparently emboldened by the promulgation in December 2018 of ultraliberal building-height guidelines by Eoghan Murphy, as minister for housing, Pat Crean's Marlet subsidiary Atlas GP opened pre-application consultations with Dublin City Council planners in June 2019 on its audacious proposal to diversify the redevelopment of Apollo House, Hawkins House and College House by adding a 10-storey 'vertical extension'. [ From the archive: Hawkins House to be knocked, but what about its ugly neighbours? Opens in new window ] Marlet's planning consultant Brady Shipman Martin referenced a High Court judgment by Mr Justice Garrett Simons on May 30th, 2019, to suggest that the planners could 'rely on the guidelines to disapply objectives of the local area plan'; in fact, Mr Justice Simons found exactly the opposite: that the building height guidelines 'do not authorise a planning authority to disapply the criteria prescribed under a planning scheme…' Crean's approach paid off. Instead of being treated as a material contravention of both the Dublin city development plan 2016-2022 and the George's Quay local area plan – which would require the approval of city councillors – Atlas GP's tower proposal was evidently welcomed by one of the council's senior planners, Garrett Hughes, who had previously condemned Ronan Group 's tower as 'unacceptably conspicuous' in its context. Tower of darkness: plans for the redesigned, blue-black residential tower at College Square. Illustration: HJL/Marlet While noting that Marlet's proposal 'will have a visual impact' on College Green and Trinity College, he considered this 'acceptable given the inventive nature of the design', with a scale that was intended to 'sit in tandem' with Ronan Group's still unbuilt tower at Tara Street station. 'Overall, the impact is considered to be positive given the modern and assertive design and the overall upgrading of the existing urban block'. Hughes also noted that the 'perceived height' would be 'moderated by the architectural treatment of the upper and lower parts of the building', with the office-block element having a blue-black terracotta frame, 'whereas the upper residential tower adopts a comparatively lighter character with the use of fritted glass and white ceramic fin detailing' – the facade finishes that Henry J Lyons Architects suggested would give it a 'calm presence'. [ From the Irish Times archive: The little known architectural firm that is transforming Dublin Opens in new window ] Dublin City Council's decision to grant permission in December 2019 was appealed by An Taisce , which warned that Dublin was 'heading toward an incoherent Manchester or Brussels-type townscape with modern high-rise towers randomly inserted into the historic urban structure'. The Irish Georgian Society said it would also 'exacerbate the negative impact' on the skyline of the tower approved at Tara Street station. The Bord Pleanála planning inspector Irené McCormack, in her 40-page report to the board, said Marlet's building would not be 'dominant or uncharacteristic with its surrounding built context', as it was 'notably slender in form and light in colour and reflective'; on the contrary, it 'would generate a strong sense of place through the diversification of the skyline and make a positive contribution to the urban character of the area'. The board triumvirate that dealt with the case consisted of its only architect members – the former deputy chairman Paul Hyde , who would later be convicted on two counts of failing to make full declarations of his property interests, and Michelle Fagan , a former president of the Royal Institute of the Architects of Ireland – along with Terry Prendergast, previously senior planner with Grangegorman Development Agency. The new Longstone House/College Square building development over the Dublin skyline. Photograph: Chris Maddaloni The new Longstone House/College Square building development over the Dublin skyline seen from College Green. Photograph: Chris Maddaloni The new Longstone House/College Square building development over the Dublin skyline seen from inside Trinity. Photograph: Chris Maddaloni As 'presenting board member' in charge of the case, Hyde convened a meeting with Fagan and Prendergast to discuss it three days after McCormack submitted her report. The trio were apparently so unhappy with the scheme that they decided to issue a rare notice under section 132 of the 2000 Planning Act to Atlas GP requesting significant design revisions to respond to 'this pivotal and highly visible location' in the city centre. In sending the Henry J Lyons team back to their designs, the board bluntly stated that the reason for doing so was that 'the proposed development, due to its architectural design quality and materiality, does not successfully address the opportunities provided by the site, does not protect or enhance the skyline at this location nor does it, in its present form, make a positive contribution to the urban character of the area'. It considered that the design and materiality of the tower 'contrasts negatively with that of the lower blocks' on Marlet's huge site while its 'horizontal emphasis ... and lack of facade articulation provides an unsatisfactory response to its context'. But matching the 'materiality' of the build-to-rent tower with the dark-terracotta frame of the office block beneath it inevitably meant that its skyline impact would be more strident. [ Dublin's disappearing venues: A promised 500-seat theatre is shrouded in mystery Opens in new window ] In its response, submitted in July 2020, Henry J Lyons did exactly what it was told by redesigning the tower 'using the same materials, profiles and rhythm of the base building', as it explained, while also giving it a 'strong vertical emphasis' with a frame of blue-black terracotta fins – similar to the office floors below – reinforced by a 'double order' expression, meaning that horizontal profiles occur at every second floor. Henry J Lyons claimed that its darker finish would contrast with the lighter stone of historic buildings in Trinity College, allowing these to be 'read independently and not to be confused with the backdrop'. Does that sound like grasping at straws? A revised townscape assessment by the Paul Hogarth Company conceded that the tower would be 'more noticeable' on the skyline and would also have a 'heavier' presence in views along the Liffey quays. After holding two further meetings to consider the case, the board's triumvirate decided unanimously on September 14th, 2020, to grant permission for the proposed development 'as superseded and/or amended by the plans and particulars submitted in response to the section 132 request', with the order signed by Paul Hyde. It was, to paraphrase Yeats, 'all changed, changed utterly: A terrible beauty is born ...' In March 2022 Dublin City Council approved Marlet's plan to add a floor, increasing the number of build-to-rent apartments from 54 to 58, including a large penthouse on the 21st floor; this raised the tower's overall height to 22 storeys, topped by a 'crown' that appears peculiarly unresolved. One can just imagine how discordant this high-rise luxury tenement will look at night, with light in some windows and not in others. The view from Lower O'Connell Street towards Burgh Quay, originally designed by the Wide Streets Commission as a uniform composition, has been so spoiled by uncoordinated redevelopment in recent decades that it resembles the urban-design equivalent of a dog's dinner – now trumped by a tower of darkness on Tara Street that will sadly stand for decades as a monument to developer-led 'planning' in Dublin.