logo
Commission of inquiry into child safety in Queensland will focus on children leaving care

Commission of inquiry into child safety in Queensland will focus on children leaving care

A woman who alleges she was abused while in the care of the Queensland government has called for significant changes to the child safety system.
It comes as a powerful commission of inquiry into Queensland's child safety sector held its first public hearing on Wednesday, promising to review the hundreds of children reported missing from placements.
Georgie Djuricic entered the residential care system at seven years old.
She she was placed in an emergency facility with several teenage boys and alleged she was abused over a year and half.
"A boy had severely bashed me to the point where, it had been so dangerous for me to live there anymore, they had to put me in a hotel for two weeks," she said.
"I was moved into another resi immediately because they had too many cases of me having been hurt too much in that house."
The now 19-year-old Aboriginal woman went to four different out-of-home placements over a decade and battled mental health and behavioural issues.
She wants young people's voices to be heard as part of the 18-month inquiry.
Ms Djuricic now works as a Youth Advocate for CREATE Foundation and said the system was broken.
"If you wouldn't treat your children like that, why are you treating us like that?" she said.
"The reality is the system has not really changed in the past 40 years.
"We deserve to be heard, we're the ones that have been hurt."
Queensland's Commission of Inquiry into Child Safety held its first hearing on Wednesday, led by former Federal Court Judge Paul Anastassiou KC.
Reports of almost 800 children "self-placing" will be reviewed as part of the inquiry's broad remit, the commissioner said.
"Self-placing" refers to children leaving a child safety placement for any reason, including to visit family or friends. However, advocates worry children who self-place may also be exposed to unsafe or dangerous situations.
Government figures showed the number of children self-placing had grown to 780 in March 2025 – a figure the state's child safety minister said was unacceptable.
"Allowing one vulnerable child to self-place in Queensland is unacceptable to me, let alone 780 young people," Minister Amanda Camm said in a statement.
"That's why I have ordered a full audit of the kids in care who are self-placing, to understand how the current system can be improved."
Queensland has the most children in residential care in the country, with the state paying more than $1 billion for their care.
In this system, children live in group homes which are staffed by youth workers.
Senior Counsel Assisting Robyn Sweet KC said residential care was designed for children over 12 years old.
She said despite this, one in three children in these homes in Queensland is under 12.
"This is a phenomenon unique to Queensland, with no other state experiencing this explosion of children in residential care," she said.
"There are scores of children under the age of five … There are even reports of infants placed in residential care."
The commissioner said "the paramount aim of this inquiry" was to "improve the lives of and outcomes for these children and young people".
"If that aim is achieved … it will benefit not only these children, but all of the community of Queensland."
He said "the skies" over the department had been "blackened" by a "fog of notices" for information, with the commission legally empowered to compel witnesses and force organisations to produce documents.
The inquiry's broad terms of reference also include reforming the residential care system, reviewing the decline of foster care, child placement breakdowns, the resourcing of workers and "the ministerial accountability of the child safety system".
Following an ABC investigation, the commissioner said the inquiry will prioritise reviewing the complaints system for carers and accelerate submissions on that subject.
Reporting by the ABC in July revealed the violence and chaos inside some residential care homes, with workers saying they feared reprisals for speaking out.
More than 60 submissions by foster carers, former child safety workers, academics and parents of children in care have already been received by the inquiry.
Tom Allsop, chief executive officer of PeakCare, said he hoped the inquiry would bring significant change.
"We know we sit at a moment in time where we can set up a system that Queensland deserves when it comes to supporting children," he said.
"We know we need this inquiry to shine a light on parts of this service system … that aren't operating how we need."
The inquiry will deliver a final report to the Queensland government by November 30, 2026.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

$110,000 payment for union peace: Developer's deal in spotlight amid fresh calls to clean up industry
$110,000 payment for union peace: Developer's deal in spotlight amid fresh calls to clean up industry

Sydney Morning Herald

time26 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

$110,000 payment for union peace: Developer's deal in spotlight amid fresh calls to clean up industry

