U.S. consulate condemns Hong Kong's government for ‘repression' of Independence Day celebrations
The consulate accused the Hong Kong government of interfering with U.S. Consulate General-hosted events, saying U.S. embassies and consulates worldwide celebrate Independence Day every year by hosting receptions and other festivities.
'We condemn the Hong Kong government's repression of U.S. Independence Day celebrations,' it said in an emailed reply to The Associated Press. 'Its attempts to characterize these activities as 'unlawful' only further reveals its insecurity and fear of freedom.'
The consulate's criticism came days after a Facebook page, 'Edu Lancet,' reported that the city's education authorities had sent 'friendly reminders' to multiple schools asking teachers not to 'casually join' the consulate's events and be cautious about violating the national security law. The reminder also asked the schools to discourage their students from joining the festivities, it said.
The Associated Press could not independently verify the claims by the Facebook page, which often provides updates about the education sector. A local English-language newspaper, the South China Morning Post, also reported that authorities had reminded schools to be vigilant about any attempts to promote U.S. Independence Day celebrations on campus.
The city's education bureau, in response to media queries, said it issued administrative and educational guidelines to schools, requiring them to take their own measures to safeguard national security, but didn't confirm the reported nature of the reminders.
'Schools have the responsibility to be good gatekeepers and to enhance the sensitivity of teachers and students to national security,' it said.
Hong Kong Secretary for Security Chris Tang previously accused the founder of the page, Hans Yeung, of seizing opportunities to incite division in society in a media interview published in March.
Beijing imposed the national security law on Hong Kong in 2020 following massive anti-government protests in 2019, saying the legislation was necessary to return stability to the city.
Under the law, dozens of leading activists were prosecuted or jailed while others fled. Fears about the law drove many middle-class families and young professionals to emigrate elsewhere.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
12 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Indonesia to Relax Import Restrictions as US Tariff Deadline Looms
Jakarta says that the measures will aid its tariff negotiations with the Trump administration, while advancing its broader economic goals. Indonesia will relax import restrictions and rules on a selection of goods in an apparent concession in its ongoing tariff negotiations with the United States. This is aimed at enhancing Indonesia's competitiveness and making it easier to do business in the country. Speaking at a press conference yesterday, Airlangga Hartarto, the coordinating minister for economic affairs, said that the government would ease import regulations on 10 groups of commodities, including fertilizers, footwear, and bicycles. The change will also exclude some industrial raw materials, including plastic and chemical products, from the import restriction list. Airlangga said that the changes 'would come into effect in two months.' Satya Bhakti Parikesit, an official in the Indonesian Ministry of State Secretariat, said that President Prabowo Subianto had 'instructed all ministerial bodies to ensure the process of business licensing is not hindered by a long bureaucratic process.' According to Bloomberg, Airlangga said that the measures would both aid ongoing tariff negotiations with the United States and support Jakarta's broader economic goals, including its aims of finalizing a trade deal with the European Union and joining the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The loosening of import regulations on these goods will be matched by a further tightening on ready-made garments and accessories, in a bid to prevent domestic manufacturers from being swamped by cheap imports, particularly from China. As per Bloomberg, 'restrictions remain unchanged for strategic goods, including rice, salt, fisheries products, goods related to security and health, and goods produced by labor-intensive industries such as some textiles, iron and steel.' The problem of red tape was among the numerous non-tariff barriers identified by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) in a report published in late March. The report claimed that Indonesia's overly complicated bureaucracy has long been a concern for many companies operating in Indonesia, including American ones, 'due to numerous, overlapping import licensing requirements that impede market access.' The USTR argues that this has contributed to its $17.9 billion goods trade deficit with the country. The deficit formed the mathematical basis for U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to impose a 32 percent 'reciprocal' tariff on Indonesian goods during his 'liberation day' tariff announcement on April 2. The tariff is due to come into effect on July 9, and Indonesian officials continue to negotiate with their U.S. counterparts over a fair resolution. With next week's U.S. tariff negotiation deadline fast approaching, Airlangga told reporters on Friday that the Indonesian government had approved several U.S. government proposals for tariffs and trade barriers and had submitted what he described as 'Indonesia's second-best offer.' 'We have fulfilled several U.S. requests regarding tariffs, non-tariff barriers, and commercial matters,' he said, adding that U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had expressed a willingness to accommodate a number of Indonesian concessions. Indonesia has previously proposed relaxing some of its local content requirements – another significant non-tariff barrier identified in the USTR's report – as a carrot to the Trump administration. In particular, Prabowo has proposed reducing the requirement on government procurements that will permit any state ministry and institution to buy products with 25 percent locally produced content, down from the current minimum of 40 percent. Also yesterday, Airlangga said that Indonesia has invited U.S. firms to invest in its critical minerals sector, in collaboration with the country's new sovereign investment fund, Danantara.
