
After ditching Spotify for a week, I now understand why readers love YouTube Music
A few weeks ago, I ran an Open Thread asking readers why they prefer using YouTube Music over many available alternatives, including my service of choice, Spotify. It would be an understatement to say that it received a flurry of comments and strong opinions from our community questioning my views. With just under 400 replies at the time of this writing, not to mention the big win for Google's streaming service in the accompanying poll, it's clear that I was perhaps missing a trick by siding with Spotify. So, as I enjoy reevaluating my opinions, I once again signed up for YouTube Music to see what the fuss is all about. A little over a week later, I'm thoroughly impressed by the strides made by Google's offering.
I was a happy Google Play Music user for many years, and regularly defended the service when people recommended alternatives. But when Google announced the end of the service in 2021, I was left disillusioned by its replacement. In its early days, YouTube Music was unintuitive and leaned too heavily on its video-hosting namesake. It often pushed video when I wanted an audio-first service. It was also heavily influenced by my YouTube browsing and viewing habits, and was astonishingly slow in operation. In short, it sucked, and I quickly jumped ship to Spotify.
Which is the best music streaming service?
0 votes
YouTube Music.
NaN %
Spotify.
NaN %
Neither (mention your preference in the comments).
NaN %
I don't use a music streaming service.
NaN %
The green team is where I still find myself now, and I've been pretty comfortable with it ever since. The Duo plan allows my partner and me to have separate and combined playlists, and collaborate in real-time via Spotify Jam if needed. I also appreciate Spotify's recommendations and the ease of finding new artists. It fits into my life perfectly.
A surprisingly positive return
Andy Walker / Android Authority
So when I returned to YouTube Music earlier this month, the experience was a shock to my system. A wave of nostalgia hit me as I reencountered some treasured playlists I thought I had lost, from the pop-heavy Turbulence reel for managing my anxiety in the air to Sunny Days, a curated list of tracks that feel like a cool summer morning.
From a more objective lens, the app has changed so much since its early days. A tighter, cleaner UI greeted me, frontloaded with playlists I've made or artists and albums I'd always tend to pick first. There's an angle towards content already discovered, which was a refreshing change from Spotify, where my mission was always to find new songs, genres, albums, and slot these into carefully designed playlists. There's something comforting about using Google's product, something functional and purposeful.
I'll admit that because of this approach, Spotify can sometimes feel scattered. While YouTube Music keeps new content and known or saved music largely contained within distinct tabs or sensible filters, Spotify lays these cards out everywhere on the home screen. At least this is what it feels like visually. I can't say that I prefer either layout, but I will say YouTube's makes better use of its screen space in almost all areas.
YouTube Music promotes content already discovered, which was a refreshing change from Spotify's constant new content push.
What about the experience of playing music? I quickly realized why many people like the service, especially those who love deep cuts. Songs that I couldn't find on Spotify, I found here, which usually took the form of a video from YouTube. This included many long-lost EDM remixes from the 2011-2012 era, like Vicetone's remix of Zedd's Clarity. Leveraging the music service gives YouTube Music a huge content discovery advantage, and the option for users to upload their content to the service, even if it's a bit of a schlep to do it via the website, makes it incredibly valuable for those who want to carry their bespoke content selections around with them.
Andy Walker / Android Authority
Dare I say, I like YouTube Music's Explore tab far more than Spotify's Search tab, even if both act as portals into new content. While Spotify opts for a genre-categorized layout with themed collections above, YouTube Music tempts me with its more analytical system, which includes new releases from artists I already follow and a breakdown of top tracks in my country. Again, Google's service makes far better use of the available space on this tab, switching between recommendations and genuine trending content. This perhaps surprised me the most during my experiment. I have always regarded Spotify as the best of the two for naturally discovering new music, and, for the most part, I feel that the Swedish app offers a better hands-off experience in this regard. But if you're the type to flip through vinyls on a Saturday morning slowly, I can appreciate YouTube Music's charm here.
In the four years since I last used YouTube Music, I'm surprised by how many elements Google has polished.
My partner also mentioned another important point: some artists still boycott Spotify. She was delighted to participate in this experiment, as Spotify does not host Joanna Newsom's music, while YouTube does. That's essential if you're a fan of more obscure or opinionated artists who don't appreciate the latter's financial model.
All in all, YouTube Music has a lot going for it. In the four years since I last used the service, I'm surprised by how many elements Google has polished. However, this is a Google product after all, and some quirks largely ruin its otherwise positive glow.
Google still has work to do
Andy Walker / Android Authority
Remember when I said that YouTube Music uses its namesake to increase its music availability? Well, this does have some side effects. I can't help but notice YouTube Music listing a video playlist of CART/Champ Car races stretching from 1979 to 2007. No tracks are found in this playlist, even though the engine sounds could be considered music to some. So why is a video playlist in my music streaming app? This was one of the core reasons I left YouTube Music in the early 2020s, and it seems that Google still hasn't quite drawn a line between playlists on the two services.