A gangland associate was paid $110,000 by a Gold Coast developer to strike a deal with the CFMEU's Queensland branch four months after the Albanese government forced the union into administration. The revelation of the Sunshine State deal, along with several other alarming new case studies, has prompted a major public intervention by the federal Labor-appointed CFMEU administrator, who is now urging conservative Queensland premier David Crisafulli to use his planned commission of inquiry into the union to attack the underworld. Administrator Mark Irving, SC, has also demanded the Albanese, Allan and Minns' governments shift their 'focus on crime and corruption across the industry'. The Sunshine State deal involved an attempt by Queensland-Melbourne joint venture Glen Q to secure industrial peace on the Gold Coast and culminated in a meeting between the CFMEU's Queensland co-ordinator Matt Vonhoff and Melbourne gangland associate John Khoury. Construction union sources who have spoken to authorities have confirmed the dealings were uncovered during recent federal police raids. The raids unearthed a money trail linking a front company in the name of Khoury's accountant to Glen Q's 16-level project a short drive from Crisafulli's Gold Coast seat. The sources said that acting as a fixer in the Gold Coast affair was Melbourne construction boss turned Queensland government contractor Nick Maric. Maric has for years had Khoury and his business partner Mick Gatto on a retainer to deal with the CFMEU. Revelations about the case have emerged amid separate details of persistent gangland activity in Queensland and down the eastern seaboard. They include a surge of industry involvement by the feared Comanchero bikie gang, including cases in Sydney and Brisbane, the latter in which a Melbourne Comanchero flying squad flew north and allegedly threatened a CFMEU representative. The bikies were ostensibly working with a security and labour hire contractor subcontracted to national construction giant BMD.

$110,000 payment for union peace: Developer's deal in spotlight amid fresh calls to clean up industry
$110,000 payment for union peace: Developer's deal in spotlight amid fresh calls to clean up industry

The Age

time26 minutes ago

  • The Age

$110,000 payment for union peace: Developer's deal in spotlight amid fresh calls to clean up industry

A gangland associate was paid $110,000 by a Gold Coast developer to strike a deal with the CFMEU's Queensland branch four months after the Albanese government forced the union into administration. The revelation of the Sunshine State deal, along with several other alarming new case studies, has prompted a major public intervention by the federal Labor-appointed CFMEU administrator, who is now urging conservative Queensland premier David Crisafulli to use his planned commission of inquiry into the union to attack the underworld. Administrator Mark Irving, SC, has also demanded the Albanese, Allan and Minns' governments shift their 'focus on crime and corruption across the industry'. The Sunshine State deal involved an attempt by Queensland-Melbourne joint venture Glen Q to secure industrial peace on the Gold Coast and culminated in a meeting between the CFMEU's Queensland co-ordinator Matt Vonhoff and Melbourne gangland associate John Khoury. Construction union sources who have spoken to authorities have confirmed the dealings were uncovered during recent federal police raids. The raids unearthed a money trail linking a front company in the name of Khoury's accountant to Glen Q's 16-level project a short drive from Crisafulli's Gold Coast seat. The sources said that acting as a fixer in the Gold Coast affair was Melbourne construction boss turned Queensland government contractor Nick Maric. Maric has for years had Khoury and his business partner Mick Gatto on a retainer to deal with the CFMEU. Revelations about the case have emerged amid separate details of persistent gangland activity in Queensland and down the eastern seaboard. They include a surge of industry involvement by the feared Comanchero bikie gang, including cases in Sydney and Brisbane, the latter in which a Melbourne Comanchero flying squad flew north and allegedly threatened a CFMEU representative. The bikies were ostensibly working with a security and labour hire contractor subcontracted to national construction giant BMD.

Concerns family intervention orders 'designed for adults' are being placed on young people
Concerns family intervention orders 'designed for adults' are being placed on young people

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Concerns family intervention orders 'designed for adults' are being placed on young people