The Diplomat
12 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Why Did Hun Sen Call For Regime Change in Thailand?
I strongly recommend readers take a look at Vu Lam's recent commentary in The Interpreter, which I cannot agree with more. Referring to the phone call with Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra that Hun Sen, Cambodia's former premier, leaked earlier this month, Vu noted that it illustrates 'what may be termed diplomatic authority drift, the growing trend of foreign policy influence shifting to individuals outside formal executive roles, often without mandate or oversight.' So might what Hun Sen said following this leak. In a previous column, I called Hun Sen's decision to leak the phone call a supreme example of the Machiavellian instincts that kept him in power for four decades. But what he said afterwards was not so cunning. On June 24, in a Facebook post, he said that Thailand would have a new leader within three months, adding, 'I already can tell who the next Prime Minister will be, but I'll leave that to the imagination.' Three days later, in a four-hour television address, he commented: 'I hope there will be a new prime minister in Thailand who will come out and solve issues with neighboring countries, especially with Cambodia.' Hun Sen's spokesman, Chea Thyrith, then followed this up by telling Bloomberg, 'The current [Thai] government does not have enough power to make decisions in consensus to represent Thailand in solving border disputes…We are happy to work with every new government that has enough power to represent Thailand.' Paetongtarn shot herself in the foot by trusting Hun Sen enough to reveal her own government's opinions about its military, and Hun Sen can claim some justification for leaking it. However, to then follow this up with calls for Thailand to remove its prime minister and appoint a new one is a blatant violation of the principle of non-interference. How is this not a call for regime change? Thai Vice Foreign Minister Ras Chaleechan was being slightly hyperbolic, but not too much, when he commented, 'In nearly six decades since ASEAN's founding, there has never been an instance of one member state so openly aiming to destabilize the government of another member state. Such actions, therefore, also serve to destabilize ASEAN as a whole.' How can Phnom Penh now claim with a straight face that it is the victim of sovereignty violation? Just last week, Hun Sen accused Thailand of violating 'ASEAN's core principle of non-interference in member states' internal affairs' by apparently allowing exiled Cambodian opposition members to operate inside Thailand. People who live in glass houses, Hun Sen. Neither does it seemingly help Cambodia's cause. As I argued previously, Phnom Penh is eager to garner international support. It has initiated proceedings to take the border dispute with Thailand to the International Court of Justice, a move that Bangkok opposes but which demonstrates Phnom Penh's adherence to international law. The Cambodian government has also spoken about taking the matter to the United Nations Security Council. Against this, Bangkok's refusal to allow a third party to adjudicate has made it look parochial and bullying. The second prong of this campaign has been to portray Cambodia as a victim of Thai political instability, in which the border disputes are merely an extension of power struggles between the Thai military and civilian government. Paetongtarn's comments played into this narrative, which explains why Hun Sen was motivated to leak the recording. However, explicitly calling for regime change in a neighboring country certainly doesn't make Phnom Penh appear to be the upholder of international norms, including non-interference in other countries' affairs, which is essentially the only principle the ASEAN states have ever agreed upon. Technically, Phnom Penh can say that Hun Sen's comments were simply those of the president of the country's ruling party and Senate president, so not the opinions of the sitting government. Indeed, Hun Sen doesn't sit in the cabinet. But everyone knows he is the government; he is the power in Cambodia. So, the de facto position of the Cambodian government is that there needs to be a change of government in Thailand. Importantly, neither Prime Minister Hun Manet (Hun Sen's son) nor any other Cambodian minister has opposed what Hun Sen said. This will have repercussions for Phnom Penh. No foreign leader will trust the Hun family again with personal information. Diplomatic relations will be set back. Hun Sen's standing in the region will be severely impacted. Moreover, the fact that Hun Manet hasn't come out to distance himself from his father's words, and the fact that Hun Sen has now seemingly taken back full control of government policy, make Hun Manet look weak. One imagines there will be strong words for Cambodia at the next ASEAN meetings. As my colleague Luke Hunt noted, it was not only an 'unfathomable breach of ASEAN protocol,' it was also a 'hard slap in the face for Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, who, as the current chair of ASEAN, did score a bounty of praise for his handling of prickly issues at last month's summit of leaders.' But why did Hun Sen say it? One claim is that Hun Sen and the CPP want to divert Cambodians' attention from domestic issues, such as the state of the economy, and making the narrative all about Thai politics helps. But realistically, this could have been done without calling for regime change. Another is that Hun Sen believes internal instability in Thailand