Joint Statement On Use Of Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) In Retail Settings
We are firmly of the opinion that FRT, when used fairly and accurately, can be a valuable intervention to help keep customers and employees safe.
The undersigned major New Zealand retailers strongly support the use of fair and accurate technology to protect our workers and customers. We support the option for retailers to use Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) to reduce harm and proactively combat retail crime.
Our teams face high rates of verbal and physical abuse from repeat offenders who pose a risk to our employees, customers and other visitors to our stores. They are often responsible for significant violence, stock loss or damage. We are firmly of the opinion that FRT, when used fairly and accurately, can be a valuable intervention to help keep customers and employees safe. It is a powerful and effective tool alongside other crime prevention resources such as security guards, fog cannons, staff training, body cameras, panic alarms, CCTV and other technology solutions.
We acknowledge Foodstuffs North Island for their leadership in trialling this new technology, and also the oversight provided by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner in assessing FRT's suitability for use in New Zealand.
The trial clearly showed that the technology made a measurable impact in reducing crime, and improving safety in stores. A survey of 1000 New Zealanders found 89% support the use of FRT if it reduces harm by 10%.
Keeping our people safe at work and keeping our customers safe is of paramount importance.
A significant proportion of retail crime is committed by repeat offenders. It is these recidivist offenders that we are able to target with FRT.
FRT offers the opportunity for us to quickly identify individuals of interest as they enter the store. Staff and/or security personnel are then able to respond quickly and decide how to manage each situation. Intervention is not required for every situation but FRT helps our teams to prevent or de-escalate incidents and offences.
We recognise that technology must be used in a fair and accurate way. Guardrails are needed to support customers' privacy, and to guard against potential bias and discrimination. We collectively make a commitment to work with Retail NZ to develop best practice to ensure FRT is used only to keep our people safe, and in line with our obligations under the Privacy Act.
The use of FRT in the right settings with the right controls will provide positive benefits and outcomes for customers, retailers and workers, while not impeding on the privacy of New Zealanders. The vast majority of customers will be able to go about their business as usual and will in fact be safer in those stores where FRT is used.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
28 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Plan to ban credit card and PayWave surcharges
The government plans to ban surcharges on card payments in-store, saving shoppers from being stung with surprise fees when paying with contactless technology. Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson announced the change on Monday afternoon, declaring: "That pesky note or sticker on the payment machine will become a thing of the past." "Shoppers will no longer be penalised for their choice of payment method, whether that's tapping, swiping or using their phone's digital wallet." Legislation is expected to be introduced to Parliament by the end of the year, with the ban to kick into effect no later than May 2026. The proposed law would cover most in-store payments made using Visa and Mastercard debit and credit cards, as well as EFTPOS, but not online purchases or other international card schemes. The move follows growing public frustration at the cost and transparency of such surcharges. Retailers are increasingly using them to recover merchant service fees charged by banks and payment providers, but the fees are often added without clear explanation. The Commerce Commission estimates New Zealanders are paying up to $150 million in surcharges each year - including $45 to $65 million in what it considers excessive charges. In March, Consumer NZ called for an outright ban, citing hundreds of complaints about fees being too high, confusing or oblique. Both Mastercard and Visa have also supported proposals for a ban. Retail NZ has previously argued businesses did not like charging extra but should have the right to recover payment costs. It called for more clarity from banks about the fees charged for different services. The ban builds on the Commerce Commission's recent decision to reduce the interchange fees imposed on businesses for accepting Visa and Mastercard payments. Interchange fees make up approximately 60% of merchant service fees. "A ban on surcharges means no more surprises for people who currently feel like they're being charged to use their own hard-earned money," Simpson said. "It means they can make a purchase knowing exactly what they'll pay, and how they'll pay it." The changes would bring New Zealand into line with the United Kingdom and the European Union, where such surcharges are already prohibited. Australia still allows surcharges but requires them to reflect the actual cost to retailers. The Reserve Bank of Australia has also recently proposed an outright ban on surcharges for EFTPOS and debit and credit card payments.
Otago Daily Times
28 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Govt to ban surcharges on in-store payments
The government plans to ban surcharges on card payments in-store, saving shoppers from being stung with surprise fees when paying with contactless technology. Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson announced the change on Monday afternoon, declaring: "That pesky note or sticker on the payment machine will become a thing of the past." "Shoppers will no longer be penalised for their choice of payment method, whether that's tapping, swiping or using their phone's digital wallet." Legislation is expected to be introduced to Parliament by the end of the year, with the ban to kick into effect no later than May 2026. The proposed law would cover most in-store payments made using Visa and Mastercard debit and credit cards, as well as EFTPOS, but not online purchases or other international card schemes. The move follows growing public frustration at the cost and transparency of such surcharges. Retailers are increasingly using them to recover merchant service fees charged by banks and payment providers, but the fees are often added without clear explanation. The Commerce Commission estimates New Zealanders are paying up to $150 million in surcharges each year - including $45 to $65 million in what it considers excessive charges. In March, Consumer NZ called for an outright ban, citing hundreds of complaints about fees being too high, confusing or oblique. Both Mastercard and Visa have also supported proposals for a ban. Retail NZ has previously argued businesses did not like charging extra but should have the right to recover payment costs. It called for more clarity from banks about the fees charged for different services. The ban builds on the Commerce Commission's recent decision to reduce the interchange fees imposed on businesses for accepting Visa and Mastercard payments. Interchange fees make up approximately 60% of merchant service fees. "A ban on surcharges means no more surprises for people who currently feel like they're being charged to use their own hard-earned money," Simpson said. "It means they can make a purchase knowing exactly what they'll pay, and how they'll pay it." The changes would bring New Zealand into line with the United Kingdom and the European Union, where such surcharges are already prohibited. Australia still allows surcharges but requires them to reflect the actual cost to retailers. The Reserve Bank of Australia has also recently proposed an outright ban on surcharges for EFTPOS and debit and credit card payments.
Newsroom
9 hours ago
- Newsroom
Govt KiwiSaver cut ‘final nail in the coffin' for self-employed
Self-employed New Zealanders are re-thinking their retirement savings schemes after the Government slashed its KiwiSaver co-contribution in the Budget. Data compiled from accounting fintech Hnry's latest sole trader pulse check highlights negativity following the change, with 52 percent of the 502 self-employed workers polled, actively opposing the cut. Forty-three percent say it will alter their saving behaviour and 24 percent plan to reduce their contribution as a result of the change.
