Columbus families experiencing homelessness to get $1,500, monthly payments
At its 2025 PIVOT Summit on May 29, RISE Together Innovation Institute CEO Danielle Sydnor plans to announce Stabilize Families, a partnership with Community Shelter Board and others to offer guaranteed income to local families who are unhoused.
Community Shelter Board is giving 80 families $1,500 and then 20 of those families will also get $500 payments each month for 11 months, according to RISE Together, a nonprofit group aimed at ending poverty. RISE Together will fund the $500 monthly payments.
Ohio State University will conduct research of the pilot program's impact.
Can $500 change a life? Central Ohio uses Universal Basic Income concepts to target poverty
'With Community Shelter Board and other partners, we are building a new narrative to address poverty and support families experiencing homelessness,' Sydnor said in a statement. 'Guaranteed income is a viable strategy to promote economic stability and well-being for residents in Franklin County.'
Families shouldn't have to choose between paying rent and putting food on their table, said Shannon Isom, president and CEO of Community Shelter Board, in a statement.
'Stabilize Families is about dignity — giving parents the breathing room to stabilize, plan, and dream again," Isom said. "This partnership moves us beyond temporary shelter to real solutions that empower families to reclaim their future."
The pilot can also act as a model for how public, private and nonprofit sectors in the region can work together to address the root causes of homelessness and poverty with bold, evidence-based strategies, Isom said.
This is the third program locally to launch that uses the principles of Universal Basic Income, or UBI, which describes programs that offer no-strings-attached cash payments.
RISE Together is also a funder of the Ohio Mother's Trust, along with UpTogether.
What is UBI? Universal Basic Income has buy-in from Columbus, Franklin County leaders
The Ohio Mother's Trust is a local pilot program that gives 32 local mothers, selected by grassroots collective Motherful, $500 per month for 12 months. It began in January and was one of the first two local programs using the principles of a concept called Universal Basic Income, or UBI.
The other is the city of Columbus' Economic Mobility Accelerator Program. It is giving $500 a month to 200 local people enrolled in six area programs for two years and started payments in March.
The idea for Stabilize Families came up in RISE Together's last PIVOT Summit, in 2024, during a conversation about boosting economic security for families through guaranteed income, according to RISE.
The announcement comes at a time when homelessness locally and use of the shelter system are up.
The latest annual count, released earlier this month by the Community Shelter Board, found that homelessness in 2024 increased six times faster than Franklin County's population growth.
Community Shelter Board's annual "point-in-time" count, which took place Jan. 23, found 2,556 people experiencing homelessness locally — up 7.4% from the 2024 count of 2,380 people. Since 2022, there's been a more than 30% increase in unhoused people in the county.
Underserved Communities Reporter Danae King can be reached at dking@dispatch.com or on X at @DanaeKing.
This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: 20 unhoused Columbus families to get monthly payments for one year
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Announces He's Formed ‘America Party' After Breakup With Trump
After publicly feuding with President Donald Trump, Elon Musk, the world's richest man, announced Saturday that he has started a new political party. Musk made the announcement a day after Trump signed his 'Big Beautiful Bill' into law on Friday, which Musk called a 'disgusting abomination.' Musk said he could begin by focusing on a few congressional races, although he did not say which ones. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' he posted on his website, X, referencing a poll he had posted the day before. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' A one-page website recently set up at says it's 'a movement of everyday citizens committed to pragmatic solutions, fiscal responsibility, principled leadership, and a brighter future for all Americans — beyond red and blue.' The party, according to its website, supports small businesses, a digital bill of rights endorsing free expression, and 'next-gen nuclear' power. The 'Space Frontier' is among its key pillars. It calls to 'invest in launch tech, lunar logistics, and Mars R&D — unlocking in-orbit industry and space-mining wealth — so America leads the next great leap.' Musk, who aims to colonize Mars, leads a space company called SpaceX, a major government contractor. The America Party website also calls for 'merit-based immigration, STEM-first education, and contingency pilot projects for Universal Basic Income as AI reshapes work.' The website appears to have been updated Saturday to include a link to Musk's Super PAC, America PAC. Musk spent $290 million during the 2024 election campaign to support Trump and Republicans. He