will benefit Cambodia's case by diverting Bangkok's attention from the border tensions. That's possible, though Paetongtarn's government was crumbling before he made his regime-change comments. Some more conspiratorial theories are also floating around. One is that Hun Sen wants to fast-track the demise of the Shinawatras over fear that their signature proposal to legalize gambling and casinos in Thailand would destroy Cambodia's casino industry, thus depriving Cambodia's elites of the backhanders and illicit money they garner from the industry. Another is that the Cambodian leadership and its networks are opposed to the Paetongtarn government's crackdown on the illegal scam industry along the Myanmar and Cambodia border. By happenstance, a major Amnesty International report was released on June 26 that alleged that the Cambodian government is 'acquiescent' and 'complicit' in the abuses happening in the scam compounds. 'Scamming compounds are allowed to thrive and flourish by the Cambodian government,' it added. The implication of this allegation, then, is that the CPP and its networks hope a new Thai government will be less eager to dismantle the scam industry and challenge Phnom Penh about its associations. Vice Foreign Minister Ras Chaleechan has made this allegation. 'As for why [Hun Sen] wants to undermine our current government,' he commented, 'part of the answer probably lies in the Thai government's serious policy of suppressing all forms of illegal businesses around our country.' Take that with a pinch of salt, though, since both sides are now trying to claim that the disputes are simply a spill-over of the domestic politics of the other country. More likely, Hun Sen lost his composure and allowed his personal anger at the Shinawatras to spill over. The fact that he made his more inflammatory comments in a four-hour speech, as is his wont, was likely another instance (in a long list of them) of Hun Sen speaking without thinking. Maybe it's his desperation to secure his son's power. Maybe the sense of authority went to his head. After all, his leaking of the Paetongtarn phone call was an impressive power play, sparking what is likely to be the downfall of another government. Hun Sen has certainly inflated his rhetoric in recent weeks and, for the first time since the 2023 leadership handover, seems quite intent on making it known that he remains the sole power in Cambodia. But this was certainly not one of the wisest things the Cambodian leader has done in his forty-odd years in power.
The Mainichi
18 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Trump complains about Japan not importing enough American rice
WASHINGTON (Kyodo) -- U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday complained that Japan is not importing enough American rice, expressing further frustration as his administration and officials from the key Asian ally struggle to make progress toward a deal in bilateral tariff negotiations. Trump said on social media that Japan "won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage. In other words, we'll just be sending them a letter, and we love having them as a Trading Partner for many years to come." In Trump's post on his Truth Social platform, which singled out Japan in a way he rarely does online, he started by saying he wanted to give an example of how "spoiled" countries have become with respect to the United States. His statement came a day after saying in a TV interview that he has no plans to roll back the hefty auto tariffs imposed on Japan, despite Tokyo's persistent opposition expressed in now-stalled tariff negotiations. "I could send one (letter) to Japan: 'Dear Mr. Japan, here's the story. You're going to pay a 25 percent tariff on your cars,'" Trump said on Fox News. During the interview that aired on Sunday, Trump also accused Japan of importing too few American cars. "They won't take our cars, and yet we take millions and millions of their cars into the United States. It's not fair," he said. To curb its trade surplus with the United States, he said Japan could purchase "a lot of oil" and other goods from his country. On Monday, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Trump plans to meet with his trade team this week to discuss tariff rates for many individual countries. She told a press briefing that Trump will set the rates if countries "don't come to the table to negotiate in good faith." In recent days, Trump and his officials have ramped up pressure on U.S. trading partners as a 90-day pause on country-specific tariffs, granted in a bid to facilitate negotiations, is set to expire on July 9. Each year, Japan imports 770,000 tons of rice tariff-free under a "minimum access" agreement with the World Trade Organization. Of that amount, up to 100,000 tons is allowed to be imported for human consumption. Any rice imported to Japan beyond the special quota is subject to a tariff of 341 yen (about $2.40) per kilogram. Meanwhile, the country charges no tariffs on imported vehicles. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Trump failed to reach a breakthrough trade deal when they held talks in Canada in mid-June on the fringes of a Group of Seven summit. Japan's chief tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, was in Washington for four days through Sunday for his seventh round of ministerial talks on tariffs with the United States. But there was a lack of tangible progress, with sharp differences apparently remaining over the Trump administration's April increase in the tariff on imported automobiles to 27.5 percent from 2.5 percent.
