Clitheroe's Moorland Senior School closes due to soaring costs
'Hardest decision'
Moorland School, established more than 100 years ago, offered either day or boarding provision and, according to its website, had 288 pupils. It charged annual fees of up to £36,000.In his letter to parents and carers, Mr Harrison said closing the senior school had been "the hardest decision of my life" and apologised for the "incredibly short notice" to all affected.He wrote: "The impact on our pupils, their families and the staff has been a major consideration [but] sadly the school must live within its economic means."Despite our best efforts, our senior school has been operating below where it should be for budgetary purposes."
'Deteriorating affordability'
Mr Harrison said he and his family had been "custodians of Moorland for nearly 40 years and we are absolutely heartbroken that we have had to make the decision".He blamed "deteriorating affordability, falling numbers of full fee-paying parents, higher operating costs, VAT on school fees, the added costs of employers' National Insurance and ultimately owed fees that remain uncollected".Mr Harrison confirmed that Moorland School's nursery, infants and junior sections were continuing to "flourish" and would remain open.When contacted by the BBC on Friday, an automated email response from Mr Harrison said he had "retired from the teaching profession, and as such is no longer an active director at the school".The BBC has asked Moorland School and Lancashire County Council to comment.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Households can apply for £320 worth of free supermarket vouchers in DAYS – check if you're eligible
HOUSEHOLDS will soon be able to apply for a free supermarket voucher worth up to £320. Hard-up families can apply for the support through the government's Household Support Fund. 1 The support has been extended multiple times, with the latest round running from April 2025 until March 2026. Each council has its own share of the £742million, which they can dole out to residents in need. Eligibility criteria for the support varies but usually you need to be on a low income or on benefits. Residents of North Northamptonshire will soon be able to apply for supermarket vouchers worth up to £320. The amount you receive depends on a number of factors, including how many people you live with and your income. For example, a person who lives alone will be given a voucher worth £150. Meanwhile, a house with two residents could receive £260 for their food shop. If you live in a home with three residents or more you will receive a voucher worth £320. To apply you will need to have a National Insurance number and provide proof of your income with a bank statement. The scheme was closed due to a high number of applications, but is due to reopen again in just a few weeks. Families can get FREE washing machines, fridges and kids' beds or £200 payments this summer – and you can apply now The second window of applications will re-open on August 4, 2025. The council said submissions are expected to take two months to process. If approved, you voucher will be sent to your email address. If you are keen to apply visit, for more information. What if I don't live in North Northamptonshire? The £742million Household Support Fund has been shared between all councils in England. So, if you don't live in this area but are struggling financially or are on benefits you will likely be eligible for help. This is because the fund was originally set up to help those on low incomes or classed as vulnerable. What type of help you can get will vary but it could range from a free cash payment to supermarket vouchers. Devon County Council has also issued supermarket vouchers worth more than £90 to 22,000 families with children on free school meals. The £90 is equivalent to £15 per week for the six week school holiday. Households in Redcar & Cleveland can also now apply for support worth up to £230. Household Support Fund explained Sun Savers Editor Lana Clements explains what you need to know about the Household Support Fund. If you're battling to afford energy and water bills, food or other essential items and services, the Household Support Fund can act as a vital lifeline. The financial support is a little-known way for struggling families to get extra help with the cost of living. Every council in England has been given a share of £421million cash by the government to distribute to local low income households. Each local authority chooses how to pass on the support. Some offer vouchers whereas others give direct cash payments. In many instances, the value of support is worth hundreds of pounds to individual families. Just as the support varies between councils, so does the criteria for qualifying. Many councils offer the help to households on selected benefits or they may base help on the level of household income. The key is to get in touch with your local authority to see exactly what support is on offer. And don't delay, the scheme has been extended until April 2025 but your council may dish out their share of the Household Support Fund before this date. Once the cash is gone, you may find they cannot provide any extra help so it's crucial you apply as soon as possible.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Keir Starmer to push Donald Trump on steel tariffs; British retail sales rise in June