Luke and Claire never expected they would be fighting to remove an intervention order placed on their own child. Their names have been changed to protect the identity of their teenager, but they wanted to share their experience in the hope it would lead to change. After a move to regional Victoria, the couple became concerned about the behaviour of their child, which eventually led to a desperate call to authorities for help. "We were in crisis, needed the police to come to help settle the crisis situation down," Luke said. "Three police officers came fairly quickly, and I think the way they managed the situation was good," he said. It was what came next that shocked the family. An interim family violence intervention order was placed on their 15-year-old child, with the father, Luke, named as the person in need of protection. "They told us pretty clearly that there was no option … we took the advice we were given, even though we made it pretty clear we didn't want [the intervention order]. The family felt like they had lost one of their avenues for much-needed crisis support. "I just asked them, how does this help?" Luke said. Across Australia, each state has different family violence and restraining order laws, which makes it difficult to get a national picture of how many young people are being placed on these intervention orders. In a number of jurisdictions, data shows domestic violence orders are increasing, but it's not always clear how many young people this involves. However, a new report from Victoria Legal Aid (VLA) found in that state since 2018, there has been a 34 per cent increase in the number of children VLA has assisted with intervention order applications made against them. The Feeling Supported, Not Stuck report, reviewed 101 closed files and found 39 per cent of families did not support the family violence intervention order made against their child. The problem is that the intervention order system is designed for adults, said VLA's associate director child protection, Elicia Savvas. "Police can choose to make an [intervention order] application to the court, and that's frequently what's happening, and then ultimately it's up to a magistrate to make a decision," she said. "That system is just not appropriate for [young people]. They can't understand the order and often it's a matter of actually needing help to deal with whatever's driving that behaviour, and the court system can't do that." Advocates have warned Victoria's extremely robust family violence law might be penalising vulnerable children who need more social support. "In 2008, Victoria forged ahead with one of the most expansive definitions of family violence in Australia, and at the time that was seen as really groundbreaking because we're recognising the diversity of experiences of victims, survivors of family," said Elena Campbell, Associate Director at RMIT's Centre for Innovative Justice. Those laws mean no consent is required for police to file family safety intervention orders, but this approach, "suitable for adults," may have inadvertently created issues for children and families, she said. The authors of VLA's report believe there are nationwide lessons from their research. "The interventional system looks different in every state around Australia, but children and young people have similar experiences, particularly of violence or trauma across Australia," Ms Savvas said. The ABC reached out to Victoria Police for comment. The overall rise in VLA's child clients responding to intervention orders was partly driven by the increase in school-based disputes leading to court action. The report examined young people's experiences of not only family safety intervention orders, but also personal safety intervention orders. Eighty-one per cent of personal safety intervention order files at VLA were related to incidents between children in school. In Victoria, parents or members of the public can apply for personal safety intervention orders to be placed on children. Serena is a proud First Nations woman who had two of her teenage children placed on intervention orders over school-based incidents. "It was really stressful, not just for my kids but me too … it affected us in every way," she said. She said her daughter was being bullied and targeted at school, which ultimately led to a fight that resulted in intervention orders being filed against both her children. Serena felt more could have been done to remedy the situation. "They should have got together with both families, spoke about it and worked with both of us, to see how we could all fix this. "My daughter had to go in separate entrance from the other [child] at the school, they put my daughter in an upper year level where she didn't understand the work at all, so then she started failing subjects." Serena and her children attended court and were able to have the orders withdrawn. The VLA report included previously unpublished Crime Statistics Agency analysis of Victoria Police data, which showed an 8 per cent increase in intervention orders against 10 to 17-year-olds since 2018. It found a more significant increase in personal safety intervention orders, which rose by 28 per cent between 2018 and 2023. "Resolving conflicts between students at school is something that we acknowledge is really hard for schools to do," Ms Savvas said. Fifty per cent of intervention order applications were withdrawn or revoked once they reached the Victorian Children's Court in 2023-2024, the report found. "The decline in final orders suggests that police are making applications that may not be necessary or Magistrates are acknowledging that a final order will not address the needs of the parties," it said. Legal and community justice experts say reforms are needed to protect vulnerable children who need social support, not legal interventions. "There's no evidence that we can see to show that children are becoming more violent," Ms Savvas said. Ms Campbell, who advised both state and federal governments on domestic and family violence, said intervention orders were a blunt instrument. "Intervention orders are a very useful device or mechanism that we have in our legal toolkit, but in terms of using them in relation to young people, they're a very, very blunt instrument," she said. She is calling for a review and reform. "There's a huge and very urgent need for reform of the Family Violence Protection Act (Vic) as a whole wholesale review, and then to look at the Personal Safety Intervention Act (Vic) as well." Luke and Claire were able to support their child in court to have the intervention order dismissed but are still looking for extra support. "I think family counselling at that point in time was what we needed. Raising teenagers today is extremely difficult." The ABC reached out to Victoria's Minister for Prevention of Family Violence Natalie Hutchins for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store