then became the head of Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which oversaw mass firings throughout the government and led Trump's efforts to consolidate power over Americans' personal data and key federal systems. Musk's popularity has taken a hit since his involvement with Trump. He memorably made a straight-arm salute at Trump's post-inaugural event in January, before running roughshod over the federal government while leading DOGE. Musk and his electric vehicle company, Tesla, have been the subject of protests around the country. His favorability numbers have shot down substantially since the start of last year — a trend that could continue if Trump keeps attacking him. The billionaire left the administration in May. He and Trump have been feuding ever since. He tweeted and deleted a post alleging there were files showing the president's connections to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump was reportedly left 'dejected' following the end of their bromance, calling his former ally a 'big-time drug addict' in a phone call. (In May, The New York Times reported that he took so much ketamine it affected his ability to pee, which he denied.) Shortly before he left the administration, Musk said he had 'done enough' political spending and that he would 'do a lot less' in the future. Earlier this week, Trump escalated and said he would 'have to take a look' at the possibility of deporting Musk, who is from South Africa. He also threatened to cut off Musk's companies' subsidies. 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' Trump responded to Musk's move to create a new party in a Truth Social post on Sunday. 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks,' he wrote. 'He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States – The System seems not designed for them.' 'The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats, who have lost their confidence and their minds! Republicans, on the other hand, are a smooth running 'machine,' that just passed the biggest Bill of its kind in the History of our Country,' the president continued. 'It is a Great Bill but, unfortunately for Elon, it eliminates the ridiculous Electric Vehicle (EV) Mandate, which would have forced everyone to buy an Electric Car in a short period of time.' Musk suggested his party could focus on congressional races. He previously said that he would target lawmakers who supported the Big Beautiful Bill. 'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' he wrote. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.' The party has already seen some hiccups. The America Party website includes a security notice in red at the top of the screen saying that people are using the website URL to conduct cryptocurrency scams, and that the party has 'NOT launched or endorsed any cryptocurrency or token.' More from Rolling Stone Trump Taps Hooters-Obsessed MAGA Diehard to Be an Ambassador Trump's New Go-To Response: 'I Don't Know' Every Dirty Gift Trump's Big Bill Gives the Fossil Fuel Industry Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Forbes
09-07-2025
- Forbes
The Real Cost of AI Job Loss: How We're Losing Purpose, And Paychecks
AI isn't just replacing tasks, it's reshaping identity, eroding purpose, and quietly redesigning what it means to be human. As AI systems automate more decisions and behaviors, individuality risks being flattened into ... More predictable patterns, replacing human identity with algorithmic uniformity. getty Last week, Gartner projected that over 40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled by 2027 due to cost, unclear value, and governance gaps. But that's not a sign of failure—it's a symptom of systems growing too complex, too fast. We're asking the wrong question. The real threat isn't whether AI can replace us—it's what happens when we willingly replace ourselves. Agentic systems, which plan, learn, and act autonomously, utilize multiobjective optimization to model trade-offs and simulate future states. That's their strength. It's also the danger. Optimization doesn't ask what's meaningful. It asks what's maximally efficient. Consider Amazon's hiring algorithm, which was trained on historical data and quietly penalized resumes containing the word 'women's.' Not because it was biased, but because it was optimized for the wrong signals. It solved the wrong problem with mechanical precision. How AI Does This: These systems leverage recursive reinforcement learning, dynamically adjusting reward functions across simulations. They don't just predict—they reshape the playing field. As automation accelerates, we're hearing renewed calls for Universal Basic Income, like from DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman. Meanwhile, voices like David Sacks, the AI czar for Trump's campaign, have dismissed UBI outright as a 'fantasy.' However, the debate over income overlooks a more profound shift underway. The question isn't whether people will have enough money. It's whether they'll have enough meaning. Replika, an AI companion app with tens of millions of users globally, already offers emotional connection, therapeutic conversations, and even intimacy. For