Update: Date: 2025-07-25T06:38:15.000Z Title: British retail sales rise in June, official figures show Content: There is some positive news for the retail sector this morning, with official figures showing that monthly sales rose in June by 0.9%. It follows a fall of 2.8% in May. That was helped by warm weather, with supermarkets reporting better trading and an increase in drink purchases, the Office for National Statistics has said. The warm weather in June helped to brighten sales, with supermarket retailers reporting stronger trading and an increase in drink was also a good month for fuel sales as consumers ventured out and about in the sunshine. While growth is encouraging, the numbers are weaker than expected. A poll by Reuters showed that economists had been expecting a monthly rise of 1.2%. Jacqui Baker, head of retail at RSM UK and chair of ICAEW's Retail Group, warns that the sunny mood music may not last long. While the June figures are welcome news and consumer confidence ticked up last month, nervousness among consumers persists, and the unexpected rise in inflation won't have helped. The higher price of essentials such as food and fuel will only add to the reluctance among consumers to spend as their discretionary income shrinks. Concerns remain in the sector, as retailers increasingly run out of headroom to mitigate rising costs. Many will be hoping the government steps in to provide meaningful reductions in business rates, as well as raising the threshold at which employers' National Insurance becomes payable. It's also hoped that the reintroduction of tax-free shopping is brought back on the table, so the sector doesn't miss out further on valuable retail spend.' Update: Date: 2025-07-25T06:37:22.000Z Title: Introduction: Keir Starmer to push Donald Trump over steel tariff deal Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. Donald Trump, who is due to arrive in Scotland on Friday for a five-day golf trip, is expected to meet with Keir Starmer early next week as the prime minister pushes to finalise their deal on steel trade tariffs. In May, the US agreed to lift tariffs on steel imports from the UK, which currently stand at 25%. However, there are concerns that the steel must be melted and poured in the UK, which could exclude Tata Steel UK as it closed its last blast furnace last year. It has been importing steel from its sister plants in India and the Netherlands, which it then processes in the UK. Starmer is expected to argue for building closer trade ties with the US, including cutting tariffs on Scotch whisky, according to a report by the Financial Times. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters this week: 'On Friday morning, President Trump will travel to Scotland for a working visit that will include a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Starmer to refine the historic US-UK trade deal.' The talks will come after Stamer sealed a tradel deal with India on Thursday. The agreement, which is the biggest struck by Britain since Brexit, will cut back the cost of India's tariffs for the UK and improve exports of products such as Scotch whisky and cars. Starmer told Bloomberg News that his government had 're-established the place and position of the UK on the world stage.' 'We're seen as a country which other countries want to be working with and delivering with.' 7.00am BST: ONS retail sales data 7.00am BST: NatWest Q2 results 11.00am BST: NatWest AGM
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
The £70bn pension tax raid that Reeves be unable to resist
Rachel Reeves is eyeing up your pension. The Chancellor is struggling to balance the books, so where better to look than Gordon Brown's favourite cash cow? It is becoming increasingly likely that she will have to follow in the footsteps of the chancellor whose framed photo she kept as a student, by launching a raid on retirement pots this autumn. As Torsten Bell, the pensions minister, highlighted conspicuously last week, the Government offers tax relief worth £70bn every year to encourage workers to save. While he insisted that incentives to save were 'a good thing', Bell refused to rule out a raid in the future. But while pensions might be a tempting target, the risk of unintended consequences is high. By taking a slice of pension savings, Reeves could inadvertently discourage people from stashing money away or lead to lower pay for the very people that Labour promises to protect. Roughly £12.8bn of individual contributions were made to personal pensions in 2022-23. Data published by the taxman show that in 2022–23, the Government gave up £46.8bn it would have collected if pension contributions had been subject to income tax. That is in addition to £24bn it would have raised if employer pension contributions had been subject to National Insurance (NI) contributions. Another telling statement by Bell this week was that the Government wanted to ensure that people are not 'taxed twice' on the money they save for retirement. He said: 'What does the pension tax system do? It makes it easy for people to smooth their incomes over their