Norman Esslemont: Together we can scrap Aberdeen's bus gates once and for all - with final £25k push to fight court battle
We're going back to court – and this time, we're going all the way.
For nearly two years, traders and residents across Aberdeen have been forced to live with the damaging consequences of the so-called 'bus priority' scheme – a system that has choked off trade, punished motorists, and turned large parts of our once-bustling city centre into a ghost town.
I've walked Union Street almost every day of my adult life.
I've run businesses here, hired local people, and helped serve generations of Aberdonians.
I've seen it thrive – and I've seen it struggle. But I have never seen it like this.
This street was once the beating heart of our city. Now, it's on life support.
And for what? For a half-baked traffic experiment that was never properly consulted on and never fairly assessed.
The people of Aberdeen didn't ask for this. We weren't given a vote.
And yet we've all been made to pay the price – quite literally – as footfall dried up and thousands of unsuspecting drivers were slapped with fines.
But now, after months of legal preparation, our day in court is coming.
We've secured a procedural hearing for June, with the full appeal likely to follow in the autumn.
And thanks to the strength of our legal team – led by the brilliant Alasdair Sutherland, of Burness Paull – we're more confident than ever that we will prevail.
But we can't do it alone. That's why I'm asking today for your help to raise a fresh £25,000 to take this legal battle across the finish line.
This is no longer just about bus gates. It's about accountability. It's about transparency.
And it's about standing up to a council that has, time and again, refused to listen, even when the Common Sense Compromise presented a chance to change route.
Our case is built on solid ground. Mr Sutherland has already dismantled Highland Council's flawed plans for Academy Street in Inverness.
Now he's turning his attention to Aberdeen – and his legal assessment is clear: the council's decision to make the bus gates permanent was, in his view, legally flawed on multiple grounds.
We've seen internal emails showing council officials lobbying bus firms for glowing reviews to justify a decision they had already made. That's not consultation — that's spin.
We've seen the council admit they pushed the scheme through to avoid repaying funding. But financial fear is not a legally valid reason to lock down a city centre and crush its economy.
And crucially, if the court agrees that the council got it wrong – on any of these points – the entire scheme could be struck down. Gone. Ripped out. Reset.
That also means every driver fined since January 2025 could be entitled to a full refund.
This is not a hypothetical. This is a real, credible, and winnable legal case – one that could reshape Aberdeen's future for the better.
The last time we launched a crowdfunder, the public raised more than £35,000 in just weeks.
That incredible show of belief and defiance allowed us to commission expert legal advice and force the council to finally answer to someone other than themselves.
Now, we need one last push.
The council will try to hide behind legal jargon. They'll try to paint this as a noisy few making trouble. But this fight is so much bigger than that.
It's about every small business owner who's watched their takings collapse. Every pensioner confused by poor signage. Every motorist stung with a £50 fine for a turn they'd been making for decades.
It's about protecting the soul of our city centre before it's too late.
We believe the court will listen. We believe the case is strong. And we believe that, with your help, we can strike this failed experiment from the record, and rebuild a city centre that's fairer, busier, and open to all.
This is our moment. Let's take it.
Bus gates lawyer: 'I'm bolder than ever about scrapping Aberdeen traffic ban – AND making council cough up refunds to fined drivers'
'Unaccountable' lawyers would only show councillors secret bus gate legal advice 'on a distant screen that kept cutting out'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
5 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Skye councillor calls for 'pause' as windfarm inquiry starts
The Ben Aketil proposal at the centre of the inquiry, is for a current array of twelve turbines, each 120m high to be replaced by nine at 200m high. Objected to by the Highland Council, it is now being considered by the Scottish Government reporter in a local inquiry over five-days, at the Skye Camanachd Social Club in Portree. Over the past two days, The Herald, has told the story of the build up to these hearings that are seeing Skye become the focus of a current debate over windfarm and electricity developments. READ MORE: A busy first morning was attended by so many community members and protestors that extra chairs had to be brought in. Cllr Stewart explained his opposition to the development. 'Fundamentally, planning is about place and people and I don't think this application actually fits either. It's not in the interests of the people of Skye and it certainly doesn't protect the landscape.' At the inquiry to speak on behalf of his constituents, he said, 'A lot of them have been really disillusioned with the planning process. They think their voices aren't heard. I'm there to try to speak up for them and it was good to see that there were so many people from the community this morning protesting outside the inquiry. 'With this application, and more broadly other developments within the community, they risk killing off our communities by overwhelming them with this industrial scale energy development.' 'The installation of 200m turbines and all the associated tracks and infrastructure, is entirely at odds with the character and identity of the north of Skye. Something that struck me was you're talking 200m is roughly the height of the observation deck in the Shard, which is one of the tallest buildings in western Europe. They would absolutely tower above everything else. They would be visible for miles in every direction.' 'One of the things that we hear in planning a lot is it's proportionate and sympathetic development. I can't say that this is. I think that Ben Aketil windfarm is a profound misjudgement because the scale of it is wrong and also the setting of it is wrong. It's not the right development in the right place, so it doesn't meet any of those two criteria. Andrew Robinson of Skye Windfarm Information Group in front of Ben Aketil (Image: Vicky Allan) He also argued that it did not protect the naturally important landscape as is committed to in the planning policy around Scotland's national planning framework 4. 'It encroaches northwest Skye and Greshornish special landscape area, which is defined by its rugged terrain and remoteness. So it's completely out of keeping with that and breaks the letter and the spirit of that policy. 'These turbines may overwhelm the landscape. If you look at Skye, we're a predominantly tourist-based economy, which employs 2,800 people and brings in £200 million revenue each year. The tourists come to Skye to see the landscape. They don't come to see pylons, substations and turbines. I think we run a real risk of killing the goose that lays the proverbial golden egg.' The inquiry comes in the wake, two weeks ago, of the Scottish Government's approval for the Skye overhead replacement line. It will hear submissions from legal representatives for Nadara, Highland Council and community groups. It also follows the issuing, earlier this month of an open letter from over forty communities, led by the Skye Windfarm Information Group, calling for a moratorium on new renewables projects. The Scottish government was approached for comment. Responding to the Herald's Sunday article on the issue, a Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government has an ambition, as set out in our Onshore Wind Policy Statement, for 20GW of Onshore Wind by 2030 and we are working with the onshore wind industry to ensure that the delivery of this ambition supports our regional and national economies, communities and nature. The UK Government's Clean Power Action Plan respects the Scottish Government's onshore wind ambitions for 2030.'
