Rubio touts Bukele's 'generous' offer to jail U.S. citizens in El Salvador but experts say it's illegal
"That's an offer President Bukele made. Obviously, we'll have to study it on our end," Rubio said Tuesday afternoon while speaking to reporters in Costa Rica, the third stop of his first foreign trip as secretary of state. "There are obviously legalities involved. We have a Constitution, we have all sorts of things, but it's a very generous offer."
The administration of President Donald Trump has not yet made a decision on the offer, Rubio said.
Three legal and immigration experts who spoke with NBC News raised questions about the legality of such actions and anticipated significant legal pushback on any effort to deport incarcerated U.S. nationals to another country.
"The U.S. can't deport one of its own citizens. Deportation is for noncitizens only," said Jennifer Gordon, a law professor at Fordham Law School.
"But that's not the end of the story. There's a second set of questions about whether the U.S. could transfer a U.S. citizen prisoner to another country to serve their sentence," she said.
Current laws 'would categorically preclude most U.S. citizens and residents from serving their sentence in El Salvador,' said John Fishwick, a former U.S. attorney in Virginia.
In the U.S., an offender could only be sent to a country where they're a citizen — and that's only with their consent and for certain offenses that apply in both countries, he said.
Fishwick added that 'housing citizens and residents in a prison located in a foreign state would raise constitutional concerns, especially regarding cruel and unusual punishment … Would El Salvador be considered an agent of the United States? What court would have jurisdiction over prisoner disputes?'
Rubio met with Bukele in El Salvador on Monday as part of his ongoing trip through Latin America as he pressures government leaders in the region to do more to align with Trump's policy priorities, including his crackdown on immigration.
They discussed an array of deals; the most controversial being Bukele's offer "to house in his jails dangerous American criminals in custody in our country, including those of U.S. citizenship and legal residents," Rubio said.
In an post on X, Rubio described Bukele's offer as "an extraordinary gesture never before extended by any country."
"Very productive meeting with Salvadoran President @nayibbukele," the post reads. "His commitment to accept and incarcerate criminals from any country, including from violent gangs like MS-13 and Tren de Aragua, will make America safer."
Fordham's Gordon said, 'Can the U.S. deport Salvadorans convicted of crimes to El Salvador? Yes. Can El Salvador keep those people in its own prisons? Yes. But as to U.S. citizens, it's not an immigration question. It's a prison policy question.'
NBC News reached out to the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Prisons for comment, but did not get an immediate response.
In another post on X, Bukele clarified that El Salvador is "willing to take in only convicted criminals (including convicted U.S. citizens) into our mega-prison (CECOT) in exchange for a fee."
"We have offered the United States of America the opportunity to outsource part of its prison system," Bukele's post reads. "The fee would be relatively low for the U.S. but significant for us, making our entire prison system sustainable."
The Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, as Bukele referred to it, is a Salvadoran prison built to house 40,000 people. Instances of extreme overcrowding and torture by guards have been documented at this prison by human rights organizations such as the Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.
Bukele's office did not respond to an NBC News request seeking comment and further details on the offer.
After meeting with Bukele on Monday, Rubio said he briefed Trump on this offer, along a couple other ones.
According to Rubio's office, Bukele also agreed to continue accepting Salvadoran nationals deported from the U.S., which El Salvador is already doing.
Bukele also offered to accept foreign nationals from other countries who are arrested in the U.S. for violating U.S. immigration laws.
El Salvador had previously signed an agreement in 2019, known as a 'safe third country' deal, to receive non-Salvadorans detained in the U.S. — but it was never implemented because of the Covid pandemic.
Kathleen Bush-Joseph, policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, said that noncitizens and people who have been granted protections preventing the U.S. from deporting them to a country where they may face persecution or torture "could be sent to a third country as long as that's not the country where they would face persecution or torture."
But as the Trump administration implements policies allowing officials to bypass regular immigration law and speed up deportations of anyone with a removal order, it may become harder for noncitizens to challenge their deportations, even if they're sent to a country where they're not from, Bush-Joseph added.