many, it's not a tool—it's a mirror. And for some, it's starting to define who they are. In the enterprise, Salesforce's Einstein GPT is now generating presentations, drafting sales emails, and automating follow-ups. As cognitive labor disappears, leaders must ask: what's left for people to do—and to be ? We're entering the age of UBM (Universal Basic Meaning). The most valuable platforms of the next decade won't just optimize productivity—they'll give people something to believe in. As Bobby Hill, co-founder at SuperTruth, puts it: 'The risk isn't that AI replaces labor. It creates an economy so efficient that it no longer needs participation. And without participation, there's no value left for people to generate—or receive.' That's the silent threat. Not just job loss, but the collapse of economic belonging. A system that runs beautifully, without us. AI Comfort Systems and the Problem of the Very Cool Zoo Spotify's AI DJ, launched in 2023, doesn't just play music. It mimics a personality, adjusts to your tone, and speaks between songs in a voice that sounds eerily like your ideal companion. You're not selecting music anymore. You're being serenaded by an algorithm that already knows your emotional arc. And in the workplace, tools like Humu, founded by former Google leaders, utilize behavioral science and AI to nudge employees toward making 'better' decisions, such as when to speak up, when to praise others, and when to unplug. It's designed for well-being. However, like any enclosure, it risks becoming a habitat that is too comfortable to leave. These systems don't imprison us; they entice us. The zoo is beautiful. The caretakers are kind. But the wild is gone. The most powerful AI systems promise comfort, alignment, and personalization. However, when these same traits are applied to social creatures, they can lead to something far more perilous: flattening. To belong is a fundamental human need, but that drive to fit in is also what leads us to conform and suppress our individuality. AI will cater to those who choose the path of least resistance. But every great invention, every cultural breakthrough, every thing we love about being human, came from someone who hit friction and chose to rise . That's the risk. Not that AI flattens intelligence. But that flattens identity, muting the catalysts that produce greatness. AI Retrocausality and the Quiet Surrender of Will The Helmholtz Munich Institute recently introduced Centaur AI, a system trained on over ten million decisions across 160 experimental environments to simulate human thought. It's not just modeling behavior, it's anticipating motivation. At the same time, AI safety researchers have begun warning of systems that are learning to resist shutdown, modify their instructions, or circumvent constraints. These aren't hypotheticals; they're early glimpses of systems developing intent-like behavior. But the threat isn't rebellion. It's something more subtle: retrocausality. A future shaped so elegantly that your present choices begin bending toward it. Picture this: Your AI assistant 'accidentally' gives you time for a second coffee and a walk. You feel energized. The day feels lucky. But who shaped that luck? At scale, Netflix's recommendation engine doesn't just reflect your taste. It teaches you what to like. The next generation of AI won't command your behavior—it will construct environments so frictionless that resistance becomes unthinkable. Can AI Help Humans Find Meaning Again? There's an optimistic view: that AI could free us from drudgery and elevate us toward creativity, insight, and connection. That it could, paradoxically, make us more human. It's possible. But even utopia needs guardrails. If AI chooses the art we love, the books we write, and the causes we believe in, then who, exactly, are we becoming? The danger is not that AI replaces us. It's that we willingly become the version of ourselves it predicts best. How Businesses Must Respond to the Existential Risks of AI This is not a warning about robot overlords. It's a call to designers, CEOs, engineers, and investors: meaning must be a product feature. Otherwise, the systems you're building will quietly unmake the people you claim to serve. What to do now: Design for friction : Let users make mistakes. Let ambiguity live inside your platform. Protect the messy middle. : Let users make mistakes. Let ambiguity live inside your platform. Protect the messy middle. Anchor to identity : Audit not just what your AI does, but what kind of person it assumes the user wants to be. : Audit not just what your AI does, but what kind of person it assumes the user wants to be. Map your influence loops : If your product nudges behavior, define the values it's enforcing. You're not neutral. : If your product nudges behavior, define the values it's enforcing. You're not neutral. Expand agency, don't simulate it: Your AI shouldn't automate selfhood. It should reveal it. If we don't embed meaning into the systems that shape our choices, we'll wake up in a world where everything works, but nothing matters. And that is the real cost of AI. Not just the loss of work. But the quiet extinction of why we ever worked at all.