lifetime. We're not taxing you twice. That is an important feature of most tax systems, and it will remain an important feature.' But that statement still leaves some low-hanging fruit for the Chancellor to pluck. The first is salary sacrifice, where staff agree to forego a portion of their salary in return for the same amount being ploughed into a workplace pension. As a result, employees can reduce their NI contributions and benefit from tax relief on the money they add to their pension. Employers, who already don't pay NI on an employee's pension contributions, can also reduce their tax bill further because the sacrifice serves as a pay cut. Pensioners do not pay NI, leaving scope for the Government to start taxing one side of this equation and still abide by this principle. HMRC estimates that it lost out on £3.9bn in NI receipts because of salary sacrifice schemes, which would be a princely sum for a cash-strapped Chancellor. In addition, employees currently benefit from roughly £6bn a year in income tax relief through salary sacrifice. 'A generous and opaque subsidy' The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has urged the Government to go further by moving towards levying NI on employer pension contributions as a principle. Carl Emmerson, the deputy director of the IFS, describes the absence of NI on employer pension contributions as 'a very generous and very opaque subsidy' that if removed entirely, could boost the Treasury's coffers by more than £17bn a year. However, with businesses still reeling from a £25bn NI raid on employers, this would be a politically toxic move, and one that Emmerson says will have consequences for working people. 'It would almost certainly put downward pressure on pay, and would also make government spending less generous because lots of public sector workers get generous employer pension contributions, and those public sector employers would find their national insurance bills going up,' he says. To ease pressures, Reeves could choose to reimburse public sector employers as she did during last autumn's raid. The Resolution Foundation has estimated that doing so would cost £5bn – though the measure would still raise £12bn. A more radical option would be to restrict the income tax relief that applies when a worker makes pension contributions at a flat rate of 30pc. This would benefit those on modest income, but at the expense of higher earners. Economists estimate the measure would affect up to 6m higher and additional rate taxpayers, costing the wealthiest savers about £2,600. HMRC estimates show that 37pc of income tax relief on total contributions is provided at the basic rate, just over half at the higher rate and 7pc at the top 45p rate. However, Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister, says the Treasury has shied away from this reform because of its hideous complexity, as well as the significant impact it would have on public sector workers and the implications for their gold-plated, final-salary pensions. Sir Steve says: 'The challenge for the Government with potential cuts to pension tax relief is that a significant part of the existing tax break goes to long-serving and senior public servants, typically in defined-benefit pension arrangements.' Any cut to higher rate relief or tax-free lump sums would affect many such workers adversely at a time when the Government already has issues with the public sector workforce over pay. As this group is part of Labour's core voting base, it is likely to be wary of alienating them further. 'Constant meddling' Baroness Altmann, another former pensions minister, warns that changes to pensions, including Reeves's decision to bring pension pots into the scope of inheritance tax, could leave many people without the means to support themselves later in retirement. 'The constant tax meddling has been a disaster for pensions,' she says. Altmann warns that private sector employees are likely to be left footing the bill for any further changes. 'We're already subsidising hugely generous public sector pensions that the private sector can almost never dream of,' she says. There is also another element of the pensions system that is currently tax-free on the way in and out: the amount that can be taken from pension pots. Tax-free lump sum Currently, people can take up to 25pc of any pension as a tax-free lump sum when they reach 55, up to a maximum of £286,275. Reducing the amount to £100,000 would affect about one in five retirees, and raise £2bn in the long run, according to the IFS. A similar proposal is being pushed by the Labour-affiliated Fabian Society, and it is understood that Treasury officials have urged previous chancellors to look at the relief, which costs about £5.5bn a year. Emmerson says: 'If you've already got £900,000 in your pension pot, it's not obvious why the taxpayer should be subsidising you to put more in your pension. These people can't really claim that they're under-saving for retirement.' However, he makes a more obvious point that should make Reeves think twice if she wants to raid workplace pension savings. 'This would almost exclusively be paid by workers,' he says. A Treasury spokesman said they were 'committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible'.