BBC News
5 days ago
- BBC News
Highland-wide holiday lets control zone proposed by councillors
A Highland-wide control zone to limit Airbnb-style lets has been suggested as a way of tackling a shortage of homes across the proposing the move said 7,011 short-term let licences had been granted across the Highlands, but only four lets are not banned in control areas, but operators need planning permission as well as a short-term lets councillors said the powers could be used where there was local demand for them. Highland Council officials said control area status for the whole of the Highlands would require research and, if it was introduced, could mean additional costs and workload for its planning department. The idea of Highland-wide status has been suggested by Inverness councillors Michael Gregson and Duncan a paper going to next week's meeting of the full council, they said the region needed more than 24,000 homes over the next 10 added: "The private long-term rental market has shrunk disastrously: estate agents are withdrawing from letting out properties because of the shortage of properties available. "Even taking into account the efforts of Highland Council and the Housing Associations, there is a shortage of affordable housing."The councillors said the local authority should first ask the Scottish government to revisit its original plan to have an overprovision policy within short-term lets said if that was not possible, then to seek approval for Highland control area their response, officials said there would be financial implications for the local authority around both suggestions from the also said there could be potential challenges to Highland-wide of Edinburgh Council had to amend its licensing scheme following a court ruling. The whole of the City of Edinburgh Council area was designated Scotland's first short-term let control area in September 2022.A law requiring operators to have a licence came into force across Scotland in October the following Council's first control zone was approved in December 2023 and covers Badenoch and who supported its introduction said it was needed because workers and local young people had difficulties finding affordable the Association of Scotland's Self-Caterers (ASSC) said at the time that targeting legitimate small businesses to address longstanding housing issues showed "a muddled sense of priorities".
The Herald Scotland
6 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Windfarm campaign calls for planning inquiry on Skye
Just over a week ago major new grid infrastructure, the Skye overhead replacement line, was approved by the Scottish Government. These developments, said Andrew Robinson, a spokesperson for Skye Windfarm Information Group, said could 'massively change Skye's landscape and cause untold damage both to the local environment, and to tourism, the island's key industry". 'The Scottish Government,' he said, 'have the power to initiate planning inquiry commissions. These are when you look at a big, strategic plan. Three times we've written to Gillian Martin, the energy minister, to say that we think on Skye because of its unique nature they should have a planning inquiry commission to look at what it's appropriate to build here. But they refused that. They just said that the existing planning process is enough.' Skye, one of Scotland's top tourist destinations, currently has two windfarms, but there are a further eight at various stages of planning and scoping. These include Edinbane, Ben Aketil, Glen Ullinish, Glen Ullinish II, Ben Sca, Balmeanach and Breakish. One of these applications, for an extension at Ben Aketil, in which nine turbine will be removed and substituted with 200m high replacements, is now at the desk of the Scottish Government reporter following an objection by the Highland Council, and will be the subject of a local public inquiry on the island this week. Scottish Windfarm Information Group campaigners (Image: Vicky Allan) In a previous letter to the Scottish Government, Robinson said: 'There is an urgent need to take a strategic look at all of the plans proposed for Skye. At present residents are overwhelmed by the individual planning applications they face, and may wish to object to. 'The paperwork for each application is huge. Communities are expected to comment and respond to each application yet we have no resources. The developers, usually funded by overseas private equity companies, have access to consultants, PR and marketing experts and endless legal and planning advice. 'The proposed plans will be overwhelming. They can not be justified on basis of need as Scotland stands to more than meet its renewable energy targets if the current consented wind farms across the country are built. The plans will cause untold destruction to Skye's fragile and beautiful habitat.' Read more: A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Ministerial powers to refer certain planning questions to a Planning Inquiry Commission apply to cases where there are considerations of national or regional importance and a proper evaluation of them cannot be made unless there is a special inquiry for the purpose; and that the technical or scientific aspects of the proposed development are of so unfamiliar a character as to jeopardise a proper determination of that question unless there is a special inquiry for the purpose. 'There are however existing and well-established consenting procedures for renewable and grid infrastructure, including for the consideration of any cumulative impacts arising. Therefore, we have no plans to constitute a Planning Inquiry Commission. 'The Scottish Government has an ambition, as set out in our Onshore Wind Policy Statement, for 20GW of Onshore Wind by 2030 and we are working with the onshore wind industry to ensure that the delivery of this ambition supports our regional and national economies, communities and nature. The UK Government's Clean Power Action Plan respects the Scottish Government's onshore wind ambitions for 2030.'