Gordon said she would anticipate constitutional and due process challenges if there are attempts to deport U.S. citizens.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
24 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Experts raise concerns over Trump's White House ballroom renovation plans
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The White House, the Supreme Court building, the Capitol, and all their 'related buildings and grounds' are exempt from the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, which requires federal agencies to assess and mitigate adverse effects to historic properties and seek consultation through a formal review process. Advertisement Instead, the White House has its own committee that provides advice on the 'preservation and the interpretation of the museum character' of the building. The Committee for the Preservation of the White House — chaired by the director of the National Park Service — is made up of several federal officials and a number of members appointed by the president. Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff, said Thursday in a news release that the administration was 'fully committed to working with the appropriate organizations to preserving the special history of the White House.' Advertisement Still, the committee's recommendations are not binding, giving the president significant leeway to do as he wishes. 'In most cases, you're not going to have a lot of binding obligations to historic buildings,' said Michael Spencer, a professor of historic preservation at the University of Mary Washington. The sheer scale of the project — a giant ballroom attached to the East Wing — worries preservationists. 'It could do some harm to the property overall,' said Richard Longstreth, professor of American studies at George Washington University. 'There aren't any checks and balances here, unfortunately.' Spencer said his expectations on preservation were 'pretty low.' 'We're oftentimes viewed as getting in the way of progress, and I would say in this particular instance, you've got a lot of strong personalities and they're under no obligation to really follow best practices as preservation puts forth,' he said. Jonathan Jarvis, former director of the National Park Service, which is responsible for the upkeep of the White House and its grounds, said any additions made to the White House must follow the architectural design of the building. 'You couldn't put something on the side of the building that doesn't match it historically in terms of its architecture, coloration, and style,' he said. He cast doubt on the timeline the Trump administration proposed, calling its plans to finish a project of this scale by the end of Trump's term 'optimistic.' 'You don't see one of those projects go that fast,' he said. 'It'll be a rush to get it done.' Advertisement Jarvis, who was the director of the National Park Service from 2009 to 2017, said construction at the White House is a 'complicated process' because it is 'not just normal construction.' 'It's the White House — it has to survive a terrorist attack,' he said. He added that every step of the process would need to be evaluated to ensure that nothing 'is being compromised architecturally or from a security standpoint.' Stewart D. McLaurin, president of the White House Historical Association, said the White House has gone through numerous changes to its interior and exterior since the cornerstone was laid in 1792, and many of them faced resistance. He said many of those changes made the White House what it is today. 'The South Portico, the North Portico, the East Wing, the West Wing, and the Truman Balcony all raised concerns at the time — but today, we can't imagine the White House without these iconic elements,' he said. It remains unclear whether the Committee for the Preservation of the White House, which works in tandem with the White House Historical Association, has provided recommendations or raised concerns about Trump's ballroom. A spokesperson for the historical association, Jessica Fredericks, did not respond to questions about the committee's position on the project. In addition to the director of the National Park Service, the committee is composed of representatives from the White House, the Smithsonian Institution, the Commission of Fine Arts, the National Gallery of Art, and a handful of presidential appointees. Trump has not nominated a park service director, a position that requires Senate confirmation, or announced the appointments of individuals to serve on the committee. The terms of 13 individuals that former President Joe Biden appointed to the committee in 2023 expired when Trump began his second term, according to a government database. Jessica Bowron, the comptroller of the National Park Service, is currently serving as its acting director. Advertisement The president tapped McCrery Architects as the lead architect of the project. James McCrery, the company's founding principal architect, was appointed by Trump in 2019 to serve a four-year term on the Commission of Fine Arts. He called the ballroom a necessary addition to the White House, where presidents have 'faced challenges hosting major events.' McCrery said he would preserve 'the elegance of its classical design and historical importance' of the White House. Questions about who is funding the project are also still largely unanswered. White House officials said the president and 'other patriot donors' would pay for the renovations but declined to give details. This article originally appeared in


UPI
25 minutes ago
- UPI
Iran forms new defense council for handling affairs in wartime
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian arrives to speak at the UN General Assembly 79th session General Debate in UN General Assembly Hall at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City in September 2024. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 3 (UPI) -- The Iranian government announced Sunday that it had formed a new National Defense Council for handling the country's affairs in wartime. The establishment of the council was approved by the Supreme National Security Council within the framework of Article 176 of the country's constitution, according to reports in Iranian state media agency IRNA and the semi-official Tasnim News Agency. The Iranian government said that the council also aims to review defense plans and centralize military decision-making. The new council will be chaired by President Masoud Pezeshkian and will include the heads of the Iranian Armed Forces and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, among other ministries, according to the pro-Iranian political blogger Middle East Spectator. In another article, the Tasnim News Agency likened the structure and purpose of the new council to that of the United States' National Security Council, noting that the American agency "plays a coordination in national security and defense policymaking." The move comes in the aftermath of the 12-day war between Iran and Israel earlier this year, which marked one of the most direct and intense confrontations between the two nations in decades. Although both sides claimed victory, Iran emerged from the conflict with significant military and economic setbacks. Israeli strikes reportedly damaged key air defense systems, missile infrastructure, and IRGC command centers in western Iran. Meanwhile, Iran's retaliatory attacks failed to breach Israeli missile defenses in a meaningful way, highlighting vulnerabilities in Iran's conventional military capabilities. Since the conflict, Iran has faced renewed domestic pressure as its economy, which is already strained by international sanctions. The Iranian leadership has focused on consolidating internal power structures, streamlining military command, and projecting efforts of international diplomacy with other Muslim nations. Iranian Army Maj. Gen. Amir Hatami said Sunday that Iran believes threats from Israel are not over and that it had only witnessed a glimpse of its rival's "brutality."

Epoch Times
26 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Senate Confirms Brian Burch as US Ambassador to the Holy See
The Senate confirmed CatholicVote President Brian Burch as the latest U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See on Aug. 2. With a vote of 49–44, Burch will head to Vatican City to serve during the first ever reign of an American Pope, Pope Leo XIV. Both men claim Chicago as their hometown, and Burch was also the president of Seton Academy Catholic Montessori School in Villa Park, Illinois, which is just outside of Chicago.