There are some other odd additions that I wish Google would reconsider. While the Comments feature is excellent in theory, usually remarks left by users offer no insight related to the track itself. It feels like a YouTube comment section, which isn't a good look. I'm not a fan of YouTube Music's Samples tab, either. While Spotify is also slowly trending towards music videos, it's far less intrusive. Dedicating an entire tab for music videos on an audio streaming platform feels counterintuitive.
There are some annoyances YouTube Music still haven't shaken, and its silly promotion of video is one of them.
But let's come back to Spotify. There are a handful of features that still sell the service to me. As I mentioned earlier, Spotify Jam is essential in my daily life. My partner and I often listen to music while doing chores, cooking, or driving. So, having an option to add individual songs to a playlist queue seamlessly is invaluable. More importantly, the feature has also rolled out to Android Auto, which makes road trips far more enjoyable and easier to manage. YouTube Music offers no equivalent.
Then there's Spotify's advanced search chops. For a search giant, Google sure doesn't know how to implement smart search in its products. I can search for artist releases in a specific year using syntax in Spotify. YouTube Music does not.
Of course, Spotify Connect is another indispensable feature I use daily on my PS4. I can control music on my phone while enjoying both game audio and my Spotify playlist, and then seamlessly jump that music over to my Nest Mini when I put the controller down. YouTube Music doesn't have this option, so it's either game chat or music for me.
I'm sticking with Spotify… for now
Andy Walker / Android Authority
Although many readers thought I was biased against YouTube Music, I went into this experiment with an open mind. Google's service has genuinely impressed me with its clean UI, innovative use of space, far broader library, and focus on hands-on discovery. However, some of the annoyances that initially turned me off the service still exist today.
There are other practical problems that I haven't yet mentioned, one of which is price. YouTube Music doesn't have a Duo equivalent, so I need to buy the whole Family package to share the service with my partner. Although only marginally more expensive than Spotify Duo, this is still a waste of money.
YouTube Music may make a fan out of me in the future, but Spotify is a better fit... for now.
Of course, Spotify wins on other fronts. As mentioned, Jam and Connect are two unique features that YouTube Music has yet to rival despite Google's expertise in the smart home and service space. The Swedish service is also more broadly available and compatible with the devices I already use and own, while it also offers best-fit plans for my lifestyle.
This isn't to say that YouTube Music is trash. I'll give Google its deserved plaudits: it's an excellent music streaming platform, but it's the small things that Spotify offers that I've grown accustomed to and that I can't quite live without. Nevertheless, I can now understand why YouTube Music has plenty of fans, even if it still falls slightly short for me.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
And Just Like That EPs Tell All About That Taylor Swift Needle Drop, Why It Was Perfect for Carrie's Big Moment
Turns out Carrie Bradshaw is like every other woman alive: She leans on Taylor Swift to help her get through a breakup. This week on And Just Like That…, Carrie said goodbye to her longtime love Aidan after she realized he'd never get over her affair with Big all those years ago. And after they decided to split up, we heard Taylor Swift's beautifully melancholic song 'How Did It End?' on the soundtrack as Carrie took all the Virginia postcards off of her fridge, got dressed up and met her girlfriends for drinks. (The lyrics even center on a recently ended relationship, with the opening line: 'We hereby conduct this post mortem…') More from TVLine And Just Like That EPs Admit to Hesitating Over Carrie and Aidan's Big Decision: 'Are We Making a Mistake?' Washington Black's Sterling K. Brown and Ernest Kingsley Junior Revel in the 'Brotherhood and Mentorship' Hulu's Historical Drama Gave Them Outlander Spinoff Cast on Why Blood of My Blood Makes Claire's Journey in the Original Series Even More 'Tragic' Swift herself signed off on the inclusion of the song, executive producer Elisa Zuritsky tells TVLine, crediting showrunner Michael Patrick King with sealing the deal: 'That was a Michael Patrick King production, right out of his brain. It was shortly after her newest album [The Tortured Poets Department] was released, and he knew of the song before I did… He was right there on it with that song.' The song really fit the resilient mood of that final scene with Carrie, too, fellow EP Julie Rottenberg points out, and the writers used it as inspiration: 'It was helpful, once [Michael] shared that idea with us, to think about that song in writing it, and to make sure that that last scene felt not just tragic, but empowering and maybe freeing. That she always has her friends, and this isn't the end. It might be an end, but life goes on.' What did you think of the Taylor Swift song — and Carrie's big breakup? Tell us in the comments! Best of TVLine Yellowjackets' Tawny Cypress Talks Episode 4's Tai/Van Reunion: 'We're All Worried About Taissa' Vampire Diaries Turns 10: How Real-Life Plot Twists Shaped Everything From the Love Triangle to the Final Death Vampire Diaries' Biggest Twists Revisited (and Explained)
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South Padre Island Board of REALTORS® Partners with iHomefinder to Equip Agents for the Future of Real Estate