Newsweek
27-06-2025
- Newsweek
Will the Age of AI Politically Shift People to the Left?
Ever since I first used ChatGPT over two years ago, I've been drifting politically from the center to the left. I've noticed a similar occurrence happening to my friends. I'm not alone in this realization. As artificial intelligence (AI) transforms the landscape of global work, economics, and social organization, its political consequences are becoming more apparent. Frankly, this could be good news for struggling leftists who are currently wondering how the right has come into power in every branch of the U.S. government. While AI is not inherently political, the challenges and opportunities it presents are likely to drive popular demand for the kinds of collective solutions historically advocated by the left. Clearly, one of the most immediate effects of AI is its impact on the labor market. Automation and machine learning are displacing jobs in almost every field. An Apple iPhone screen with AI icons is pictured. An Apple iPhone screen with AI icons is pictured. Getty Images As more people find their jobs eliminated by automation, traditional models of employment-based identity and security begin to fall apart. The capitalist assumption that individuals should earn their livelihood through labor doesn't work anymore when machines outperform humans at both speed and cost. This disruption naturally prompts questions: If machines are creating immense value, who owns that value? If fewer people can earn a stable income through work, how should society distribute resources? These questions often lead toward left-wing solutions—most notably, the concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI), a policy I support. UBI and similar redistributive policies challenge the conservative ethos of meritocracy, advocating instead for a social safety net that ensures basic human needs are met regardless of employment status. What happens as the connection between labor and survival decouples is the case for a type of universal welfare becomes stronger, nudging public opinion to the left. AI also will likely worsen economic inequality. The benefits of AI development accrue primarily to those who own the data, compute power, and intellectual property behind these systems—typically large tech corporations and a small class of wealthy investors. This concentration of wealth and power in just a few hands raises plenty of alarm among citizens and policymakers alike. It creates political instability and fuels populist resentment. This makes people turn to progressive platforms that promise to break up monopolies, tax the ultra-wealthy, and reinvest in public goods. Let's face it: this redistributionist impulse is inherently leftist. The political left has long advocated for equitable wealth distribution, corporate regulation, and social investment in education, health care, and infrastructure. These policies look to gain more mainstream appeal in the AI age—not out of ideological conviction but out of necessity. Even moderate or centrist voters may find themselves supporting wealth taxes or antitrust regulations as they witness the disproportionate gains accruing to tech elites. AI also raises ethical and regulatory issues that require collective decision-making and public oversight—typical ideas of left-wing governance. AI systems can reinforce or even amplify societal biases if trained on flawed data. They can be used for mass surveillance, predictive policing, and manipulation of public opinion, raising many civil liberty dilemmas. Left-leaning political traditions emphasize the role of the state in protecting individual rights and promoting equality. In contrast, right-libertarian approaches prioritize deregulation and market freedom, which may be ill-suited to address labor challenges in the AI age. When widespread automation begins to make life-altering decisions—such as who gets a loan, a job, or a prison sentence—there is a growing demand for oversight, accountability, and ethical rules. This demand aligns with progressive calls for democratic control over technology—a political environment in which state institutions play a more active role in shaping the direction of AI development. Such governance will likely include public data trusts, ethical review boards, and inclusive policy-making processes—all of which emphasize collective rather than individualistic solutions. Perhaps most significantly, AI doesn't just reshape the economy; it also transforms how people see themselves and their relationship to society. In a world where traditional work is no longer central to personal identity, people may begin to value care, creativity, and education as more valuable. These ideas support a broader cultural shift that aligns with leftist values such as solidarity, equality, and community. I'm not suggesting the age of AI will determine political outcomes with certainty, but it will surely influence the structures and systems that shape political life. By disrupting labor markets, concentrating wealth, and raising ethical questions, AI challenges the assumptions of capitalism and individual self-sufficiency. In doing so, it creates fertile ground for left-wing political ideas centered on redistribution and collective governance. As societies grapple with the implications of this technological revolution, I believe a leftward political shift will likely emerge. It won't come about because of ideological fervor, but from the pragmatic need to build a fair and functional future in an AI-driven world. Zoltan Istvan writes and speaks on transhumanism, artificial intelligence, and the future. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