New Member Benefit Brings Industry-Leading Tools for Visibility, Lead Generation, and Long-Term Growth EUGENE, Ore., July 25, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The South Padre Island Board of REALTORS® (SPIBOR) today announced a new partnership with iHomefinder, the leading provider of real estate growth technology designed to help agents thrive in an increasingly competitive and fast-evolving market. This partnership gives SPIBOR members exclusive access and preferred pricing on iHomefinder's complete platform providing smart lead generation, marketing automation, and a proven system for building long-term pipeline in a market where visibility is no longer optional. "We've seen the real estate landscape change dramatically in recent years," said Lindsey Martinez, Association Executive at SPIBOR "Buyers and sellers aren't waiting to raise their hand—they're starting their journey earlier and online. This partnership ensures our members have the modern tools they need to stay visible and grow in this new environment." A New Way to Stay Visible—and Win in a Changing Market This partnership comes as iHomefinder sharpens its positioning around solving what it calls the "lead deficit"—a widespread issue where agents rely on moment-of-intent lead capture and miss out on the 95% of buyers and sellers who begin their decision-making process long before reaching out. iHomefinder's platform is designed to help agents become what it calls Visible Agents—professionals who show up early, earn trust, and build long-term client pipelines by leveraging the right mix of content, automation, and tech. "Today's most successful agents don't wait for leads—they build pipelines. And visibility is the key," said Bryson Womack, Vice President of Sales at iHomefinder. "We're thrilled to partner with SPIBOR to help their members stay competitive, even as the market continues to shift." SPIBOR Members Now Have Access To: AI-Powered Marketing Automation – Personalized email and SMS nurture flows based on lead behavior High-Intent Seller Leads – Including equity estimates, ownership history, and likely-to-sell scoring IDX Website + CRM Integration – Tools that track, score, and convert buyer and seller activity Mobile Lead Management – Stay responsive with full-featured mobile access to your database A Proven System to Generate 50+ Nurture Leads/Month – Built on daily visibility, content, and CRM signals Members also gain access to iHomefinder's exclusive Visible Agent Playbook—a modern blueprint for turning online presence into real-world closings. Why This Matters Now With fewer listings, rising competition, and buyer attention spread across dozens of channels, today's agents need more than just a website or an IDX feed—they need a growth engine that helps them stay visible, build trust early, and move buyers and sellers toward action with less manual effort. This partnership reflects a shared vision from both SPIBOR and iHomefinder: to equip agents for the next era of real estate success. SPIBOR members can get started today by visiting: 👉 About iHomefinderiHomefinder is a leading provider of real estate growth solutions that help agents, teams, and brokerages grow through visibility, automation, and client engagement. With more than 20 years of experience, iHomefinder supports thousands of agents across North America with powerful IDX tools, high-intent lead generation, and a modern Growth Operating System. Learn more at View original content: SOURCE iHomefinder Inc. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ben Stiller to Explore His Parents' Legacy in New Documentary, Set for October Release
Stiller called it a "great honor to celebrate" his parents, adding that he has "come to know them in new ways through the making of this film" Ben Stiller is bringing his parents' story to life in a personal new project. The 59-year-old actor and director is joining forces with Apple Original Films to direct and produce a documentary titled Stiller & Meara: Nothing Is Lost, which will chart the lives of his famous parents Jerry Stiller and Anne Meara. 'I feel very fortunate to be partnering once again with the incredible team at Apple TV+, this time on a project that is very personal to me and my family," Ben said in a statement. "It's exciting to finally get to share it with audiences; and a great honor to celebrate my parents, both as I knew them growing up, and as I've come to know them in new ways through the making of this film.' Stiller & Meara: Nothing Is Lost will premiere in select theaters on Oct. 17, before coming to Apple TV+ on Oct. 24. Ben's film explores his parents' "impact on both popular culture and at home, where the lines between creativity, family, life and art often blurred," per Apple's logline. Jerry and Meara worked as a comedy act before pursuing solo careers in the 1970s. Jerry went on to star in hit projects such as The King of Queens and Seinfeld. As for Meara, she appeared in Awakenings in 1990, and several TV shows, including Archie Bunker's Place, Oz and Sex and the City. Both stars shared the screen with Ben over the years, with all three appearing in 1995's hit Heavyweights. Meara joined forces with her son on 2006's Night at the Museum, and Jerry's final acting projects involved collaborations with his son in 2016 on Zoolander 2 and the animated TV movie Zoolander: Super Model. After meeting a year prior, Jerry and Meara tied the knot in 1954. They welcomed their daughter Amy Stiller in 1961. Four years later, they gave birth to Ben. Anne died at 85 in May 2015. Jerry followed almost exactly five years later in May 2020 at 92. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Appearing on the Today show after his father's death, Ben expressed joy that his parents were able to reunite in the afterlife, saying, "They found each other and they were there for each other." He continued, "Not to get too sappy, but I feel like they're connected again." During a June 2024 appearance on the Hey Dude…The 90s Called! podcast, Ben said that he had "amazing memories" with his parents, recalling time spent no sets and "going with my parents whenever they would go out and do, you know, do nightclubs or go to see them in the theater." He added that he "loved" being on set with his parents, explaining how much he enjoyed "just to see the behind-the-scenes of what they were doing. I realized pretty young that I loved directing and movie making and was fascinated by that and wanted to learn about that." Ben previously worked with Apple TV+ on Severance. He is an executive producer on the show and has directed several episodes. Read the original article on People